How America controls ‘fascist shock’ video sites!

This is because everyone knows that what happened to George Floyd was clearly a ‘crime’, and that Black, Asian and Chinese people are right to complain, as are the thousands of White people supporting them. These inherently ‘racist’ shock sites cannot portray the Black, Asian or Chinese community in a positive light for any reason, as that would contradict their reason to exist. Furthermore, these ‘shock’ sites do not want to advertise the fact that large swathes of the White community are ‘supporting’ these non-White protests, and that the various communities have been ‘united’ in outrage and protest! Instead, videos of the Minnesota protests are being deliberately took-down and deleted from these ‘shock’ sites, as they depict the non-White communities as ‘having a point’, and in so doing, straying into the area of ‘positive’ portrayal. The fascist ideology that underlies these ‘shock’ sites will not allow such a deviation from its prime directive of racial misrepresentation. In the meantime, the bourgeois system will allow a certain amount of protest, offer one or two ultimately pointless concessions (that change nothing), and peace will be restored. The status quo will be preserved and the usual racism will exert itself. This racism can be seen on any number of these sites which can be found with a quick Google search. As the US government lies behind these sites, the US government is directing that the biggest street protests since Rodney King should be played-down and all videos ‘deleted’ before being allowed to go viral. This is extraordinary considering these sites routinely spread the most obscure videos that misrepresent non-White people and minorities – gathered from all over the world!

Lockdown Church Service for Atheists, Non-Theists and Agnostics (24.5.2020)

Marx and Engels understood the comfort that people experienced through attachment to religion, but stated that the very Church thy adore supports and encourages the very capitalist system that oppresses and crushes their aspirations – blaming their poverty not on the injustices of men – but rather on the bizarre notion that an unseen god is inflicting these sufferings ‘for your own good’, when rich people obviously suffer far less, if they suffer at all! Remember, you are in-charge of your own destiny.  

How China’s WeChat is Safer than US Social Media!

The communication app designed in Mainland China has two versions. Within the Chinese domestic market, the simplified app is known as ‘Weixin’ (微信), or ‘micro-message’, whereas the more technologically complex international version (which has spread throughout the world) is known as ‘WeChat’. This system of ‘communication through small text’ is designed primarily for use on mobile telephones, with a limited capability on desk-top computers (although this may only apply to the international version which allows ‘chatting’ on-screen, but not ‘moment’ updating). Wherever China has exported WeChat, her designers and lawyers have been very careful to maintain privacy and safety of the users, whilst the app fully conforms to regional laws. This means that the Chinese business that administer WeChat are very careful to safeguard the legal sovereignty of each country outside of China they operate within. This means that every user benefits from the legal safeguards of the PRC by default, unless the local or regional laws contradict or improve on these laws. At no time does PRC law supersede (by default) the local law of the sovereign country the WeChat app is operating within. Of course, China’s influence in this area goes no further than the function of the communication app she administers. China, unlike the US, does not link the spread of its social media platforms with the granting or withholding of business contracts or the issue of threats of war (or application of sanctions) through UN or market manipulation. Whereas Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, etc, actively pursue racist anti-China and anti-Socialist policies, WeChat does not pursue an openly anti-US stance contrived and controlled by the Chinese government. In this regard, whereas US social media is a continuation of US foreign policy by other means, WeChat is a truly ‘neutral’ and ‘impartial’ social media platform.

1 529 530 531 532 533 654