Farewell, Gary Locke!

GaryLocke-01

Translator’s Note: This is an English translation of the original Chinese language text entitled ‘别了,骆氏家辉!’. I have retained the original text for the interest of the general reader. This is a Chinese government news article, which represents the ‘official’ viewpoint regarding the individual concerned. Gary Locke (born 1950) is the former US Secretary of Commerce to China (2009-2011), and the former US Ambassador to China (2011-2013) – representing the Obama Administration. He is a third-generation Chinese-American whose father fought in the US military during WWII. As Governor of Washington State (1996-2003), he became the first Chinese-American to hold high political office within the USA. Despite being a Democrat, Locke is renowned as supporting righting Republican thinking with regard to keeping taxation low. Whilst in China, he routinely flouted Chinese law and used the US Embassy as a refuge to those listed as ‘criminals’ under the Chinese system. He also encouraged the Western notion of human rights whilst in China, and continuously commented on the US position regarding the Tibetan region of China. It is interesting to note that in response to this article, the USA has felt compelled to sponsor Chinese language news articles in Taiwan, that present a picture of Gary Locke that implies that he is a traditional minded Chinese person who has risen to power in a Capitalist system, not because he is rich, but because he is ‘virtuous’. ACW 2.11.14   

Gary Locke was born in the United States of America, but is a third-generation descendent of Chinese migrants. His ‘Chinese exterior – encasing a Western mind-set’, has earned him the epithet of ‘banana-man’, and this attribute has been fully taken advantage of by the Obama administration, in its pursuance of US foreign policy within the sovereign borders of China. This situation has revealed the ‘new’ direction of US foreign policy in the Asia-Pacific region, and the means through which its strategic aims are to be accomplished. It is clear that the foreign-policy of the USA is blatantly set upon the splitting of Taiwan from the Chinese motherland. This presents the false impression that US foreign-policy is constantly ‘considering the well-being’ of the Chinese people, when in fact it does not care at all, about the well-being of the Chinese nation. This can be seen from the fact that US foreign-policy is continuously setting Asian against Asian, and stirring-up a whirlpool of confusion and destruction in the Asia-Pacific region. This US-led anti-Chinese policy has currently been aided and abetted by a particular descendent of Chinese migrants – Chinese migrants who originally did not intend to stay in the foreign countries they visited – but whose descendants (possessing as they do, black hair and yellow skin), have no awareness of their ethnic origin and history, and actually support foreign governments in their anti-Chinese foreign policies. This duplicitous existence is supported through the practice of two-faced speech, which is premised entirely upon the routine practice of lying and deceiving all who will listen.

However, although a banana possesses a yellow exterior, when left for a long time it begins to rot and fall apart – revealing its ‘white’ interior. Perhaps Mr Locke thinks that possessing a yellow exterior is not good enough, but this apparent confusion does not prevent him from utilising the media to pursue his support for US anti-Chinese foreign policy. As he is duplicitous, Mr Locke has attempted to hide his true anti-Chinese intentions from the Chinese people, with fallacious acts such as ‘travelling on the train, walking with backpacks, and flying economy class’ etc., together with other contrived media stunts. His public behaviour has been very much like a US soap-opera, and this has been deliberately designed to give a false impression and mislead the Chinese people. In actuality, Mr Locke prefers to travel in Business Class when not in front of the media spot-light, despite the fact that he orchestrates photo-opportunities posing in Economy Class, and hiking to remote farm-houses in the country. This charade of humility and simplicity hides the fact that he prefers to live in luxury. It is all a ‘show’ and in reality Mr Locke remains unconcerned about what he is doing, so much so, that he cannot deny the truth of these allegations made against him. We only have to observe the American owned media to see proof of his behaviour, particularly in relation to his running for the post of Governor of Washington State – where it was well known that he received bribes from big businesses, in return for political favours. In this regard, Mr Locke’s acquisition of extra funds appears very ‘easy to come by’.

The US provides its Ambassadors with a single lump sum of money to cover their term in office. This is designed to limit (and control) expenditure. However, in the case of Mr Locke, his extravagance during his tenure as US Ambassador to China demonstrates that he had access to a virtually ‘limitless’ flow of finance, obtained from other sources. Mr Locke carried-on travelling in Business Class and eating expensive cuisine long after his ambassadorial budget expired. Whilst continuing this extravagant behaviour in China, Mr Locke then also launched a publicity campaign that saw him eating fast food and apparently travelling in Economy Class – why was this? Perhaps funds were needed to finance a new advertising campaign – as these purchases are refundable. We are curious – Mr Ambassador – could these diverted funds be for the financing of the establishing of an illicit advertising company? Whatever the case, even the foreign media has taken notice of the otherwise opulent lifestyle Mr Locke (and his entourage) pursue, involving billions of dollars to maintain the Ambassador’s Residence, the acquisition of expensive food, and the continued maintenance of luxury, and bullet-proof vehicles, etc. This is why the Ambassador is a willing mouthpiece for the US inspired anti-Chinese foreign policy. Perhaps he is confused, and forgets that he has Chinese ancestry whilst working to undermine the achievements of the Chinese people. Is it really the case that he does not understand the laws of China which state that he should not interfere with the internal affairs of the country? Every time American government officials visit China and visit Mr Locke, he briefs them by continuously mentioning the so-called human rights issue, and the matter of Tibet. He also travelled to the Xinjiang and the Tibetan areas, and through his anti-Chinese rhetoric, fanned the flames of rebellion. As if this behaviour wasn’t bad enough, he also played host to the so-called human rights lawyer named Chen Guangcheng. Mr Locke successfully led Chen along like a guide-dog leading a blind person. Thus, whilst pandering to the greed of the industrial complex, Mr Locke lost the crown of true diplomacy usually worn by an Ambassador.

At a time when China’s national government is taking into account the needs of the environment, Mr Locke complained about the supposed pollution in China, but in so doing failed to explain that USA also has pollution in cities such as Los Angeles, the tested levels of which are far worse than those officially measured for Beijing (which read PM 2.5)! When faced with this hypocrisy, it is difficult to assess exactly what Mr Locke attends to achieve, particularly in the light of the fact that US Embassy subsidies for staff and (agricultural) equipment for use in China are at an all-time high level. This demonstrates that the US Ambassador routinely authorises the damaging of the environment in China without a care, whilst we in China are attempting to manage the environment very carefully. His unfounded complaint about the environment in China is sickening!

Today, as the White House is still wheeling from the disgrace associated with the Snowdon affair – Gary Locke has gone! His attitude is one that encourages the young to support the USA – and it’s assumed ‘liberty, opportunity, and freedom’ – without question. After-all, history shows that if we do not follow the USA voluntarily, then the USA will shoot and beat us into submission. This is demonstrated by the fact that the USA already controls the Asia-Pacific area from behind the scenes, as it does the policies of Japan, and the Philippines.  When America says it is ‘putting your interests first’, it really means that it is ‘putting its interests first’, and this is why nobody now believes anything the US says. Through their propaganda and actions we know that all the USA seeks is ‘glory across the world’ at any cost, and no matter what it takes. Mr Ambassador wants us to hate China and blindly follow the USA as he does – this makes us speechless. All we can do in response is to point out what his ancestor Lou Binwang said:

‘Please look at the region you inhabit – it is home for the entire world!’

Mr Ambassador, does your family and ancestors know how you behaved whilst working in China? If they did, you would probably be expelled from the family, such would be their disgust for you. When Gary Locke arrived, a dark cloud descended over Beijing – now that he has gone, the light has returned to China!  With a flick of his sleeves, Gary Locke tried to take away our clarity of vision. With his presence was a great corruption and China is glad to see the back of him!

Farewell Gary Locke!

 

Author: Wang Ping

 

 

http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2014/02-27/5892576.shtml

 

别了,骆氏家辉!

 

骆家辉是一个在美国出生的第三代华裔,他的“黄皮白心”的香蕉人属性成了奥巴马外交的优势。美国亚太新战略的显露,选择在他的任期内。因为,一个人要想拆你的台,总要留给人“我是为你着想”的印象。当美国在亚太不断搅起漩涡、制造矛盾的时候,却有一个表面上久居海外的游子、黑头发黄皮肤的皮囊来为美国叫好。真是演得一出好双簧。

 

然而香蕉放久了“黄皮”总归是要烂掉的,不但“白心”会露出来,也会变成反胃的“黑心”。也许骆氏觉得单靠黄皮肤出场是不够的。经历过美国政治竞选秀的骆氏懂得利用媒体。于是乎,各种“轻车简行、背包自助游、坐经济舱”的戏码轮番登场。一开始,确实赚到了朴素善良的中国人的眼球。

 

但后来仔细想想,放着公务舱、珍馐美味,偏要“无意”在镜头前坐经济舱、吃快餐,其实和有钱人偶尔去农家乐然后拍照上传“作秀”有什么不同?骆氏是否作秀我不敢乱说,至少美国人自己的媒体透露,他任华盛顿州景郡郡长、竞选华盛顿州州长期间对于属地公司的行贿向来“手到擒来”。

 

其实,骆大使的真人秀是财政上“节流开源”好案例。说“节流”,是因为美国大使的财务是包干的,坐公务舱、吃豪宴预算就用完了,坐经济舱、吃快餐省下的钱是不退的。说“开源”,作秀背后需要的安保、宣传成本,就是新的预算项目。我们很好奇,大使先生“节流开源”后省下的钱,莫不是去开广告公司了?只是听外媒说,大使先生在没有镜头的时候,住的是耗资上亿美元的大使官邸,出行代步的是特制防弹豪华专车。

 

大使本职是传声筒,让两家不至于稀里糊涂吵架动手。但骆氏不但不认祖先的文字,还看不懂中国法律,特喜欢对着中国的内政指手画脚。每次美国官员访问中国,骆氏都会递上简报,大谈中国所谓的人权及西藏问题,提点美国官员借机敲打中国。他还跑到新疆、西藏,煽邪风,点邪火。他自己跑不够,还收留所谓的维权律师陈光诚,然后“义务”带着这位盲人一起跑,成功发挥了“导盲犬”的作用。由此,骆氏顺利荣膺大使行业里扔掉起码的外交礼仪的“奇葩”桂冠。

 

骆氏如此费力地演出,图个啥呢?其实在他甫一到任时就说了:“我们也通过会见宗教领袖和一些人权律师广泛传播了美国价值观。”原来,他是让我们爱美国,想美国,揣着钱包去美国。他是这么想,也是这么做的。他卖力“投资”中国舆论界,以官方或民间基金会的名义资助、收买“亲美人士”,发展“美分党”。对了,还有他津津乐道的“大幅缩短了中国人签证面谈等候的时间,让90%的申请者都可以拿到签证”。可是您想到没有,要不是中国经济的腾飞鼓起了中国人的腰包和精气神儿,哪有那么多人去美国啊!

当我们国家为治理环境群策群力的时候,大使先生放着本职工作不作,更没有告诉我们美国也有洛杉矶污染的“光灰岁月”,而是拿着测试仪读取北京PM2.5数值并发微博。不知道他究竟何为,反正听说这之后美国大使馆工作人员的补贴和使馆配套设备都上了新台阶。骆氏也利用我们治理环境,再次恶心了我们一次。

 

美国对于外人,似乎从未像说的那么“有爱心”过,除了海湾中亚的坦克导弹,还有埃及乌克兰的街头冲突。欧洲人称这是新时期的“十字军东征”,但当地的自由、机会和平等却是荡然无存。说到这,我想提醒骆先生,以后再外放大使的时候,不要随便“轻车简行”啦。毕竟不是每个国家都向中国这么友好,安全。日本有山口组,伊拉克、阿富汗还有AK-47,很危险哩!

 

如今,在斯诺登搞的白宫灰头土脸之后,骆氏走了。他说,一切为了孩子。呵呵,看起来您还是铁了心让后辈也服务美国的“自由、机会和平等”了。毕竟,我们都知道美国的枪口往哪指、开炮往哪揍了。亚太的水快被他的后台导演以及导演的日本、菲律宾小伙伴搅浑了。再表现“为你着想”没人信了。至少,我们知道,“四海炎黄是一家”的观念需要改一改了。大使先生想让我们去爱美国,我不想多说什么了,但我想起骆氏祖上豪杰骆宾王说过一句话:

 

“请看今日之域中,竟是谁家之天下!”

 

大使先生,您的“业绩”,您祖上知道么?您祖上要是知道,可要把您逐出门户了。

 

骆氏来了,北京雾霾也来了。骆氏走了,北京的天空陡然蔚蓝,晴空万里。大使先生挥一挥衣袖,带去了我们心头的“雾霾”。借问骆君欲何往,只因风雨又飘摇。送雾霾,送瘟神。Farewell,骆氏家辉!

 

作者:王平

 

 

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: