Deconstructing the ‘Woke’ Trotskyism of Francis Aaron (Problematic)

Francis Aaron Uses Every Far-Right Trope Available!

Author’s Note: Below is a short review I made of yet another far-right offensive against ‘difference’ disguised as ‘material science’, which says one thing any yet means another. This all stems from Adolf Hitler’s book entitled ‘Mein Kampf’ (‘My Struggle’) which advocates (prophesises) a ‘race war’ between the different races of the world, which, according to Hitler, will result in a victory for the ‘superior’ White race and the inevitable eradication of all the so-called ‘inferior’ races! Ironically, like this video, Hitler substitutes actual science for pseudo-science and then claims (also like this video) that he possesses a ‘higher insight’ that is both stunningly insightful and thoroughly unique! Make no mistake about it, just as Trotsky formulated his alliance with the forces of international fascism in 1938 – this video aligns itself with neo-fascism and neo-Nazism and as it is British – disguises this sleight of hand as ‘trip down the pub’ and being a manifestation of ‘common sense’. Of course, fascist rhetoric is none of these things as it is comprised of the central Hitlerite stricture of ‘lying’ to gain popularist influence and political power. The ultimate end logic of this video (and other similar songs) is the Death Camps for all those human-beings who do not psychologically or physically conform to the so-called ‘norms’ of the White race as defined by the fascists. A non-White person cannot be ‘British’ because they are ‘not White’ with ‘Britishness’ destined by the Hitlerites as belong to ‘White’ people only! The Strawdog fallacy this video peddles is that a) personal perception (a varied psychological element of humanity), is b) equated with different (but essentially ‘static’) physical categories of ‘species’ – as defined by the rigours of material science. This is an attack upon personal choice justified on the fallacious grounds of supporting material science – but this was the false grounds that defined the ruthless warmongering and genocidal racism as pursued by fascist Italy, imperial Japan and Nazi Germany both prior to and during WWII. Fascist Italy massacred hundreds of thousands of non-White people in Africa (with their fascist ineptness being their only impediment to killing a greater number in a more efficient manner), whilst Nazi Germany murdered around 34 million Soviet men, women and children during its barbaric invasion of the USSR (1941-1943) and another 11 million during the Holocaust proper (6 million Jews and 5 million others) and Imperial Japan murdered tens throughout Asia (including tens of millions of Soviet POWs used in military experiments in Manchuria)! If the neo-fascists and neo-Nazis had their way – all the human-beings who exercise their right to diverse self-perception would be placed in Concentration Camps and ‘murdered’ for daring to exercise ‘freedom of thought’ – regardless as to the scientific categorisation of their bodies! I would suggest a working-class boycott of this type of fascist-supporting ‘entertainment’. We should protect the vulnerable, support freedom of choice and not tolerate the stealthy rise of fascism within our communities! ACW (15.8.2021) 

A fascistic sleight of hand. Woke Rap in the form of a Trotskyite misdirection (this track is not about what you are misled into thinking it is about – and that’s why the author feels ‘smug’ when he laps up your misplaced adulation)! An ever-present right-wing agenda attacking what it misconstrues as ‘the left’ – whilst laughingly attempting a (‘Vanilla Ice’ type) cultural appropriation and utilising the very anti-intellectualism it claims to be exposing! Appreciated best by those who possess the very same inverted mindset that gave rise to this counterfeit art form. Move along – nothing to see here. Get yourself an authentic education. Learn about the history of the far-right (and its Trotskyite allies), learn how it lies and how to expose and fight it, and form a new Red Army! 


  1. Yom HaDin upon the brit: viewed in the context of history. טוב

    The 13th Century exposed the chaos and moral debauchery of Western European society. Still, a general rule applies to this very day, when a people or nation falls into Civil War, foreign nations jump to intervene. Rabbeinu Yonah, the cousin of the Ramban, led the condemnation which denounced the Rambam code. In 1202 Rabbi Isaac ha-Baḥur spoke direct with the Rambam, 2 years before he died, and denounced that code. The Rambam “redefinition” of the meaning of halacha, caused an outcry which did not limit their denunciation to the Guide for the Perplexed and the Sefer ha-Madda, as many modern revisionist historians suggest.

    Samuel David Luzzatto, (1800 -1865), denounced assimilated Rambam, Ibn Ezra, and Spinoza based upon his opposition to Greek philosophy. He likewise challenged the authenticity of the Zohar because he held that in the era of the Mishna, pilpul scholarship, which studies the grammar of vowels and accents, had yet developed. The Zohar speaks on grammar\pilpul. Nonetheless, Luzzatto did not link Aristotelian philosophy to the Yad HaChazakah. Yet Heinrich Graetz perceived that Luzzatto regarded nearly every word of Maimonides as un-Jewish and heretical, as does this author.

    In 1233 under the direction of Solomon ben Abraham of Montpellier, a ban – issued against the works of the Rambam. Rabbeinu Yonah favored the public burnings of his works in that same year. Jewish refugees could only enforce this action with Church and Government support. In 1242 the Pope and the king of France ordered the destruction of 24 cartloads of Talmudic manuscripts! The Rambam Civil War adversely impacted all Jewish exile communities across Western Europe. The ensuing population transfer of Jewish refugee populations from Western to Eastern Europe came as a direct consequence of Jewish chaos and anarchy.

    In 1282, John Peckham, the Archbishop of Canterbury, closed all synagogues in his diocese. English King Edward I in 1290, issued the Edict of Expulsion. The expulsion edict remained in force for the rest of the Middle Ages. In 1298 came the Rintfleisch massacres, 8 years before the expulsion of all Jews in France. This, the first mass pogrom in Germany following the first Crusade catastrophe.

    During these dark times, Goyim propagated and promoted Blood libels, comparable to flies attracted to fresh manure. The mysterious death of Werner of Oberwesel gave Goyim the excuse to accuse Jews of ritual murder. These barbarians believed that Jews used Xtian blood to make our Pesach matza. The butcher, “Lord Rindtfleisch”, led a bloody series of pogroms which resulted in the destruction of 146 communities, and the violent murder of some 20,000 Yidden. The cities where these pogroms occurred, King Albert I imposed fines upon the refugee survivors, and compelled them to pay for the resultant damages.

    The Rambam’s redefinition of halacha, followed by the victory of his supporters in that tragic Civil War, resulted in spiritual disaster. Jews no longer learned how to da’aven, using the Talmud as their spiritual guide. This set the stage for the mystic kabbala era that immediately ensued following the destruction of the Rashi\Tosafot schools in France and Germany. The Zohar and Ari kabbala produced the false messiah movements, Chassidut, and likewise set the stage for Reform Judaism. All g’lut Jewry ceased to da’aven with k’vanna; prayer replaced tefilla. Yidden lost all knowledge of how to dedicate tohor middot דאורייתא ודרבנן to HaShem. The chosen Cohen nation altogether ceased doing avodat HaShem. Then came the Shoah.

    A rejection of the post Rambam Civil War theory of פשט.

    Meir ben Todros HaLevi Abulafia opposed the Mishna Torah during the lifetime of the Rambam. To his shock and disappointment, the French Jews in Southern France supported the Rambam’s code. The comments which he made upon the Talmud followed the styles set by the Rif, Hai Gaon, and Sherira Gaon. His work Yad Ramah, written in Talmudic Aramaic influenced the Rosh.

    Assimilated Spanish rabbis, highly influenced by theology. Theology defines Xtian and Muslim literature starting with the new testament and Koran to all later works which promoted these texts of avoda zara. Following the Rambam Civil War, it seems to me that schools of פשט dominated the minds of Reshonim scholarship. Almost like a “kosher pig with split hooves” did the פשט sh’itta of learning attempt to reintroduce the Karaite sh’itta which limited and restricted T’NaCH scholarship to ‘ Mule diving’ kind of cruelty – study of פשט?

    The different פשט works on the Talmud, universally err. Talmud teaches Jewish Common Law. Reading these texts with an eye to understanding the פשט totally distorts the wisdom of understanding what qualifies as a precedent; and how this external source precedent defines the k’vanna of a specific Mishna. As all T’NaCH prophets command mussar, in similar fashion all Gemara halachot serve as precedents which assist the attainment of clarity – the k’vanna of a specific Mishna.

    As such the פשט schools on the Talmud effectively compares to the Rambam error which equates halachot from the Gemara as equal in the authority with any Mishna. It dismally fails to address the two opposing sh’ittot of kabbala: Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס explanation of the Torah Sh’Baal Peh; opposed by the prophets whose kabbala organized and wrote the Shemone Esrei. All non-legal Midrashim, Midrashim whose instruction falls outside of halacha, can learn the Mishna to a specific blessing within the Shemone Esrei. Midrash employs דרוש which links stories etc to specific Parshaot within the Torah.

    The halachic rulings of the Rosh, qualify as a commentary to the Rif code. From my first year in the Chabad Yeshiva in Har Nof, studied, together with my Hasidic friend Yeremy Zukkur, the Rosh as a commentary to the Rif. Even in my first year, the Rambam code, like an odd man out, something “smelled” off with his rulings. The Rif and Rosh halachic commentaries fit together like two peas in a pod. Despite the fact that virtually all the rabbis favored the halachot of the Rambam, and his clear influence upon the Codes of Yaacov ben Asher and Karo, the Rambam required close investigation.

    In possession of a liberal arts education in history, this background gave me the means to judge the Rambam code in the contexts of his times and what sequence of events publication of his code produced. Did the York pogrom in 1190, and expulsion of Jews from Britain have anything to do with Rambam’s code? This question, clearly speculative in nature. It seems to me that the Rambam code introduced a revolutionary approach to understanding halacha. Only much later did the conclusion crystalize that the Rambam code destroyed the פרדס kabbala, whereby Rabbi Akiva explained the revelation of the Torah Sh’Baal Peh.

    The same “smell” concerning מה פשט … מה פשט that my peers rang into my head, something like a mantra. Did I come to learn in Yeshiva to study classic Jewish jurisprudence or did I come to correctly read the words of Jewish law books? Learning פשט does not teach how the Sages chose a particular halacha as a valid precedent by which to understand the k’vanna of the Mishna. It truly bothered me that once a person started studying the Gemara, that the Mishna became an after-thought. Learning פשט did not teach how a בית דין functioned as a lateral common law courtroom. Therefore, like the Rambam code, it gradually crystalized in my mind, that the פשט theories which so resonated within the walls of every Yeshiva wherein i visited and learned therein, that these פשט schools — likewise wrong.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s