American communists Claudia Jones and Harry Winston in Yalta with a group of vacationers, 1962. Photo. Photographer Evgeny Khaldei.

US: Claudia Jones Deported to the UK [in 1955] for Being a “Communist”! (3.9.2026)

This is typical of the bourgeois academic community – and perhaps to be expected of someone who has infiltrated and made his own way (successfully) in the White world (there are realities of “race” and “racism” that require navigating to avoid exclusion and ostracization). Indeed, even on the far-left, people like Claudia Jones are omitted from the general history and this stems from as yet un recognised and untreated disease of racism that exists on the left. The left lives in a world where it feels it occupies the moral high-ground because the USSR conquered racism. This “conquering” did not spread outside the USSR and the left in the West has no right to associate itself with it. Furthermore, from 1956 onwards, the USSR pursued a subtle but distinct “White” (Russian nationalistic) approach to the spread of Communism – as non-White China was demonised for daring to support Stalin against the lies perpetuated by Khrushchev. Although Claudia Jones did receive medical care in the USSR – and met Mao Zedong in 1964 (twice) – as part of an anti-racist and anti-colonial delegation (despite my extensive personal [family] and professional contacts with Chinese academia on the Mainland – I have not been able to locate any photographs of these meetings).

Leicester Mercury Blots-Out Female Breasts!

UK: Statue of King Richard III “Defaced”! (31.8.2026)

When you consider the sheer state of Leicester (I visited recently) – why did the Leicester Mercury Newspaper decide to “censor” photographs of the alleged incident – so that the masses cannot “see” or “access” the true details of the situation. Who are the journalists and editor seeking to defend? Whose sensitives are being protected by attempting to alter reality? Which part of the population would be offended by this graffiti? I had to look on the internet to find the uncensored pictures. Considering King Richard III has been vilified in Shakespeare (and throughout history – possibly unjustly) – and that millions tuned-in on TV to watch the “live” digging-up of his bare-bones from under a car-park – what other injustice could the King possibly be defended from? History is history – reality is reality. Those who commit these pointless acts should be appropriately punished – but the media should not conspire to “hide” facts from the public. At least King Richard III possessed the courage to die fighting on the battlefield.

The packed public meeting chaired by MS Janet Finch Saunders at Beaumaris. Image: Dale Spridgeon

Wales: Bizarre “Baumaris Town Council” Functionality Issue Persists! (30.8.2026)

This aligns with the BBC being a (forcibly) publicly-funded entity that behaves in a monolithic manner toward its financiers (the huddled masses). The BBC has routinely misreported about China, Iran, Russia, and has openly supported Neo-Nazism in Ukraine and the Israeli genocide in Gaza. The BBC, whilst being financed by the working-class – operates a ruthless centre, centre-right (bourgeois) trajectory in its reporting. This continuous disinforming has led to the BBC being banned in Russia and China for “racialised” reporting (amongst other places). It would seem that the “Beaumaris Town Council” has a historical issue regarding a rupture between the people who “elect” the Town Council – and how the Town Council that “delivers” all the functions expected of such a (democratically) elected entity. In a similar situation as that highlighted below – half of the “Beaumaris Town Council” (including the “Mayor”) “resigned” from their roles in 2017. It would seem that the local people are not satisfied with how the Town Council operates and is holding it democratically accountable (the local masses possess the democratic power to do this as “voting” equals “function”).

Yerbury's Neo-Nazis - Oxford 2026!

UK: Infiltrating A Hitler-Clone Neo-Nazi Outfit! (26.8.2026)

You are right – we do not know each-other – but I know your work, as I have been studying the UK far-right for some time. You are a self-hating gay – if memory serves me right. A horrible, bigoted dwarf of a man who was accused by an ex-police woman of rape and abusing teenagers. I am surprised you are not stood in the ranks of the demented. So, “Colin Robertson” – I will post your ridiculous video because it is of public interest. How could the UK produce such useless people as these – and yourself.

One of the first known images of the Major Oak, according to the RSPB

UK: Robin Hood’s “Major Oak” Dies in Sherwood Forest! (26.8.2026)

If this is the case, then ironically the building was soon “removed” for some reason or other (to be fair, according the maps, there were many places termed “lodges” and they seem common). In recent years, this area was a multi-storey car-park (not far from a cinema and the town centre) but has just been developed into expensive flats. The “Rectory” used to located nearby – but that disappeared decades ago (and was flats for disabled and vulnerable people for awhile). I have spoken to numerous local historians who have no idea as to “why” Sutton is associated with Robin Hood. I came to live here in the early 1990s – and the idea serves as a flowing undercurrent of identity in the area that is never questioned. I have no knowledge as to why this is. Obviously, there may well be a historical connection that nobody remembers today. Be that as it may, surely the English notion of “Socialism” (the redistribution of wealth) has its bases not in (the far later) Marx (who was exiled to 19th century England) – but in Robin Hood’s idea of “robbing from the rich to give to the poor”. Whatever the case, an old tree in Sherwood Forest has finally died after 1200-years of life. Robin Hood and his men are supposed to have met and/or hidden under its branches.

Tyndale: The Man Who Gave God an English Voice

UK: My Review of David Teems’ Tyndale Book! (25.8.2026)

Writers are very good at being both “honest” and “dishonest” in equal measure. No genuine writer will disagree with me – but will instead knowingly puff on their pipe whilst inspecting a duck – or something similar (the mundane is lifted-up by a competent writer). Am I being too harsh on Mr Teems – of course. Yes – I am – and for good class-related reasons. The bourgeois already possess control over the means of production – what more do they want? We are left a) with our “words”, and b) the use of those “words”. My words must penetrate straight through the ideological heart of the matter and I feel that the author’s use of Soviet-era exiles is indicative of his world-view and political bias. And even if it is not – it might as well be.

1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 29