Author’s Note: Not only does Shakespeare hint at cross-dressing and gender-bending (Twelve Night and elsewhere) and expresses blatantly bisexual and homosexual sentiment (Sonnets) – but so does the work of Plato (Socrates explores gender and sexuality in The Symposium to a surprising degree – with Paedophilia being opening discussed as a legitimate pastime in Ancient Greece in this work and elsewhere. Socrates even surprises his male-dominated audience with the fact that his primary teacher in Philosophy was in fact a “woman”). Socrattes’ viewpoints are in no way unique to him – as they are expressed throughout Ancient Greek and Roman culture. Many are unaware that the Age of Consent in England was 12-years of age from the 12th century to the late 19th century – when it was raised to 13, and then 16. All other the world, and from one country to the next, this law varies dramatically, as it does from one State to another in the USA, etc.
In the USSR, VI Lenin adopted the British Age of Consent of “16” – as there was no such law protecting woman and girls throughout feudal Russia or the 14 other countries that comprised the USSR. VI Lenin believed girls and women should receive a full education and be literate before deciding to get married or raise a family. As the Russian Orthodox Church had ordered the Czar to demonise Homosexuality – and given that this attitude had dominated for hundreds of years – many in the USSR (including the medical community) possessed a dim view of same-sex relationships. This is despite Lenin abolishing the anti-gay Czarist laws and never re-establishing them. Indeed, prior to WWII, many gay groups reported a great tolerance for gayness in the USSR – even if the lifestyle was not encouraged amongst the youth.
As for Socialist China – girls used to get married at 11 or 12 prior to the 1949 Socialist Revolution. Indeed, poor girls were used for sex by the rich even prior to these young ages. Any resistance often met with their murder. Girls were generally never educated and had to live their lives through their husbands and/or male relatives, owners, or controllers. Within Hakka cuture things were a little different, as Hakka women did not have their feet bound, worked in the fields with the men, could read and write, and learned martial arts – fighting together with the me on the battlefield. This is why the Hakka formed the core of the early Communist Armies in China – as Mao Zedong was a Hakka. Today, the Age of Consent in China is “14” – but women and men are not permitted to get married until their early to late “20s”. This gives time for a full University education to be had. Should an adult engage in sexual activity with a child 13 or under in China – a mandatory “Death Sentence” is applied. China has recently executed three adults who routinely abused young children in their care.
On the other hand, although not necessarily encouraging or advocating alternative lifestyles, China has a tolerant attitude to gayness and transgenderism. Perhaps this arises from men often playing the parts of women in the theatre in China – as women were not initially allowed on stage to play their own gender – just as was the case in the West. In Taiwan, a US colony, women and girls are encouraged to sell their bodies for monetary profit, primarily for the wanton pleasures of White men, but also degenerate Chinese men brought up under US persecution and brain-washing. The US hopes that this exposure to Western decadence and hedonism will undo a Taiwanese belief in Chinese collectvism and undermine any belief in the spread of Socialism to the island. Taiwanese girls and women can be found all over the internet carrying-out sexual activity for profit. This is usually in the form of self-abuse designed to assist a paying audience to masturbate to a computer screen. A particular disturbing aspect of this is the “underage” nature of many of these girls broadcasting directly to the US without censure or correction. This is very similar to the situation in Japan – another US colony. ACW (29.12.2024)
I was brought up watching Doctor Who. My early childhood saw Jon Pertwee as the Doctor – but in the “Three Doctors” (1973) episode I was introduced to the original Doctor (William Hartnell) and his successor – Patrick Troughton. I suspect I must have watched a “repeat” of this episode as I was only “6” when it was first broadcast. Many years later I learned that William Hartbell held leftwing viewponts – whilst shockingly Jon Pertwee (famous for Wozel Gummidge) held right-wing and far-right viewpoints! I never really understood anything about the private life of Patrick Troughton – although as a middle-class English gentleman – his general demeanour of expressing a natural dominance through superior knowledge was very much like my teacher – Richard Hunn (1949-2006). Most actors who play the part tend to hide their political viewpoints as their job is to appeal to the greatest number of people throughout the watching audience. Even Hartnell and Pertwee strictly followed this rule on set. As Jon Pertwee got older, he stopped hiding is anti-working-class attitudes and firmly announced (in public) his support for Margerat Thatcher. William Hartnell once expressed support for the Palestinians – and subsequently attracted vitriol from some Jews working at the BBC (and beyond).
Doctor Who is a fictional, science fiction character. He is not human and was born as a Time Lord on the plant of Gallifrey. Generally speaking, a Time Lord has twelve regenerations – through which he/she can reincaranate into a new body (male or female, young or old, etc). As Gallifreyans are human-looking – they (conveniently) tend to gravitate toward the human-look – all speaking “English” by default (as a fictional character – any apparent “rule” [including the number of regenrations] can be arbitrarily changed to suit storylines, trends, and plot requirements). Doctor Who, from its very beginning, was a composite construct premised upon the ease of primarily White, male British actors playing the part. Although in recent years, a British (White) woman and an African (Britiish) man have both officially played the part – and I believe a British (Black) woman temporarily played the Doctor in passing (in the midst of an episode). The Doctor has been vegatrian and a trained martial artist who abhors war and violence in general – although this has altered and changed as the decades have passed and new writers have come into being (the Doctor even had a cloned “daughter” in one episode – the audience never heard of again as this popular plot was immediately kiiled-off by the BBC). As he is ancient in years – he tends to be asexual – but even this changed as social norms and values have evolved. He was not gay – but has been made gay in recent years – even though he was not heteoosexual, but has been made to seem so in contemporary storylines. Indeed, this would make the Docotr “bisexual” by default – a reality completely lacking in his Gallifreyan origination. As he regenerated into a woman – the association with transsexuality is obvious.
How do Gallifreyans reproduce? The answer is we simply do not know for sure – but the process cannot be anything like that prevalent within human evolution and society. Possessing a box bigger on the inside than on the outside is an interesting idea – with obvious sexual undertones. The reality is that Doctor Who is a British (English) creation of the 1960s designed to educate young people about actual history – and to entertain their parents who were assumed to be watching with them. As this is the case, the storylines of Doctor Who, regardless of their other worldly trajectory, should recognise and respect this reality. If the foundation is correct, then any storyline is understandable, regardless of its structure, texture, taste, and direction. If the foundation is disrespected, ignored, uprooted, and generally deemed irrelevant and out of date, then any storyline, regardless of how good it is, become moriband, morally deficient, and repugnant to mainstream British people (regardless of their orignin – as I do not use the term exclusively). This is exactly where we are with the current deficiency that is “Docto Who”. The cultural foundation is missing – and its tone is causing apathy within the British people – a population that is paying the TV Licensing Fee.
As for Ncuti Gatwa – I do not consider him a good actor – at least as far as the role of Doctor Who is concerned. We are being told to consider him a “good actor” because of the trend of cultural dictatorship that the bourgeoisie is currently inflicting upon the workers. Nucti Gatwa is the wrong actor to play Doctor Who – and this has nothing to do with him being “Black”. Russel T Davis and Steven Moffat are either following orders – or have been given a free-hand with no consequences or controlling boundaries. Of course, those that run the BBC are behind this nonsense and deformation. My point is that the Doctor is the essence of toleration. We do not need to see everything he is “tolerating” being paraded (as if on a conveyor-belt) in every episode – as Doctor Who is first and foremost an “escape” from reality! It should not be a reflection of reality or a confirmation of reality. If this neutral position is msintained as a foundation – then every type of realty (not just one preferred reality) can be shown on the screen at different times in such a manner that does not illicit a moral resistance from the audience. As the situation stands, Doctor Who has become a ghetto for one type of existence – and this seems designed to kill-off the series on the BBC insulting the British people to oblivion. This is the same BBC that has supported Neo-Nazi Ukaine from 2014 – and is currently ignoring the Israeli “Genocide” that is unfolding in Gaza! The current incarnation of the BBC possesses NO moral foundation – so how can we trust it to produce a morally wholsesome Doctor Who?
Author’s Epilogue: Today, I read about the extraordinary life of one “Billy Tipton” (1914-1989) – a talented “White” jazz musician in the US famous for playing the piano. He made his early progress by playing on the radio – where nobody could see that he was “White” and not “Black” (jazz was considered a Black cultural activity). Later, as he became really famous, the Black and White audiences started to accept the fact that he was “White” and possessed a jazz-ability usually only seen in Black people (although there was always some resistance from both communities). Furthermore, being a jazz musician, Billy Tipton, once he started openly performing in public, was a big hit with the women – and was “married” at least five-time – with at least three children being ascribed to these relationships. As a very successful Jazz-musician, Billy Tipton died a very wealthy man. However, all these achievements were eclipsed by one final surprise that Billy Tipton had kept securely up his sleeve. When examined by a doctor, Billy Tipton was found to be a biological woman. Indeed, he had been born “Dorothy Lucille Tipton” – and decided to change his outward persona from 1940 onwards when he realised that a “White” woman would get nowhere in the jazz world. A “White” man had a better chance – providing his “Whiteness” was concealed from the general public when he played the piano. Once famous, his apparent “maleness” worked in his favour – although two of his (adopted) sons posthumously disowned him when they discovered what they termed their mother’s “deception”. Of course, some Black people quite rightly comment that being “White” is always an unfair advantage in White America – and they are absolutly correct. In a sense, even without the transgender element – Bily Lipton was something of a fetish for the “White” community. As far as my research has shown – all of Billy Lipton’s wives were “White” – which is a real achievement considering he was around Black people nearly all the time!
SANGHA KOMMUNE (SSR) 