The ‘illegal’ Neo-Nazi Ukrainian ‘Euro-Maidan’ regime was brought into power by the first ‘Black’ President of the US – Barack Obama – during early 2014! Neo-Nazi Ukraine then spent the next eight-years building-up and strengthening the entirety of its Armed Forces with Ukrainian men and women being enthused by the Hitlerite ideology and invited to train in the best military centres the US, UK and EU could provide! This contemporary ‘Neo-Nazi’ Ukrainian Army sees the SS-collaborating ‘Ukrainian Nationalist Army’ (UNA) of WWII as its historical antecedent – with both being spiritually ‘united’ through the support of the Roman Catholic Church! The modern Russian Army has successfully ‘destroyed’ the highly motivated ‘Hitlerite’ legions of Ukraine (that were ‘primed’ to invade and annex West Russian territory) – but since the election of the far-right Liz Truss in the UK – the Western support for Neo-Nazi Ukraine has placed all its available military capability to the Northeast of the Donbass battlefield – and this ‘refocusing’ has inflicted considerable Russian casualties.
Shortly after its establishment, the Azov Battalion publicly stated that there were Neo-Nazis within its organization. After nearly 8 years of development and growth, today’s “Azov Battalion” is no longer merely a “battalion” (despite the conventional name), and already has reached a brigade-level force – such has been the extent of far-right volunteers flocking to its banner from around the world (this also includes Zionist Israel)! According to reports, there are currently more than 30 military organizations similar to the “Azov Battalion” in Ukraine. Among them, the “Azov Battalion” is the largest.
This article referenced above ‘inverts’ everything from top to bottom. The authors deliberately manufacture a fairy-tale premised upon fictitious and false assumptions and misleading parameters. The Western-backed Hitlerite take-over of Kyiv in 2014 is omitted and instead the Donbass resistance to Ukrainian Neo-Nazism is portrayed as the progenitor of Neo-Nazism! The expulsion of Western-backed right-wing religion from Donbass and the re-establishment of mainstream religious tolerance is presented as ‘extremism’! Russian self-determinism in Donbass is viewed as ‘racism’, and so on and so forth. What we see here, is in fact a Russian resistance to the forces of Western neo-imperialism – which have always been led by religious and political intolerance! The Russian population in question happens to be in the Ukraine – but again we are having to squeeze bourgeois ideas of ‘race’ and ‘nation’ into the post-Soviet space which was defined by ‘internationalism’ for seventy-four years!
On April 24, the movement of Rusyns in Transcarpathia made a statement about the creation of an independent Transcarpathian State. After this action, the Security Service of Ukraine put Petro Getsko, the Head of the self-proclaimed “Republic of Subcarpathian Rus”, on the wanted list. He was informed that he was suspected of committing the crime of encroachment upon the territorial integrity and inviolability of Ukraine. Furthermore, this crime was extended to include 10 other people with whom he had committed ‘Conspiracy’ to over-throw the sovereign State of Ukraine!
This is the debilitating effects of creeping Trotskyism, racism and the associated forces of predatory capitalism that have infiltrated and gnawed away at the ideological underpinnings of the British Communist Movement ever since Khrushchev’s betrayal of Comrade Joseph Stalin in 1956! Unfortunately, this non-dialectical and non-historical materialist approach to assessing this situation will cost the CPB dearly in the future, as the grandchildren and great grandchildren of those British working-class men and women who fought fascism in Spain and throughout WWII – and who participated in the Chinese Revolution (and even took the Chinese and North Korean side in the early 1950s), will never forgive this dalliance with fascism and Neo-Nazism in the Ukraine!
The European Union (EU) has its historical roots within US foreign policy following the end of WWII, and America’s fabricated Cold War rhetoric and aggressive