Jack Whitehall’s ‘Bad Education’ Really is ‘Bad’ (2012-2015)


Bad Education was commissioned by BBC3 between 2012-2014 and even spawned a film in 2015. Although universally panned (even by the racist Daily Mail), it has received good ratings upon screening, and has sustained reasonable DVD sales. The problem is that this series as a concept is entirely premised upon its creator – Jack Whitehall’s – middle class stereotypes of the working class and ethnic minorities. Furthermore, its depiction of homosexuality is entirely homophobic in nature, but disguised as ‘inclusion’. In fact, all of Whitehall’s characters are nothing but negative gender, ethnic and class stereotypes that are demeaning and disemporing. This should not be surprising, as Whitehall is the product of his own bourgeois socio-economic conditioning. For a responsible parent, the idea of a teacher like Jack Whitehall’s character is distressing and alarming. Failing schools are not funny, and social inequality is not a laughing matter for those not living in a middle class utopia. When a society fails its children due to an asymmetric distribution of wealth and resources, this is ‘child abuse’ and not humour. Ignorant working class children with no responsible adult role models should not be the cannon fodder the Whitehall’s flagging career, but the class prejudice he displays runs much deeper than this. The assistant head master is depicted in an entirely misogynistic manner. This character is made to appear like a male fascist hell-bent on world domination. She is sexually aggressive (whilst depicted as ‘repulsive’), and her sexual preference appears to change with the wind. although Nazi-esque in attitude, Whitehall avoids all mention of Hitler and Nazi Germany, but instead has a Soviet education poster hanging on her office wall. At this point all is implied but nothing is said. Obviously Whitehall is so poorly educated in reality, that he accepts and perpetuates US Cold War propaganda that equates Nazi Germany with the Soviet Union (despite the fact that the USSR was an ally of the UK during WWII, and lost between 27-40 million people fighting Nazi Germany). In a later episode which features the sub-plot that the deputy head has committed suicide, Whitehall has one of his working class thugs stating that she is probably in hell with Stalin – as if Joseph Stalin was a bad person! Again, Whitehall does his best to demonize the Soviet Union whilst protecting the reputation of Nazi Germany. As for disability, Whitehall seems to think that everyone with a disability possesses legs that do not function – that is it.  Probably the most outrageously ‘racist’ element of this ‘comedy’ is the character of Jing Hua – a supposedly Mainland Chinese teenager attending school for some unknown reason in Watford. Whitehall does not seem to understand that Britain possesses its own indigenous Chinese community of children born in the UK. By depicting Jing Hua as he does, he omits from British history the historical Chinese presence in this country – a country that has forcibly deported its Chinese populations twice – once in 1919 and again in 1946 – due to White British racist and xenophobic attitudes. Even if it is argued that there are Mainland Chinese students in the UK (which there undoubtedly are), Whitehall is entirely wrong to cast a Japanese actress (Kae Alexander) in the role of Jing Hua, when there are many fine and capable British born Chinese actresses to choice from. Furthermore, Japan committed atrocities in China during WWIi (and before), killing millions of Chinese men, women and children, crimes that the Japanese government will neither admit to, or apologise for.  The character of Jing Hua appears to have been created by Whitehall for his character to attack Communist China, and make an apparently ‘Chinese’ student the butt of all his racially motivated ‘jokes’. Bad Education is a disgrace in the 21st century, and reminds me of a modern re-make of the notoriously ‘racist’ Mind Your Language from the 1970’s. Jack Whitehall and BBC3 demonstrate that prejudice and racism survives the changing times by adapting the manner in which they manifest.

Professor Elena Senyavskaya Dispels the Myth of Mass Red Army Rapes in Germany (1945)


An Interview with Professor Elena Senyavskaya (Еленой Сенявской)

Full member of the Academy of Military Sciences, Specialist in the Military History of Russia in the 20th century, Expert in Military Psychology, Author of more than 250 Scientific Papers.

Original Russian Language Article: http://sovsojuz.mirtesen.ru/blog/43183030982/1.-Vyimyisel-i-pravda-ob-«Iznasilovannom-Berline».-Oproverzhenie (Net Published 22.3.2016)

(Translated by Adrian Chan-Wyles PhD)

The US Cold War rhetoric is premised upon the disinformation that Soviet Communism was exactly the same as Nazi German fascism, and that Joseph Stalin was no different to Adolf Hitler. This ahistorical approach to misrepresenting the past has been so successful in the West, that many people are subsequently confused and dumbfounded to learn that the Soviet Union was an ‘ally’ of Britain and the US during WWII, and suffered between 27-40 million casualties fighting the Nazi German invasion of the USSR. The purpose of this US disinformation is to hide and obscure the egalitarian nature of Socialism, and turn the mind of the average Western worker against any association with it. In its drive to preserve its system of predatory capitalism, the US ideologues had to play-down the obvious advantages that Soviet Socialism offered the international working class, and drive a permanent wedge between the Western proletariat and its Soviet counterpart. To this end, much was borrowed by the US myth-makers from the Nazi Minister for Propaganda – Joseph Goebbels. The leading researcher of the Institute of Russian History (which is part of the Russian Academy of Sciences), is Doctor of Historical Sciences – Professor Elena Senyavskaya (Еленой Сенявской). Professor Elena Senyavskaya is an expert in the Nazi German and US disinformation campaign aimed at sullying the reputation of the Red Army, and associating its ‘liberation’ of Berlin with a deliberate policy of mass rape. Professor Elena Senyavskaya states that it was Joseph Goebbels who first ‘invented’ the idea that the Soviet Red Army was an army of barbaric rapists and murderers. He did this by simply accusing the Red Army of carrying-out the holocaustal activities the Nazi German Army had been routinely committing within the Soviet Union and throughout Eastern Europe.  The Nazi German Army, enthused as it was by racist rhetoric of its own superiority, carried-out mass rapes of Soviet women and young girls as part of its demeaning of an inferior race. If the victims were not gang-raped to death, or killed in some other equally hideous manner, the resulting pregnancies would ensure that the Slavic ethnicity would be replaced with at least partly ‘Aryan’ off-spring, making the Soviet population easier to control from a Nazi German point of view. Goebbels simply inverted the situation and incorrectly presented the marauding Nazi German Army as ‘liberators’, and the self-sacrificing Red Army as ‘brutish’ savages. The problem for the Nazi Germans had been that ordinary German people were beginning to go over to the advancing Red Army – seeing it as a ‘liberator’ from Hitlerite oppression. In an attempt to counter this, Goebbels concocted the story that the Red Army had a policy of ‘raping’ any girl or woman aged between 8 – 80. This scare tactic was designed to encourage the German civilian population to either fight the Red Army as it approached, or to retreat with the Nazi German Army as it was pushed back.


The mythology of Red Army mass rapes in Berlin (and elsewhere throughout Germany) was slow to development in the post-WWII anti-Soviet climate. Even in 1945, as the Soviets and US collaborated to secure and rebuild a defeated Germany, Western generated rumours were being spread of the Red Army committing between 20,000 and 150,000 rapes throughout Germany (not just Berlin). As there was no documented evidence surrounding these rumours, no mainstream historian took them seriously (although the Western far-right ideologues continued to espouse Goebbels’ ahistorical ramblings). This changed with the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991. In 1992, two (bourgeois) German feminists – named , Helke Zander and Barbara Yor – published a book entitled ‘Liberators and Liberated’, within which they ahistorically stated that the Red Army had committed 2 million rapes throughout Germany during the closing months of WWII. This was a dramatic reworking of Goebbels’ main anti-Soviet idea, and a massive increase in supposed ‘victims’, but a logical assumption of how these ‘authors’ arrived at this number reveals the fallacy of their argument. This incorrect number was arrived at using the following flawed methodology. Zander and Yor focused on a single Berlin Hospital for the years 1945-1946, and assessed the births that occurred there. For both years it was reported that around 500 babies were born respectively, with 15-20 fathers being recorded as ‘Russian’. In two or three cases it was reported that the pregnancy was caused by rape. These two ‘authors’ then ignored the fact that the vast majority of pregnancies were consensual, and assumed that ALL were the product of rape. They then presented Goebbels’ Nazi German propaganda of the Red Army raping all German women between the ages of 8-80 years, and concocted the arbitrary figure of ‘2 million’ as an ‘estimate’ of supposed rapes committed throughout the Soviet occupied areas of Germany. (These two ‘authors’, incidentally, remain ‘silent’ about the well documented rapes carried-out in Germany by US and British troops). However, even after this highly unreliable book was published, the idea of ‘2 million’ rapes did not gain much traction until the British historian Anthony Beevor published his ‘Fall of Berlin’ in 2002, within which he repeats without question the research of Zander and Yor, and perpetuates the anti-Soviet rhetoric of Goebbels’ Nazi German propaganda. This is the history behind how the Red Army was misrepresented by Nazi Germany and modern German and British revisionist ‘historians’ sympathetic to the political rightwing.


Since the collapse of the Berlin Wall, German people have been tired of having to repent for the holocaust and destruction they brought to the world during the 1930’s and 1940’s. They have found solace in a type of fiction made fact, that demonises the USSR and equates Stalin with Hitler. This alternative history has gained a certain credence through the decisions of endorsement made by various European organisations, and of course, the European Parliament. Coupled with the US anti-Soviet (and now ‘anti-Russian’) position, the burden of ‘guilt’ for the appalling crimes of WWII is being shifted from Germany to Russia. An attempt is being made to make the Russian people take the blame for the crimes committed by the Nazi German regime. People like Zander, Yor and Beevor are pursuing a typical Western bias against Russia and against Soviet history. This may be viewed as a form of anti-Slavic racism. There is no doubt that a ‘united’ Germany is trying to ‘hide’ its Nazi past and with US help is actively transferring the burden of historical guilt onto Russia. The Soviet Red Army did no wrong and was on the winning side, it must always be remembered. The reality is that women were ‘equal’ and ‘respected’ within the USSR – as were all women from around the world. Men and women respected one another within Soviet Society, and wherever possible, this respect was exported outside the USSR. Considering the crimes committed by the Nazi Germans within the USSR, the defeated German citizens were treated very well. Did rapes happen? Yes – but on a very small-scale. This was considered a highly ‘immoral’ crime within the Red Army, with those responsible often being tried and executed, but the incidence was very low, certainly far lower than the rapes committed by US or British troops in Germany. A report by the military prosecutor for the First Byelorussian Front regarding the illegal actions carried-out against the civilian population for the period from April 22 to May 5, 1945. (i.e. seven armies of the front) states that whilst amongst a civilian population of 908.5 thousand people, it was recorded that 124 crimes took place, of which 72 were rapes. Total 72 cases for 908.5 thousand …


Front commanders were responsible for the ideological education of the Red Army soldiers, although guidance was also often issued by the Soviet Government. The point is that leaflets and lectures were given explaining that the German working class people needed to be liberated from the bourgeois fascist Nazi regime, and that it was the Nazi elite themselves that were ultimately responsible, and not the ordinary German people. It was made clear to every Red Army soldier that it was highly expected that sections of the German population might well support the Soviets, and that everything possible must be done to facilitate this eventuality. Regardless of official communiques from the Soviet Government in Moscow – front commanders had to strictly follow the ‘internationalist’  ideology of Marxist-Leninism. What the West has to ignore when propagating the ‘mass rape’ lies about the Red Army, is the numerous reports from former German soldiers who stated clearly how well-behaved the Soviet soldiers were, particularly toward the German children. Yes – it is reported that within a number of political lectures a certain portion of the Soviet soldiers ‘questioned’ the orders to be ‘kind’, virtually all Red Army soldiers did follow these directions (with the exception of a few). This is remarkable considering the death and destruction caused in the USSR by the Hitlerite forces. Indeed, Russian historian Yuri Zhukov (Юрий Жуков) is of the opinion that on the whole no serving Red Army soldier committed any rapes in Germany, but that the rapes that were committed were carried-out by former Red Army soldiers and Soviet civilians released from Nazi German Concentration Camps. Due to the horrors experienced in these terrible places, obviously these people were not in their right minds. Eventually the Soviet Authorities took control of the situation and these people were apprehended and put in hospitals or special medical centres to recover from their ordeal. This was followed by a mass feeding and rebuilding campaign within Eastern Germany by the Soviet Authorities.


What is little known today, is how German civilians fled in terror from the British and US Armies that advanced into Western Germany. Western atrocities against the German population is a subject for another topic – but the idea that Germans ‘instinctively’ headed to the Western Allies is a myth. Soviet troops treated German women (and girls) with respect and did not even visit prostitutes (an act looked down upon by the Soviet officers). German civilians often arrived in the Soviet Zone of Occupation with tales of all kinds of abuse suffered at the hands of the Western Allies. Evidence suggests that US soldiers carried ‘gang rapes’ of German girls and women – usually accompanied by much violence. The US High Command turned a blind eye to these mass rapes, and would only occasionally punish a ‘Black’ soldier – despite most US rapes perpetuated by ‘White’ Americans. This is obviously a reflection of the racism that exists throughout US society. It seems that the US Authorities over the years have tried to ‘hide’ the behaviour of their White troops by scapegoating Black troops. On the other hand, some Black troops – such as the French Senegalese in Stuttgart – are reported to have raped around three thousand women and girls in the Subway, over a one or two-day period. In occupied Italy, for example, the Allied Moroccan troops are said to have raped women, girls and young boys. However, the vast majority of the rapes and looting throughout Western Germany were carried-out by ‘White’ British and American troops. These crimes are very well documented in the West but not very well known throughout the Western population. Not so long ago, Western websites were sharing a photograph of a Soviet soldier apparently wearing ‘two’ wristwatches – with cries of ‘looting’! – before it was pointed-out that one of these supposed watches was in fact a Soviet-issued ‘compass’. Another picture of a Red Army soldier apparently ‘stealing’ a bicycle from a German civilian actually shows bicycles being ‘commandeered’ by order of the Soviet Authorities.


Part of the problem with interpreting Soviet history properly, is that nowadays there are Russian academics who accept the US Cold War disinformation as ‘fact’ and do not question it. These types of people are like ‘enemies within’, which teach false history and perpetuate anti-Soviet and anti-Russian lies. Sometimes these individuals are just misled, but at other times they know exactly what they are doing. Prior to the collapse of the USSR, this kind of incorrect thinking only existed in the West – where it was invented and perpetuated – but today it has penetrated Russia at many levels to the extent that Russian people no longer know their true history. This is a case of US Cold War rhetoric continuing to cause damage to Russia from within, with Russians spreading the damage to future generations. I would say that bona fide academics know the true history because the facts are readily observable through research, but the internet has generated many misinformed ‘amateur’ historians who research nothing and share ignorance everywhere.  What these distorters of history continuously omit is the truly horrific fate of Soviet women and the mass rape and abuse that they suffered at the hands of Nazi German troops and other Axis forces. It is the suffering of Soviet women that is being written-out of history, being replaced by the myth of the suffering of Nazi German women. This is exactly the result that Joseph Goebbels wanted and expected through his basic manipulation techniques. Black becomes white, up becomes down, and good becomes bad, etc. In the first decade following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the West ensured that the films and documentaries that appeared all repeated the Nazi German and US lies about the USSR, about Stalin and about SMERSH, etc. Russian soldiers were depicted as drunken layabouts prone to violent outbursts, and the USSR not as an advanced Socialist society, but rather as a regime soaked in blood. This is brain-washing through the popular media which was illegal during the years of the USSR, but which is common currency today. The Soviet Leadership (particularly during WWII) is presented as fascist thugs that ordered the shooting of its best and most talented individuals, and won WWII by accident. None of this is true, and all of it is pure anti-Soviet fantasy from the West. There is no documented Russian language evidence for these things happening, and no reliable eye-witness reports. This pseudo-history forms a counter narrative to the facts of actual history and is used to obscure what really happened for what the US and Nazi propagandists would prefer the people to believe.


This all hinges on the Soviet Victory on May 9th, 1945, over the forces of Nazi German fascism. This victory by the Red Army had and continues to have immense historical impact upon world history. The Red Army brought men and women together from all over the Soviet Union and Russia, and served as a world-wide anti-fascist inspiration. The Nazi Germans tried to stop the Red Army on every level (including the use of anti-Soviet propaganda) but this rightwing effort failed. Where Goebbels has been successful is that his distorted thinking has been kept alive and developed by the US and its European Allies between 1945 and the present day. Not only did the USSR build a progressive Socialist society, but its victory over Nazi German fascism proved the superiority of its socio-economic structure even though warfare was not the primary focus of its existence. Building a peaceful world premised upon scientific development was the true purpose of the Soviet regime, but as these exposed the Western, capitalist system as being inherently inferior and of no developmental use for the working class, the enemies of Socialism must attack and destroy the true purpose of the USSR and replace it with a degenerate mirage. Modern Russia has been losing this battle of disinformation because there has been no reaction at State level. The Russian Government today remains ‘silent’ every time an anti-Soviet lie is perpetuated through the media, and makes no attempt to counter these untruths with alternative sources of reliable knowledge. This is a ridiculous situation where the Russian government refuses to act in the best interests of the Russian people. The Russian government says and does nothing whilst foreign money pays for anti-Soviet and anti-Russian films to be made in Russia! Even Czar Nicholas I acted against plays that criticised the Russian Army. Virtually every other government in the world acts in the best interests of its people – except in modern Russia. Could you imagine the US allowing Russian money to pay for a WWII film that depicts US soldiers mass raping German women? Of course not – the West never allows the truth of the behaviour of its soldiers in Germany to become common knowledge (although it is known by academics). In 1989, a Canadian author named James Buck published a book entitled ‘Other Losses’, which argued that around 1 million Germans ‘starved’ to death in relocation camps in the US Zone of Occupation. Although his work was well researched, factual and conveyed real history, the Western academic community turned on Buck and attempted to discredit his work because it contradicted the preferred US Cold War disinformation story of the Red Army being the bad guys. The current Russian Government will not even raise its voice against obvious false history that insults all Russian (and Soviet) people.


Eyewitnesses in Germany – 1945

“… At the end of my first day in Berlin, I was sure that the city was dead. Human beings simply could not live in this horrific pile of garbage. By the end of the first week my performances began to change. Society began to revive among the ruins. The Berliners began to receive water and food in quantities sufficient to survive. More and more people were engaged in public works under the guidance of Russians. Thanks to Russians who have extensive experience in dealing with such problems in their own devastated cities, the spread of the epidemics was put under control. I am convinced that the Soviets did more in those days to give Berlin a chance to survive than the Anglo-Americans could have done in their place … ”

“… After the fighting moved to German soil, soldiers of the Allied front units and those who followed directly behind them committed many rapes. The number of them depended on the attitude of this senior officers … The lawyers admitted that for violent and perverted sexual acts with German women, some soldiers were shot, especially in those cases when they were Negroes. However, I knew that many women were raped by white Americans. No action was taken against these criminals … ”

“… Severe discipline prevails in the Red Army. There are no more robberies, rapes and bullying than in any other zone of occupation. Wild stories about atrocities emerge due to exaggerations and distortions of individual cases under the influence of nervousness caused by the immoderation of the manners of Russian soldiers and their love for vodka. One woman who told me most of the tales of Russian cruelties, from which the hair stands on end, was eventually forced to admit that the only evidence she saw with her own eyes was how drunken Russian officers shot pistols into the air and threw bottles …”

©opyright: Adrian Chan-Wyles (ShiDaDao) 2018.

Russian Language Source:



Examples of Mass Murder and Cannibalism in Austral-Hungary


Hungarian Mass Murderer – Bela Kiss

Unless translated into English, reliable knowledge of this type of crime within the Austral-Hungarian Empire before, during and after WWI (1914-1918) is difficult to acquire. The following two videos deal with the extraordinary cases of Hungarian mass murderer Bela Kiss (b. 1877 death unknown), and Prussian mass murderer and cannibal Karl Denke (1860-1924). Whereas Bela Kiss killed at least 24 people – picking their bodies in barrels of alcohol – Karl Denke murdered as least 42 people, butchering their bodies and selling the meat at local markets. Denke used every part of the body in a cottage industry that included making shoe-laces out of human hair. These body counts are thought to be only those casualties the police could confirm, and that in both cases the number of victims could well be much higher. The Austral-Hungarian Empire was an absolute monarchy until its defeat at the end of WWI. What is interesting is how aberrant crime mirrors the inequalities within specific socio-economic models. Of course, this observation does not absolve the individual from all responsibility, but it does explain the primarily ‘unseen’ psychological and physical pressures that a given society imposes upon its citizens, which can contribute to highly amoral, immoral and destructive behaviour. The totalitarian nature of Germanic culture at this time led to a rigid social order from which there was no escape, grinding poverty, and continuous bouts of famine (particularly amongst the poor). What Kiss and Denke did as individual criminals would be later raised to State policy under Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany. This is why collecting details of this type of crime prior to the rise of Nazism within the Germanic States, can offer an explanation as to why it was that millions of people had no problem either assisting or committing mass crimes against humanity. On the other hand, this does not mean that all German people were like this, but rather that the socio-economic constructs were present within the totalitarian system of Germanic Government prior to the rise of Hitler to power in 1933, which Hitler subsequently used to apply his murderous policies. More evidence of similar crimes needs to be gathered to add weight to this hypothesis.

Wereth 11 – African-American Heroes of WWII!


The brave and tragic story of an African-American military unit (333rd Field Artillery Battalion) which was taken prisoner by Nazi German Forces during the Ardennes Offensive of December 1944. This unit was sacrificed to cover the retreat of the main (White) US force. Despite the utmost bravery of their last stand, and the fact that they defended their position to virtually the last round, the survivors of this unit were surrendered by their Officer to the advancing Nazi German soldiers. Whilst being marched toward Germany in appalling weather, these 11 men came into the custody of Waffen SS Stormtroopers – renowned for their religious-like devotion to Adolf Hitler and strict adherence to his racist and eugenic ideology. For the Nazi German regime, this was an all or nothing offensive designed to split the Allies in Western Europe and bludgeon a ceasefire. With his Western Front secured, Hitler could then marshal his forces to the East and attempt to stop the Soviet Red Army from its advancement toward Berlin. For the average African-American conscript – particularly those recruited in the Southern States (as was the 333rd) – the institutional racism of the White US system was a common experience. This discrimination and prejudice was expressed in a segregated army staffed almost exclusively by White Officers. If there was a choice between sacrificing Black soldiers over White soldiers – the Black soldiers were always viewed as expendable, and a Black life not as valuable as a White life (this continued well into the Vietnam War era) . In this regard, the Black soldiers faced US fascism everyday of their lives, which could culminate in the hideous US pastime of ‘lynching’ – or the rape, torture and murder of African-Americans by rabid White mobs – a practice that was supposedly ended in the 1960’s, but which still continues in its modern form through the hands of the White police force. After African-American troops returned to the US after WWII, many would be rewarded with terminal unemployment, imprisonment, poverty, debt and death. I am proud of the African-American soldiers of the US Army in WWII because like their Soviet-counterparts, they activity took part in the fight against International Fascism. African-American prisoners were often filmed by the Nazi German regime as a means to ‘scare’ the German population into putting-up more of a fight against the Allies. The German newsreels spoke of ‘monkeys’ in uniform being unleashed by the Americans to rape the racially pure girls and women of Nazi Germany. After falling into the hands of the Waffen SS, the Wereth 11 were brutally (and systematically) tortured before being killed with multiple bayonet strikes (often through the eye socket). Their arms and legs suffered numerous breakages, as did their jaw-bones and skulls. When shot – the wounds were intended to cause great and continuous pain – rather than sudden death. Such was the racism inherent in the US Army at the time, that although many similar massacres were officially reported during the ‘Battle of the Bulge’, and despite the fact that the Wereth massacre was known to have taken place, its details were deliberately omitted from the report on the battle. The Wereth 11”, were: Curtis Adams of South Carolina; Mager Bradley of Mississippi, George Davis Jr. of Alabama; Thomas Forte of Mississippi; Robert Green of Georgia; James Leatherwood of Mississippi; Nathaniel Moss of Texas; George Motten of Texas; William Pritchett of Alabama; James Stewart of West Virginia; and Due Turner of Arkansas. When African-American soldiers returned to the US and were demobilised – the US Government deliberately withheld from this men the financial assistance granted to all White Veterans of WWII.

On Why Stalin was not a Homophobe


Of course, LGBTQ people are people first and fore-most, and a sexual preference secondarily, although the persecution this group of people face everyday throughout the world, due to their sexuality, draws that sexuality out into the open so that it often obscures the personalities and characters of those concerned. This is because ‘gayness’ (and its many varieties) has not been allowed to ‘normalise’, and is still seen by any people as being ‘wrong’ or even an ‘aberration’. As a consequence, gay people do not all think the same, and certainly do not all agree on he finer points of politics. Gay people have been known to hold leftist, centrist, and rightist political view-points, even though it has been the rightwing that has enshrined their persecution in ideological lore. I have also noticed a Trotskyite tendency within the gay left that purposely demonises and misrepresents the Soviet Union, referring to Lenin and Stalin as homphobes. Gay people who think this way should be ashamed of themselves. Lenin was one of the first world leaders to abolish homophobic laws in 1917, and Stalin, during the Great Patriotic War (1941-1945) committed hundreds of thousands of Soviet troops into areas of the Western USSR that were facing the grim possibility of Nazi German occupation – as a means to hold-out as long as possible to prevent a holocaust against Soviet Citizens being perpetuated! As a consequence, during the Battle of Kiev for example, hundreds of thousands of Soviet men and women died or were taken prisoner trying to stop the Nazi Germans from occupying the land. This sacrifice was on the direct orders of Joseph Stalin – who knew only too well what laid in store for the Soviet populations of homosexuals, Romany, disabled, Jews, Bolsheviks and anyone not considered racially pure or ideologically sound. Of course, many gay people are misled by the US-generated Cold War lies -which after 1945 depicted the USSR as being nothing different to Hitler’s Nazi German regime. The differences are in fact stark and multitudinous. I once asked a gay person who was espousing anti-Soviet propaganda what he thought of the 40 million Soviet men, women and children who died during the war with Nazi Germany? He just stared at me open mouthed and muttered something about Communist propaganda! There is no evidence that Stalin was homophobic in any Russian language text, but the idea that he was, has a certain currency in (false) Western narratives that seek to demonise Communism and Communist leaders. It was the Nazi German regime that was homophobic – and not the Soviet regime that confronted it. This video explains the circumstances surrounding the Battle of Kiev – and details the Nazi German holocaust that was committed in the Ukraine almost immediately after the Nazi Germans conquered the area.

Soviet Red Army Crushes Waffen SS – the Battle for Budapest (26.12.1944-13.2.1945)


Soviet Red Army liberates Budapest 

Soviet Press Statement (21.12.1944):

‘At the beginning of December, under the chairmanship of Dr Vasary, the mayor of Debrecen, a group was formed of representatives of the different Hungarian parties… In liberated territory the election of delegates to the Provisional National Assembly took place between December 13 and 20. 230 delegates were elected, representing the democratic parties, the town and village councils and the trade and peasant unions… The Assembly opened with the playing of the Hungarian National Anthem. The meeting was held in the Reformation College where, in 1849, Kossuth proclaimed the independence of Hungary…

An Address to the Hungarian People was adopted which said:

It is time to make peace. Salasi is an usurper,,, We call upon the Hungarian people to rally to the banners of Kossuth and Rakoszi and to follow in the footsteps of the Honweds (volunteer militia) of 1848. We want a democratic Hungary. We guarantee the inviolability of private property as the basis of our social and economic order. We want Land Reform… Turn your arms against the German oppressors and help the Red Army… for the good of a Free and Democratic Hungary!’

(Russia at War 1941-1945: By Alexander Werth [1964] Pages 909-910)

Hitler’s Nazi German regime was assisted in its widespread (highly destructive and genocidal) invasion of Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union by Bulgaria, Romania and Hungary, all of which had acquired politically rightwing governments. Nazi Germany was also assisted with supplies of oil and other raw materials by Sweden, Denmark and Portugal, as well as Vichy France and fascist Italy. The so-caked ‘Axis’ powers (of which there were many), coalesced around the 1936 ‘Anti-Comintern Pact’, an agreement between various rightwing countries to jointly resist the spread of ‘International Communism’. Therefore, it can be said that Hitler’s attack on the USSR was a direct manifestation of the pursuance of this pact, an act of aggression which was assisted by a number of Axis powers. Over-all, contemporary estimates suggest that around 34 million Soviet men, women and children died during the Nazi German invasion of the USSR, and the application of the Hitlerite ‘final solution’. Hitler had declared the the Slavic people to be racially inferior, and their embracing of Communist ideology to be a confirmation of this fact. To remedy this problem, Hitler demanded nothing less than the eradication of the Slavic people and their Communist ideology.

As the tide of war changed, and the Soviet Red Army started to push the Nazi German invaders out of the USSR, it became necessary to pursue the retreating Germans all the way to Berlin to ensure the complete defeat of the Nazi regime. Whilst pursuing this anti-fascist policy, the countries that had collaborated with Nazi Germany had to be invaded and ‘liberated’ from their fascist governments and Nazi German occupiers. As can be gleamed from the Soviet Press statement (above), the Soviet Authorities implemented ‘democratic’ elections, so that the ordinary citizens of countries such as Hungary, could choose a non-fascist political path. By and large, the ordinary citizens of such countries, (i.e. the ‘workers’), were treated as ‘victims’ of fascism, rather than its perpetuators.

On October 21st, 1944, the Soviet Red Army (under Malinovksy) entered and took Debrecen in eastern Hungary. Although the Red Army advance into Hungary was rapid at first, it was soon slowed by stiff (fascist) Hungarian and Nazi German resistance. This resistance increased as the Red Army fought inch by inch toward Budapest in November. In early December (1944), Hitler met with the fascist Hungarian leader Salasi in Berlin, where it was agreed that Budapest must be held at all costs (although behind the scenes, many of its industries were already being re-located to Austria). As part of this deal, Hitler allocated around 23,000 well-equipped and highly motivated troops of the Waffen SS to defend Budapest (and possibly turn the tide of the battle). These units were essentially heavily armed and highly politically motivated annihilation squads (being considered racially ‘pure’ by Hitler), whose motto was ‘Give Death and Take Death’. These men were not ordinary soldiers, and their training was designed to embody a certain ‘mindless’ brutality that existed outside of the traditions of the conventional German military. Surrender was out of the question as was taking prisoners or providing medical care to wounded enemy soldiers. In fact, the Waffen SS often tortured the enemy wounded to death, considering it a sport to invent ever more painful methods. These troops were under the direct command of Adolf Hitler himself (being considered his personal bodyguard), and were trained to believe that they personally represented the ideological foundation of the fascist ideology of National Socialism. As racially pure Aryans, these men received the best clothing, training, food, housing and weaponry, and were treated with the utmost respect (and fear) within German society. As an embodiment of ‘Nazism’, Hitler believed that these racially superior beings, entirely through an act of will, could defeat the military might of the Red Army, and in so doing trigger a collapse of its Communist ideology (bringing down the USSR from within).

The 50 day Battle for Budapest was to test this hypothesis. Around 23,000 racially pure Waffen SS troops were to spear-head the defence of Budapest and inflict a debilitating defeat upon the Red Army. By comparison, Red Army soldiers, whose motto was ‘Free the Workers!’ was comprised of ordinary men and women from the length and breadth of the vast Soviet Union. As such, they were ethnically diverse, and represented no particular race. They pursued Socialist Revolution every time they fought – freeing the oppressed workers from the tyranny of capitalism and fascism. The average Red Army soldier was selfless, supportive of his fellow Comrades, and willing to self-sacrifice to save others. These soldiers were not racially superior, did not pursue any form of fascist ideology, and were motivated by a broad non-racial ‘Internationalism’, rather than by a narrow fascistic ‘Nationalism’, and yet in the space of around 7 weeks, these quite ‘ordinary’ Communist soldiers encircled and then systematically ‘destroyed’ the 23,000 fanatical Waffen SS soldiers – killing 19,000 in the fighting! The fascist forces of Budapest surrendered on the 13th of February, 1945, and Hungary was finally liberated.

The following documentary explains who the Waffen SS were – and how they were deployed during WWII. Comprised of around 900,000 at their peak, toward the end of the war (as casualties mounted), Hitler allowed non-Germans to join, such as French, Swedes and Danes. In fact, as the Nazi regime collapsed under Soviet pressure, around 90% of the Waffen SS units defending Hitler in Berlin near the end, were comprised of foreigners who fanatically fought to the bitter end. Allowing non-Germans into the Waffen SS was thought by certain Nazi Germans as ‘weakening’ the spiritual strength of these units, and therefore lowering their fighting efficiency. However, Hitler gambled with some of his best (racially pure) Waffen SS regiments in Budapest – and despite their assumed ‘spiritual strength’, they were systematically destroyed by Slavic peasant soldiers from the Urals.

Modern Fascism: Beware the National Bolshevist Party (of Russia)


National Bolshevist Flag (Mimicking the German Swastika)


Swastika: National Socialism

In his ramblings recorded in ‘Mien Kampf’, Adolf Hitler made it clear that the number one enemy of the Third Reich was the Scientific Socialism developed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, more commonly referred to as ‘Communism’. As the father of Karl Marx had been a Jew before converting to Christianity (and marrying a non-Jew), Hitler was of the opinion that ‘Marxism’ was a Jewish plot to secure world domination. Hitler thought that the Jewish race might gain popularity around the world by ‘sharing’ their wealth with everyone and thereby creating a Socialist World State (despite the fact that Karl Marx never considered himself a Jew, and Friedrich Engels was a non-Jewish Prussian aristocrat). Paradoxically, Hitler also subscribed to the contradictory idea that all Jews were money-grabbing parasites that sought to control society through predatory capitalism. Hitler could entertain this two diametrically opposed ideologies because he was quite insane. Within the work of Marx, fascism is a ruthless ideology that is created by capitalism whilst in a state of decay. Fascism is the opposite to Communism, and is viewed as all the vicious elements of capitalist greed condensed into a single and deadly political system. When Hitler invaded the USSR in 1941, a fight to the finish was initiated between these two ideologies that led to around 40 million Soviets losing their lives before Nazism was finally crushed in early 1945 (in Berlin). Although the USSR was an ally of the West during WWII, following 1945, the USA developed a false Cold War strategy that misrepresented the USSR (and its Communist ideology) as nothing more than just another a form of German Nazism. From that time onwards, many commentators in the West bizarrely (and illogically) compared Stalin with Hitler, and routinely demeaned the Soviet contribution and sacrifice in the defeat of International Fascism. The political rightwing likes to endorse this thinking, and takes it one step further by stating that the USSR was far worse than Nazi Germany, and that it was the USSR that perpetuated the holocaust, etc. Following the collapse of the USSR in 1991, and the violent suppression of its supporters in 1993, the capitalist West demanded that all manner of political rightwing ideologies be imported into the Russian hinterland. This included the Cold War ‘false flag’ idea that Soviet Communism (i.e. ‘Bolshevism’) was identical with German Nazism. As a counter to Communist ideology, Russian racist nationalism was encouraged amongst the younger generation, and many White supremacist movements developed (particularly centred around martial arts clubs and anti-migrant violence). Out of this mess developed the ‘National Bolshevik Party’ (NBP), a movement that accepted the lie that Soviet Communism was identical with German Nazism, and which adopted a modified Hitlerite swastika as its flag. The NBP has a flag has a central white circle superimposed on a red rectangular background, and within the white circle there is a black hammer and sickle emblem (which replaces the black swastika proper). The NBP is NOT Communist or Socialist in a Marxist-Leninist sense, and should not be mistaken as such. The NBP is a racist organisation that encourages White Russian nationalism, and advocates total war to achieve its political ends of racial purity and world domination.

USSR: FI Shcherbatskoy (1866-1942) – Expert in Buddhism


There is much disinformation not only in the West, but also in modem (capitalist) Russia, about the history of the Soviet Union (1917-1991). A number of contemporary Russians, in their haste to make a living, are prone to taking on the flawed anti-Soviet perspective of the Cold War (emanating from the USA), and mindlessly replicate all this false propaganda as if it were true. Obviously this is not the case with all Russian historical literature, but the reader is advised to remain forever vigilant. For instance, as the Nazi Germans invaded the USSR in 1941, many important Soviet intellectuals and innovators were relocated to the relative safety of Kazakhstan, where there existed well-stocked, well-supplied and well-protected Soviet towns and cities. In fact, this area became known as the scientific heart of the USSR, and the place where the Soviet Space Shuttle would eventually be developed. Being sent to Kazakhstan was always a privilege and never a punishment, but one modern Russian text, playing to the Western anti-Russian agenda, falsely stated that FI Shcherbatskoy was ‘exiled’ to Kazakhstan – as if being sent to safety to continue one’s work was a punishment. Certain other Russian texts follow the Western texts by implying that the USSR attacked ‘religion’ and this included Buddhism, again, this is false. State was separated from church, and the church from the classroom, but religion continued as a ‘private’ matter, with uncorrupted Buddhist thinking not being included as ‘religion’ due to the fact its philosophy did not conform to the inverted thinking inherent within Judeo-Christian theology. In fact, a Buddhist temple (replete with Buddha statues) is featured in Sergei Eisenstein’s 1928 Soviet film entitled ‘October 1917 (Ten Days that Shook the World)’. It was also a matter of historical fact that Marx and Engels had positive viewpoints about Buddhism (with Marx even claiming to have once tried Buddhist meditation).

Fedor Ippolitovich Shcherbatskoy (1866-1942) was Polish born, and dedicated his academic career to the study of Indian philosophy. In 1889, he earned his PhD from the Historical-Philological Faculty of St. Petersburg State University in Russia, after presenting (and defending) his thesis regarding the pronunciation of two types of Indo-European languages. So impressed were the educational authorities that FI Shcherbatskoy was immediately employed by the university, where he pursued his studies for a professorship. Also in 1889, he was sent to Vienna to further improve his knowledge. In Vienna he studied Sanskrit and Indology under Prof G. Buhler, a renowned expert in the field of Indian poetics and broader Indian culture. Prof G. Buhler played a significant role in the development of Indian Philology. This is where he was introduced to Brahmanic texts and the Sanskrit language, (a book he wrote on the Sanskrit language was considered so good that it was published by the Soviet authorities in 1923). He was introduced to Buddhism proper by Prof. Jacobi in Bonn during another of his travels to acquire reliable knowledge. Meanwhile, between the years 1893 to 1899, FI Shcherbatskoy left his studies to deal with matters in his homeland, but permanently returned to academia when he attended the 12th Congress of Orientalists held in Rome during October, 1899. This conference dealt with the discovery of ancient Northern Buddhist texts in the oasis of Tarim, which included remarkable works of art and pieces of Buddhist manuscripts written in both Sanskrit and Tibetan script, that attracted much interest in the West. This is where FI Shcherbatskoy transitioned from the exclusive study of Brahmanic texts, and decided to specialise in the field of Buddhology. 

FI Shcherbatskoy was able to read Sanskrit to a very high level of accuracy, and was therefore ideally positioned to translate Mahayana Buddhist texts into Russian. So good were his Russian translations, that they were soon translated into many other European languages. Following the October Revolution of 1917, FI Shcherbatskoy was left to continue his Buddhist studies, but such was his reputation amongst the Bolsheviks, that in 1918 he was elected a full member of the Russian Academy of Sciences (under Lenin).So encouraged was he by the revolutionary mood in Russia that in 1923 he published his work entitled ‘The Central Conception of Buddhism and the Meaning of the Word Dharma’ to widespread acclaim (from both within and without the USSR). In 1927, he published his masterpiece ‘The Conception of Buddhist Nirvana’ which revolutionised the manner through which Mahayana Buddhism was understood in the West. In the same year, FI Shcherbatskoy worked upon a comprehensive ‘Buddhist Encyclopaedia’ for use in the Soviet education system, whilst in 1928 (under Stalin) he was appointed to head a new academic facility dedicated exclusively for the study of Buddhism within the USSR entitled ‘Institute for the Scientific Study of Buddhist Culture’ (ISBC). The remit of the ISBC was to establish a scientific dialectical history of the development of Buddhism in ancient India, how the teaching spread throughout Asia, how Buddhist culture integrated into previously existing cultures, and how contemporary Buddhism functioned in the modern world. This undertaking required a precise and accurate interpretation of the Buddha’s philosophy, together with an assessment of Buddhist art and culture in Tibet, Mongolia and China (as well as Russia, which had at least two Soviet Buddhist Republics). The ISBC developed such a good academic reputation throughout the world, that it established permanent academic relations with its German counterpart – the Heidelberg Society for the Study of Buddhism – a very good working relationship that was abolished by Adolf Hitler in 1933, after the rise to power of his fascist Nazi Party. FI Shcherbatskoy continued to specialise in the translation of important Mahayana Buddhist texts up until his death in Northern Kazakhstan in the village of Borovoye, on March 18th, 1942. 

Russian Language Sources:






The Rise of Neo-Nazism in Mongolia


Chinese Language Source Article By: http://m.fengniao.com/document/1911618.html

(Translated by Adrian Chan-Wyles PhD)

The leader of the neo-Nazi movement in modern Mongolia – Tsagaan Khass – recently explained that in a post-Communist Mongolia, a number of people, free as they are from Marxist-Leninism, are avidly embracing the neo-Nazi ideology of Germany’s Adolf Hitler.  A movement locally known as ‘Dayar Mongol’.  Of course, Tsagaan Khass was quick to add that he does not necessarily agree with the rather ‘extreme’ nature of some of Hitler’s policies, but stated that with regard to the presence of Chinese people in his country, he was prepared to make an exception.  He  added that many Mongolians had a natural ‘distaste’ for Chinese people and Chinese culture – pointing-out that it was Mongolia (under Genghis Khan) that originally subjugated China and influenced that country’s cultural development, and that it was historically inappropriate for the superior culture of Mongolia to become ‘tainted’ by association with an inferior Chinese culture.  Furthermore, Tsagaan Khass explained that culture aside, the most worrying aspect of the Chinese presence in Mongolia was the issue of ‘race-mixing’ and ‘mixed-marriages’ between Mongolian women and Chinese men.  These tendencies have had the effect of watering-down the genetic purity of the Mongolian race, and has led to the neo-Nazis attacking (and occasionally ‘killing’) those Mongolians that commit this kind of ‘sexual crime’.  When asked what his position was on Mongolian men having affairs with Chinese women, Tsagaan Khass replied that it was the right of every Mongolian man to procreate with whomever he wishes – but that this right does not extend to Mongolian women – who must obey the wishes of Mongolian men.  He added that the ‘swastika’ was originally an ‘Asian’ symbol, and that it was not a contradiction for Mongolians to embrace this symbol and its Nazi German ideology.  After the matter of ‘White’ racism against Asians was raised, Tsagaan Khass answered by stating that ‘National Socialism’ works within individual nations for the benefit of the dominant (and purest) race.  White people are racist, he continued, because their countries have been over-run by non-White peoples, their indigenous cultures destroyed, and their racial purity ‘compromised’.  He concluded the interview with a straight-armed salute and reiterated that the extant problem for Mongolians was the eradication of all Chinese influence. As Buddhists shave their heads, there is a natural parallel – he assumed – in Mongolia with the skin-head movement of the West, which we are very proud of.  In reality, neo-Nazis in Mongolia remain a minority that spend their time parodying their Western-counterparts, and terrorising ordinary Mongolians.  We are told that when Western neo-Nazis heard about the Mongolian neo-Nazis – they responded by calling them ‘monkeys’ – so much for neo-Nazi solidarity!







Original Chinese Language Source Text:



 蒙古近年兴起多个新纳粹组织,主要攻击目标是当地的中国人。蒙古今年以来仇视外国人的攻击事件与日俱增,反对者担心新纳粹组织日益复杂,势力悄悄扩大。蒙古新纳粹组织“全蒙古”(Dayar Mongol)威胁要把和中国男子有过性行为的蒙古女性剃光头。“蓝色蒙古”组织领导人3年前谋杀女儿男友被定罪,杀人原因据传只是因为受害者曾在中国求学。

 类似团体“白色纳粹十字”(Tsagaan Khass)共同创始人之一表示,该团体也不茍同纳粹领袖希特勒的极端主义和点燃二次大战战火,但“尊敬希特勒,他教导我们保有民族认同”。


有舆论认为,新纳粹没有获得民众广泛支持,且随着年轻人接触全球化并到海外求学,强硬民族主义已渐式微。蒙古新纳粹组织“白色口十字”(Tsagaan Khass)一名领导人的话说,希特勒是我们尊敬的人,他教会了我们如何保护民族同一性。

Rightwing Bothering – Chinese in WWI!


Chinese Shot At Dawn (British Army WWI)

I occasionally receive emails from disgruntled White supporters of the old colonial order (and the modern neo-Conservative bourgeois State), usually applying a sentimentalist (and wholly ‘false’) rightwing eulogising of imperialist warfare, atrocity and murder.  Although the White population retains all the social, cultural and political power, nevertheless, such is the general lack of education and class consciousness, that these kind of people assume a sickening and demeaning mimicry of ‘victimhood’ – the very false consciousness this blog exists to expose and eradicate as a political force.  Of course, this type of rightwing ignorance, being as inverted a mind-set as it is possible to possess, mistakenly glorifies the mass-slaughter of the working class and ethnic minorities, whilst rather stupidly believing that the destruction of the working class by the controlling middle class, is in the best interests of the working class being destroyed!  I usually delete these emails and permanently ‘ban’ the sender, but every so often I post one of these efforts as an exercise in political awareness. Remember the simple rule that the rightwing ‘lies’ and ‘deceives’ to cause panic and derision within the ranks of their political opponents.  This is because the rightwing supports capitalism and the ‘individualism’ it generates. The rightwing also attempts (in typical bourgeois style) to dominate at the point of contact.  Retain a calm mind and intellectually assess the false argument being presented, and steadily dismantle its deluded premise.  The following emails are gems in this regard, purportedly supporting the murder of Chinese men during WWI by the British military authorities, whilst simultaneously claiming a familial link to a ‘fallen comrade’.   Sender MB – Tuesday, November 08, 2016 16:59:

‘I have read your piece on ‘Chinese Shot at Dawn’ and would like to say that Coolie C M Hei, and Coolie C H K’hung of the Chinese Labour Corp were executed for murder ‘after the war’ because they committed their crime ‘after the war’. they committed their crime in October 1919 and were executed in February 1920.  It was not racial backlash (in the case of these two men) as you suggest in your piece but in fact for the murder of my wife’s Great Grandfather who was a Sergeant in the British Army and had bravely served his country in many battles at the Somme. He was working with the Chinese Labour Corp during clear up operations after the war and was murdered by the two named persons above.  One rule of going to print I believe is to check ones facts first.’

The obvious deluded nature of this piece, coupled with its obvious ‘White’ racist sentimentality, reads like a post from the rightwing Britain First website – but I digress.  The point this rightwing fool is making is that ‘White’ people are ‘superior’ to ‘Chinese’ people, whilst using an internet assembled and non-referenced quote, and assuming a sugary sweet association with a fictitious upholder of White valour.  I asked in an email dated Wednesday 9.11.2016, for the following corroborating information which was not forth-coming:

‘I have read your email.

Please provide the following information for historical verification:
1) The name, rank and number of the sergeant in question.
2) The Court Martial transcripts you have referenced.’
This is the reply that proves my assessment of this fool (Wednesday, November 09, 2016 20:27):
‘I have no wish to appear curt but this information is as you appreciate a little personal to my family however is in the public domain and is available for you to check if you do your research rather than make assumptions.’

This deluded supporter of the rightwing refers to this information as ‘personal’, after sharing with me – a complete stranger – whilst further contradicting himself by stating all the information is in the public domain!  He could not give me any proof of what he says, simply because no proof exists.  Besides, the point of my original post is to highlight and reveal the extent of ‘anti-Chinese’ racism in the UK at the time, when China was officially on the side of the British during WWI! WWI was nothing less than the mass-slaughter of the international working class – nothing more. In this war the Chinese were shot by their enemy – the Germans – and their allies – the British. What this exchange does, is confirm that the rightwing has a weird tendency of ‘reading’ Marxist-Leninist blogs (probably because Hitler wears thin after awhile), and of trying to use the bullying tactics of racism and dominance at the point of contact, to deliberately misrepresent the ongoing leftwing ‘anti-racism’ project.  As far as I am concerned, I will continue to expose these enemies of the working class and defilers of internationalism wherever and whenever they appear.
%d bloggers like this: