Racism is a degenerate ideology. Racism is a primitive ideology. Racism is a pre-modern ideology. The problem is that a certain orientation of the thought-processes seeks to arrange and order society along the lines of apples and oranges. All apples look alike – all oranges look alike – but oranges and apples look “different” to one another. The distinguishing of “difference” demands that an ideology be contrived that “separates” apples from oranges in a manner which arbitrarily places one set of differences over another set of differences. This order can change due to shifts in power dynamics – whoever controls the political system – can arbitrarily alter the order of “differences” identified within society. A pro-Zionist dictator, for instance, might place all Zionists above all non-Zionists, with the “friends of Zionists” constituting the second rung. A pro-Black dictator might place all Black people in the top tier – with all non-Black people forming the “lesser” races. All the “friends of Black people” might well constitute the second rung. The same schematic can be applied to Arabs, Persians, Asian, Chinese, Japanese, Polynesians, Europeans, and any other group.
The above description, although correct from a certain perspective, also presents a false narrative which suggests an “equality” of racism exists between the various ethnic groups. Racism may exist between non-White groups – but it is hardly “equal” in practice (as non-Whites have historically been the victims of White racism – which is prejudice plus socio-economic power). Modern racism derived from the spread of White (Christian) Europeans across the world and is the product of their meeting and interaction with human beings who happened to occupy a less modern niche in the evolutionary scheme. What was missing was the understanding that given the right conditions, all human groupings can evolve a modern mind and body. Human beings do not have to be “White” or “Christian”. Indeed, the progression of European culture derived from a “moving away” from the domination of Christian theology. Yes – the Europeans still thought they were doing everything for absolute monarchs ordained by god – but they still made and wore armour, and they still designed, made, and carried muskets, pikes, and cross-bows, etc. Ironically, perhaps the Europeans were applying the Biblical statement “Trust in god – but tie your own camel”.
The 20th century saw the rise of fascism – which is a distilling of historical White racism – bringing into a sharp ideological contrast with the success of Scientific Socialism (an ideology that rejects “racism”). When White Europeans encountered the pre-modern cultures of the world, they realised that Christian morality and monogamy was not present. This reality permeated not only the most primitive tribes – but was also prevalent throughout Islamic societies, Hindu societies in India, and developed to a sublime level in China and Japan. Sexual behaviour was far more liberal and less inhibited, as was homosexuality and an amorphous attitude to gender identity. Not only was polygamy common – but in some societies (such as the Buddhist Kingdom of Bhutan) Polyandry was common. As can be seen by the events surrounding the Mutiny on the Bounty – for many Europeans, these attitudes were liberating and freeing – whilst scorned and looked-down upon by the gate-keepers of European society. For other Europeans, the non-aggressive attitudes of these cultures encouraged a reactive attitude of out-and-out brutality and wanton decadency.
Inflicting acts of punishment on the practitioners of these cultures for their supposed deviancy away from a Christian morality they never knew – led to the death and mutilation of millions. Not all Europeans reacted positively when experiencing these realities – but became quite despotic and blinded by rage. Rape of men, women, and children became normal, expected, and supported by the European status quo. This act of wanton (hate-filled) aggression took away the natural consent practiced by these people. The idea was to inflict physical violence as punishment – and extract some type of dominating “pleasure” from the experience. These types of Europeans would rape and torture indigenous men, women, and children to “prove” that a promiscuous lifestyle was incorrect. This relied upon a totalitarian (hierarchical) power structure that placed the Europeans at the top – and the indigenous people at the bottom. This demonstrates the ideological dysfunction of this European reaction to the experience of non-European and non-Christian cultures. I suspect that these psychopaths already existed “pre-contact” – but the conditions prevalent in the contact permitted this psycho-sexual dysfunction to manifest like never before – serving to legitiise and reward it.
Once back in the straitjacket of British society, the psychopaths still existed. They passed on their genes and their attitudes to future generations. The Age of Consent was “12” in England until the late 1800s (it had been this age since 13th century) – when it was raised to “16” with certain caveats. Many noblemen in England (including Henry VIII) were famous for “hunting” (and raping) peasants girls of all ages (Charles I was also decadent in this manner – preferring boys). This type of sexual activity may well have existed amongst the peasantry, but a lack of written evidence makes this difficult to discern. Whatever the case, a general ignoring and breaking of Christian morality was common – with “nuns” often becoming pregnant and “monks” rearing families. Therefore, this type of debauchery obviously existed prior to European expansion across the world and was not a consequence of encountering the different cultures of the world. Encountering different cultures unencumbered by Western feudalism and Christian morality (and hypocrisy) led to an inner and outer explosion of greed and hatred which sought to rob its victims of self-respect and their developed sense of peace and tranquillity. Perhaps these descendants of “Celts” saw in the indigenous peoples of the world the “natural” culture that the Romans and the Christians ripped from them – and could not handle the despair and grief of something once great being lost.
Today, the post-1945 fascist and Neo-Nazi groups in the UK and elsewhere – have the problem of attracting sexual deviants motivated by racism and totalitarian modes of social organisation. As these groups require the mainstream media to at least be indifferent to their presence – by uncritically broadcasting their message and existence – they do not welcome media scrutiny and criticism, particularly if that scrutiny includes the bad press of exposing “paedophiles”, “rapists”, “child abusers”, “women-beaters” and “murderers”, etc as being amongst their ranks. Paedophiles today can be comprised of teenagers, young adults, the middle-aged, and the elderly, consisting of both men and women. The far-right also attracts “incels” and “terrorists” of every kind. Adolf Hitler has been exposed as being “bisexual” – having sex with his SS Guards. Many of his upper echelon were also hidden homosexuals often being married with children as a form of camouflage. Nazi German soldiers were taught that “raping” sub-human people was permitted and a legitimate part of war as their victims were not protected by the anti-rape laws that guarded genuine humans. The Nazis tolerated bisexuality but persecuted gays who rejected fascism, did not practice rape, and were not interested in children. Unfortunately for the far-right, as racism is linked directly to sexual deviancy, if their vetting actually worked – there would be nobody in their groups – and the movement would be dead. As a consequence, the far-right only attracts sexual perverts hell-bent on world domination due to the contradictory patterns of thought that dominate their inner mind. This is a partly genetic deviancy – but one that can be encouraged or removed from manifesting on the physical plane via appropriate conditioning.
SANGHA KOMMUNE (SSR) 