Mahayana Buddha is Trans Gender

BMA-UK: The Buddha – Gender Fluid or Gender Irrelevant? (6.8.2026)

Of course, even in Shakespeare’s time in England – men dressed as women because women were not permitted to act on the stage. The Vinaya Discipline seeks to completely “cut-off” all sexual activity in the environment, body, and mind. This includes heterosexual, homosexual, and beastiality. This is what a Buddhist monastic is expected to follow – whilst a lay-person may get married and have children – providing there is an element of sexual control. This often comes down to use in the West as “No Adultery” – but in the old Pali Suttas, it is explained in a slightly different manner. In the time of the Buddha, a rich lay-man could marry up to four wives – and as it was the Hindu custom for a man to marry sisters – the Buddha advised that “control” in this instance was not to engage in sexual activity with anyone outside his wife’s family. Replacing this with “Adultery” is a clear example of how the bourgeois (Christian) West has tinkered with Asian Buddhism – and attempted to alter its essential nature. Adultery in the monogamous (modern) West is not the same as adultery in polygamous (ancient) India.

A joint statement from Trans+ Solidarity Alliance, Scottish Trans, and TransActual.

UK: Joint Statement – Trans+ Solidarity Alliance, Scottish Trans, & TransActual – EHRC’s Code of Practice Comes into Effect! (5.8.2026)

However, we decided to just turn-up at the UNITE double-decker bus (I was a member of that union at the time) – and see if we could blag our way through – and blag we did. If we had not taken direct action – Gee is very gay-friendly and the crowd took to her – we would not have been able to attend. I think the fact we are mixed-race couple acted as camouflaged for our presence (everyone thought someone had okayed it previously). As a straight couple – we were not permitted on the bus by the lesbians who occupied and controlled it. At one point, I was kissed by a gay Asian man – which was not traumatising to me at all. He asked Gee’s permission first. Later, as a straight, mixed couple, with mixed kids, the gay and trans people that sat in and around London landmarks with us – looked at us with such love that I cannot deny the experience. I am not telling you how to think – indeed – I would advise thinking for yourself by reading all the evidence and weighing things-up. As workers living in a capitalist society – we are already oppressed. Granting (or withholding) access to toilets will not change that – even if it might be seen as “progressive” and a “movement in the right direction”. A genuine Red Army soldier fights to defeat capitalism and fascism for ALL people – not just those the bourgeoise establishment decide are acceptable or persona non grata.

“This is a worker’s rights crisis for the trans community,” a spokesperson for the Trans Solidarity Alliance said.

UK: Judges References “Two Unyeilding Ideologies” – in Latest “Trans Rights” Ruling! (14.2.2026)

Lastly, I would say that People with Disabilities have to use “asexual” toilets – with the idea that the ordinary “Male” and “Female” toilets should not be altered to accommodate disability (this is viewed as inconveniencing the non-disabled). The Disabled have no right to expect single-sex toilets – as such an adaptation would cost “too much”. However, and simultaneously, Women’s’ toilets are altered to accommodate pregnant women and women with babies – sometimes with an entirely separate and spacious area designed for breast-feeding and nappy-changing (in these separate spaces – both parents are allowed in together – or one or the other without comment – meaning men “share” women’s toileting areas). Quite often, the Disabled Toilets are co-opted by the able-bodied to act as spare toilets for themselves – or for mother and baby rooms – thus depriving the Disabled of the limited toilet-spaces the law has granted them after decades of campaigning for equal rights. The Disabled are continuously told it is unreasonable to expect better toileting conditions – or to keep the non-Disabled “out” of their areas. Of course, the Disabled are excluded from the “Trans” Vs “CIS” turf-war that is going on – but their plight does shed some light on this issue.

Council of Geeks - Vira Wylde!

Genuine Anti-Fascism = Pro-Trans Rights! (10.3.2025)

A similar situation exists regarding the fact that I am not “religious” in the conventional sense – but support the right for all-beings to be religious or not – atheist, non-theist or theist, etc. In a time when the Socialist-Communist left is literally “dead in the water” – it is ironic that it is from within the Trans community that the most (Marxist-Leninist) progression is emerging. Just as racism and transphobia permeates the entirety of the White, Black, and Asian community – this ignorance manifests equally on the political left, right, and centre.

Daleks Were Based On the Nazi German SS!

UK: Doctor Who, Billy Lipton, and Social Engineering! (29.12.2024)

Of course, those that run the BBC are behind this nonsense and deformation. My point is that the Doctor is the essence of toleration. We do not need to see everything he is “tolerating” being paraded (as if on a conveyor-belt) in every episode – as Doctor Who is first and foremost an “escape” from reality! It should not be a reflection of reality or a confirmation of reality. If this neutral position is msintained as a foundation – then every type of realty (not just one preferred reality) can be shown on the screen at different times in such a manner that does not illicit a moral resistance from the audience. As the situation stands, Doctor Who has become a ghetto for one type of existence – and this seems designed to kill-off the series on the BBC insulting the British people to oblivion. This is the same BBC that has supported Neo-Nazi Ukaine from 2014 – and is currently ignoring the Israeli “Genocide” that is unfolding in Gaza! The current incarnation of the BBC possesses NO moral foundation – so how can we trust it to produce a morally wholsesome Doctor Who?

Lin Yu-Ting - Female Boxing Champion!

Women’s Olympic Boxing: Fighting in the Shadow of Far-Right Gender Wars! (17.8.2024)

Women tend to be quick, clever, and light on their feet. Being kicked and punched toughens their mind and body in the training hall – so that if they are attacked on the street they might well survive and prevail against their attacker. In Old China, particularly amongst the Hakka people, men and women formed huge medieval armies that fought on the battlefield using ancient weaponry! Women fought and died alongside men – and that was just the way things were. In modern armies, women train with the men and go to war against men – women are capable fighters. It is anti-intellectual to assume that a woman will be killed or badly hurt in the ring if she happens to spar with a male. I know for a fact that female boxers routinely spar with male opponents whilst preparing for important fights with other women – as this conditioning develops extra strength and endurance! The idea that women should not fight is sexist and just another example of far-right misogyny!

1 2 3 5