Marxism is NOT “Jewish” – Hitler was Wrong!
Translator’s Note: I have deliberately left-out the examples of Mao Zedong and Ho Chi Minh from the body of this work, not because they are not important, far from it, but because I wanted to maintain a certain logical “flow” for the European reader. If we include these two great Revolutionary heroes, then the thinking would be something like this:
Mao Zedong – Confucian, Buddhist and Daoist upbringing – lived a in pre-modern feudal hierarchy in China. Mao read Chinese-language translations of Marx provided by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. Despite his religious background, Mao’s mind was immediately propelled into the “modern” state of “non-inversion” – due to the manner in which Marx and Engels ordered their words and assessed their subjects. In other words, Marx turned Mao’s mind the “right-way-around”.
Ho Chi Minh – Confucian, Buddhist and Daoist upbringing – lived in an intense French colony that pushed Catholicism and the destruction of Vietnam’s Chinese language and heritage. Ho travelled extensively outside of Vietnam, visited the West and was good friends with Charlie Chaplain (Chaplain was forced to flee America due to this association – with the US government “stealing” $20 million of his money). It is said that Ho encountered Marxism whilst visiting France – and the words of Marx (translated into the French language) profoundly altered his thinking. Ho’s mind-set was propelled into a sudden (secular) modernity that transcended his socio-economic condition.
Neither of these two non-European men gained any understanding of “Judaism” after studying Marxism – as the far-right would have you falsely believe. Indeed, as two men steeped in the religions of Asia, it was this religiosity that was lost, and not a foreign and alien religion that was gained. Of course, none of this assessment will stop the racism that the bourgeoise – or its far-right cronies – throw-out as routine. All non-White leaders and heroes are not only supposed to be inspired “by the Jews” – but they are are also accused of committing the vary mass murders that were aimed at them! The Imperial Japanese killed and maimed around 60 million throughout Asia during the 1930s and 1940s – and so the bourgwisie (and its fascist chums) “invert” reality and say that these leaders killed their own people! Although there is NO evidence these supposedly Communist massacres ever took place – in the “inverted” fairy land of fascist counter-reality – these phantom deaths are considered real and a forgone conclusion. The same can be said for the USSR which saw the Nazi Germans kill and maim 40 million between 1941-1945 – only for the Western bourgeois to “invert” reality and claim Stalin murdered all these people – and he did this during a parallel history the West invented! Even Polpot was only in power for just 18 months – but the West (and a misled Vietnam without Ho Chi Minh) fabricated a mass murder which was in fact the bodies of the hundreds of thousands killed in Kampuchea during the illegal US blanket-bombing and land invasions of that country! The West “inverted” reality and spoon-fed a receptive public – absurdly claiming that this poverty-stricken group possessed the technology and the know-how to enact a Nazi German style mass murder! Hollywood did its bit – as did the Japanese Yoko Ono – allowing a track to be used in the fictional film “The Killing Fields” – recorded by the then deceased John Lennon. One project that united the West with the USSR was the preventing of the spread of Chinese Communism outside of geographical China. The UK killed thousands of ethnic Chinese people in Malaya between 1948-1960, with the UN killing millions of Chinese and Koreans in the US War of Aggression in Korea (1950-1953). The Trotskyite Vietnamese, the US, and the USSR also killed thousands of ethnic Chinese people between 1979-1989 in Kampuchea. Marx was a human-being who happened to be a genius. He foresaw all this inverted madness – and traced its delusion right back to the inner core of religiosity! This is the danger of Trotskyism – as it misleads the masses and re-inserts the “inverted” mind-set back into the thought-processes of the workers. This is what happened to the USSR with Khruschev’s betrayal of Stalin in 1956 (causing the Sino-Soviet Split) – and in Vietnam post-1975. ACW (24.6.2025)
I find it laughable when people on the left and right of the political spectrum attempt to reconstitute the figure of Karl Marx in their own image. The far-right has very little that would pass as “intellectual” in its arsenal, and this is why the image of Marx must be shoe-horned into the bizarre and ahistorical thinking of Adolf Hitler. The onus of this type of anti-intellectualism is that capitalism is “normal” and to think otherwise is to be psychotic. This deception arises from the fact that the deluded rarely possess the objectivity to diagnose their own deficiency – and so they must limit everything to the boundary of their current thinking. Nothing outside the illness must be allowed to exist, grow, or gain traction amongst the masses. For the enemy of the paranoid “ill” – is anyone who can work-out “they are ill”. It turns out that Hitler may well have had one-ball – and that it is “back-to-front”!
I must not belabour the point I am making. There is nothing “defensive” about revealing inherent stupidity. All we need is the basic Greco-Roman reasoning (used by Marx himself) – which is the foundation of Western civiliastion (“not Christian theology”) used in the correct manner:
Karl Marx + Friedrich Engels = Scientific Socialism (Historical Materialism & Surplus Value)
Karl Marx + Friedrich Engels studied Hegel and were of secular, Prussian backgrounds.
Historically the Marx family was Jewish
Historically the Engels family was Protestant Christian
Marx & Engels were brought up outside the religions associated with their ancestral pasts.
Marx & Engels were both secularists
Scientific Socialism = secularist materialist ideology
Scientific Socialism is NOT Judeo-Christian in either history, content, or objective
Scientific Socialism contradicts Judeo-Christian theology – antithesis of theistic reasoning
VI Lenin was of a Russian Orthodox Christian ancestry – secular in reality
VI Lenin studied Law in a secular atmosphere
VI Lenin studied the work of Marx & Engels – applied for prevailing Russian conditions
VI Lenin effectively “universalised” Marx-Engels Thought
VI Lenin’s Marxist thinking is NOT Jewish, Protestant Christian, or Russian Orthodox Christian
VI Lenin interpreted Marx-Engels Thought – suitable for historical material conditions
Hitler chose to wrongly define Marx-Engels-Lenin Thought as “Jewish” – because he is an Anti-Semite
Although much can be written in a parallel fashion proving that Marxism contradicts Judaism at almost every point), a much simpler argument can be employed. As the work of Marx and Engels is voluminous, many who are opposed to Socialism are not inclined to study it – or gain any genuine understanding of it. The arguments used against Marxism are often generic and derivative – relying more upon rhetoric, past opinion, untested and unquestioned hypotheses, than upon sound logic. In fact, there is one sublime and pristine observational comment made by Karl Marx which kills all theistic religion dead in the water – never to be re-born again. This is a very different situation than simply deciding to be an atheist or non-theist, etc. Anyone can place their mind anywhere on an arbitrary scale that measures “belief” and “disbelief”. Hitler, for instance, had so many contradictory beliefs that it is obvious his thought processes were all over the place and lacked a proper anchoring in existential logic and reason. He ordered 800,000 ethnic Germans to be publicly executed (many beheaded with an axe) for disagreeing with his flaky thinking. As Hitler possessed “no original thought” – he was unable to produce any truly “original thinking”. Hitler simply spent his time recycling old hatreds in new ways, believed scarecrows were ancient fertility gods, declared June 21st New Year’s Day, and made sure his maniacal soldiers received a steady supply of performance enhancing amphetamines – drugs that enabled the wounded to keep fighting and the usually placid to be full of rage and anger.
Hitler could have said:
Marx-Engels-Leninism = Protestant Christianity (reflecting Engels’ contribution)
Marx-Engels-Leninism = Russian Orthodox Christian (reflecting Lenin’s contribution)
Hitler could have wrongfully chosen any of the three religions at play – but chose “Judaism”
The prevalence of anti-Semitism on the left, right, and centre of the political spectrum ensures that every political commentator opposed to Socialism will try to associate Marxism with what they perceive to be the worst possible ideology and culture that can be imagined. For the anti-Semite this will not include any form of Christianity (despite this religious ideology being an off-shoot of the Judaic religion) – but will always settle upon “Judaism”. For Hitler, “Communism” is “evil” not because he understands any of its teachings or has witnessed any of its policies in action, but rather because he (falsely) thinks “Jews” invented it. The ridiculous nature of this rather stupid (circular) argument does not require any further elucidation on my part. Hitler is basically saying that he does not like cats – because dogs invented them (dogs are evil because they invented cats). It is an argument with no intellectual depth or logical reasoning – and yet it has captured the imagination of millions since Hitler penned it in the mid-1920s.
Furthermore, Hitler likes to copy what he thinks are the “good points” of Socialism – such as reasonable pay, good working conditions, cheap prices, cheap holidays, free schooling, free healthcare, and animals rights, etc, and he achieves this by pretending “Marx” (who died in 1883) “stole” these ideas from Him (Hitler) personally and the German Volk (People) in general – as they existed (bear with me here) “in the Germanic tribes” throughout the ancient past. Yes, Hitler stated in numerous Press interviews that within German tribal totalitarianism was the “true” Socialism that (the “Jew”) Karl Marx “stole” from the German People (essentially “himself”) – and which he dishonestly “integrated” into his “Talmudic” thinking. What? None of this makes sense. Hitler thinks that the ability for a tribal leader to dispense “downwards” throughout his tribe, the things and resources he owns but his tribe need to exist and thrive (if they are to remain loyal), is an act of benevolent “Socialism”. However, as this is a top-down affair with no freedom of choice at any point, and given that this behaviour does not constitute a lateral “redistribution of wealth” throughout a society with no hierarchical classes, this “issuing” of supplies (for that is what it is) cannot be construed as being an act of “Socialist” redistribution, and is in reality nothing more than the action of a military-style “Quarter-Master” giving-out that which is available to those who have a need. Just why so many people blindly follow Hitler down this blind ally of “tribal sustaining” is a mystery.
Karl Marx wrote:
‘For Germany, the criticism of religion has been essentially completed, and the criticism of religion is the prerequisite of all criticism.
The profane existence of error is compromised as soon as its heavenly oratio pro aris et focis [“speech for the altars and hearths,” i.e., for God and country] has been refuted. Man, who has found only the reflection of himself in the fantastic reality of heaven, where he sought a superman, will no longer feel disposed to find the mere appearance of himself, the non-man [Unmensch], where he seeks and must seek his true reality.
The foundation of irreligious criticism is: Man makes religion, religion does not make man. Religion is, indeed, the self-consciousness and self-esteem of man who has either not yet won through to himself, or has already lost himself again. But man is no abstract being squatting outside the world. Man is the world of man – state, society. This state and this society produce religion, which is an inverted consciousness of the world, because they are an inverted world. Religion is the general theory of this world, its encyclopaedic compendium, its logic in popular form, its spiritual point d’honneur, its enthusiasm, its moral sanction, its solemn complement, and its universal basis of consolation and justification. It is the fantastic realization of the human essence since the human essence has not acquired any true reality. The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.
Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.
The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions. The criticism of religion is, therefore, in embryo, the criticism of that vale of tears of which religion is the halo.
Criticism has plucked the imaginary flowers on the chain not in order that man shall continue to bear that chain without fantasy or consolation, but so that he shall throw off the chain and pluck the living flower. The criticism of religion disillusions man, so that he will think, act, and fashion his reality like a man who has discarded his illusions and regained his senses, so that he will move around himself as his own true Sun. Religion is only the illusory Sun which revolves around man as long as he does not revolve around himself.
It is, therefore, the task of history, once the other-world of truth has vanished, to establish the truth of this world. It is the immediate task of philosophy, which is in the service of history, to unmask self-estrangement in its unholy forms once the holy form of human self-estrangement has been unmasked. Thus, the criticism of Heaven turns into the criticism of Earth, the criticism of religion into the criticism of law, and the criticism of theology into the criticism of politics.’
To be clear:
‘Religion is, indeed, the self-consciousness and self-esteem of man who has either not yet won through to himself, or has already lost himself again. But man is no abstract being squatting outside the world. Man is the world of man – state, society. This state and this society produce religion, which is an inverted consciousness of the world, because they are an inverted world. Religion is the general theory of this world, its encyclopaedic compendium, its logic in popular form, its spiritual point d’honneur, its enthusiasm, its moral sanction, its solemn complement, and its universal basis of consolation and justification.’
This idea that the bourgeois world (and the way of thinking that justifies it) is “inverted” reappears throughout the work of Karl Marx. Essentially, and a point vitally important to this discussion, a “god” entity is “imagined” in the mind – and then falsely believed to independently “exist” outside the mind that has created it – somewhere in the outside world. Perception with regards to religion is “back-to-front” according to Marx – and must be placed the “right-way-around” for this false habit of “historical idealism” (that is “religion” as thoughts in the head) to be replaced with the correct and logical “historical materialist” point of view (that is, “objects in the environment”). Here, Karl Marx exposes the false thinking that underlies the Jewish and Christian religions, and firmly replaces this with a “genuine consciousness” which views the material world as it actually is – and not what the deluded would want it to be. Hitler is “wrong” because the thoughts emanating from his mind are “inverted” (and therefore “wrong”). As the thoughts emanating from Hitler’s mind are “inverted” – his ideas are hopelessly lost in a destructive idealism that cost the lives of millions. Hitler’s “inverted” thinking is “religious” in nature because such thoughts are “wrong” in orientation. Inverted thinking does not have to be linked to any single religion – but rather serves as the bases of ALL theistic thinking (Judaism is not “special” and has the same delusional bases as any and all human inventions that are “religious” in nature).
Scientific Socialism is “Scientific”. This being the case, why do myriad of academics and street commentators attempt to distort Marx-Engels Thought into “non-Scientific Socialism” – and why is it that the masses is unable to see this is happening? Marx was no more a Jew than I am a Christian. I, through my material history, possess a lineage of Protestant and Catholic ancestors – but I was born a Chinese Buddhist. Anyone who knows me, knows that I am a non-theist and a historical materialist, and no serious argument could be made that my interpretation of the world is either “Protestant” or “Catholic”. Of course, I know people of all kinds of religious backgrounds – just as Marx knew his Jewish and Christian relatives. When he came to live in London in 1849 – one of the greatest cities in the world – his thinking blossomed but did not alter trajectory. Marx cognised exactly what the Western tradition of religion is – and he understood that this stemmed directly from Judaism. He “exposed” this thinking within which many others become entrapped, believing the “inversion” to be real – and the antidote to the “problem”. Imagine if humanity persuaded itself that every illness was the perfect state of the human body – and every cure was the enemy of humanity. Well, you would have the “anti-vax” movement the far-right is currently pushing (this is ironic as Hitler believed in a fascist society benefitting fully from the science of medication). Again, the “inverted” mind-set is present. This is why the far-right is riddled with religiosity – and it does not matter whether it is Judeo-Christian or Pagan – it all stems from exactly the same misapprehension of reality. The Scientific Socialism of Marx-Engels puts an end to all deluded religious thinking – so when the bourgeoisie (including the far-right contingent) continuously misidentify Marxism as “Jewish” – they are expressing the very “inverted” consciousness that Marx is exposing! They are also exposing their own anti-Semitism.
SANGHA KOMMUNE (SSR) 