The Rightwing Polish

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

The Nazi Germans used ‘Sonder Kommando’ Units in their death camps. Usually, these ‘Units’ were comprised of collaborating Polish Jews and they assisted in every part of the extermination process – from arrival to the dead bodies being burnt. Churchill had encouraged a rightwing Polish government in exile in London – which was not concerned about the deportation from Poland of Jews, gays or the disabled – but took exception to Germans running their country! The real Polish government, however, was Socialist and living in exile in the USSR – assisting in the raising and training of Polish volunteer military units to assist the Red Army’s fight against Nazi Germany. However, when the Polish Jews rose-up in the Warsaw Ghetto in 1943 – Churchill (and the rightwing Polish government in London) refused to support them, because it was felt that Jews were not Polish, and prone to holding leftwing viewpoints. Churchill let the Jewish uprising be destroyed by the Nazi Germans – but he did work on a new plan that involved the ethnic Poles rising-up in Warsaw (a year later), in an attempt to quickly get the rightwing Polish government in London back into power in Poland BEFORE the Soviet Red Army arrived on the scene! Churchill viewed this gambit as a means to prevent a Socialist government in Poland. This plan failed when the Nazi Germans quickly put-down this new threat before the Soviets could fight their way into the city. As matters transpired, it was the Soviet Red Army that eventually fought its way into Warsaw – freed the Jews, freed the Polish people in general, and installed a Socialist Polish government. However, racism has always been a problem in Poland – particularly anti-Semitism, but also anti-Slavic (i.e. ‘anti-Russian’) prejudice. This situation led to a permanent rightwing resistance to ‘Socialism’ that exists in Poland to this day (alongside the usual racist attitudes). Today, the modern Polish State plays-down the Jewish Warsaw Ghetto Uprising of 1943, but eulogises the Warsaw Uprising of 1944 – whilst simultaneously demonising their eventual liberators – the Soviet Red Army!

Joseph Stalin Reconstructed – an Interview with Yakov Dzhugashvili (2013)

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Original Russian Language Article By: http://kprf.msk.ru/?p=4246

(Translated by Adrian Chan-Wyles PhD)

‘The lies about Stalin are an attempt by the current elites

to justify the plundering of Soviet heritage.’

Yakov Dzhugashvili (Great Grandson of Stalin)

Interview between Dmitry Fakowski & Yakov Dzhugashvili

Lies Like a Virus

Dmitry Fakowski: Are you annoyed and frustrated with all the anti-Stalin hysteria prevalent in the global media today?

Yakov Dzhugashvili: Lies offend me, and I expose these lies with all the means at my disposal, whilst trying to convey the truth to the people. Stalinization is the education of people – an explanation of what Joseph Stalin wanted to do and what he managed to do, including an assessment of who resisted his reforms and why. Without exposing the prevalent lies about Joseph Stalin (and the distorted history of the USSR of that period), no correct understanding of Stalinization is possible. Today, Joseph Stalin is dear to everyone with correct understanding, and for whom such words as Justice, motherland, and the people are not empty.

The fact is that the lies about Joseph Stalin (and the USSR of that period) were created with the aim of undermining the authority of the leader of the country, so that any attempt to comprehend the nature of the real phenomena that occurred during his life (and the important role he played in these events) is rejected by the people. These lies are not just directed against Joseph Stalin or his relatives, but, above all, are against the integrity of the Russian people. Lies about Stalin try to deprive the Russians (and, with them, those nations that together with the Russians built the world’s first society free from capitalist parasites) the ability to resist both external and internal threats. The lies about Joseph Stalin are a virus created by the inhuman fascists, as a means to destroy the defensive mechanism of the people, together with the ability to even recognise the existence or presence of a danger. Finally, the lies about him are an attempt by the current elites to justify the looting of the progressive material, cultural and spiritual wealth accumulated through the collective hard labour of the Soviet people.

Georgian Youth do not Know the Russian Language.

Dmitry Fakowski: In Georgia, do the people remember Joseph Vissarionovich with love and respect?

Yakov Dzhugashvili: The attitude of the people toward Joseph Stalin in his homeland today, is determined by their awareness of the leader of the country, and about the history of the USSR of that period. These are the two most deplorable topics, and to understand them you need to have access to specific literature, but this literature is written mostly in the Russian language. The contemporary powers in Georgia have been eradicating Russian language from Georgia for almost a decade now, and have achieved ‘effective’ results in this area. This deliberate eradication of the Russian language now means that the younger generation cannot read, write or speak Russian. But even that part of the population that is fluent in the Russian language (and does not consider it ‘the language of the occupiers’) and which continues to get involved in world culture through the Russian language media, is not particularly interested in the topic of Stalinism. Most Georgians today, do not even have a desire to deal with these issues, as they are overwhelmed by their extremely unhappy material situation (since the disastrous collapse of Communism). This includes the monstrous racist anti-Soviet and anti-Russian and anti-Stalin propaganda, which pours around the clock from two dozen TV channels in Georgia which serve just four million people – two dozen channels! It is necessary to have a stable psyche and have a serious motivation in order not to lose heart and resist in such conditions. Therefore, we must admit that in Georgia the Stalinists do not influence the mood and consciousness of the people in any significant way at the moment. Despite such a sad state of affairs, the positive image of Joseph Stalin (in articles, comments and observations) remains strong – like a powerful ray of light piercing the minds and hearts of the people, forcing them to think about this great man and his progressive deeds.

Reviving the Just Reputation of Stalin without Violence.

Dmitry Fakowski: Do you possess a Russian passport?

Yakov Dzhugashvili: I am a citizen of Russia, and moreover, I am a member of a political pressure group, pushing for the holding of a Referendum on the adoption of ‘Amendments’ to the Constitution (and Law) in modern Russia, regarding the ‘Responsibility of the Authorities’ toward the well-being of the people. This is effectively a change in Law.

Dmitry Fakowski: What is the essence of these proposed new Laws?

Yakov Dzhugashvili: Life is arranged unfairly throughout modern Russia. This is an important observation, as injustice emanates from the centre of political power. Power can be unjust because it has the potential and opportunity to be unjust, if not tempered by specific Laws that prevent this degeneration. How is political and social justice to be achieved without revolutionary violence? This is easier than it might seem, but first there is a need to get to the root of injustice within the political power structure. Why do the authorities (and their minions) do anything in power? Because they are in no way responsible for the results of their government – they are not punished for the harm done to the people. Why should this be the case? If a driver causes an accident by chance, he or she will be punished, but the authorities do not answer for anything, regardless of what they do (or do not do)! Is this fair? A ‘Referendum’ is needed whereby the people will be asked to decide (through voting) whether the ‘old’ (Soviet) Law (which held politicians directly responsible for their actions whilst in office) is ‘preferable’ to the ‘new’ (Liberal) Law of capitalist Russia (where politicians are not held responsible for their actions whilst In office). If voters prefer the ‘new’ style of government over the ‘old’, then they must answer three further questions which will decide whether the modern behaviour of politicians should be ‘encouraged’, ‘punished’, or be ‘without consequences’. If the voters fully reject the ‘old’ (Soviet) power structure, then the modern system can remain without any change or consequence (and politicians will remain unaccountable for their actions). If the ‘new’ system is positively encouraged, then the President and every Member of the Federal Assembly will be considered a Hero of Russia, and their behaviour will have been vindicated by popular vote. If the voters decide to ‘Punish’ (obviously over specific issues), then the President or any Member of the Federal Assembly could be immediately imprisoned for their actions, over the duration of their time in office.

Dmitry Fakowski: How will the judging be carried-out?

Yakov Dzhugashvili: The (democratic) power of each individual voter will serve exclusively as the ‘judging’ principle, assessing each case separately and entirely upon its positive or negative merits. Each voter will exercise his or her free-will and judgement at the ballot-box. In order for the verdict to be objective, voters need to ask themselves a simple question: has their life improved, deteriorated or has not changed during the period of the government’s rule. It is agreed that this question can be answered by any voter, regardless of his or her education, or cultural level, etc. We citizens take upon ourselves the responsibility to obey the authorities for five years – but at the end of this five year time period – we will judge the authorities on the results of their behaviour in office whilst we were legally subjugated to their rule. This is justice!

The Katyn Case.

Dmitry Fakowski: You have paid special attention to the Katyn case.

Yakov Dzhugashvili: Not so long ago, the Tverskoi Court of Moscow indirectly confirmed that the Germans had shot the Polish officers in 1941. The result of this trial within the State Duma was sensational. No, the suit was denied, but in its decision the judge wrote in black and white twice that the Poles in Katyn were shot in September 1941, by the Nazi Germans (that were occupying the area at the time). This is a great victory! This is no longer a matter of speculative (or ‘Cold War’) distorted  journalism, but rather a matter of common knowledge as established in legal fact, and drawn-up in a document issued by the Courts. I congratulate all honest people. Most importantly, I think honest Poles, for this victory! I advise all the scoundrels, including the Polish ones, to stock-up with validol (an anti-depressant).

Dmitry Fakowski: Who helped you fight during this process?

Yakov Dzhugashvili: In 2009, the publicist Leonid Nikolayevich Zhura contacted me and asked my father (Yevgeny Yakovlevich) to allow him to file a suit to protect the honour and dignity of Joseph Stalin. The suit was filed against the newspaper Novaya Gazeta, because of the publication of an article by Anatoly Yablokov entitled ‘Beria is guilty’. According to the Laws of Russia, only Joseph Stalin’s relative has the right to file such a claim. My father agreed, and Leonid Zhura became the official representative of my father in Court on this case. However, my father found it necessary that his representative, along with Leonid Nikolayevich, should also include Yury Mukhin (www.ymuhin.ru), who was sick and at the hospital, at the beginning of the trial. (The fact that this happened to him is a separate and almost tragic story). Then they were joined by Sergei Emilyevich Strygin, the author of an independent investigation into the Katyn tragedy. For the last three years, this trio has been successfully combatting and suitably horrifying all those ‘fighters against Stalinism’, and were awaiting such a time that they could fulfil their dream of getting these despicable people into a Court of Law! Were these enemies of Joseph Stalin demanding a trial to prove their case? We thought this was excellent, as these people could not prove their case in Court – because their ideas were just lies presented as fact. This has been the case in endless trials in the past, where the real facts were produced, proving the Cold War assertions to be thoroughly false. This track record showed the utter helplessness of the accusers of Joseph Stalin. Unlike the studios of the radio stations Ekho Moskvy, or the editorial office of Novaya Gazeta, in Court our opponents were forced to answer for their lies. Our representatives actively assisted in this, asking different questions, to which these liars were obliged to respond, as required by Law. Historians conducted an amazing work of considerable scale to expose the lies about Joseph Stalin and the history of the USSR. Yuri Mukhin, despite his extreme workload (he also pursued two criminal cases at the same time on the ‘Russian’ article due to its extremism) and despite requiring heart surgery that had to be postponed, managed on the day of the meeting (or immediately afterwards) to write exhaustive reports about what was happening there. Now, these reports are combined into a book entitled ‘The trial of Stalin’. I note that the media, both official and allegedly oppositional, kept amicable silence about these processes. Even Ekho Moskvy and Novaya Gazeta preferred to remain silent, although they were direct participants in the Court.

Dmitry Fakowski: You had a high-profile trial against Vladimir Pozner?

Yakov Dzhugashvili: I was able to personally attend to this process, and had the ‘happiness’ to see this guru of ‘TV-boltology’ in the immediate vicinity. Ironically, the process took place on December 21st – the birthday of Joseph Stalin. The bottom line is this: Vladimir Pozner, in his traditional line at the end of one of the broadcasts, accused Joseph Stalin of the execution of Polish officers in Katyn. When he learned about the lawsuit, he said on the air at Ekho Moskvy, that he was ready to prove in Court the involvement of Joseph Stalin in the shooting of the Poles (which he mistakenly thought was ‘documented’). Arriving at the Court session, accompanied by two lawyers (one of whom was clearly on friendly terms with the judge), he laid out – on the table – two of four documents from the most famous folder of fakes in the Katyn case. The judge reacted immediately, and made it clear that these document were not historically valid, and should be ‘hidden’ far away and forgotten about by him. Following this disastrous start, Vladimir Pozner’s case fell apart, and along with his ‘forgotten’ documents – his terrible promises to reveal the involvement of Joseph Stalin in the execution of the Poles, also disappeared. Instead, he began to defend his constitutional right to spread gossip, (i.e. – personal opinion as ‘fact’). I note that all the ‘fighters against Stalinism’ in the trials, instead of giving specific arguments in favour of their statements, were engaged precisely in upholding their right to spreading (false) personal opinions. During one of the breaks, there was a dispute with Vladimir Pozner about the ‘documents’ brought to court. It became clear that this was the first time he had seen these papers in his life. Moreover, he had never even heard that these papers were fakes. What does it mean? This means that Vladimir Pozner, knowing about the subject of the upcoming Court dispute, and having at least two weeks in Court at his disposal, did not even deign to spend at least an hour of his time and ‘google’ this topic on the Internet. So, for example, my comment on one of the ‘documents’, namely, ‘Beria’s letter’: or ‘Could Lavrenti Beria have ordered something’, and with regards to troika power-sharing – he could have searched ‘in 1940, if the troika were abolished in 1938?’, Vladimir Pozner had done none of this and could only blurt out: ‘Perhaps’ when questioned in Court – acting like a guru with (imagined) telepathic powers!

Stalin the Movie

Dmitry Fakowski: What do you think about the western-style film about Joseph Stalin, to be shot by Alexei Balabanov?

Yakov Dzhugashvili: He promised to make a film about my great-grandfather, stating ‘one of the heroes’ of the picture will be Joseph Stalin, which would portray Stalin not as an idol in the years of his youth – but rather as a bandit, a thief and renegade from the (Czarist) Law. Was he really a thief running from the Law? It is not proven that he personally participated in the robberies – but it is also not proved that he did not participate. However, this kind of nonsense is not politically relevant or historically accurate. Joseph Stalin was not a Western-style gun-slinger (in a Hollywood movie), but was a great Revolutionary leader. We must be careful because all great lies have a firm basis in small, foundational lies. If lies are told about Joseph Stalin – it does not insult me ​​personally. This is rather the humiliation of the entire Russian people, who (through Stalin’s leadership) built a powerful industrial country in the shortest time, won a vicious war against a fascist army led by Nazi Germany – but which was comprised of armies from many other European countries (after all, Hitler had many allies in the world). Finally, such lies about Stalin insult the very Soviet people that conquered space.

Fabrication of the ‘Holodomor’ Famine.

Dmitry Fakowski: In Ukraine, the anti-Stalin policy focuses on the famine of 1932-1933 …

Yakov Dzhugashvili: This is what Professor Grover Furr says in his book covering ‘61 of Khrushchev’s lies’: ‘In the 1930s, Ukrainian nationalists (with the help of Nazi Germans) began fabricating the so-called ”Holodomor” famine’. Now, the late Canadian researcher Douglas Tottle proves this in his book “Lies, Hunger and Fascism: The Myth of the Ukrainian Genocide from Hitler to Harvard” (1987). I read an article in 1987 in which he debunked the lies of Ukrainian nationalists, I was amazed at what Douglas Tottle wrote and went to Toronto, Canada, to meet with him. In 1988, American journalist Jeff Coplon, interviewed him (along with others) for his article ‘In Search of the Soviet Holocaust: A Hunger 55 Years Ago’. A lie about the so-called ‘Holodomor’ is necessary for Ukrainian nationalists to justify their co-operation with the Nazis – and the killing of millions of their compatriots, (including Jews). These fascists killed up to 100,000 Polish citizens during the so-called Volyn massacre. Polish researchers Vladislav and Eva Semashko, Ukrainian-Canadian researcher Viktor Polishchuk and Russian historian Alexander Dyukov – all precisely document this massacre. In order to justify even a small part of these crimes, nationalists must insist that the USSR was worse than the Nazis and Ukrainian nationalists, and that there is nothing worse than Communism – stating that virtually ‘anything else would be better’. Similarly false stories about Soviet atrocities are also propagated by the right-wing nationalists of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Usually they are based on sources of Nazi propaganda, which are most often simply reprinted. The ‘Historical Memory’ Foundation of Alexander Dyukov publishes works on the topic of these falsifications.

The great grandson of Joseph Stalin is sure that the exposure of anti-Stalin lies is necessary not only for the restoration of historical justice, but also for restoring to our (Slavic) peoples a protective mechanism that shields us against dangerous ideological aggressions, because the knowledge of our history grants us the ability to distinguish lies from the truth, the original from the fake. This truth about the USSR and Joseph Stalin is one of the foundations that builds such a protective mechanism – which benefits the well-being of the people.

Interviewed by Dmitry Fakowski

©opyright: Adrian Chan-Wyles (ShiDaDao) 2017.

Original Russian Language Article:

http://kprf.msk.ru/?p=4246

Яков Джугашвили: Ложь о Сталине – попытка нынешних элит оправдать разграбление советского наследия (2013)

Источник: stalingrad-info.ru

Правнук Иосифа Сталина – художник и общественный деятель Яков Джугашвили – рассказал, почему продолжит бороться за правду о своём великом прадеде, заявив прямо:  Коба нужен нам и сегодня.

Ложь как вирус

— Антисталинская истерия, царящая сегодня в глобальных СМИ, Вас сильно напрягает?

— Ложь меня оскорбляет, и я эту ложь всеми имеющимися у меня средствами разоблачаю и пытаюсь донести до людей правду. Сталинизация – это просвещение людей, объяснение того, что хотел сделать Иосиф Сталин, что ему удалось сделать, кто и почему сопротивлялся его реформам. Без разоблачения лжи об Иосифе Сталине и истории СССР того периода невозможна никакая сталинизация. Сегодня Иосиф Сталин дорог всем, для кого такие слова, как Справедливость, Отечество, Народ — не пустые звуки.

Дело в том что, ложь об Иосифе Сталине и СССР того периода создавалась с целью подрыва авторитета лидера страны, чтобы людей отталкивала любая попытка осмыслить природу явлений произошедших в период его жизни и его роль в этих событиях. Эта ложь направлена не против Иосифа Сталина или его родственников, а, в первую очередь, против Русского народа. Ложью о нём пытаются лишить Русских (а вместе с ними и те народы, которые вместе с Русским строили первое в мире общество свободное от паразитов) способности противостоять как внешним, так и внутренним угрозам. Ложь об Иосифе Сталине — это созданный недочеловеками вирус, разрушающий защитный механизм народа, ответственный за распознавание опасности. Наконец, ложь о нём — это попытка нынешних элит оправдать разграбление того добра, которое было сохранено и приумножено Советским народом, – говорит Яков Джугашвили.

Грузинская молодежь не знает русского языка

— В Грузии Иосифа Виссарионовича помнят, любят?

— Отношение людей к Иосифу Сталину у него на родине сегодня определяется их информированностью о лидере страны и о СССР того периода. Это две самые оболганные темы, и чтобы разобраться в них нужно иметь доступ к специфической литературе, а эта литература в основном русскоязычная. Власть в Грузии вот уже почти десять лет вытесняет из Грузии русский язык и добилась «неплохих» результатов в этом деле: молодое поколение практически не знает русский язык. Но даже та часть населения, которая не считает его «языком оккупантов» и продолжает приобщаться к мировой культуре посредством русского языка, не особо интересуется темой сталинизма. У большинства грузин сегодня нет даже желания разбираться с этими вопросами, так как они подавлены своим крайне нерадостным материальным положением, а также той чудовищной по своей подлости антисоветской (а по сути — антирусской) и антисталинской пропагандой, которая льётся с ТВ, а в Грузии на четыре миллиона человек — два десятка каналов! Надо обладать устойчивой психикой и иметь серьёзную мотивацию, чтобы в таких условиях не унывать и сопротивляться. Поэтому, надо признать, что в Грузии сталинисты никак не влияют на настроение и сознание народа. Несмотря на столь грустное положение дел, положительный образ Иосифа Сталина — в статьях, репликах, — подобно мощному лучу света пронзает умы и сердца людей, заставляя их задуматься об этом человеке и его делах.

Как возродить сталинскую справедливость без насилия

— У Вас есть российский паспорт?

— Я – гражданин России, более того – участник инициативной группы по проведению референдума по принятию поправок к Конституции и закона об «Ответственности власти» в обеспечение этих поправок.

— В чём их суть?

— Жизнь устроена несправедливо. И несправедливость идет от власти. Власть несправедлива потому, что у нее есть возможность быть несправедливой. Как достичь справедливости без революционного насилия? Это просто, но нужно зреть в корень этой несправедливости власти. Почему члены власти и их приспешники творят во власти всё, что угодно? Потому, что они никак не отвечают за результаты своего правления — никак не наказываются за вред, нанесенный народу. Водителя за аварию, которая произошла по случайности, накажут, а власть ни за что не отвечает, что бы она ни натворила! Разве это справедливо? Нужен закон, согласно которому на всех выборах каждый избиратель кроме бюллетеней с новым составом власти получит проект вердикта старому, сменяемому составу власти, а в этом вердикте будет три строчки: «Достойна поощрения», «Достойна наказания» и «Без последствий». Если большинство избирателей решит отпустить старый состав власти без последствий, то власть оставит свои полномочия как сейчас — без последствий для себя. Если большинство избирателей решит поощрить власть, то Президент или каждый член Федерального собрания станет Героем России. А если избиратели решат «Достойна наказания», то Президент или каждый член Федерального собрания сядут в тюрьму на срок своего пребывания у власти.

— Как будем судить?

— Судить власть каждый избиратель будет исключительно из собственного убеждения в ее вине и заслугах. А для того чтобы вердикт был объективным, от избирателей требуется ответить самим себе на простой вопрос: улучшилась, ухудшилась или не изменилась их жизнь за период правления данной власти. Согласитесь, что на этот вопрос сможет ответить любой избиратель, вне зависимости от его образования, культурного уровня и т.п. Мы, граждане, берём на себя ответственность подчиняться власти, но раз в пять лет мы будем судить власть за результаты этого нашего ей подчинения. Вот это и есть справедливость!

Катынское дело

— Особое внимание Вы уделяете Катынскому делу.

— Не так давно Тверской суд Москвы косвенно подтвердил, что польских офицеров в 1941 году расстреляли немцы. Итог суда с Государственной Думой оказался сенсационным. Нет, в иске было отказано, но в своём решении судья чёрным по белому дважды написала, что поляков в Катыни расстреляли в сентябре 1941 года, т.е. — немцы. Это большая победа! Это уже не публицистика, а документ, в котором общеизвестность этого факта установлена в судебном порядке. Я поздравляю всех честных людей. И, главное, честных поляков, с этой победой! А всем подлецам, в том числе и польским, советую запастись валидолом.

— Кто Вам помогает бороться на процессе?

— В 2009 году со мной связался публицист Леонид Николаевич Жура и попросил, чтобы мой отец Евгений Яковлевич разрешил ему подать иск о защите чести и достоинства Иосифа Сталина. Иск был подан к «Новой газете» за публикацию статьи Анатолия Яблокова «Виновным назначен Берия». По законам России подобный иск имеет право подавать только родственник Иосифа Сталина. Мой отец согласился, и Леонид Жура стал официальным представителем отца в суде по этому делу. Однако отец счёл обязательным, чтобы его представителем вместе с Леонидом Николаевичем был и Юрий Мухин (www.ymuhin.ru), который к началу процесса был болен и лежал в больнице. (То, что с ним там приключилось — отдельная история, едва не закончившаяся для него трагически). Затем к ним присоединился Сергей Эмильевич Стрыгин — автор независимого расследования Катынской трагедии. Вот эта тройка уже несколько лет наводит ужас на «борцов со сталинизмом» всего лишь тем, что «осуществляет их мечту!» Они ведь требуют суда над Иосифом Сталиным? Вот вам суд, приходите и доказывайте его «преступления». Судебные процессы показали полную беспомощность обвинителей Иосифа Сталина. В отличие от студии радиостанции «Эхо Москвы» или кабинета редактора «Новой Газеты», в суде наши оппоненты вынуждены были отвечать за свою болтовню. Наши представители им в этом активно помогали, задавая разные вопросы, на которые они были обязаны отвечать, как того и требует законодательство. Историки провели удивительную по своему масштабу работу по разоблачению лжи об Иосифе Сталине и истории СССР. Юрий Мухин, несмотря на крайнюю загруженность (на него самого заведено два уголовных дела по «русской» статье за экстремизм) и перенесённую операцию на сердце, умудрялся в день заседания или сразу после писать исчерпывающие репортажи о том, что там происходило. Сейчас эти репортажи объединены в книгу под названием «Суд над Сталиным». Замечу что СМИ, как официальные, так и якобы оппозиционные, хранили дружное молчание об этих процессах. Даже «Эхо Москвы» и «Новая Газета» предпочли молчать, хотя они были непосредственными участниками суда.

— У Вас был громкий процесс против журналиста Владимира Познера.

— Я смог присутствовать на этом процессе, и имел «счастье» лицезреть этого «гуру ТВ-болтологии» в непосредственной близости. По иронии судьбы, процесс состоялся 21 декабря — в день рождения Иосифа Сталина. Суть вот в чем: Владимир Познер в своей традиционной реплике в конце одной из передач обвинил Иосифа Сталина в расстреле польских офицеров в Катыни. Когда он узнал об иске, то в эфире «Эха Москвы» заявил, что готов доказать в суде причастность Иосифа Сталина к расстрелу поляков документально. Придя на заседание суда в сопровождении двух юристов (одна из которых была явно на дружеской ноге с судьёй), он выложил на стол два из четырех документов из той самой знаменитой папки фальшивок по Катынскому делу. Судья отреагировала сразу же, и дала понять, чтобы этот документ спрятали куда подальше и забыли о нём. Владимир Познерзабыл об этом «документе», как забыл и о своих грозных обещаниях документально доказать причастность Иосифа Сталина к расстрелу поляков. Вместо этого он стал отстаивать своё конституционное право на болтовню, т.е. — личное мнение. Замечу, что все «борцы со сталинизмом» на судебных процессах вместо того, чтобы приводить конкретные доводы в пользу своих утверждений, занимались именно отстаиванием своего права на личное мнение. Во время одного из перерывов произошёл спор с Владимиром Познером относительно принесённых им в суд «документов». Стало ясно, что он видел эти бумажки впервые в жизни. Более того, он никогда даже не слышал о том, что эти бумажки являются фальшивками. Что это значит? А это значит, что Владимир Познер, зная о теме предстоящего судебного спора и имея до начала суда, как минимум, две недели в своём распоряжении, даже не соизволил потратить хотя бы час своего времени и «погуглить» эту тему в Интернете. Так, например, на моё замечание по поводу одного из «документов», а именно «письма Берии»: «Мог ли Лаврентий Берия приказать что-то «тройке» в 1940 году, если тройки были упразднены ещё в 1938 году?», Владимир Познер выпалил: «Мог!» Одно слово — «гуру».

— Как Вы относитесь к вестерну об Иосифе Сталине, который собирается сниматьАлексей Балабанов?

— Он пообещал снять фильм о моём прадеде, заявив, что «одним из героев картины станетИосиф Сталин, предстающий уже окончательно развенчанным идолом в годы юности – бандитом, вором в законе. Он на самом деле был вор в законе – не доказано, что он лично участвовал в ограблениях. Но и не доказано, что не участвовал. Поэтому я могу и так, и так это сделать». Я бы хотел подчеркнуть, что ложь об Иосифе Сталине – это не оскорбление нас, родственников. Она не оскорбляет лично меня. Это – унижение русского народа, построившего за кратчайшие сроки мощную индустриальную страну, выигравшего Войну у армии всей Европы (ведь на стороне Германии воевали не только немцы). Наконец, народа, покорившего в космос.

Фабрикация “голодомора”

— На Украине в антисталинской политике основной акцент делается на голоде 1932-1933 годов…

— Вот что говорит профессор Гровер Фер автор книги «61 Неправда Хрущёва»: «В 1930-х годах украинские националисты с помощью нацистов начали фабрикацию так называемого “голодомора”. Ныне покойный канадский исследователь Дуглас Тотл (Douglas Tottle) доказывает это в своей книге «Ложь, Голод и Фашизм: Миф об украинском геноциде от Гитлера до Гарварда» (Fraud, Famine and Fascism: The Ukraiinian Genocide Myth from Hitler to Harvard (1987). Я еще в 1987 году прочитал статью, в которой тот развенчал ложь украинских националистов. Я был поражен тем, что Дуглас Тотл написал, и поехал в Торонто (Канада), чтобы встретиться с ним. В 1988 году американский журналист Джефф Коплон (Jeff Coplon) взял у него и других интервью для статьи «В поисках советского холокоста: Голод 55-летней давности кормит Правых» ( In Search of a Soviet Holocaust: A 55-Year-Old Famine Feeds the Right). Украинским националистам ложь о так называемом “голодоморе” необходима чтобы оправдать своё сотрудничество с нацистами и убийство ими миллионов своих соотечественников, включая евреев. Они убили до 100 000 польских граждан во время так называемой Волынской резни. Польские исследователи Владислав и Ева Семашко (Wladyslaw and Ewa Siemaszko), украино-канадский исследователь Виктор Полищук и российский историк Александр Дюков документируют эту резню. Для того, чтобы оправдать хотя бы малую часть этих преступлений, националистам необходимо настаивать на том, что СССР был хуже, чем нацисты и украинские националисты, причём был таким плохим, что ничего хуже, чем коммунизм нет и «всё остальное было бы лучше». Подобные лжеистории о советских зверствах также пропагандируются правыми националистами Эстонии, Латвии, и Литвы. Обычно они основаны на источниках нацистской пропаганды, которые чаще всего просто перепечатывают. Фонд «Историческая Память» Александра Дюкова публикует работы по теме этих фальсификаций.

Правнук Иосифа Сталина уверен, что разоблачение антисталинской лжи необходимо не только для восстановления исторической справедливости, но и для того, чтобы вернуть нашим народам защитный механизм оберегающий нас от опасных идеологических агрессий, ведь знание своей истории, умение отличать ложь от правды, подлинник от фальшивки – одна из основ такого защитного механизма народа.

Беседовал Дмитрий Факовский

 

Why Putin Bothers the West!

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Under President Putin – many Socialist structures in Russia have been re-built and are now functioning to relieve the suffering of the ordinary people. Of course, the capitalist West (led by the US) does not want this because it contradicts the brutality of free market economics. However, there is a certain strand of modern Russian viewpoint that supports Western capitalism and opposes the history of the USSR. These people are traitors, of course, but their voices are lifted-up in the West through various books and articles that voice Western capitalist greed as the norm for modern Russia. There is no reason to accept this distortion, simply because whatever anyone thinks of Vladimir Putin – he has been continuously re-elected via a democratic vote. The duplicitous West, whilst extolling liberal democracy and predatory capitalism, nevertheless has continuously ‘interfered’ in the internal functioning of other countries – whilst destroying regimes and murdering leaders simply because they preferred Socialism over the exploitation of Western capitalism. The other reason that ‘bothers’ the West is that the Communist Party of Russia remains incredibly popular throughout the country and holds around one-third of the elected seats in the State Duma – and it is not beyond the realms of possibility that Russia might well ‘elect’ a Communist Government should Putin be over-thrown. The capitalist West seeks to denigrate Soviet history and play-down its historic victory of international fascism during WWII, and this bizarre strategy has led to the US, EU and UK openly supporting the neo-Nazi (and anti-Russian) regime operating out of Western Ukraine.

Fijian Troops at China’s 70th Victory Over Japan Parade (2015)

a parade 3

I have read estimates within Chinese academic sources that between 1931 – 1945 – there were an estimated 60 million deaths of Chinese men, women and children. This was primarily due to the Japanese Imperial Army agitating in Manchuria (North-east China) prior to the ‘official’ outbreak of the Pacific War between Japan and the USA in 1941. I suspect this figure also includes millions of Chinese civilians ‘murdered’ by Chiang Kai-Shek’s Nationalist Armies – supported, financed and armed by the capitalist West. Ironically, it was at the behest of the USA that the Soviet Red Army invaded and ‘liberated’ the Japanese controlled North-east China in August, 1945, an act that freed the Chinese people from Japanese Imperialist oppression, and paved the way for the final victory of Mao Zedong’s Communist People’s Liberation Army (PLA) over Chiang Kai-Shek (in 1949). After fleeing to Taiwan in 1945, Chiang Kai-Shek unleashed a murderous campaign against the non-Chinese indigenous population (that resisted what they saw as a ‘Chinese’ invasion), and a initiated a ‘White Terror’ campaign that lasted decades, murdering thousands of Chinese people suspected of having leftwing sympathies. The Soviet Red Army handed-over the entirety of North-east China (including its Japanese industrial infrastructure and captured weaponry) to Mao’s Communist Forces – an act that effectively finished Chiang Kai-Shek. It is clear that it was the ‘Communist’ forces that ‘liberated’ China from Japanese fascism, whilst also fending-off Chiang Kai-Shek’s Western-backed fascism. Of course, due to its Communist connotations, the Western, capitalist countries (that place so much sentimentalism toward the memory of its own veterans), boycotted this 70th Anniversary Parade – showing no respect for the 60 million Chinese casualties.  However, the forces of 17 other countries did attend this event including Russia, Venezuela, Cuba, Egypt, Cambodia, Laos, and Pakistan (although not India, whose incumbent, rightwing and fascist BJP government is busy pursuing an anti-Chinese disinformation campaign at this current time). I include within this post photographs of the Fijian contingent taken from video footage of the march.

a parade 2

a parade 1

Nazi German ‘Fake’ Photography, Mock Executions and Misrepresentation of the USSR.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

(I would to like to pay my utmost respect to the French Resistance Fighter in this photograph named – Mr George Blind – whose ‘ordinary’ bravery is beyond compare, and whose example gave a glimmer of light to millions in the darkest of times!)

Following the end of WWII and the Soviet defeat of Nazi Germany, the US Cold War drive sought to re-write history and present the USSR in the worst possible light from any and all directions. One part of this policy was the accusation that the Soviets ludicrously ‘altered’ photographs to make the Nazi Germans to be ‘worse’ than they actually were. These ‘apologists’ for Nazi Germany atrocities created a whole raft of disinformation photographs which accused the Soviet of altering ‘friendly’ Nazi German photographs and thereby misrepresenting Adolf Hitler’s true intentions and realistic actions. These ‘apologists’ would have the world believe that between rounds of mass executions, the Nazi German troops would ‘hang-out’ in a jolly manner with the Soviet Citizens they had pledged to eradicated during ‘Operation Ost’ – because they were thought by Hitler to be an inferior race. However, what follows is a prime example of Nazi German photographic fakery.

The above photograph was presented by the Nazi Germans as the shooting of a member of the French resistance member – named Georges Blind – in the fortress of Belfort (Northwestern France). For a long time it was believed that this execution was ‘staged’ for dramatic purposes by the occupying (and brutal) Nazi German Army in France – using an unknown person (possibly an actor playing along). However, there is no documentary evidence that executions were carried-out in the Belfort Fortress (as no rifle shells were found on or in the ground). Many years after the war, the son of Georges Blind, (Jean Blind), saw this photograph for the first time and immediately recognised his father!  He confirmed that although his father was briefly held in Belfort Fortress after his arrest, he was not shot in Belfort Fortress. In fact, he was subjected to psychological and physical torture – which involved a ‘mock’ execution recorded in this photograph. At the time, George Blind thought he was about to be shot. As he would note talk, he was soon moved to the Concentration Camp in Blechhamer (Upper Silesia) where he died from the effects of ill treatment, torture and slave labour conditions. This photograph is ‘real’ in the sense the situation depicted involved a real person, but is ‘fake’ in the sense that the execution was never carried-out. The Nazi Germans used this photograph to threatened the French population into accepting subjugation. There are countless other ‘fake’ Nazi German photographs in existence, many falsely portraying the hellish conditions of the Nazi German holocaust unleashed on the USSR.

Имитация расстрела члена французского движения Сопротивления Жоржа Блинда (Georges Blind) в крепости Бельфор (Belfort). Долгое время считалось, что на этом фото запечетлена казнь члена движения Сопротивления, но не было известно имя человека на фото, и не было документальных подтверждений того, что в крепости Бельфор проводились расстрелы (в частности, на территории не было найдено ни одной гильзы). Через много лет после войны сын Жоржа Блинда, Жан, впервые увидел эту фотографию и узнал на ней своего отца. Он рассказал, что отец не был расстрелян в Бельфоре. Его арестовали и держали в крепости, а позже перевели в концлагерь в Блеххамере (Blechhamer, Верхняя Силезия) где он погиб. В тюрьме немцы подвергли Жоржа Блинда имитации расстрела, но не добились от него никакой информации, и отправили его в лагерь.

Defending the Red Flag: Rules and Regulations for Official Flag Bearers

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Definition: A flag-bearer is anyone – male or female, young or old – who either volunteers to carry the Red Flag (with a golden hammer and sickle, golden star, or any other identifying Marxist-Leninist Communist or Socialist symbols), or who is ordered to carry the Red Flag by an Official of the Communist Party (or another individual – either civil or military – who is suitably empowered to issue such an order). The Red Flag should be affixed to a suitable flag-pole, or hung in a correct manner from a window, door or wall. Whether carried on a pole, or placed on a building or other object (either stationary or movable), generally a single flag-bearer should is responsible for the cleanliness, state of repair and safety of the Red Flag. Secondary flag-bearers are often selected to theoretically take-over these duties, should the primary flag-bearer be incapacitated or otherwise unable to meet these duties. It is an offense of the highest order to wantonly ‘abandon’ a ‘Red Flag’.

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Red Flag Defined:

The Red Flag is ‘red’ because it represents the blood of the Workers sacrificed all over the world to secure rights, justice and freedom for the ordinary people. The tradition of a ‘Red Flag’ may have began during the 1871 Paris Commune. The ‘golden’ or ‘yellow’ hammer represents industrial workers, whilst the ‘golden’ or ‘yellow’ sickle represents agricultural workers. The ‘golden’ or ‘yellow’ colour represents a ‘New Dawn’ for the International Proletariat. Within the Soviet Union, the Red Flag was ‘red’ with a yellow hammer and sickle emblem on each side – but in 1980 – a new flag was instigated. This Red Flag was ‘red’ on both sides, but only carried the yellow hammer and sickle on one =-side. This 1980 Red Flag did not invalidate the pre-1980 version – with both types being regularly flown.

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Rules & Regulations:

  1. Never relinquish control of the Red Flag unless officially ‘relieved’ of this duty by a suitably qualified individual.
  2. The Red Flag must never fall into the hands of the fascists.
  3. When carried in public, the Red Flag must be held high and be easily visible.
  4. The flag-pole must be suitable for both the Red Flag and venue within it is flown.
  5. When marching, the Red Flag must be permanently on display and not ‘wrapped’ around the pole (due to the wind).
  6. The Red Flag must be held either vertically or diagonally and not be allowed to ‘catch’ in surrounding obstacles.
  7. The Red Flag must be kept in good repair and a clean state.
  8. Verbal challenges to the Red Flag must be met with either a crushing silence, or dialectical clarity.
  9. A Red Flag bearer must be progressive of nature and suited to this task.
  10. The Red Flag represents the power of the combined Working Class,
  11. Unless otherwise stated, Red Flag bearers are unarmed.
  12. The Red Flag represents the blood of the Workers spilt in the name of greed by the bourgeoisie.
  13. If a Red Flag is discovered on the ground, it is the duty of every Communist to pick it up and assume responsibility for its welfare until relieved.
  14. The Red Flag represents the power of Marxist-Leninism and the spirit of Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong (as well as other Revolutionaries).
  15. The Red Flag represents the International Communist Party (and all its contemporary factions), with impartiality (regardless of any personal allegiance of the Red Flag bearer).
  16. The Red Flag represents Proletariat Unity and rejects Bourgeois Division.
  17. The Red Flag (of the Soviet Union) represents all oppressed people.
  18. The Red Flag symbolises universal hope for the masses.
  19. When the Red Flag is lowered (for whatever reason), it must be folded with respect, and suitably placed in storage for safe keeping.
  20. The Red Flag is imbued with the dialectical power of Socialism and Communism. In times of warfare, unless otherwise ordered, the Red Flag bearer advances upon the enemy positions ‘unarmed’.

“Glory to the Soviet troops, who hoisted the banner of victory over Berlin!”0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

My family have carried the Red Flag for decades – and now it is the duty of myself and my partner:

20170701_130443

20170701_122804

Soviet Red Army Liberates Manchuria (North-East China) August-September – 1945

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

At the behest of the United States under President Roosevelt – the Soviet Red Army Declared War on the fascist Empire of Japan in 9.8.1945 – and fought their way into the Chinese city of Harbin not long after. Although the Japanese Authorities hinted that Japanese Forces (in the form of the 700,000 man Kwantung Army) would offer little resistance, in reality however, Japanese resistance was very strong in places, leading to many Soviet casualties. The Imperial Japanese had been agitating in ‘Manchuria’ (i.e. North-East China) since at least 1931, and their forces had committed continuous atrocities against the local Chinese population, and prisoners of war. The Japanese plan was to eradicate the Chinese presence from North-East China, and use this ‘new’ space to accommodate millions of Japanese migrants. This strategy reflected that of Adolf Hitler and his plans for a ‘Greater Germany’ in the Soviet Union (by eradicating the Slavic race). Following the bloody and brutal Battle of Okinawa, President Roosevelt was not keen on the idea of further large scale conventional battles with the Japanese Imperial Forces, and certainly did not favour the idea of a conventional US military invasion of the Japanese homeland. As he had been discussing with Britain’s Winston Churchill about the possibility of encouraging the destruction of the Soviet Red Army by bleeding it dry against Nazi Germany – a plan was hatched to try and bleed it dry against the Japanese. The problem was that instead of bleeding it dry – the Soviet Red Army grew ever stronger with each campaign and victory! As matters transpired, the Red Army was spectacularly successful in China and the islands off the North-Coast of Japan. The local Chinese population welcomed the Soviets with open arms, and when the campaign was complete, the Soviets handed the captured area over to Mao Zedong and the Communist Party of China (together with all its captured Japanese industry and weaponry). This acquisition allowed the CPC to consolidate power in North-East China, and eventually defeat Chiang Kai-Shek in the South. As a consequence, and contrary to the English wikipedia pages that still espouse false US Cold War propaganda as ‘fact’, there were no atrocities committed by the Soviet Red Army in China. There are no Chinese language texts, Japanese language texts, or indeed Russian language texts recording any untoward behaviour. As can be scene from some of these photographs (all gathered from the Russian language internet), there were even Westerners present in Harbin during the Soviet ‘Liberation’ and not one recorded any incidence of bad behaviour on the part of the Soviet Red Army.  It is remarkable today, to witness in the West a pro-fascist mentality developing which attempts to re-write history and present the perpetuators of world fascism as being the ‘victims’ of those who fought back against the real atrocities. The Nazi Germans (who committed the holocaust), and the imperial Japanese that pursued a genocidal policy against the Chinese – are falsely packaged as being the real victims! This is nonsense and nothing but a rightwing attempt at clearing its own conscience that has the deaths of countless millions upon it.  The historical evidence is clear – Nazi Germany and fascist Japan both thought that they could eradicate large swathes of humanity from the earth through military aggression – and both failed due to the strength of the Soviet Red Army and the resistance to invasion Of China by the CPC. I include a documentary with these pictures that clearly describes the Soviet campaign in Manchurian. The Soviets recorded 9 ineffectual Kamikaze attacks – with Japanese troops surrendering en mass after each defeat suffered. Of particular note is the successful use of Soviet paratroops to quickly ‘liberate’ forward areas before being relieved by Soviet infantry and tanks within 24 hours.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

A Glimpse of the Murderous Nature of Capitalism!

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Western wikipedia, of course, publishes ‘fake’ history about the Soviet Union that has no bearing to recorded history – but remains absolutely ‘silent’ about the very real and obvious crimes and excesses committed by the economic system we are all brain-washed to follow – called ‘capitalism’. Even though capitalism privileges the few over the many – the many unquestionably accept the lie that the many are privileged over the few, when everyday facts are clear, and speak for themselves. The crimes of capitalism are so immense and wide-ranging that I can only point-out a few aspects here. According to Russian demographic records – 5.8 million Russian people died between 1991-1999 – the first decade of capitalism in modern Russia. Of course, the biased Western media remains silent on this atrocity because ‘greed’ is more powerful than ‘caring’. I have also read that according to stats from the US – 7 million people have died since 2010 in the US due to the economic collapse and the US government’s response of ‘cutting’ budgets to relieve the tax burden on the rich. Of course, in the UK since 2010 (and the imposition of Tory and LibDem ‘Austerity’), the total numbers of poor and vulnerable people who have died remains unrecorded as a distinct category – but the UN Report of 2016 (that found the UK government ‘Guilty of Crimes Against Humanity’ for its despicable treatment of British Disabled people) – suggests a number between 10,000 and 80,000 – with the DWP releasing the death figures piece-meal so as to downplay the disastrous effects of this murderous policy and avoid rioting on British streets!

Reconstructing JV Stalin – Exposing the Myths, Lies & Fraud

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Original Russian Language Posted On: http://politrussia.com

Original Authors: Ilya Belous (Илья Белоус), Yuri Belous (Юрий Белоус)

(Translated by Adrian Chan-Wyles PhD

At this present time, scientific and public interest in the ‘true’ personality of Stalin is growing. In December 2014, more than a half (52%) of those questioned by the Levada Center expressed positive viewpoints about Stalin’s historical role in Russia. Those expressing negative viewpoints – measured less than a third (30%). This result was something of a sensation – after 60 years of attempts to forget and even destroy the personality of the Secretary General, his authority remains very high.

Before the celebration of the 70th anniversary of the Great Victory over fascism, Stalin’s authority resurged. Many people were astonished to witness posters with his image appearing in Krasnodar, Makhachkala, Yekaterinburg and other cities, on ‘steel-buses’ in St. Petersburg, the installation of monuments in Lipetsk and the Crimea (still in the planning stage in St. Petersburg, Yekaterinburg), the opening of memorial plaques in Simferopol and Ussuriisk. These are just some of the examples that greatly disturbed the liberal media and politicians. This is an astonishing development considering the false propaganda used against Stalin by the West and Khrushchev in the USSR.

Argument 1. In the era of Stalin, evidence shows that the population increased, and under the capitalist liberals in the nineties – catastrophically declined.

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

The green line in the graph indicates the population growth in percent (the higher the line, the higher the percentage), and, despite the wars, the best dynamics are just in the days of Stalin, and one of the best – in 1937. Population demography is an essential qualitative indicator of the standard of living. From 1926 to 1954, despite the famine and the Great Patriotic War, the population grew by 50 million people. However, such a drop in population, as in the case of the capitalist liberal-era of post-1991, was not seen in the USSR even during the times of warfare and famine! For comparison: from 1991 to 1999, the natural growth of the population was minus 5.8 million people, that is, instead of growth (through capitalism), it was alarmingly reduced (by capitalism). As the liberal reformer Anatoly Chubais callously explained the deaths, ‘They did not fit into the free market.’

In the Great Patriotic War, the Soviet people’s losses amounted to 6.3 million servicemen killed and died from wounds, 555,000 died from illnesses that died as a result of accidents, sentenced to death (according to reports of troops, medical institutions, military tribunals) and 4.5 million wounded in captivity and missing. The total demographic losses (including the dead civilian population in the occupied territory and the increased mortality in the rest of the USSR from the adversities of the war) amounted to around a conservative 26.6 million people (with other estimates being between 34 – 40 million combined Soviet losses).  Even in the military and post-war years of the USSR, there was no such drop in the population as in the nineties, which turned out to be even worse for Russia in the demographic sense. The liberal policy of the nineties led the country to a demographic catastrophe, whilst under Stalin’s leadership the USSR escaped such a disaster.

Argument 2. Industrial production grew at a high rate.

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Under Stalin, a powerful national (industrial) production was created. Before the war in terms of gross industrial output, the USSR became the second power in the world; Quite a bit behind the United States, but ahead of any single European country (Industrialization of the USSR, 1933-1937 Documents and materials .- M .: Nauka, 1971. – p. 598). Soviet industry was born and, most importantly, operated in the very 1930s, when, after the great financial crisis, the economies of the capitalist countries actually slumped on the spot. On the other hand, Soviet industrialization changed the balance of world power. From the point of view of industrial development, non-Russian republics were not only not discriminated against, but also found themselves in a preferential position, and some of them (in Central Asia) developed faster than other parts of the country. The former peripheral republics were actively involved in the Soviet economic transformation. Impressive growth of personnel was noted in the field of education: the number of personnel in the Narkompros system doubled over the same period: from 1.3 million to 3.7 million people. Also doubled was the number of people employed in health care and research institutions. These figures show that industrialization, as it was successful, began to yield beneficial results not only in the form of strengthening the country’s economic potential alone, but also throughout the surrounding countries. On the national outskirts, where people did not know how to read and write, a network of scientific and research institutions, universities, schools, and libraries were established.

By 1937 in the USSR, 13 economies were created. The country could produce any equipment, including military equipment. In 1953, Korolev carried out the development of a draft design for a two-stage long-range ballistic missile weighing up to 170 tons with a detachable warhead weighing 3 tons for a range of 8,000 kilometres. The successful project became the bases of all the further successes in space. Diametrically opposed to this trend are the (capitalist) liberal nineties, where Russian society was turned upside down, and Soviet progression destroyed through the Western ideology of capitalist greed. The liberal nineties saw the systematic destruction of Soviet science and industrial progression, and represented the exact opposite of the development seen during the USSR years. Under Stalin, the country worked and created, a policy that worked due to the high level of discipline and the presence of a national idea. In terms of per capita growth rates in the USSR were significantly higher than in any of the developed countries of the world.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Argument 3. The standard of living under Stalin was the best in modern history.

In our time, the ‘hamburger course’ (or ‘how many hamburgers can be bought for salaries in different countries?’) is quite popular. Why should we, in Russia, poison ourselves in the literal sense, for this food? Let’s measure the standard of living with potatoes!

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

According to this schedule, we reached the level of 1953 only in 1970, but now we are lower – and this is with all the technologies and progress! The standard of living was to grow many times, but it does not grow. Why? Can there be an answer on the surface – due to the phenomenon of Stalinist leadership? We should study this phenomenon and not just focus upon the rigidity of government. The market of products has grown today due to their production in factory enterprises, rather than due to small peasant farms. It was this goal that Stalin’s collectivization pursued. Those who actively obstructed the State course, created a threat to the policy and were naturally punished, but why should this be surprising, and was it a feature of a particular country at that time? In 1953, the average salary in the USSR was 719 roubles, that is, 179 dollars at the then rate. Taking into account inflation in terms of today – about 1600 – 1700 dollars. Now the average salary is not more than 500 dollars, with the most profit going into the hands of the 10% that constitute the richest. It turns out that never after Stalin did the people earn so much money. If you take into account the so-called ‘social package’: apartments, free education, vouchers, medical care. Things were by far better for ordinary people under Stalin in the USSR.

Under Stalin, a society of social justice, and a society for working people was built. The authority of Stalin before the war (and especially after the war) was so great that it threatened the (capitalist) oligarchy. Due to Stalin’s authority, Communist States and Movements began to spread across all continents. The only way out for the (capitalist) oligarchy was to launch a campaign to humiliate Stalin, first to besmirch and demean his ‘personally’, and then misrepresent and demonise the USSR, China and the Communists in all countries.

It was through the criticism of Stalin’s cult of personality that Khrushchev caused the deterioration of relations with Communist China. The “Thaw” in the USSR was used to a greater extent by the CIA. The so called ‘A breath of fresh western air’ was a spoonful of honey in a barrel of tar. The country was inundated with representatives of Western services, which were subversive to the idealogical well-being of the USSR. They already had to deal with Brezhnev, but China became an ally of the United States. In the implementation of the principle of peaceful coexistence with the countries of European ‘democracy’ Khrushchev himself already collided with the ‘pro-American club’ in the UN. An epiphany came to Khrushchev late, with his support for the anti-US Fidel Castro, Patrice Lumumba, and Nkrumah Kwame, put an end to the ‘Soviet thaw’ and sparked a new round of ‘cold war’ hostilities. What else did Khrushchev do? He transferred the Crimea to the Ukrainian SSR, thereby intensifying the West’s program for ‘liberating Ukraine from the USSR’ (we recall that such a ‘case’ was instituted under Stalin).

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Three arguments refuting Anti-Stalinist Propaganda.

Counter-Argument 1. Stalin unleashed the Second World War.

The war was already in progress in 1935. In 1935-1936, Mussolini captured the only independent state in Africa, Ethiopia. In the years 1936-1939 Italian-German fascist aggression was happening in Spain, through which the Socialist Republic was eventually overthrown, and the fascist government of Franco established. Between 1937-1945 – the Japanese-Chinese War was in full effect. The Japanese captured Manchuria. The invasion of China was carried out by Japan – the ally of Hitler – as part of the Anti-Comintern Bloc. In 1938, Hitler had already annexed Austria and the Sudetenland. In March 1939, the whole of Czechoslovakia was next to fall. At the same time, we are assured that the world war began on September 1, 1939, by Hitler’s attack on Poland, and that subsequently, Stalin unleashed the war. In fact the war began in 1935-1937 with the tacit consent of Britain, France and the United States. And in 1938, with the open consent in Munich. The allies declared the beginning of the world war from the date of Hitler’s invasion of Poland, as a means to blame Stalin for the war, and as far as possible, absolve Hitler of any direct blame. The USSR, having entered Red Army troops in September 1939 in Poland, saved the Ukrainian and Byelorussian peoples from Hitler’s holocaust. All of the Western democracies deliberately obscure the Hitlerite racial programme entitled ‘Ost’ – which was formulated as the ‘liberation’ of the land from the ‘subhuman’ Slavs to the Urals, to make way for Nazi German colonisation. The extermination of Poles, Jews, Gypsies, Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanians was in preparation for the complete ‘Germanization’ of these areas.

Counter-Argument 2. Repression. The excesses in repression were a provocation of the fifth column.

This fact is documented. The counter-argument is confirmed by archival materials. Marshal of the Soviet Union (1935) MN Tukhachevsky, repressed in 1937 on the ‘Military Cause’, wrote in his manuscript that since 1932, with the support of Britain and Germany, he was preparing a conspiracy of generals that the Entente and Kolchak failed to accomplish. This time the goal was the overthrow of Stalin (there were plans for physical elimination). The proof of this is, in addition to the Tukhachevsky manuscript, declassified Soviet, German, British documents.

In the Central Committee of the CPSU (B), the conspiracy was led by the Lithuanian, Joseph Vareikis, who ‘distinguished himself’ in the first post of Secretary of the Dalarkai Committee of the CPSU (b) in 1937 by drawing up ‘execution lists’ and deporting Koreans to Central Asia. On September 8th, Vareykis sent Joseph Stalin a report on the work done, in which he told about the situation in the Far East and about the successes in exposing the enemies of the people. He reported that 500 spies were identified and shot only among railway workers.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Joseph ‘Juozas’ Vareikis 1894-1938

However, Vareikis was shot as a traitor on the verdict of the Military Collegium of the Supreme Court of the USSR. Particularly intense was the sabotage work on the national outskirts (including in Ukraine) with the aim of the collapse of the USSR. The plans of the (capitalist) West to shake the Soviet regime included a provocation with the drawing up of ‘shoot lists’ – to create the ‘myth’ of sacred sacrifices in the West. Against the background of the counter-operation of the OGPU-NKVD ‘against pests’, the slandering of honest people began, which included their inclusion on these lists. Then the so-called regional ‘firing troika’, consisting of the head of the regional department of the NKVD, the secretary of the regional committee and the regional prosecutor, was included in the work. The decisions were made by the three in absentia on the materials of the cases submitted by the NKVD authorities, and in some cases, and in the absence of any materials, on the lists of detainees submitted, even by telegraph (for example, from Igarka to Krasnoyarsk). The procedure for dealing with cases was free, no protocols were kept. A characteristic feature of cases considered by the “troika” was the minimum number of documents on the basis of which a decision was made to apply repression. By decision of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the CPSU (B) No. P65 / 116 of November 17, 1938, judicial trios were liquidated. The cases were referred to courts or to the Special Meeting of the NKVD of the USSR.

Supporting Fact 2. In the ‘years of repression’ in the USSR, there were no more people behind bars than in modern America. The number of victims of repression is overestimated.

Unbelievable but true. According to the International Center for Prison Studies (ICPS), today in an exemplary-democratic and free USA for one hundred thousand people there is an average of 738 people behind bars, or in absolute terms – 2 217 000 people in prison. For comparison, in Russia now this figure is 460 people per one hundred thousand, or 673 818 people.

According to statistics, which VN. Zemskov published in the magazine ‘Sotsis’, in the 1930s in the USSR, on average, there were 583 prisoners per one hundred thousand. Very important is the reservation that at that time in the USSR, according to eyewitness accounts, most of the criminals were behind bars, and in modern Russia, because of too liberal laws, often criminals are walking free.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

The Memorial Society, which is funded by the US NED Foundation, in an interview with Ekho Moskvy – he too was carried away by manipulating figures. The mechanism of manipulating the consciousness of society with political goals is expertly disclosed by the Soviet Russian scientist Sergei Georgievich Kara-Murza in his book, a training manual for students ‘Manipulation of consciousness.’ In Chapter 17, ‘Impact on the Equipping of the Mind’ dealing information with war programmes, this involves the effectiveness of the destruction of a person’s ability to ‘weigh’ phenomena, loss of sense of proportion when manipulating numbers, is particularly noted in the information warfare programmes: ‘It is not that a person loses the instrument of measurement and reduces accuracy,’ ‘He loses the very coordinating system into which we place reality in order to orient ourselves in it. and make more or less correct conclusions.’

‘The largest campaign to manipulate consciousness is with the help of numbers,’ in his opinion, was associated with Stalin’s repression: ‘Public consciousness still rejects any rational information about the actual quantitative scale of repression. So, it was their quantitative side that was important for manipulators.’

Similar machinations were made with the number of ‘kulak links’, and with the fate of Soviet prisoners of war returned after the German captivity, etc. Thus, the Soviet and Russian historians and writers, and the director of the State Museum of the History of the Gulag, Anton Vladimirovich Antonov-Ovseyenko wrote in his article: ‘According to General Supply Directorate of the Gulag, on remuneration in jails there were almost 16 million – according to the number of paikodachs in the first post-war years.’

However, the work of Sergei Kara-Murza exposes this falsification: ‘In the list of persons who used this document, Antonov-Ovseyenko’s surname is missing. Consequently, he did not see this document and interprets it using someone elses words, with a gross distortion of meaning. If AV Antonov-Ovseyenko saw this document, he would probably have paid attention to the comma between figures 1 and 6, since in reality in the fall of 1945 there were 1.6 million and not 16 million prisoners in the camps and colonies of the Gulag, Prisoners. In the materials of the all-Union population censuses of 1937 and 1939, the strength of the special contingent of the NKVD of group ‘B’ (prisoners and labourers) coincides with our data taken from the statistic records of the GULAG of the USSR NKVD, and the prison administration of the USSR NKVD and the Department of Labour Settlements of the GULAG of the NKVD USSR.’

It is a simple manipulation – remove the comma, and launch the false number in the media – and hundreds of millions of people believe it. When a stereotype arose, no arguments will change a mind already full of fear and used to being manipulated. Supposed political victims of repression were rare, whilst in reality most were ordinary criminals who were extradited. This is confirmed by the statistics of crimes. In 1940, with a population of 193 million people. In the USSR there were 6,549 murders, and in 2005 in Russia, with a population of 145 million people, there were almost 5 times more murders – 30,800.

Counter-Argument 3. Stalin dealt with the church and priests: falsification.

Archbishop Luke, Russian spiritual writer, Bishop of the Russian Orthodox Church; From May 1946, the archbishop of Simferopol and the Crimea, testifies that Stalin never fought the church: ‘Stalin fought for the greatness of Russia and actually preserved the Church of Christ from the pogrom carried out by the Trotskyites, most of them hated the Church, Russia, and the Russian people with Its history. Stalin preserved Russia, showed what it means to the world. Therefore, as an Orthodox Christian and a Russian patriot, I bow low to Stalin.’ Under Stalin, the State did not interfere in the affairs of the church, the church was free.’

In relation to religion, to the servants of the Russian Orthodox Church and to the Orthodox believers, the Central Committee decides: ‘1) It is inadvisable to continue the practice of the organs of the NKVD of the USSR with regard to the arrests of the servants of the Russian Orthodox Church, the persecution of believers. 2) Instruction of Comrade Ulyanov (Lenin) on May 1, 1919 for N13666-2 ‘On Combating Priests and Religion’, addressed to the pre. VChK to Comrade Dzerzhinsky, and all the relevant instructions of the Cheka – OGPU – NKVD, concerning the persecution of the Russian Orthodox Church servants and Orthodox believers – should be cancelled.’ EXTRACT FROM THE PROTOCOL N98 MEETING OF THE POLITBUREAU OF THE CC OF 11/11/1939.

The result. The personality of Stalin remains both historically and scientifically deficient in study. The demonization of his image in the West and in the USSR after his death does not allow scientists, even after the discovery of secret archives, to recreate a true picture of the life of the country in the reign of JV Stalin. The demonization of Stalin logically turned into demonization of the image of the whole country. Throughout Europe and the USA there is a biased attitude towards the head of state Joseph Stalin, whose image is even viewed as being worse than the war crimes committed by Adolf Hitler and his accomplices.

Based on the above, we submit the following provisions for public discussion:

1. The positive image of JV Stalin should be returned not only to the history of Russia, but also to the history of the world.

2. The merits of JV Stalin as a statesman are enormous. Stalin saved Russia from destruction after the First World War and the ensuing revolution, civil war and intervention. It is hardly possible to blame Stalin for all these upheavals. He did not give in to the countries of the Entente and the United States, and did not allow these enemies to tear the country to pieces. Moreover, he was able to restore almost all of Russia within the borders of the USSR, thus creating the conditions for all non-Russian republics to become economically and culturally prosperous state formations. None of these peoples before the USSR had a developed Statehood.

3. Stalin’s merits in the field of national construction are great. On the site of the ruins after the wars in Russia, he created a powerful Union of Soviet Socialist States, a supranational association that does not have any to compare to in history. Within the framework of the USSR, in the shortest time, all large and small peoples realized their rights. This is particularly true for the peoples of Central Asia, who have received their Statehood (i.e. Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Kazakhstan). In 1936, there was the right to work (there was no unemployment), the right to free education, the right to free medicine, and the right to rest (in all republics and regions there were built health resorts for adults, youth and children) all of which were guaranteed in the USSR. There was also access for each person to cultural activities: including books, Newspapers, cinema, theatre, museums, Statehood and the development of national culture. Schools, colleges, technical schools, universities, research institutes, and branches of the Academy of Sciences quickly spreading to the national outskirts, as well as industrial enterprises.

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

4. ‘The Stalinist system of labour’ was built on other economic laws, on a different socio-economic organization. European democracy, based on the pursuit of profit and capital markets, the Soviet system opposed exploitative labour and exploitative production. This system was created, functioned perfectly and was reflected in the shortest possible time in the successes of industrialization. Under Stalin, a society of social justice was built that did not know the bourgeois contradictions in the world that the Renaissance humanists dreamed of, based on a new socio-economic organization, excluding the wild laws of capitalist competition, which assert the dominance in the economy and politics (including international politics) of the financial oligarchy.

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

5. The process of uniting millions of people into collectives was started, in which the workers created new forms of self-organization in production, culture, sports, and crime control. All this was a manifestation of a genuine, different form of existence to that found in the Western democracies. Under Stalin, a society with humanistic values ​​was formed: collectivism, mutual assistance, diligence, internationalism, respect for elders, the desire to constantly improve their educational and cultural level. All this formed the basis for educating the youth. Organizations of the children’s pioneer and youth Komsomol movement also have no equivalent in the world.

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

6. In economics, the material values created in the Stalin years were enormous. The USSR became a country with the most advanced industry, the strategy of an import-substituting economy was successfully implemented. The USSR could produce any machinery and any equipment, including equipment for nuclear power. The foundations were laid for the creation of high-tech agriculture.

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

7. Stalin built a State that was not only able to protect its sovereignty during the Second World War, but also to save Europe and the world from fascism. During the Second World War he showed himself as a talented commander. In many cities of Europe and Asia they honour the memory of Stalin, who led the world’s greatest army to  victory over fascism. Streets and squares carry his name, sometimes even Stalin’s statues are found in many cities throughout Europe and Asia. Most of the monuments were demolished in the 1990s, an act of vandalism of a generation of children who did not know service at the front and the war against fascism, and had forgotten how people went into battle and died with the name of Stalin on their lips, how in three shifts from small to large they forged metal for Victory.

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

8. The rehabilitation of Stalin’s name will be a significant event for modern history. Today we observe the phenomena, in many respects similar to those with which our country collided 70-80 years ago. Russia is restoring its authority in the world, becoming a country independent of foreign influence. In this regard, the West initiated an information war against our people, against our successes in State building, against our President Vladimir Putin. In Russia itself, agents of the West have once again become more active.

Today, Russians are better able to understand the difficulties that their grandfathers encountered while building their sovereign State of a non-Western pattern. The ‘democratic’ West again tries not to allow us to go our own unique civilised way, and to make our own national choice, for which our Veterans have shed blood.

The rehabilitation of Stalin not only will prove our right to our national course, but it will also be an excellent hint for the ‘fifth column’ that the politeness of our people can not last forever. It will also be an act of the political will of the Russian people to support the President’s firm actions and policies aimed at strengthening the sovereignty of the country, to freeing it from Western economic dependence, and to clearing the perverse Western values ​​which are like a plague.

Today it becomes obvious: there was no cult of Stalin’s personality, there was a unity of the people around the leader in a complex war against internal and external aggression for the preservation of the Motherland. Similarly we are now consolidating around our leader. We already hear how the liberals talk about the personality cult of Putin.

It is absolutely justified today to review the role of personalities in history, which have preserved Russia, prevented its division and turned into a raw appendage of the West. On the contrary, it is necessary to give a historical assessment of the actions of the liberal rulers of the country, who, under the leadership of Western services, disorganized Russia and the USSR. The country must know the true heroes who served and strengthened the Motherland, and anti-heroes – those who destroyed it.

The wave of Stalin’s popularity is now growing, so both monuments and posters will appear. This is understandable: because only now we have become aware of the context of the domestic and world history of the 1930s. Now the spirit of fascism is again hovering over the world. The war is already being waged against Russia, conducted by new sophisticated methods and technologies. In the absence of opposition to this war, conditions for a crisis will again be created in Russia, as it was in the 1990s. Can we withstand again?

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

At the same time, ruthless figures and declassified documents show that most of the negative material about Stalin is fabricated. We propose to get rid of the stereotype, study the materials, restore historical justice, inscribe Stalin’s name in his era, see, for example, that next to the broken destinies of the Soviet peasants were the same broken destinies of American farmers in 1929, a million of which went ‘nowhere’, the middle class in the USA was completely ruined. These were the harsh laws of capitalist industrialization.

Historical facts show: Joseph Stalin was no more cruel than his contemporaries Churchill, Truman or Allen Dulles. The facts help to conclude that Stalin the ‘false’ Statesman is a fabrication of West historiography, and that, especially annoyingly, is the habit of some modern Russians to betray the Motherland, by taking on the fabrication about Stalin, and treating the lies as ‘truth’.

Soviet power lived in wartime and operated under the laws of the Soviet era. We believe that the truth will prevail. Stalin, who re-assembled a country that had been smashed to pieces, made it one and the greatest on Earth, and foresaw the information warfare initiated by the West, and rightly declared it a heap of debris, which the wind of history will disperse, and which will be delivered to his grave after death.

So it’s time to let this wind do its thing.

Authors Ilya Belous, Yuri Belous

©opyright: Adrian Chan-Wyles (ShiDaDao) 2017.

Original Russian Language Article:

http://politrussia.com/istoriya/menya-sprosili-nuzhen-456/

 

International Brigade Commemoration: Waterloo – London (1.7.2017)

20170701_182853

INTERNATIONAL BRIGADE MEMORIAL TRUST

MARX MEMORIAL LIBRARY

Although there are many statues, plaques and signs throughout Britain and Ireland commemorating the sacrifice of the British and Irish men and women who fought and died fighting for the Socialist ‘Republican’ government of Spain between 1936-1939, against the fascist forces of General Franco (backed by Nazi Germany and fascist Italy), for many, the main monument of remembrance remains that on London’s South Bank. The IBMT website states: ‘National memorial and sculpture by Ian Walters in Jubilee Gardens, SE1, to the 526 killed in Spanish Civil War who went to Spain from Britain and Ireland. Erected by Greater London Council and International Brigade Association and unveiled by Michael Foot MP, 5 October 1985. Moved to new site in the park in April 2012.’ Although the IBMT does sterling work, it also pursues a narrative that plays-down the ‘Communist’ and ‘Socialist’ nature of the International Brigades, and the fact that the Soviet Union recruited, funded, armed and trained volunteers from around the world through the National Branches of the International Communist Party. The thousands of volunteers were certainly not motivated to defend the very same bourgeois democracy that had brought Adolf Hitler to power, and various Western politicians in the UK, France (and elsewhere) who conspired to withhold all official help to a beleaguered ‘democratic’ Socialist government in Spain, and to actively strive to prevent leftwing volunteers from leaving their respective countries, and travelling to Spain to join one of the Soviet-inspired International Brigades. These same ‘democratic’ governments in the West further conspired to ‘punish’ all those who had bravely fought in Spain upon their return – with Winston Churchill ordering that they be denied any chances to join the British Armed Forces (even by conscription) during WWII, together with pressure being exerted upon the Veterans to be thrown-out of their employment unions, and denied access to jobs as a means to make a living. Another fact that is missing from the usual IBMT narrative, is that of how popular ‘fascism’ was throughout the Western democracies during the 1930’s, with even Winston Churchill writing glowing reports about Adolf Hitler in 1937! Obviously, as matters transpired, the British Working Class had other ideas that openly contradicted the hypocritical opinions entertained by the bourgeoisie. No – the men and women who volunteered for hardship and possible death in the International Brigades, were not inspired by a fight to save the very same bourgeois democracy that supported fascism and oppressed them at every turn – but were inspired to fight for Socialism as a means to ensure a world-wide Socialist Revolution. As we were marching through London yesterday in protest against the current rightwing Tory government, we were not able to attend the memorial in Jubilee Park. However, we did pay our respects for the fallen later in the day and took the photographs included on this blog entry. I also include the ‘new’ Spanish Civil War banner commissioned by Islington Museum. Another important depository of information about this subject is found in the ‘International Brigade Library’ held at the Marx Memorial Library in Clerkenwell, London. This collection not only includes historical books, official documents and papers, newspaper articles, and personal correspondence (as well as other memorabilia), but also marching banners celebrating the ‘Socialist’ and ‘Communist’ nature of the International Brigades, and their involvement in fighting fascism during the Spanish Civil War.

20170624_143839

20170701_181538

20170701_181547

20170701_181531

20170624_154211

%d bloggers like this: