Charles I – SANGHA KOMMUNE (SSR)

UK – My Review of “Flick: The Story of Female Pleasure” (2026) by Dr. Kate Lister! (26.8.2026)

26/08/2026 Adrian (釋大道)

It is thought that “soul” is of a Germanic (Pagan) origin of uncertain meaning. Western secular narratives tend to incorrectly use “soul” when referring to “psyche”. The Greeks would not have known this term and did not agree with the notion of a spirit existing in opposition to the body. This is a purely Christian corruption of this Greek term. It is a habit of laziness that even academics who should know better at Oxford and Cambridge – still confuse “psyche” for “soul”. These two terms are not the same and should not be conflated. An argument can be made that “psyche” could be construed as the “moment of conception” in the womb (rather than a “soul” which is separate from the body, and which has nothing to do with sexuality). Psyche is the “essence” of psychological and physical existence.

Windsor Catle - St George's Chapel - A sketch drawn in 1888 by Alfred Young Nutt, Surveyor to the Dean and Canons, of the vault containing the coffins of King Charles I (left), King Henry VIII (centre) and his Queen, Jane Seymour (at right). Upon Charles' coffin is the small coffin of a still-born child of the Princess George of Denmark, later Queen Anne.

Email: The Original & Developed Roman Calendar! (10.8.2026)

10/08/2026 Adrian (釋大道)

. In 1751 the Calendar Act was passed by Parliament – so that in 1752 – New Year’s Day would fall for the first-time on “January 1st” – as opposed to the traditonal “March 25th” (the latter bang the original Roman “New Year” – subsequently adopted by the Christian Church to celebrate “Lady’s Day” – referring to “Mary Mother of Christ” Day – as the UK was now “Protestant” Mary was no longer the central figure she still is in the now ousted Catholic Church). Interestingly, when I worked in an Accountancy firm in the UK, the “Financial Year” legally began on “April 1st” – the retaining of the old Pagan New Year for financial purposes – I am told (a time of “plenty” in the world as Spring has arrived). What happened after the 1752 change is that all the historical dates were altered to reflect the new calendar – with “January 1st” now being “New Year”. Therefore, King Charles I was executed in “1649” and not the actual “1648” – as “January 1st” (New Year) had come and gone prior to the event. Sometimes in UK textbooks, you may find acronyms like “OD” (“Old Date”) and “ND” (New Date) next to differing years – or something similar. So, King Charles died in 1648 (OD) and 1649 (ND) – and so on. As time has gone by, quite often the “Old Dates” have been forgotten altogether – until a particularly efficient historian decides to brush-off the cobwebs.

Andrew - the Man Formerly Known as "Prince" Still Allowed Near Young Children!

UK: The British Royal Family’s History of “Arrested” Development! (21.2.2026)

21/02/2026 Adrian (釋大道)

Charles II was the first of a long and meandering line of “Constitutional” monarchs (many of them “foreign”) who lived a life of opulence – but possessed no direct political power (Americans still think George III was in-charge of the UK during their rebellion). Since 1648-49, the English Parliament has been in-charge of the UK via democratically elected MPs. A constitutional monarch is a “civil servant” – employed by the government at the taxpayer’s expense – in exactly the same manner as a soldier, police office, or NHS employee, etc. They possess no direct political power – but the Establishment does permit them a certain (behind the scenes) “influence” in many areas of policy. If the constitutional monarch tries to use their royal power directly – then the institution will be abolished. Other than a supposed tourist attraction – these pointless entities literally have nothing to do whilst living a life of luxury – Andrew chose to visit Epstein’s Island during his leisure time – and abuse children.

Supporters of the America First ideology and U.S. President Donald Trump cheer on Nick Fuentes, a leader of the America First movement and a white nationalist, as he makes his way through the crowd for a speech during the "Stop the Steal" and "Million MAGA March" protests after the 2020 U.S. presidential election was called for Democratic candidate Joe Biden, in Washington on Nov. 14, 2020. Credit: REUTERS/Leah Millis

Far-Right “Incel” – Nick Fuentes – Sends Me an Email! (24.9.2025)

24/09/2025 Adrian (釋大道)

When I read these posts, I can’t understand why you keep talking about Charles I and fixate on his execution hundreds of years ago! Are you some kind of idiot? Charles I is not the same person as Charlie Kirk – why would you think these two men are the same person? Kirk is his second name and not an alternative word for a Church – idiot. Well? You keep bleating on about the far-right being stupid and anti-intellectual – but here you are talking trash about the great Charlie Kirk – who was murdered by out of control leftists controlled by Tel Aviv. And yes, I know that recently I have started back-peddling away from my usual antisemitic attitudes – but you would do the same if one of your colleagues was shot for just wanting to express his freedom of speech. What happened in 1600s England has NOTHING to do with what happened in 2025 in Utah! Trannies are dangerous and I suspect you sit at your keyboard writing these ridiculous posts dressed as a women and wearing a long wig!

Bonnie Prince Charlie: King James III, King Henry IX & Queen Maria Clementina of Great Britain, France & Ireland! (23.4.2023)

23/04/2023 Adrian (釋大道)

As matters transpired, the Pope over-ruled ‘King Henry IX’ and finally recognised Bonnie Prince Charlie as ‘King Charles III’ on his deathbed – just as he drew his last breath. I assume that the Pope believed this would allow him to enter Catholic Heaven as a ‘King’ – in recognition of his services to the Vatican – if indeed that was what they were (as I am not convinced this was his primary motivating drive). The thousands of Gaelic-speaking, kilted Scotsman who fought with sword and shield against musket, canon and bayonet were surely fighting for something far more visceral. Having visited the Battlefield of Colluden a number of times (and run across it as the Clansman did) this remains my viewpoint today! These brave and great Clansman ‘stood’ for nearly an hour whilst British canons blew their bodies into tiny pieces! They then initiated a Highland Charge after displaying such iron bravery the likes of which is rare throughout the history of military affairs! Surely reminiscent of the Spartans and the Zulu at their absolute best! Whatever the case, as the true ‘Celts’ of Britain – we lit incense sticks out of respect and placed them on the burial mounds representing each ‘Clan’! Hundred were killed in the fighting and then the British (government) soldiers bayonetted the wounded – rolling all the bodies into mass graves denoted by the differing colour of tartan (an institution inflicted by the British so that the various Clans could be easily ‘distinguished’).

I’d Rather Watch the Krankies… (14.5.2022)

14/05/2022 Adrian (釋大道)

The bourgeoisie grew out of the peasantry. These were primarily ‘men’ of the ‘peasant’ class who made themselves indispensable to the feudal aristocracy (or those who held all the political power), by linking the ‘desires’ of such people to the craftsmen and artists who knew how to acquire supplies and raw materials and construct the (often ‘luxurious’) goods required by these over-lords. These ‘lords’ and ‘ladies’ would bestow goods, money, titles and land upon an effective ‘mercer’ or ‘merchant’ – that is someone who specialised in the exchange of ‘goods’ (barter) and ‘money’ (sales), etc. These peasants would break out of their usual peasant-lifestyle and through self-effort develop a deep and profound knowledge of who owned what, who could acquire what, and who could make what! They then ‘sold’ this knowledge (and ‘ability’) to the highest bidder and slowly, overtime, developed a new and highly wealthy group of people with considerable power and influence! Eventually, the ‘bourgeoisie’ or ‘mercers’ were able to even purchase ‘armies’ and fight the aristocracy! This is how the British bourgeoisie took political power (that is took control of the ‘means of production’) from King Charles I in 1649 – and has kept hold of it ever since!

1 2 »