Many commentators who attack the far-right – and in fact supporters of the “far-right” themselves. Indeed, it is this incessant in-fighting (a type of “White-on-White” crime) that prevents the far-right from achieving anything truly tangible in the physical world. Of course, there is always the humorous adventurism of the far-right comprised of essentially pointless operations that register at most – as a mild inconvenience on the social barometer. In the 1990s in Sutton (South-West Great London) – racist skinheads took it upon themselves to “shout” racist abuse down the stairwells of local train stations. I witnessed one such antic – with most people, Black, Brown, White, or Yellow – simply walking past, and going about their day unaffected. In a very real sense, these constitute self-imposed “morale-sapping” operations – a profound form of self-sabotage. The Nazis do not look at it this way – they think that any act of opposition can serve as the spark that might light the fire of civil unrest which leads to a race-war. If you want to know the script – study Hitler’s Mein Kampf – it’s all the far-right has and is the basis of its paranoia and psychosis. Far-right “leaders” come and go, and the failed “Fuhrers” of yester-year are like last week’s dinner – once very interesting – but now no longer relevant.
Being stale, they can even be bad for your personal health of the operational health of the movement. Mark Collett is an oddity as he has lasted a long time – and yet his relevancy expired many moons ago. He is the product of the internet age and has been able to re-invent his grifting ways many times over. Mark Collett can only communicate through a very narrow, genetically deficient rubric that expresses as educationally sub-normal and intellectually challenged. He is successful because he attracts those individuals who perceive the world through exactly this narrow, hatefilled tunnel-vision. What is interesting is that the upper echelons of the far-right resent Collett’s grifting ways as he is dominating the pool of available funds the far-right could be using to facilitate race-hate and violent Revolution. The Paradoxes that riddle and cripple the far-right do not stop at Collett’s hypocrisy – or his money-grabbing ways. Collett could anyone of the mindless far-right that currently permeate the UK. His thinking is “inverted”, anti-intellectual, and follows a medieval level of ignorance and lack of awareness. He needs to be taken off the streets and treated in a psychiatric hospital – alongside those he attracts and encourages.
As improbable as it may seem, a number of deficient (White) Englishmen and Scotsmen live in Thailand (often seeking the quality of lady-boys they cannot encounter in the UK – at least in-front of their friends) – and yet are notorious racists who routinely express anti-migrant rhetoric on their social media platforms. By “anti-migrant” – I mean “non-White” migrants living in the UK. The lie is that all crime is committed by non-Whites – whilst the reality is that the in a White-majority country – the majority of the crime is committed by “Whites”. The problem is that the ignorant racists are quite happy to accept the rancid myths of racism instead of carrying-out research into the reality of society (and read “Das Kapital” written by Karl Marx). The far-right racist are quite happy with White migrants who hold Neo-Nazi viewpoints, such as the Poles, Ukrainians, Estonians and Romanians, etc, Neo-Nazis who are welcomed with open-arms even though they represent entirely alien (and unfamiliar) ethnic groups and cultures. These types of British miscreants seem to think that as White people – they possess the inherent right to go anywhere and live in any place – whilst being welcomed by the indigenous population.
The Thais, like the Filipinos, are laid-back and generally accepting providing the White visitors are not sex tourists (prostitution with women is tolerated) or paedophiles (children can be exploited by the criminal underbelly) – the latter forming a substantial proportion of White migration to these countries. Think about it, why would White men who usually believe that non-White migrants impoverish the UK – suddenly decide to go and live within the epicentre of where they consider to be the “racially inferior”? Obviously, there has to be an attraction. Sometimes, whilst being thoroughly racist – these White men “use” non-White women for sex – occasionally marrying one or two in passing. I have even discovered a White American racist who lives in Japan – and is married to a Japanese woman. She is fine with his viewpoints – or so she opines – as the Japanese are far more racist than Americans and she finds his outbursts to be nothing but “cute” temper-tantrums triggered by living amongst his “racial betters”.
SANGHA KOMMUNE (SSR) 