With the failure of universal health since the Thatcher-years – the rise of the so-called “dissident right” – is in fact a product of ongoing and untreated mental illness. This movement is vast and growing across the West. It is neither “dissident” nor “right” – as these are masks its sufferers wear. Masks designed to hide from everyone (and themselves) that their core-hatred is a dysfunction of the mind that is nothing other than a continuation of the inverted mind-set that Marx clearly pointed-out in his work. That mind-set which pulls monetary profit toward the individual – whilst pushing everyone else away – this is bourgeois capitalism. Nationalism, whilst supporting this greed, seeks to “gather together” (yet another contradiction) of those self-identifying profit-hunters – who wish to nevertheless “coalesce” around a pseudo-scientific concept – in this instance “skin-tone” and the supposed genetic history of “skin-tone”. All very shaky ground for legitimate science. In the enhanced (lower-level) world that mathematics and science reveals through magnification – “race” as a rigid identifier simply does not exist. Of course, part of the mental illness we are discussing is that an individual can choose, as an act of will, to “believe” that race exists, and then voluntarily live in a world theoretically defined by the boundaries of this category error.
The problem is that in its hubris to be recognised as the best possible society that can exist, liberal, bourgeois capitalism “permits” its citizens to believe whatever nonsense the greed-infested individual sees fit to uphold. Yes, there is an orthodoxy, the bourgeois understand that it holds power only through the material science that underpins modern weaponry, and so will not allow a slip back into Medieval modes of existence. Everything in the world of the bourgeoisie must be post-industrial but not pre-industrial. This is why all genuinely pre-industrial societies have either been completely destroyed, torn apart, and its members fully exploited, or cynically preserved for the exploitation that only tourism can bring. Only on occasion, such as is the case with modern India (itself remarkably backward despite being fully capitalist) – are islands of indigenous peoples “protected” by the Indian State and allowed to live unhindered in their behaviour. As an example, this is rare, as humans living in pre-modern societies have tended to be overly trusting toward modern humans – and have paid a heavy psychological and physical price for this “non-greed” orientated existence.
When this historical context is properly understood, it is sobering to observe that the modern capitalist bigot (that soldier of both Christ and capital) laughingly declares that it is the victims of their ideology that are the problem – and not their own maniacal urge to tear apart, own, and destroy what does not belong to them! No wonder the “cross” is the chosen symbol of Christian – the object upon which a person’s body (and mind) was torn to pieces during the crucifixion process. Of course, the cross prior to this usurpation (the early symbols of Christ were the morning star, the double fish, and the dove, etc) – used to represent the four-seasons through which nature seems to traverse in most parts of the globe. Remember – not all racists are Christians – but most are quite happy to have a “cross” as their symbol signifying the oncoming doom that their ideology represents for their perceived enemies (hence the latest burst of George Cross veneration in the UK). The ironies and similarities are legion – to coin a phrase. As contradiction lies at the bae of all far-right thinking, the ability “to be wrong” – at least for these adherents of hate – proves to their mind “that they are right” – as this is exactly how an inverted mind-set operates. The reality is that the past is that set of socio-economic parameters that have led to the present (as there is an observable history) – but which have now been dialectically transformed into a new set of realities. Although perhaps unfamiliar for those who knew the older ways – what is new today – will be the supposed tradition of tomorrow. It is an amorphous flow with nothing set in concrete – not even the concrete.
Like “race” – “tradition” only exists in the mind as a memory – or a recalling. That being said, only tradition has a ring of authenticity about it – because at least it can be seen in the past in the form of physical structures (in the old buildings) that surround us. Society and culture – or those realities that individuals live within – prove that White Europeans can be born in China and brought-up as “Chinese” with no contradiction – just as a Chinese person can be born in the West – and brought-up as “Western”. The far-right mistake conditioned behaviour (or that which can be altered given the right training or stimulus) with the false idea of a rigid (or “determined”) “race”. Crime is far more prevalent where a) bourgeois systems of law exist which privilege the rich, and b) that are designed to punish the poor for not recognising the dominance of the bourgeisie. People are poor because the system is designed to make them poor – it is not the fault of the poverty-stricken that they are poor. The bourgeoisie, however, propagate the lie that being “poor” Is the fault of the poverty-stricken – and that their capitalist system is the fairest in the world. All this is a lie that individuals all live-out everyday of their lives. Poor White people may well commit just as much crime as poor non-white people – and definitely do. These are tired old troupes that the far-right trots-out every so many years to see if it can manipulate society toward their its nefarious ends. Imagine if India, which has venerated the chakra-wheel, combined this imagery with the (Western) Medieval punishment of “breaking on the wheel” – then society might be venerating the spoked-wheels of cars and bicycles. Once the laughter dies down, we must all admit that this is exactly what the far-right would have us do.
The bourgeoisie, ever since the defeat of Cromwell, has pursued a centre-right political trajectory, one that serves the ousted aristocracy – but firmly oppresses the peasantry that fought in all the Parliamentarian Armies. Cromwell was demonised for taking the side of workers – much like Stalin is demonised today. The far-right is allowed to exist because the bourgeois permits it (usually through the shadow-government that is Free Masonry). The Free Masons control everything behind the scenes and they do this in plain sight. Notice that the far-right never (or hardly ever) complains about their pay-masters – the Free Masons – but would rather have the populace obsessed with a Jewish issue that hardly anyone ever experiences (I oppose Zionism just like most Jews that I know). Even Karl Marx stated in a rarely seen letter (the Free Masons control the left as well and work to propagate Trotskyism whilst hiding their own involvement) – that the Free Masons infiltrated the rank and file of the Working Men’s Association (the First International) – so that Marx was forced to relocate its headquarters to New York, and then close it down to protect its members from the nefarious activities of those who move in the shadows. Now, I do not wast my time worrying about Free Masonry – but the fact remains that this entity controls the ebb and flow of bourgeois society. The corruption is tangible. It is best to keep away from these people so as to avoid the influence they wield. In the meantime, the Welfare State will continue to be dismantled, migration will continue to be weaponised, and Socialism will continue to be suppressed, misrepresented, and nullified.
Although the Western mind in general may well be considered advanced today – this has not always been the case. Ancient Egypt, India, and China may well have influenced the thinking of Greece – with the development of capitalism (and the Industrial Revolution) being more or less fairly recent historical accidents. This is on the macro-level – but what about the micro-level? Take Fred West and his partner – just two random delinquents lifted out of the cutural texture that is modern Britain. There are many more like them. As thick as sh’t and twice as nasty. When Fred was questioned by the Police about his alleged association with the far-right – Fred answered that this assumption can’t be right – as he’d voted Conservative all his life! This is a hard-working man (a manual labourer) who was born in a Herefordshire Gypsy camp. He and his wife kidnapped, sexually tortured, murdered, and dismembered at least twelve young women and girls – some estimates say 18. Incest was prolific in both their families – Fred and Rose routinely sexually molested their children – with Rose being raped in a local park by an older (local) man at the age of 15-years. Both acted-out the violence inflicted on their own minds and bodies in their youth as adults – as they embraced the S & M lifestyle. Violence, pain, and suffering made-up the core of this particularly “White” enclave of UK society – with not one single immigrant in sight! This included the raping, dismemberment, and murdering of their own children – as well as runaways and those girls brought up in Social Service care – and yet the far-right of the early 1990s said nothing. There was no “Gypsy Grooming Gang” scandal – only silence from the right. Rose was a White woman who carried-out despicable crimes – and yet no “White Woman Grooming Gang Scandal” from the right. No campaigns to stop all White migration from the US, Europe, Australia, or New Zealand, etc.