China: Mother’s Mean Age at First-Birth to Keep Rising! (11.4.2023)

The mean age of women at first marriage was 25.7 years old and that at first birth was 26.8 years old in 2017, both much higher than the legal age for marriage, said the NHC, citing data from the National Bureau of Statistics.

The NHC said financial burden, children’s care and women’s worries about employment have become the main factors restricting fertility.

The commission promised that it will improve supporting measures with relevant departments to create a good social environment for marriage and childbearing.

The US Bucket List! (10.4.2023)

The routine ownership of fire-arms is ‘banned’ in most Western Europe countries! What is interesting is that the rebelling American government in the 1770s attempted to ‘militarise’ it’s British population against its rightful (elected) London government by overturning King Henry VIII’s (16th century) general ban on private weapon ownership. The King had dissolved the ownership of private armies as part of the dismantling of the feudal system and as a security against his fellow nobles launching an armed coup against his leadership! From that time onwards, the only military force allowed in the UK has been the British Army controlled by the Crown – and then after Cromwell (in the 17th century) Parliament. However, during the 18th century the British government was afraid of invasion by the French and for a time a law was in effect which allowed Local Militias to be formed – manned by the good and the well-off who could afford to pay for their own uniforms, pistols, muskets and training, etc. Interestingly, this law was active during the American War of Independence and it could be that the American rebels got the idea of arming their population from the British policy of preparing it’s homeland population to meet the threat of Napoleon.

DPRK: Opening Ceremony for Chosun Disabled Children Restoration Centre! (2.4.2023)

These experts collectively emphasized that children with Disabilities will continue to grow through the use and application of bright and courageous medical and educational programmes which encourage the development of their hopes and talents of each child – facilitating a blossoming in the future! Disabled people are an important part of our Revolution and are serving as a very real benefits for our country’s most Superior Socialist System! Following this collective discussion – all the participants enthusiastically looked around the recovery centre! (End)

China: US Urged to Stop Slandering TikTok! (17.3.2023)

The greatest threat to Internet security for people living in the West is the danger posed by US hegemony – which seeks to strengthen its already substantial control of the Western Internet and how we – as free-thinking individuals – access, store, share and transmit data through it. By making a straw dog enemy of China, the US is slowly but surely eroding our individual and collective freedoms to an ever greater degree whilst it tightens its restrictive grip upon the minds and bodies of our youths! It is frightening to think that whilst the US is fabricating fake security concerns regarding off course spherical, canvas devices – its aggressive social media platforms already have access to our personal and corporate living spaces and are busy pumping their unceasing US anti-intellectualism into the minds and bodies of our young people, the vulnerable and the easily led! Perhaps we in the West need a genuine ‘choice’ instead of greater US ‘hegemony’ disguised as choice. Indeed, perhaps we in the West would benefit by China providing this ‘choice’ through its technological genius and willingness to share. Most people living outside of the US are unaware that they live only a short distance from a fully armed and functioning US military base that has absolutely NO reason to be outside of America in the first place! Where is it there? What is America doing to your freedom and why are our Bourgeois governments allowing this to happen without our consent!

William Burroughs – My Lunch is Naked – So What? (21.2.2023)

For instance, William Burroughs (in his masterpiece ‘Naked Lunch’) argues that male homosexuality is a product of Matriarchy – whereby women ‘influence’ men (through a sort of cultural ‘osmosis’) to take on a female sexual orientation. Women deny they are doing this, of course, whilst perpetuating the camouflaging myth that they are the ones being oppressed by male ‘Patriarchy’ – the very attribute combined womanhood is destroying through this ongoing effeminate re-programming of men. The Bourgeois State accepts this female-concocted surface argument as a means to avoid acknowledging the real causes of Gayness, or the further suggested idea by William Burroughs that much of what passes as ‘deviant’ sexual behaviour in a post-industrial society (as decreed by the Bourgeois State and enforced by reactionary elements of the working class) – exist because those participating in such activities find them enjoyable and fulfilling.

How the Bourgeois (Capitalist) State Conditions and Controls Young People! (14.2.2023) 

The minds and attitudes of the young people today are the product of the policies the Bourgeoise State has enacted. In other words, the older generation has protected the Bourgeois (capitalist) State by ensuring that the younger generations are conditioned to think in a way that sees middle of the way liberal democracy as being the only acceptable way for society to exist, and the only expression of reality that keeps non-White populations ‘happy’. This is because Black and Asian groups have ceased to support the overthrow of predatory capitalism (through a Marxist-Leninist Revolution), and now seek to gain their own fair share of the ‘profit’ gained from the historical and existential exploitation of the working-class! The irony is two-fold. Firstly, the greater percentage of this profit has been historically gained through the exploitation of the White proletariat – and as the ‘White’ population serves as the majority of the population throughout Europe and the US – this Black and Asian policy is striving to acquire a share of capitalist profit it has not earned (the millions of African slaves who built America through the White enforced use of their ‘free’ labour – were not part of the proletariat – with most being agricultural workers existing in serf-like ‘feudalistic’ conditions). Secondly, this Black and Asian policy is supporting the capitalist division of labour which gives rise to the competitive forces that are the basis of all forms of racism (forces expertly exploited by Henry Ford in his US automobile factory, for example). Whilst supporting capitalism, this Black and Asian policy supports the very theoretical basis of the ‘racism’ that its various campaign groups strive to oppose. 

1 7 8 9 10 11