Blogger’s Note: Malta was a British colony founded in the 1700s. Its population is a mixture of indigenous islanders (who possess an ancient culture recorded in the extraordinary archaeology), Moors (Black and Arab Africans), Spanish, and English. Somehow, all these cultures (and languages) mixed and integrated – forming a unique (voluntary) identity. Malta has not been subject to the destructive mass immigration demanded by the US via the EU. Within European countries, millions of workers are forced to migrate for work – thus creating a pool of cheap labour that destroys the economy for indigenous workers (indeed, mass migration is a deliberate policy designed to attack the working-class and prevent strong unions and grass-roots worker organisations from developing). The England voted to leave the EU in 2016 to escape this cycle of imposed cultural and socio-economic destruction. Even so, the Human Rights Act imposed on all EU member states prevent each constituent country from “deporting” those who commit crime. For instance, the UK is NOT permitted to deport individuals representing a certain “Abrahamic religion” (who hail from a third-world country the US has given nuclear weapons to) – when they form grooming gangs that “rape” British children – as the law states this action would be a “violation of their Human Rights”. I think Malta has every right to deport those who do not respect their laws and act appropriately. Of course, Malta is being careful from a legal perspective. This ruling does not apply to Maltese citizens. Furthermore, those subject to this form of deportation (tourists and holiday-makers) possess the right of an instant appeal process. It may be that Malta could well end-up being trapped by the current Human Rights Act – which is written in such an outdated manner that it ends-up protecting the criminals – whilst punishing the law-abiding citizens (who are forced to continue to live next-door to these reprobates because they possess citizenship). What’s odd about all this is that Starmer authorised the deportation of 10,000 Brazilian men, women, and children from the UK (people who lived quietly and did nothing to us) – illegally depriving the children of their British citizenship (these children were born in the UK and were therefore “British”). Starmer decided to target an innocent group in the UK – whilst continuously ignoring another group. Indeed, Starmer placed 12,000 British people in prison for sharing posts about this group’s criminal tendencies. The Human Rights Act needs to be re-written so that criminality is discouraged and not rewarded. We shall see how practical this Malta initiative turns-out to be. ACW (25.7.2026)

Tourists fined €200 could be ordered to leave Malta under new rules

MHRA backs measure, saying anti-social behaviour risks damaging the country’s tourism reputationNationalTourism

24.7.2026| Times of Malta 

Visitors and other people who do not normally live in Malta could be ordered to leave the country after receiving on-the-spot fines totalling €200 or more, under new regulations announced by the government.

Cases involving non-habitual residents who receive such fines will be referred to the Principal Immigration Officer, who will assess whether the person’s continued presence is contrary to public order, public security or the public interest.

The officer may withdraw the person’s permission to remain in Malta and order their removal before the end of their holiday or stay, according to the Home Affairs and Security Ministry.

Anyone affected will have the right to appeal before the competent tribunal within one working day of being notified of the decision.

Home Affairs and Security Minister Glenn Bedingfield said Malta would remain an open and welcoming country but would not tolerate visitors who abused its hospitality or disrupted public order.

“Those who choose to break the law or create a danger to public safety should know that they will face immediate consequences, including removal from Malta before the end of their holiday,” he said.

The Malta Hotels and Restaurants Association welcomed the measure, saying it sent a timely message that unacceptable behaviour would not be tolerated.

MHRA president Tony Zahra said visitors should be able to enjoy what Malta had to offer but must respect local laws, public order and host communities.

“Those who deliberately engage in anti-social behaviour should understand that there are consequences for their actions,” he said.

The association said disruptive behaviour by a small minority of visitors could affect residents, damage Malta’s international reputation and undermine tourism operators working to provide a high-quality experience.

It said the measure was consistent with its calls for a tourism model that prioritised quality over quantity and placed greater emphasis on respect for Malta’s cultural heritage, public spaces and residents.

Times of Malta

Malta’s oldest and most trusted news organisation, founded in 1935.

Maltadaily.mt

Tourists Who Get €200+ On The Spot Fine Can Be Forced To Leave Malta Earlier

In a video statement, Minister for Home Affairs Glenn Bedingfield has announced that a new legal advice has been published wherein any tourist who gets an on the spot fine going over €200 can have their case referred to the Principal Immigration Officer.

If the officer finds that the actions of the tourist is deemed dangerous to the rest of the public, the person can be removed before their holiday ends.

Bedingfield said that most of the tourists that visit Malta are welcomed and respect the country, but some of them do not always abide by the law.

#MaltaDaily