Author’s Note: I realised long ago that the only power others have over us as individuals – is that of inter-personal “violence”. Of course, I am not including State-power – as the State can do what it wants whenever it wants to, and justify it in anyway it sees fit – even supressing and disinforming. The far-right trades on the threat of inter-personal violence. Do as they say – or you will be hurt. Most people cannot fight and are unable to defend themselves from this ignorant thuggery. Well, as I grew-up practicing martial arts, I became adept at deliberately clashing with Neo-Nazis and fascists – giving them a good beating that broke noses, teeth and hearts. The few bruises I received in return were worth c. I enjoy fighting and am a member of the far-left (I have also been a Buddhist monk). I believe in militant peace where the balance of nature is retained through inner and outer discipline. Most far-right thugs I have encountered are riddled with fear – even those who train in boxing or whatever. Get past the surface bluster and they crap themselves. Those on the left must practice martial arts for self-defence and continue the grand tradition of the “Red Army”. We must defend ourselves and one another from far-right violence. To be clear, I do not agree with – or advocate – violence. However, just as long as violence exists within society that targets “us” – we must be prepared to defend ourselves from it. Our minds must be “still” and “quiet” whilst our bodies must be “fit” and “strong”. We must psychologically undermine the far-right so that its physicality is merely a “husk” that can be smashed and pushed aside. We must inwardly defeat the far-right before we are able to decively defeat it outwardly. ACW (7.10.2026)
What is loosely referred as the “left” is a nightmare construction premised upon the inverted bourgeois mentality. This is similar to how the Western image of “Soviet History” is really just all the inconsistencies (and injustices) inherent within the capitalist system – “projected” outward onto the USSR. It is the psychology of the psychopath writ-large. It is the triumph of an unbridled and untreated mental illness. The patient, through an act of will, “defines” the medical establishment that is tasked with his “treatment”. When this model of misrepresentation is understood, it is clear that what passes as the “left” today is in fact all the defiencies of the political “right” and “centre” – misplaced. This situation works because the perpetuators exist in a world of anti-intellectual denial. Acquiring political power permits this madness to become State Creed. All those who see through it – or who protest against it – are subject to all the draconian practices the State can muster (and this can be considerable). The bourgeois establishment allows the far-right to combat the left – and when the right becomes to influential its wings are clipped – leading to the far-right ideologues to bleat allegations of all kinds of “victimhood”. The far-right is the low IQ sector of the middle-class establishment which is manipulated by the bourgeoisie to act as a barrier preventing widespread Socialist movements from developing.
This is because the far-right is comprised of poorly educated workers who possesses the most destructive of false consciousnesses. This is why the far-right is riddled with self-hatred. Indeed, the bourgeoisie relies upon this inherent weakness to prevent the far-right from ever achieving terminal velocity and thus gaining electoral or dictatorial power in the UK. The far-right is permeated with paedophilia – and so the left must be comprised of sexual deviants. The far-right advocates pogroms and genocide – so the left must have a history of destroying populations. The far-right has no coherent ecnomic policy – so the history of the left must be strewn with economic deserts. The far-right continuously loses the wars it starts – so the left must be an ideology that prevails through thuggery and deception. The far-right hates women and eradicates the disabled – so the left must force women to abort unborn foetuses. The far-right believes “race” is real – and so the left must be guilty of destroying homogenous societies (through “race-mixing” and “displacement”). The far-right hates Judaism (whilst preferring its Christian variant) – and so the left must mimic Judaism through its “Internationalism”.
The far-right thinks Karl Marx was a “Jew” (so what if he was – Jesus was a Jew and the Buddha was a Hindu) – so the left must be a covert religious project hell-bent on converting the world to Abrahamic theism. The far-right believes in god – so the left must deny god. The far-right thinks Hitler was a great man – and blame all his failures on the deception of the left. The far-right, like its bourgeois pay-masters, believe there is no difference between the Nazis and the Soviets – so the left must be Nazis in disguise. The reality is that the far-right, if given its head, would destroy any and all bourgeois notions of morality – so that society would become a free for all – where the strong would feed on the weak. Dominate males (decreed by the far-right society) would be permitted to satisfy their sesual desires upon the bodies of men, women, children, and animals. The bodies need not be “living” for this practice to occur. SS Officers in Hitler’s army would routinely sexually abuse young recruits as a “toughening” exercise – whilst claiming they opposed homosexuality.
Indeed, Hitler has been described as being found in-bed with handsome young men on many occasions. The hypocrisy is palpable. By way of comparison, the USSR was considered morally conservative and did not permit any of this kind of behaviour (homosexuality, although tolerated to a certain extent, was officially considered a mental illness). Prior to the 1917 Socialist Revolution, Czarist Russia was incredibly backward with feudalism and the Church ensuring the survival of tribalism. Young girls were routinely married at 12-years old – with the rape of girls and women being widespread. Orthodox priests and monks often sexually abused their congregations. Rich aristocrats used their status to abuse the male bodies of poor. This is the kind of behaviour that the far-right (and Catholic Church) admires – but Lenin swept it all away when he abolished the Czarist Legal System in 1918. Lenin abolished the anti-gay laws – but also brought-in the first anti-paedophilia law in the world (designed to stop older men preying on younger boys. Lenin, who admired the UK, copied the British Age of Consent of “16” – granting women and girls full equality and the right to work. Lenin believed that women needed to work in factories to become full members of the proletariat.
The experience of practicing the self-discipline required to abide by the factory clock (and turn-out a good 12-hour shift) performing work that benefitted society – was vital if women were to transcend the psychology of drudgery that surrounds child-reaing and house-keeping. Of course, each factory possessed a 24-hour cresh – and all women workers possessed the right to visit their young children at anytime during their shift – without the permission of the Foreman. Women and girls were also entitled to a full and free education without being forced into sexual slavery or involuntary child-bearing. Men and boys were taught to be clean, disciplined, fair, equal, and wise, and to protect the Socialist society that had raised them. Men and women understood that the 15-countries that comprised the USSR represented one branch of the working-class – which existed all over the world. Internationalism recognised that the working-class existed everywhere and was expressed through the various cultures within which it had developed. Internationalism seeks to explore that which unites the working-class – whilst acknowledging the cultural difference that distinguishes it. The far-right hates the left because the left has built civilisations and won world wars. More to the point, the far-right is staffed by deficient workers who are traitors to their class. Hating the left for them, is in fact a form of “self-hate”. They want to come in from the cold, but the thuggery of their movement holds them in a fearful subjugation.
