Tag: public order

A memorial to Jean Charles de Menezes outside Stockwell tube station in London. Boutcher said the SDS should never have spied on the dead man’s family. Photograph: Stephen Kelly/PA

UK: Undercover “Special Demonstration Squad” – Closed Down Over Unjustified Surveillance – Spycops Inquiry Told! (3.8.2026)

Around 20-years later, Starmer would order the quick round-up of 10,000 Brazilians in the UK for deportation – whilst illegally taking the British Citizenship of the children (so that entire families could be deported with no legal or moral issues resulting. To be clear, the Brazilians have done nothing wrong in the UK, and are here in relatively few numbers – and yet the British State has targetted this group whilst ignoring the groups that have caused trouble. Bear in-mind that the SDS came into being one year after the “Summer of Love” in 1968 – and was instigated by an incumbent Labour Party. It existed and weaved its evil webs throughout the UK until 2010 (between 2008-2010 it seems to have had a name-change to “National Public Order Intelligence Unit”) – and the election of a far-right Tory-LibDems Coalition (although it was during the outgoing of Labour Prime Minister of – Gordon Brown – that it ceased operations after years of complaints). I suspect groups like the Maoist Workers’ Institute were subject to its machinations over the years – machinations that are now considered both illegal and immoral. My views about the Guardian Newspaper remain unchanged. Stop lying about Neo-Nazi Ukraine and the Israeli Genocide and re-orientate your political compass firmly back toward the left.

Continue reading

A brawl that took place in Sliema earlier in July.

Malta: Foreigners Who Break the Law – Disrespect Maltese Culture – & Are Fined €200 – Will Be Deported! (25.7.2026)

Malta was a British colony founded in the 1700s. Its population is a mixture of indigenous islanders (who possess an ancient culture recorded in the extraordinary archaeology), Moors (Black and Arab Africans), Spanish, and English. Somehow, all these cultures (and languages) mixed and integrated – forming a unique (voluntary) identity. Malta has not been subject to the destructive mass immigration demanded by the US via the EU. Within European countries, millions of workers are forced to migrate for work – thus creating a pool of cheap labour that destroys the economy for indigenous workers (indeed, mass migration is a deliberate policy designed to attack the working-class and prevent strong unions and grass-roots worker organisations from developing). The England voted to leave the EU in 2016 to escape this cycle of imposed cultural and socio-economic destruction. Even so, the Human Rights Act imposed on all EU member states prevent each constituent country from “deporting” those who commit crime. For instance, the UK is NOT permitted to deport individuals representing a certain “Abrahamic religion” (who hail from a third-world country the US has given nuclear weapons to) – when they form grooming gangs that “rape” British children – as the law states this action would be a “violation of their Human Rights”. I think Malta has every right to deport those who do not respect their laws and act appropriately. Of course, Malta is being careful from a legal perspective. This ruling does not apply to Maltese citizens. Furthermore, those subject to this form of deportation (tourists and holiday-makers) possess the right of an instant appeal process. It may be that Malta could well end-up being trapped by the current Human Rights Act – which is written in such an outdated manner that it ends-up protecting the criminals – whilst punishing the law-abiding citizens (who are forced to continue to live next-door to these reprobates because they possess citizenship). What’s odd about all this is that Starmer authorised the deportation of 10,000 Brazilian men, women, and children from the UK (people who lived quietly and did nothing to us) – illegally depriving the children of their British citizenship (these children were born in the UK and were therefore “British”). Starmer decided to target an innocent group in the UK – whilst continuously ignoring another group. Indeed, Starmer placed 12,000 British people in prison for sharing posts about this group’s criminal tendencies. The Human Rights Act needs to be re-written so that criminality is discouraged and not rewarded. We shall see how practical this Malta initiative turns-out to be.

Continue reading

A Slightly Inclined Seat!

Hong Kong: Biased BBC Fails to Report Cathay Pacific “Inclined Seat” Properly! (24.9.2024)

The Western (White) governments operate an ongoing project of attempting to turn as many diasporic Chinese people as possible against Mainland China. Non-Chinese people arguing over seating is so common on aeroplanes that it is virtually never considered worthy of news-time coverage – so why is this considered important? Could it be that the Hong Kongers who rioted due to Western manipulation in 2020 – are once again angry at the behaviour of PRC representatives? This Hong Kong couple was probably on their way to the UK to take-up their British citizenship (Hong Kong ceased to be British Territory in 1997), free house, free car, free education, free medical care, and privileged employment. Who knows – perhaps they will soon be frequenting Sutton United Football Ground on Sunday mornings – attempting to learn what Christianity is – as their Visas have been granted on the false grounds that they are “Christians” that have been persecuted by the CPC! This is the kind of criminal the UK governments are importing to our communities. This couple should have been arrested at Heathrow and welcomed with one of Starmer’s 12 month prison sentences given out for Public Order Offences!

Continue reading