China ‘Bans’ the Commercial Ivory Trade (1.1.2018)

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
I was asked if it is true that Communist China has ‘banned’ ivory imports. The up to date headlines state:
 
‘全球野生动物保护迎来里程碑事件,2018年1月1日起,我国将全面禁止商业用途的象牙加工及销售。为了让公众更多地参与到拒绝象牙贸易、保护大象的行列中。’
 
This confirms the ‘ban’ is correct and comes into force midnight on January 1st, 2018:
 
‘As part of China’s world-wide policy of animal preservation and protection, as of the 1.1.2018, China will ‘ban’ all ivory imports intended for processing and commercial purposes. The general public will receive the appropriate education, and be encouraged to support and perpetuate this ‘ban’.’
 
To assist in the policing of this ‘ban’, Baidu is launching a new phone app which connects Chinese citizens directly to the appropriate rapid response police department. The modern Chinese State is of the opinion that killing elephants for their tusks is a thing of the past, and that the traditions premised upon this trade must adapt to modern times. In December 2016, the General Office of the State Council of China issued a regulation stating that all ivory processing was to be curtailed and reduced, so that all such activity ceases by December 31, 2017. Anyone caught dealing in this trade after the 1.1.2018 will be severely punished according to the Law of the PRC.

Chinese Language Source:

http://tech.china.com/article/20171230/2017123093928.html

Ten Examples of Western Charity Corruption

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

‘Those who toil and live in want all their lives are taught by religion to be submissive and patient while here on earth, and to take comfort in the hope of a heavenly reward. But those who live by the labour of others are taught by religion to practise charity while on earth, thus offering them a very cheap way of justifying their entire existence as exploiters and selling them at a moderate price tickets to well-being in heaven.’

VI Lenin: Socialism and Religion

Charities are businesses ‘exempt’ from paying tax under UK Law. Many of these charities arose in the 18th and 19th families, and were founded by individuals and families who had made vast fortunes during the Industrial Revolution (and the vicious exploitation of the workers), and also through the institution of trans-atlantic slavery (and the brutal exploitation of African men, women and children). This process of immense wealth-generation was aided and abetted by European imperialism and colonialism throughout the world. British society was highly dichotomised with a minority rich on the one hand, and a majority poor on the other. This era also saw the founding of a permanent ‘police force’ designed to protect the interests and privileges of the rich, from any incursion by the poor. The Christian Church – which had fully backed the exploitation of the poor, imperialism and war – advised its rich followers to give a small portion of their ample income for charitable causes. This process was never intended to ‘end’ the injustices apparently highlighted by these charitable causes, but rather to temporarily ‘elevate’ the problem – whilst ensuring the issue continues as a means to generate further income. Bear in mind that it is common practice for the modern charities to use only 10% of all the money raised in the name of the cause, whilst 90% of the income generated by the cause is used to pay often excessive salaries, and the rent for large buildings in fashionable parts of town. These ‘corporate’ charities often deploy a ‘demeaning’ attitude toward the people they are supposed to be helping, which manifests as ‘racism’ during campaigns abroad. This is because all these self-serving charities are thoroughly ‘bourgeois’ in essence, and interested only in retaining their own class privilege. The video below, explains ’10’ prominent cases of shocking charity-abuse, malpractice and illegal activity.

  1. Zoe’s Ark. Workers were prosecuted and imprisoned in France for the mass ‘kidnapping’ of African children to be ‘sold’ as ‘adoptees’ to rich, White middle class French families.
  2. Kenya Clothes Donation. Second-hand clothing from the West has been ‘donated’ to Kenya and other areas of Africa, but in reality, this means these garments and shoes are sold en mass through local markets at cheap prices. This has destroyed the local textile and shoe-making industry, causing wide-spread poverty and starvation, etc.
  3. UN Cholera Outbreak. The UN, whilst attempting to assist during the Haiti Earthquake, transmitted the Cholera disease into Haiti from its bases in Nepal. This killed 8,000 people in Haiti – but the UN refuses to the surviving families compensation.
  4. BBC Children in Need. between 1999 and 2002, the BBC Children in Need Charity funded Islamic terrorism in the UK.
  5. World Food Program – Somalian Warlords. Over $200 million in aid was directed to Islamo-fascist organisations in Somalia – and not to the ordinary people who were starving and being brutalised and murdered by the Islamo-fascists.
  6. Tsunami Rivalry. Western charities raised $10.5 billion for Tsunami relief across Asia, following the 2004 Tsunami. The charities refused to co-ordinate with one another, but instead ‘competed’ for media exposure and corporate sponsorship. None of these charities would communicate with the local ‘Asian’ Authorities, and would not listen to the needs of local survivors.
  7. Saville Sex Abuse. The rightwing Tory Margaret Thatcher gave Jimmy Saville unlimited power and access to the paralysed people being treated at Stoke Mandeville Hospital. He would sexually abuse those paralysed from the neck downwards, and raped an 8-year-old girl on 10 different occasions as her family visited a relative.
  8. Live Aid. The 1985 Pop Concert designed to relieve famine in Ethiopia, donated millions of ponds to the rightwing Ethiopian government, the leader of which ethnically cleansed the population of the north – placing the displaced people in Concentration Camps. It is estimated that 100,000 Ethiopians died as a consequence of Live Aid interference.
  9. Rwanda Humanitarian Aid. Charities from the West granted ‘protection’ to the mass murderers in Rwanda following the 1994 genocide. This ‘protection’ allowed the massacres to continue with the sanction of the Western charities operating in the region.
  10. Afghan Bombs. Tens of thousands of innocent Afghanis (many of the children) have been killed by Western ammunition left scattered around the country. Many mistake artillery rounds for food parcels dropped by Western charities.

Beware Dishonest Trotskyite Fascists!

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

This documentary dishonestly borrows the critique of capitalism from Karl Marx and his ground-breaking ‘Das Kapital’ – but never credits Marx or overtly explains that Marx remains the only intellectual in history to expose capitalism in this manner. This would suggest the ‘entryism’ of Trotskyites, but also confirms what might be termed ‘hyper-individualism’ (associated with such movements as rightwing Anarchism). As bourgeois individualism is a consequence of the capitalist division of labour, this documentary supports the capitalist system, whilst appearing to criticise certain, or specific aspects of it. Early US presidents such as James Madison and Andrew Jackson were not ‘anti-capitalist’ (as neither advocated any type of ‘Socialism’), but anti-internationalist banking system (a symptom of early US ‘isolationism’), and remained opposed to ‘national’ or ‘central’ banks remaining in the hands of private individuals. The dishonesty continues in this documentary by suggesting the Russian Czars were opposed to capitalism – they most certainly were not – or that the British invaded the USA in a vicious war of expansionism. It is not that the British were not ‘expansionist – they most certainly were – but in 1812 it was the United States that had ‘declared war’ on Great Britain because of its imperialist control of the seas, and its equally imperialist operations of ‘closed markets’.

The Soviet-Communism section is ahistorical and incorrect. In 1918, the US, UK, Germany (and 11 other capitalist countries) invaded Revolutionary Russia to protect the Czar (and the money afforded to him), whilst attempting to destroy Bolshevism. All capitalist debts in Russia were wiped-out by Lenin in Russia (as they were in every truly ‘Socialist’ countires), and as a punishment, all capitalist governments (and the international banking system) excluded the USSR from any and all international trade and financial aid. The same has happened to ALL Socialist countries including China, Vietnam and Cuba. There is no reliable objective evidence that Lenin (or Mao) was given any international money – in fact, the exact opposite is true. The ignoring of Western racism and imperialism across the world, and espousing of a bourgeois individualism, demonstrates the ‘Trotskyite’ nature of this documentary which carefully weaves fact and anti-Scientific Socialist fiction together.

Beware of anti-Semitism. Although it is true that banking families such as the Rothschilds have undue influence across the world, this fact should be honestly and objectively studied free of any notion of anti-Jewish racism. Not all bankers are Jewish, and not all Jews support capitalism. A concise criticism of the privately owned international banking system must be free of any notions of racism, if it is to be academically viable. As the documentary makers have blatantly ‘lied’ about International Communism, it is logical to assume that in this more than 3 hour documentary which conveys a bewildering array of information, certain aspects will be wrong, and designed to serve an equally false central narrative. Jews are not the problem – capitalism is. This documentary aims to swamp the average viewer with so many apparent facts that its central narrative (that ‘Jews’ and ‘Communists’ are bad), is never questioned. The length of this documentary (not uncommon in ‘new world order’ narratives) is part of the deception. This amalgam of apparent facts appears authoritative and the final word on the matter, as most people do not possess the time, education or ability to deconstruct such a narrative. In this regard, such racist and anti-Socialist narratives constitute an often engaging and entertaining form of rightwing (i.e. ‘fascistic’) propaganda designed to continue predatory capitalism and not to curtail it. The Trotskyite fascists behind this documentary do not want to remove ‘capitalism’ from human society, but rather Jewish bankers from within capitalism. This is nothing but the continuation of Hitlerite disinformation and must be opposed by every true Socialist.

 

Imprison Nick Clegg – Do Not ‘Knight’ Him!

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

We object to Nick Clegg being offered a Knighthood

Nick Clegg – as the Leader of the Liberal Democrats, and as Deputy Prime Minister in the Tory-LibDems Coalition (2010-2015), was responsible not only for the facilitation of the devastating ‘Austerity’ policy initiated by both political parties, but also the subsequent deaths of around 120,000 vulnerable, poor and disabled people in the UK, through the privatisation of the NHS and the dismantling of the Welfare State. In fact, the UN in 2016 found the Tory-LibDems Coalition Government ‘Guilty of Crimes Against Humanity’ for the deaths of at least 10,000 people in the UK suffering from a range of disabilities. As a consequence of the illegal actions of Nick Clegg, the UK now joins Nazi Germany as the only two countries in Europe to have been internationally investigated and confirmed as violators of Human Rights. Nick Clegg is not a role model – he is a criminal – who should be imprisoned and not granted a knighthood by the Queen.

How Dishonest Medieval Goldsmiths Invented Fractional Banking

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

4th President of the United States

Around 1000 CE, the goldsmiths in Britain began the tradition of modern banking by taking custody of gold deposits from the general public, and storing those deposits in their own vaults. A paper ‘credit note’ was then issued to the owner of the gold deposit, which recorded (in writing) the ‘value’ (i.e. ‘weight’) of the gold, which was believed to easier (and safer) to carry around. A credit note could be lost or stolen, but the gold deposit itself remained safely hidden away – at least in theory. Originally, the goldsmiths issued credit notes that exactly expressed the amount of gold that was held in their vaults, but over-time, they realised that they could issue credit notes on the value of gold that they did not possess, and that nobody outside of the goldsmith industry had the ability to understand what was happening. Goldsmiths could issue vast loans to private individuals or businesses, charge ‘interest’ on the repayment of the loans, and no one within British society was the wiser. This is the birth of ‘fractional banking’, whereby the banking system accepts deposits, or makes loans or investments, whilst only required by law to hold reserves equal to only a fraction of its deposit liabilities. This means that a bank might only possess as little as 10% in actual gold, compared to the face-value of the credit notes it issues. Credit notes, of course, are today usually termed ‘bank notes’, or ‘paper money’.

This means that the basis of modern capitalism, although it has its roots in ancient times, (the biblical Jesus is said to have used violence against the money-lenders in the Jewish Temple), is dishonest and misleading. The goldsmiths were able to gain control of individuals, businesses, governments and monarchs, simply through the act of issuing more paper money than the gold reserves they possessed. Furthermore, when loans were repaid (with interest), the goldsmiths actually acquired a material wealth that they did not originally possess. If any monarch (or government) attempted to ‘expose’ or ‘curtail’ this banking industry the goldsmiths would simply ‘limit’ the amount of paper money in circulation, and immediately call-in all their loans (stacking misery upon misery for the ordinary people). If monarchs and governments granted the goldsmiths privileges, social status and political and religious influence, the goldsmiths would reward society by issuing more paper money – generating the false impression that times were ‘good’.

Of course, when the issuing of paper money exceeds the value of actual gold deposits, that paper money is worth far less than the value stated in print. This is how the banking system trades off of fictional gold reserves, generating billions in profits through loans and deposits, and then re-calls all these liabilities when the ‘inflation’ the bankers of generated, causes the economy to ‘collapse’. The modern bankers (as did the ancient goldsmiths) behave as if the processes of ‘boom’ and ‘bust’ that they generate (through their institutional dishonesty). and administer through their corrupt banking system, have nothing to do with them, and are the fault of the ordinary people who suffer due to their manifestation. As the bankers now fully administer the capitalist system by directly controlling governments, big businesses, the media, education and the electoral process (in the liberal, democratic West), all aspects of modern society are geared toward serving their greed. Times of economic hardship or economic ease are falsely presented to the ordinary people as objective forces of nature that no one control, when in fact the forces of ‘boom’ and ‘bust’ are nothing more than unnatural contrivances fabricated in the minds of ‘elitist’ greedy men and women, given expression through the various structures of society (including the Christian Church), the independence of which have been historically ‘surrendered’ by various monarchs and governments. Socialist governments, of course, reject the this highly exploitative and predatory bourgeois banking system and immediately ‘cancel’ all usury debt following a ‘Revolution’ – ths explains the ‘resistance’ to Socialism in the capitalist West, and the vitirol aimed at it – for Scientific Socialism (through the work of Karl Marx) fully exposes this corrupt system for what it is, but it is interesting to note how truly ‘Revolutionary’ some of the early US Presidents actually were.

The US Was ‘Fascist’ Before the Rise of Donald Trump

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Although the North Americans fought on the side of the Soviet Union during WWII, and played a part in capturing, prosecuting and executing hundreds of fascist and Nazi War Criminals (including German, Japanese, Italians and other collaborators) after WWII, this activity did not prevent the United States granting US Citizenship (and immunity from prosecution) to numerous fascistic German and Japanese military and scientific personnel (who would have otherwise been held ‘legally’ responsible for their War Crimes). These ‘exempt’ fascists were all deemed important for the knowledge they had accrued before and during the WWII in the areas of mass extermination, torture, terrorism, and murder. From 1945 onwards, the US Government fully and overtly aligned itself with the fascist far-right, and used this alliance as a means to rhetorically attack the Soviet Union, and militarily threaten its borders. This development is not surprising, as despite its liberal and democratic veneer (invariably propagandised as ‘freedom’), the US is a racist country that favours the White Middle Class, and which trains its police forces to threaten and kill unarmed non-White people as a matter of routine (this is as well as its equally continuous murder of poor White people, or the persecution of White people who stand-up against all forms of police brutality).  Leading up to WWII, African-Americans were subjected to public lynchings, which involved crowds of out of control and rabid White people torturing and murdering Black people through hanging, with the bodies being further abused and mutilated after death (postcards were often taken of these hideous events, and posted around the country. Many scenes depicted White children jumping with joy as the Black victims suffered terrible pain and deprivation of life). During WWII, whilst German-Americans (and other allied White Americans) strutted around in Nazi German uniforms and administered Hitlerite ‘straight-armed salutes’, innocent and loyal Japanese-American families were ‘illegally’ detained and placed in US Concentration Camps – termed ‘Resettlement Camps’ for the official records (as a means of masking the true fascistic nature of this policy). In reality, the US possessed a social system that had far more in common with Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, than it had in the more ‘Socialistic’ countries of Western Europe and Scientific Socialism of the USSR. Of course, leading up  to the 1941 US entry into WWII, many prominent Americans advocated not supporting the UK in its fight against Nazi Germany, but instead suggested that America should make a ‘separate’ peace with Adolf Hitler. All these observations demonstrate that in reality, the US use of fascist War Criminals in its post-WWII anti-Soviet offensive was nothing ‘new’ or particularly ‘unusual’, as the social fascism employed internally within the United States was simply ‘modified’ and turned ‘outward’ and onto the international stage. The bankrupted and destroyed counties of Western Europe became the victims of US imperialist control, and through the anti-Socialist Truman Doctrine and anti-peace Marshall Plan, Europe’s naturally Socialistic position was destroyed in favour of a virulent US-derived, fascistic policy of warmongering and educational deficiency. This US influence eventually led to the formation of the anti-Socialist and inherently racist European Union (EU). The election of Donald Trump is not the aberration White American liberals would have you believe, but is in reality fully in keeping with all the observable social trends evident throughout US history. This is why Donald Trump is an affirmation of the US fascistic system, and is not a deviation from it.

Perceptual Development Cannot Be Forced

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Who is pulling our strings? Most people remain unaware that they have been conditioned to follow somebody else’s view of reality, mistakenly thinking that they are being ‘free spirited’ and exercising ‘self-determination’. Any attempt to ‘expose’ this conditioning is invariable interpreted as an ‘oppressive’ or ‘draconian’ act, designed to limit ‘free expression’. What is interesting to observe, is how human-beings interpret the cognitive and physical limitations within which they exist, as being completely ‘free’ of any outside influence, when in reality this kind of existence is nothing but a conditioned ‘restriction’ operating within every direction. Those ‘trapped’ in this condition are prepared to ‘fight’ to retain their imprisonment – incorrectly viewing ‘limitation’ as being ‘limitless’ in nature. This demonstrates that ‘freedom’ from conditioning cannot be ‘forced’ upon an individual or group, but must be carefully planned and provided for through a subtle and tolerant ‘learning curve’. This is achieved through the agency of education, and requires a steady but precise exposure of past conditioning, so that a pristine state of mind can be rediscovered that facilitates multi-dimensional perception, and the ability to see different points of view, and select the most correct mode of behaviour in any given situation. If at any time an arbitrary use of ‘force’ is used, those being educated will simply contract around their past conditioning, and adhere its strictures to an ever more fanatical degree. This is why tolerance and wisdom go hand in hand, and do not contradict one another. On the other hand, there does exist a very real need to defend one’s ideas and values against fascism, terrorism and other forms of draconian social interaction and organisation. Although structure is undoubtedly required in one form or another, it must be a structure that simultaneously ‘progresses’ as it ‘frees’. Restricting expression so as to ensure a regressive state of mind, is of no use to the evolution of the individual or group.

Mariya Oktyabrskaya (1905-1944) – Stalin’s Soviet Tank Commander!

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

(Research and translation by Adrian Chan-Wyles PhD)

Translator’s Note. The US (Engish) Wikipedia page is deficient when relating the true story of Mariya Oktyabrskaya, and has many facts either missing or just wrong. For instance, Wikipedia states that in 1941, Mariya was ’38’ years old, when the same article gives her birthdate as 1905 (which would make Mariya around ’36’ years old in 1941). Interestingly, whereas the US, Russian and Ukrainian Wikipedia pages all give her birthdate as ‘1905’, a number of other historical Russian language sources give Mariya’s birthdate as being ‘1902’. An ‘official’ Monument to Mariya states ‘1905’, whilst another states ‘1902’. The narratives I have read appear to favour a ‘1905’ birthdate:

 

Furthermore, as US Wikipedia supports the neo-Nazi ‘Maidan’ Movement currently committing atrocities in Western Ukraine, it incorrectly gives Mariya’s name in the modified Cyrillic script preferred by the Ukrainian neo-Nazis, instead of her actual name, which is historically always written in standard Russian Cyrilic (i.e. ‘Мария Васильевна Октябрьская ‘ as opposed to the incorrect Ukrainian ‘Марія Василівна Октябрська ‘). Mariya was born in the Russian area of the Crimea, but even Ukrainians are ‘Russian’ as they are descendents of the Slavic (i.e. Viking) King Rurik I. Nikita Khruschev, for reasons known only to himself, transferred the Crimea to be administered as part of the Ukraine whilst both areas existed as psrt of the Soviet Union. There had been a terrible problem with a minority of Western Ukrainians during the ‘Great Patriotic War’ (1941-1945), which had seen Ukrainians joining the Nazi German extermination squads, and assisting in the murders of millions of people in the area. The special forces of the NKVD eventually put-down this fascist insurgency in 1947 – but many of the Ukrainian Neo-Nazis today state that they are proudly descended from these fascist collaborators and War Criminals. The point to remember here, is that Mariya Oktyabrskaya had already lived and died nearly a decade before Crimea and Ukraine were administratively linked, and along with her husband, was proud to be a ‘Soviet’ citizen and a ‘Russian’ patriot. Furthermore, the Ukrainian neo-Nazis have started a separate ‘modified’ ‘cyrillic’ Wikipedia page that misrepresents the life of Mariya Oktyabrskaya, claiming that she was ‘Ukrainian’, and it is this fascistic page that the US (English) Wikipedia page has decided to emulate. This demonstrates the ‘rightwing’ agenda of the US Wikipedia franchise. Following the ‘Maidan’ neo-Nazi rise to power in Western Ukraine in 2014, the people of Crimea democratically voted to return to non-fascist Russia. Predictably, the US (English) wikipedia page covering the history of Crimea, trumpets the Ukrainian neo-Nazi distortion of history. Despite all this racism and misrepresentation, however, I have accessed Russian language sources and convey here the ‘real’ story of Mariya Oktyabrskaya as part of the commemoration of the 100th Anniversary of the Great October Russian Revolution! ACW (28.12.2017)

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.png

Mariya Vasilyevna Oktyabrskaya (Мария Васильевна Октябрьская) [1905-1944] was born ‘Mariya Garagulya’ (Мария Гарагуля) in the Crimean region of the Soviet Union. She was of ‘Russian’ (i.e, ‘Slavic’) ethnicity, and was a very loyal citizen of the USSR and committed Communist. Mariya married Ilya Ryadnenko (Илью Рядненко) in 1925. Ilya Ryadnenko was a Cadet training at the highly regarded Soviet Cavalry School, and was also a committed Communist, both he and Mariya decided that they would create a progressive and fully ‘Socialist’ family in the USSR, and as such, changed their surname to ‘October’ (Октябрьская – Oktyabrskaya) out of respect for the 1917 October Revolution (led by Lenin), which had given them every possible help, support and advantage in life.

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

As a Red Army Officer’s wife, Mariya – born into a large family of peasants – was devoted, honest, selfless and tireless in her work, as she followed her Red Army husband from one Garrison appointment to another. She was particularly skilful in all aspects of needle-work, and was renowned for the quality of her work. However, although needle-work was a ‘traditional’ skill learned by women in Russia, as the Soviet Union legally treated women as being ‘equal’ to men in every respect, Mariya trained to be a Medic, drive a car and efficiently operate a machine-gun, as well as operate a military radio-set. In June, 1941, when the military forces of Nazi Germany invaded the Soviet Union, Mariya (and her husband) lived in Chisinau. with Ilya Oktyabrsky then serving in the 134th Howitzer Artillery Regiment.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

With the outbreak of war, Mariya (and other military families) were evacuated to Tomsk – whilst her husband remained at the front. As a Member of the Red Army (in a ‘reserve’ capacity), Mariya resumed her role as a radio-operator. However, in August, 1941, Mariya received notification that her husband – the Regimental Political Commissar – had died bravely leading a Soviet attack – when he was hit and killed by a machine-gun burst. Mariya immediately volunteered for front-line duty to serve the Soviet Union and wreak revenge upon the Nazi German invaders! However, even though she was qualified for front-line service, her request was denied because she was already 36 years old. This decision was premised upon the results of her medical examination, which revealed that she was suffering from tuberculosis of the cervical vertebrae. Mariya Oktyabrskaya then decided to personally purchase a ‘tank’ as a direct contribution to the anti-fascist war-effort. Although this sounds unusual today, there was nothing incredible about this idea, as the entire country was then collecting funds for military equipment and weapons. However, to purchase a tank was a very expensive under-taking! Even selling everything that she owned, Mariya could not afford anything near the price of a combat vehicle. This is where Mariya was very clever and made use of her embroidering skills. Arriving home from duty at the tele-communication station, Mariya would sit at the craft-frame, and embroider napkins, tablecloths, and towels. As her work was so valued, more and more orders arrived and she soon made a large amount of money which she gave to the anti-fascist war-effort. The right amount – 50 thousand rubles – was collected and sent to the State Bank by the spring of 1943.

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Mariya did not just want to purchase a Red Army tank for general purpose, she wanted to operate it herself as part of a direct contribution to the anti-fascist war-effort. To this end, Mariya took the unusual step of writing a telegram directly to Joseph Stalin which read:

«Дорогой Иосиф Виссарионович! В боях за Родину погиб мой муж — полковой комиссар Октябрьский Илья Федотович. За его смерть, за смерть всех советских людей, замученных фашистскими варварами, хочу отомстить фашистским собакам, для чего внесла в госбанк на построение танка все свои личные сбережения — 50 000 рублей. Танк прошу назвать «Боевая подруга» и направить меня на фронт в качестве водителя этого танка. Имею специальность шофера, отлично владею пулеметом, являюсь ворошиловским стрелком. Шлю Вам горячий привет и желаю здравствовать долгие, долгие годы на страх врагам и на славу нашей Родины. Октябрьская Мария Васильевна»

‘Dear Joseph Vissarionovich! In the battles for the Motherland my husband, the Regimental Commissar Oktyabrsky Ilya Fedotovich, was killed. For his death, for the death of all Soviet people tortured by fascist barbarians, I want revenge on these fascist dogs, a cause for which I contributed all my personal savings into the State Bank as a means to build a tank – 50,000 rubles. I request that the tank be named ‘Combat Girlfriend’, and that I be allowed to operate it during frontline operations. I can already drive and operate a machine-gun, and I have been trained as a ‘Voroshilov’ sharp-shooter. I send you my warmest greetings and wish you long, long years of life. May you strike fear into our enemies and for the eternal glory of our Socialist Motherland. Oktyabrskaya Maria Vasilyevna.’

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Joseph Stalin soon sent the following reply:
«Тов. Октябрьской Марии Васильевне. Благодарю Вас, Мария Васильевна, за Вашу заботу о бронетанковых силах Красной Армии. Ваше желание будет исполнено. Примите мой привет. И. Сталин»
‘Comrade. Oktyabrskaya Maria Vasilievna. Thank you, Maria Vasilievna, for your concern about the armoured forces of the Red Army. Your desire will be fulfilled. Please accept my greetings. J. Stalin.’
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Between September, 1943 and March 1944, Mariya served in the 26th Guards Tank Brigade, starting as a Mechanic and Driver, but soon rose up through the ranks (due to her bravery), eventually reaching rank of Guards Senior Sergeant. Mariya eventually commanded the T-34 she had paid for and named ‘Combat Girlfriend’. Mariya was very skilled at clearing Nazi German machine-gun nests, and seeking-out and destroying well-hidden Nazi German artillery emplacements and ammunition dumps in and around the Vitebsk area of Belarus. She was expert in the handling of the T-34 machine gun and was renowned for taking on and clearing Nazi German infantry. Mariya, as an expert mechanic, was also able to repair the T-34 tracks when damaged by Nazi German fire – even when still in the midst of battle. She would climb out of the tank and ignore the enemy fire whilst performing her tasks. In January, 1941, whilst fighting near Vitebsk, Mariya guided hr T-34 tank through the enemy defenses and destroyed a number of entrenched Nazi German positions. Whilst repairing the tracks of her T-34 tank, however, she was hit in the head and remaind in a coma for two months before dying. On August 2nd, 1944, the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR awarded (by decree) the title of Hero of the Soviet Union (posthumously) for courage and heroism displayed in many battles – to Senior Guard Sergeant Mariya Vasilievna Oktyabrskaya . The tank, acquired by Mariya Vasilyevna, was destroyed by the Germans in one of the battles. However, a young Soviet tank man, in memory of their dead mother and Commander, wrote on the tower of one of the new tanks, the words ‘Combat Girlfriend’. After the fighting for Minsk, this tank was decommissioned, but the proud inscription appeared on the tower of another tank, and after this tank was hit, there was another tank with this writing on its turret, meaning the memory of the ‘Combat Girlfriend’ continued to fight the Nazi Germans right up to Koenigsberg, where this tank ended its career.

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Russian Language Sources:

http://aeslib.ru/istoriya-i-zhizn/velikie/geroj-sovetskogo-soyuza-oktyabrskaya-mariya-vasilevna.html

http://www.neveroyatno.info/news/boj_baby/2014-03-13-2218

http://russian7.ru/post/mariya-oktyabrskaya-zhenshhina-tank-pro/

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Октябрьская,_Мария_Васильевна

US (English) Wikipedia Page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariya_Oktyabrskaya

Fake Neo-Nazi Ukrainian Wikipedia Page:

https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Октябрська_Марія_Василівна

Fake US (English) Wikpedia Page (Crimea):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimea

 

 

The ‘Evil’ T-34 Soviet Tank

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

T-34-85 Model 1944 “Factory No.174”

The minority rich control the political system. As the minority rich controls politics, this wealthy class also dictates the cultural direction of civil society and the use of its military. To maintain this physical power and psychological dominance, the population that comprises this society must be kept docile and in a state of unquestioned and unchallenged arrested intellectual development. This is accomplished by the minority rich retaining an iron-like grip upon the police, the legal and judicial systems, the education system, and the media. Thrown into this mix of a socio-economic control mechanism, is the cynical use of religious ignorance to hold everything together (as even bourgeois secularism is ‘religion’ stripped of its most obvious, outer religious garb). Western secular society has grown out of a staunch ecclesiastical dominance, and is premised upon a judeo-Christian theology that nolonger directly relates to the church (unless of course, one happens to believe in Christianity). Any attempt at breaking free from this bourgeois dominance (using Socialist thinking) is immediately attacked, decried, and misrepresented as being against the best interests of the majority poor. This is rather like stating that it is not in the best interests of slaves to be ‘free’ of the oppressive, material conditions of their enslavement. As long as the majority poor are brain-washed to interpret their own freedom from capitalism as ‘enslavement’, the minority rich will continue to control society unopposed.

Notice how the minority rich maintain their power through ‘inverted’ or ‘reversing’ reality by turning it inside-out, and back to front. Although the minority rich control a science that uses the ‘non-inverted’ observation and measurement of matter and material processes, its scope remains deliberately ‘narrow’, and is never allowed to formulate theories that contradict the dominance of capitalism within society. This type of science is premised upon generating monetary profit from innovation, and so humanity’s progress is continuously hindered by market share and projected income, etc. Outside of science, however, the inverted mind-set of religion is retained to keep the docile masses afloat in a morass of religious ignorance, and unable to see ‘beyond’ the limitations of its own conditioning. Above all, this psychological and physical enslavement must be viewed as ‘freedom’, and any attempt to end this enslavement must be interpreted as ‘tyranny’, ‘dictatorship’, and ‘the loss of freedom’. The minority rich also divide the international working class into competing camps of industrial out-put, and through the fabrication of ‘nationalism’, encourages workers to fight amongst themselves using the false constructs of ‘race’ and ‘racism’ as justify causes. We can see this today in the continuous misrepresentation of China’s history and its exercise of self-determination since 1949. Racism is aimed at China (and other non-White – non-capitalist countries), because of its rejection of predatory capitalism and Western dominance.

The same process of incorrectly depicting the purpose and history of the Soviet Union can also be clearly seen, not only in the capitalist West, but also within certain sectors of modern Russia’s intelligentsia. As this essentially ‘racist’ misrepresentation of the history of the USSR does not have its interpretative roots within Russia, it is obvious that it has been ‘imported’ from an antagonistic West. Although capitalist today, Russia’s post-Soviet leaders have refused to allow a Rothschilds controlled central bank to be established in Moscow. This irritates the US leadership which wants to control Russia by establishing such a financial institution. Another issue is that many people in Russia do not want capitalism, and prefer Communism – a fact confirmed by the fact that the Communist Party of Russia holds around one-third of the seats in the Russian Parliament. The US government is anxious to stop a ‘Communist’ government being democratically elected in Russia, as this would take away a major plank from US anti-Communist disinformation – namely the false assumption that Communism is despotic and imposed from above. The US tried to commit genocide in Vietnam during the 1960’s and 1970’s, just on the strength that it was believed that Ho Chi Minh (and the Communist Party of Vietnam) would win 90% of a democratic vote, in a free election. This is why all capitalist countries have adhered to US Cold War Anti-Soviet propaganda since 1945. This is a religiously inspired and racist ideology that seeks to denigrate any attempt by the working class to establish self-rule. As it is religious in nature, the Soviet Union, its leaders and all its actions are rather childishly presented as ‘evil’, and ‘dangerous’. Every step-forward which improved life for the Russian people is interpreted as being ‘at a great cost’, and every technological advancement viewed as being essentially ‘sinister’ in origin. At no time is the reality of Soviet progression and ingenuity permitted to be recognised, as this would be seen as a challenge against the dominance of capitalism. Instead, the US-dominated capitalist system holds to the highly illogical position that although the USSR is politically egalitarian, culturally progressive, and scientifically advanced, it is also ‘backward’ because it is ‘evil’. This ignorance is astounding, and can only be held in place by apathetic sections of the working class that are unable to break free of the educational brain-washing they have been subjected to.

The following bourgeois documentary informs as it disinforms about a) the history of the Soviet Union (i.e. ‘evil’ and yet ‘advanced’), and b) about the development of the T-34 Soviet tank used to good effect during WWII. There many historical points that are untrue. Lenin founded the Red Army and not Leon Trotsky. After the October Revolution of 1917, a ‘volunteer’ Red Army took to the field to try and stop the imperialist Germans invading Russia, but suffered heavy losses due to inexperience. Lenin began the industrialisation of the Soviet Union – not Stalin (although under Stalin’s guidance, Lenin’s project was completed). No one died in the Soviet Union due to the industrialisation process, on the contrary, life improved dramatically for millions of Russians. The Soviet Union had no plans to invade the West using the Red Army. The strictures of Scientific Socialism demand that the working class, wherever it happens to exist within the international capitalist system, must strive to free itself from that system. Notice also, where Soviet advanced technology is very much viewed as the ‘devil’s work’ by contrast, there is a sneaky admiration for the advanced technology of Nazi Germany, despite that regime murdering 11 million people in the holocaust, and inflicting casualties of between 27-40 million men, women and children in the USSR.

Having seen T-34 Soviet tanks in UK military museums, it is obvious that the basic design was effective, but that during WWII they were hastily assembled in large numbers due to the huge casualties in troops and machines suffered by the Red Army in the early stages of the war. Add to this the fact that as millions were being killed and wounded in the USSR, it was difficult to train and maintain experienced construction crews. As a consequence, crude welding is often evident on many models of T-34 – but the Soviet System prepared for all these problems and set about designing a standard tank ‘blue-print’ that even a poorly educated peasant could help to assemble with the minimum of training and experience. The parts were mass-produced and the T-34 tanks were assembled quickly in factories. From what I gather, the Nazi German tanks were better-made and generally more effective per individual tank, but the Soviet System countered this ‘capitalist’ advantage by ‘out producing’ the German manufacturers. In effect, the Nazi German tanks were outnumbered and destroyed by adequate Soviet T-34 tanks used effectively en mass. The Soviet designers produced a good all-round machine capable of defending Russia, but which was also able to operate outside of Russia as the Nazi Germans were pushed-back. The crews were adequately protected (within design parameters), as were the Red Army infantry that advanced behind the tanks. The Soviet System did not eulogise warfare, or make a fetish out of mechanical devices designed to achieve a specific function. From a Soviet perspective, the T-34 did the job is was designed to do, and there was no mystery surrounding its success on the battlefield.

 

Ruby Ridge – White Washing History (1992) – Eric Gardner RIP (2014)

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

The bourgeois establishment of the police (and other ‘law enforcement’ agencies), was created historically by the middle class, to protect its wealth, and keep the impoverished working class at a distance. The middle class felt this was required, as it had rapidly generated immense wealth (through the brutal exploitation of the working class) during the Industrial Revolution throughout the 18th and 19th centuries (in the UK). The point of the industrialised working class was to work long hours for low pay, and though ‘surplus value’, generated huge profits (including ‘leisure time’) for their middle class over-lords (who own the means of production). Today, whilst presenting the propaganda that the police enforce the law ‘equally’, in fact exactly the same underlying ideology of protecting the privileged middle class from the working class is upheld. Included in this approach is te concept of ‘imperialism’, where all non-White people (regardless of ‘class’) are automatically treated as ‘potential criminals’ and treated as second class citizens. The bourgeois-serving police are brutal enough toward the White working class, of this there is no doubt, but exactly the same police operate a far greater viciousness and brutality against the non-White working class. Make no mistake, the bourgeois police are trained to perceive the working class as the ‘enemy’, and the middle class as the ‘pay masters’. As the notion of the police began in the UK around 1800, and has since spread across the world in support of the capitalist system. Within non-White countries, the police serve the non-White bourgeoisie over he non-White working class in exactly the same manner. This type of law enforcement prevents working class people ‘taking back’ the wealth that they have earned through collective hard labour, but which has been institutionally ‘stolen’ by the middle class. This status quo of wealth flowing from the workers toward the employers is considered ‘normal’ and ‘peaceful’, and any questioning of this exploitative mode of existence is treated as ‘terrorism’, or ‘disruptive’ of the peace.

In 1992, in the USA, a ‘White’ working class family of Christian far-right, Aryan Brotherhood supporting neo-Nazis (that screeched race-hate and genocide against non-White people), clashed with the US marshalls and the FBI (amongst others), for a minor fire-arms offence. Casualties were suffered on both sides, but the manner in which the US ‘White’ establishment supported this family at the time (the far-right survivors received $3.1 million in compensation), is quite incredible and indicative of the sentimentalizing of ‘White Supremacy’ in the US. These religiously inspired, terroristic racists have had numerous sympathetic books written about them, documentaries  produced giving their point of view, and even feature films that a priori present these White supremacists as ‘victims’ of the State. Undoubtedly, the US law enforcement agencies moved against these people because of their association with extremist associations, but it has been proven time and again that many law enforcement agents in the US adhere to exactly the same extremist ideology, and that this racist view of reality is deployed everyday on the streets of America.

What follows are two videos. The first is a sympathetic film about the happenings on Ruby Ridge in 1992 – with survivors given centre stage and their fascist viewpoints brushed-off as a harmless personal choice:

This second video features Mr Eric Gardner (from 2014), an unarmed African-American man who was committing no crime. Mr Eric Garner was murdered by New York police officer Daniel Pantaleo – a man still employed as a police officer. Officer Daniel Pantaleo illegally stopped, and tried to illegally search Eric Gardner. When Eric Gardner declined to be searched (which was his right), officer Daniel Pantaleo then tried to make an illegal arrest. Officer Daniel Pantaleo applied an illegal choke-hold to Eric Gardner’s neck whilst other officers stood by watching and laughing. The civilian bystander (Ramsey Orta) who took the film, did verbally challenge the police officers behaviour, but after he made the video public, the NYPD persecuted him, and eventually had him imprisoned for daring to confront their corruption. Even the paramedics who attended te scene did not make any attempts to help Eric Gardner – automatically siding with the racist NYPD officers. Despite world-wide protests, officer Daniel Pantaleo was not charged and returned to work. Many of his colleagues celebrated – being members of the rightwing ‘Blue Lives Matter’ protest group. The murder of Eric Gardner is racism and class distinction in action – in other words, exactly the same ideology held by the Weaver family at Ruby Ridge.

%d bloggers like this: