Category: Philosophy

How ‘Socialist’ Star Trek was Hijacked by Bourgeois America! (3.3.2023) 

The Socialist spirit of scientifically driven exploration has been replaced by the expansion of US political and military hegemony. The absence of opposition to this expanding US dominance is termed ‘peace’. In other words, where Roddenberry’s original Star Trek told the story of an unknown theoretical future, the Star Trek of today has become a multifaceted vehicle for the expression and endorsement of the politics and culture of contemporary America! Every new culture and species must bow down to the all-conquering Federation (NATO) and alter their way of life to ‘fit-in’ or face the consequences. Even some of the Black actors who play prominent roles in the new plethora of Star Trek mimicry – wear skin lightening make-up. Obviously, the White America that has now co-opted Star Trek – has liberated these actors from their ‘Blackness’ – all part of the benefits of living in a multicultural society. 

Continue reading

Film Analysis: The Strays (2023)! 

The central character of this film is a ‘Black’ woman whose history as a human being has obviously involved ‘mixing’ of various forms experienced by her ancestors. To what extent this has happened is a matter of debate and is certainly not discussed in the film, but the reality of her two original (biological) children being African looking suggests that the central character possesses genuinely ‘African’ genes and that the father of her children was also ‘Black’, etc. Indeed, her ‘Black’ children are a shocking contrast to the ‘White’ (middle-class) society she has infiltrated – particularly when compared to her ‘new’ children produced with her ‘White’ husband! Through their uncompromising attitudes and violent behaviour – her original ‘Black’ offspring are presented as positively ‘demonic’ – and it cannot be doubted that the writer of the film must have intended this to be the case! Again, playing upon ‘White’ sensitivities and ‘Black’ experience. The Bourgeois Establishment, as is usual for its double standards, has tended to avoid virtually any of the above issues, and instead has limited the assessment of this film to being that of a run of the mill script with no reality beyond the surface presentation! This may be termed a typical ‘White’ response of ‘denial’ when confronted with the progressive dynamics of Black intelligence!

Continue reading

William Burroughs – Spending Working-Class ‘Leisure’ Time is NOT Revolution! (22.2.2023) 

As well as this chemically altered perception – Burroughs would participate in all kinds of deviant sexual activity – which he admitted in his books also included the ‘illegal’. How did the hypocritical Bourgeoisie respond to these revelations? By turning a blind-eye, of course, Everything that titillated the Bourgeois imagination was viewed as prime examples of an ‘alternative’ lifestyle well-lived, whilst anything that was or could be ‘illegal’ was simply declared as ‘imagination’ and pure ‘art’ – and nothing else was said! Losing control of the material world is NOT Revolution and is the process of effectively ‘abandoning’ the field to the opposition. Participating in various forms of illegal and/or sexual deviancy (as a form of ‘lack of control’) is nothing more than William Burroughs letting his ‘Bourgeois’ side shine through!  

Continue reading

William Burroughs – My Lunch is Naked – So What? (21.2.2023)

For instance, William Burroughs (in his masterpiece ‘Naked Lunch’) argues that male homosexuality is a product of Matriarchy – whereby women ‘influence’ men (through a sort of cultural ‘osmosis’) to take on a female sexual orientation. Women deny they are doing this, of course, whilst perpetuating the camouflaging myth that they are the ones being oppressed by male ‘Patriarchy’ – the very attribute combined womanhood is destroying through this ongoing effeminate re-programming of men. The Bourgeois State accepts this female-concocted surface argument as a means to avoid acknowledging the real causes of Gayness, or the further suggested idea by William Burroughs that much of what passes as ‘deviant’ sexual behaviour in a post-industrial society (as decreed by the Bourgeois State and enforced by reactionary elements of the working class) – exist because those participating in such activities find them enjoyable and fulfilling.

Continue reading

How Carl Jung Betrayed Evolutionary Science! (17.2.2023) 

If the bizarre work of Carl Jung produced in 1956 is compared with the work he produced in the early 1900s – it seems to be written by somebody else – so different is its poor intellectual style and illogical state of its construction. Around the same time (and perhaps for the same reasons), the British Philosopher – Bertrand Russell – was interviewed in the UK and also chose to ignore the immense suffering of the Soviet people (and their 41 million casualties), stating instead that Marxist-Leninism is a ‘violent’ ideology! Like Jung, Russell was presented as a Western ‘intellectual’, and yet like Jung – ended-up talking utter illogical bilge when the time come to tell the truth and expose Bourgeois lies! He attempted (like Jung) to ‘punish’ the Soviet people for daring to ‘defend’ themselves! This is tantamount in its lack of logic to accusing a woman of committing acts of ‘violence’ – because in her desperation she managed to fight off a potential rapist! Of course, many men of Jung’s German ethnicity did ‘rape’ not just women – but men and children as well during the Nazi German orgy that unfolded in the USSR! How dare an ethnic German like Carl Jung deliberately side with the stupidity of US anti-intellectualism and the viciousness of predatory capitalism! Fascism, of course (and I am sure Jung knew this) is capitalism in decline!

Continue reading

How the Bourgeois (Capitalist) State Conditions and Controls Young People! (14.2.2023) 

The minds and attitudes of the young people today are the product of the policies the Bourgeoise State has enacted. In other words, the older generation has protected the Bourgeois (capitalist) State by ensuring that the younger generations are conditioned to think in a way that sees middle of the way liberal democracy as being the only acceptable way for society to exist, and the only expression of reality that keeps non-White populations ‘happy’. This is because Black and Asian groups have ceased to support the overthrow of predatory capitalism (through a Marxist-Leninist Revolution), and now seek to gain their own fair share of the ‘profit’ gained from the historical and existential exploitation of the working-class! The irony is two-fold. Firstly, the greater percentage of this profit has been historically gained through the exploitation of the White proletariat – and as the ‘White’ population serves as the majority of the population throughout Europe and the US – this Black and Asian policy is striving to acquire a share of capitalist profit it has not earned (the millions of African slaves who built America through the White enforced use of their ‘free’ labour – were not part of the proletariat – with most being agricultural workers existing in serf-like ‘feudalistic’ conditions). Secondly, this Black and Asian policy is supporting the capitalist division of labour which gives rise to the competitive forces that are the basis of all forms of racism (forces expertly exploited by Henry Ford in his US automobile factory, for example). Whilst supporting capitalism, this Black and Asian policy supports the very theoretical basis of the ‘racism’ that its various campaign groups strive to oppose. 

Continue reading

1 … 367 368 369 370 371 … 388