Trump: Fascist Israel to Move Capital to Jerusalem!


International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network

Anyone who doubts that Zionism is not just another form of White racism (and White supremacy) only has to look at the cosy relationship between the elected fascist dictators Trump and Netanyahu. Trump’s anti-Arab and anti-Muslim attitudes mirror those of Zionism exactly – and that is the motivation behind Trump colluding with Netanyahu to move the capital of Israel to Jerusalem (from the designated Tel Aviv). This move is designed to cause the maximum outrage to Palestinian (and Arab) sensitivities, and lead to an all-out war in the region, whereby US-assisted Israel will militarily take the rest of Palestine and expel what is left of the Palestinian population into the wilderness. This impending (aggressive) military attack by Israel upon the defenceless Palestinian population will be fully supported by the BBC and presented to the world as an ‘act of self-defence’ – even though it is obvious who the aggressors actually are.

The USSR broke-off diplomatic relations with Israel in 1952 due to the behaviour of various Israeli diplomats in Russia – who abused their diplomatic status and tried to encourage Soviet Citizens (of Jewish heritage) to rise-up and over-throw the Soviet Regime (killing an aging Stalin in the process). The Trotskyite Khrushchev re-established diplomatic links with Israel fr a time – but the USSR permanently severed all diplomatic links with Israel in 1967 following the Zionist land-grab known as the ‘Six Day War’. In 1975, at the urging of the USSR, the UN voted unanimously to condemn ‘Zionism’ and formally recognise it as a racist ideology. This has not prevented the US or Israeli fascist politicians from continuing to murder non-Whites in the region, and with Trump’s latest insane initiative, this trend looks like it will continue unabated. Never forget that Zionism is racism, and that Israel is a fascist State that utilises murder in the name of religion. Many Jewish people oppose racist Zionism from both within and outside of Israel, and it is with these people that non-Jews should join, in a united front against all forms of racism (including anti-Semitism).

Debunking the Global Consciousness Project (USA)


The Global Consciousness Project Meaningful Correlations in Random Data

Working from the simple scientific observation that human bodies move physical objects – but that disembodied notions of ‘mind’, ‘consciousness’ and ‘spirit’ do not, it is obvious that any Western attempts at ‘proving’ the existence of a disembodied consciousness are doomed to failure (despite the resources spent upon trying to establish this notion), and that the entire exercise is is in reality not ‘science’ but in fact an attempt of re-establishing the primacy of certain medieval theological constructs within mainstream modern society – namely that of a Judeo-Christian concept of ‘soul’ – which correlates in modern thought to a vague and poorly defined concept of ‘mind’.  In the case of the Global Conscious Project (GCP), a development within the USA, I would highlight the a priori presence of a disturbing ‘Eurocentricism’ that seeks to find White bourgeois significance in random events. This assumption invariably finds and confirms ‘meaning’ that appears to support the current domestic or foreign policy of the United States government, or ‘privileges’ the experience of the White American Establishment with a significance it does not possess. So much for ‘objective’ science. If you doubt this, why does the GCP not ‘predict’ in its observations, the sheer terror that non-White populations of the world ‘feel’ when facing the prospect of US bombing, or invasion from US ground troops? Why are the thoughts and feelings of non-White populations subordinated to those of their White counter-parts? Just as the politicised church is racist – so is its secular expression – politicised science. My personal view is that existence is unified in the sense that everything is comprised of energy (and matter), and anything above and beyond that observation is pure speculation. The following video is an advertisement for the GCP and contains some interesting sleight of hand. The Soviet Union was premised upon the exclusive use of the scientific method throughout society, and did not, as a rule, encourage belief in ‘spiritualism’. Everything observed in the USSR (if confirmed as actually happening), must be treated as ‘nothing happening’ (or ‘fake’), until proven otherwise. In the case of Uri Geller – his supposed abilities were clearly ‘debunked’ by James Randi (I will add another video about this), but as Geller is an ardent Zionist – the Zionist community, for quite sometime, attacked James Randi’s work and attempted to protect Geller from his own scandel. What the GCP video omits to mention is that Geller ‘failed’ on the Tonight Show due to experimental protocols established by James Randi. James Randi’s exposure of Geller exists in the mainstream for all to see. In 1975, the United Nations (UN), following a consultative period, declared Zionism a form of ‘racism’ (i.e. a form of White supremacy) – because it was founded by White middle class secular Jewish people in the late 1800’s in Europe – and has nothing to do with the Jewish religion per se. In this regard, many Jewish people reject Zionism – but the holding of this type of attitude should demonstrate something of the character of Uri Geller. As the US and Israel are ‘allies’ the GCP video presents Geller’s case in a highly sympathetic light. Finally, as it would be immeasurably easier to move physical objects with the mind – rather than by manual labour – it is extraordinary that humanity has not ‘evolved’ this ability species-wide, simply through the environment pressure to do so. The lack of any such ability suggests that it is not possible. As technology improves, and labour-saving devices become common-place, it is less likely (and not more likely) that such an evolutionary ability would develop. It is technology produced by the human mind (through science) that is now making life easier for many people – and not an ‘imagined’ ability to move physical objects with a disembodied ‘intention’ alone.

The Problem with Zionist Archaeology


International Jewish anti-Zionist Network

White, Zionist, secular Jewish (middle class) men, armed to the teeth, and with the backing of the USA and UK, annexed a large part of Palestine in 1947 (displacing around 800,000 Palestinians, and killing untold others), establishing the modern State of Israel, which was immediately organised around ‘apartheid’ – with the brown-skinned Palestinians being deemed ‘sub-human’, and subject to persecution and pogrom. From that date onward, operating under the lie of ‘self-defence’, the Zionist Israelis have continued to invade and annex any and all land surrounding their original settlement, murdering, maiming and raping as the ‘Israeli Defence Force’ (IDF) expanded its reach. This is the situation today, with an ever-impoverished Palestinian population being forced to live within an ever shrinking geographical area. This is allowed to happen because Israel is an ally of the Eurocentric West, and its presence in the region serves to de-stabilise the Middle East in favour of US and UK foreign policy, ensuring that no ‘Arab’ State can become sufficiently ‘strong’ so as to ‘resist’ the Zionist (imperialist) threat, and military expel it from the region. Within Israel, the Zionists have created a ‘White’ State that mimics its European counter-parts, using a compromised academia that ignores the real historical facts about Zionist Israeli racism, and which perpetuates pseudo-history and lies as facts. In the West, whenever Christian academics attempt to enter the mainstream with their ‘Creationist’ agendas of flat earth and anti-Darwinism, they are immediately exposed and expelled as practising ‘bad’ academics designed to misled the people. This being the case, why does the international academic community continue to entertain Israeli Zionist archaeological studies, which continuously seeks to link contemporary archaeological finds in the ground, with that of a ‘mythical’ biblical narrative that exists only in the Zionist imagination? This type of flawed academia presents the Zionist lie that the State of Israel has always existed, and that the Jewish bible records, preserves and transmits ‘real’ history that is to be taken literally. Archaeological finds in ‘Israel’ are actually more likely to be Palestinian, Roman, Phonetician, or even belong other unknown and non-Jewish civilisations that once occupied the region. There are Western archaeologists who do expose this Zionist lie – but their opinions are side-lined by a pro-Zionist media and the broader apathetic academic community.  The Jewish bible was never designed to be read as actual history, or to be used to interpret the physical world – as I have heard certain non-Zionist rabbis state on numerous occasions. In fact, many Jewish groups and association outside of Israel also reject ‘Zionism’ and do not support the distortion of secular archaeology. The bible is a collection of texts which the Jews believe reveal god’s word, and is an intuitive guide for the (non-Zionist) practitioners of the Jewish religion. It is not a manual premised upon the gathering of ‘objective’ historical fact, and is entirely deficient in this task, and yet on educational programmes broadcast all over the media and internet, one Zionist ‘miracle’ after another is presented to an unquestioning audience, designed to justify Zionist Israel’s murder, maiming and rape of the Palestinian people since 1947. The false conclusion the racist Zionists make, is that everything is okay – because ‘Israel’ has always been here!

The Far-Right Complexities of Zionism and Anti-Zionism


Zion (Jewish Eurocentric racism), and anti-Zionism (opposition to this racism), are peculiar entities, as both possess the power to attract far-right political support.  In the case of Zionism, not much imagination is required as to work-out what the political far-right find attractive, as a predominately ‘White’ and highly militarised and aggressive Jewish State is given carte blanche by the United States (and its allies), to persecute, torture, rape and murder the non-White Palestinian (and primarily ‘Islamic’) indigenous population of that occupied land (i.e. historical Palestine).  It seems illogical for the forces of neo-Nazism to politically ‘align’ themselves with Israel – particularly as this political far-right grouping has historically viewed all Jewish people with a racial disdain, and perpetuated the Hitlerite holocaust of WWII specifically (although not exclusively) against them.  Just as ‘like’ attracts  ‘like’, it is the Eurocentric ‘White’ racism that is implicit in Zionism that the political far-right find attractive, and not the theology of Judaism.  The Western far-right will support Israel for as long as it pursues its racist anti-Palestinian cause, but will abandon this support if Israel ever changed its Zionist policies.  This is nothing more than a relationship of convenience, because although Israel is currently supported by the far-right political establishment, Jews living outside of Israel are still subject to attack and murder by Western neo-Nazi thugs. Israel, of course, from time to time, condemns far-right political activity, but refuses to include its own Zionism in that criticism.

As Adolf Hitler specified that ‘lying’ is an important tool for far-right political activists, the far-right ‘ideologues’ have continuously sought new ways to sully and blur the left – right political debate.  This policy has been inspired as a means to hide its own despicable actions throughout the world both before and after WWII, particularly with regard to the Holocaust that targeted primarily Jews, but also the disabled, homosexuals, political dissidents, anti-racists, Communists, Socialists and anyone who opposed any aspect of Hitlerite thinking.  Rightwing historians assist this process of denial by claiming that the holocaust never happened, and that such a claim is nothing but a conspiracy theory aimed at besmirching Hitler’s reputation as a ‘great’ leader.  Another tactic is to argue numbers – stating that for various (and spurious) reasons, at least six million Jews (and other people) could not have been killed in the Concentration Camps both before and during WWII.  Given al this seeming contradictory information, how does the far-right justify supporting the anti-Zionist cause?  It does so because it links Zionist Israel with Soviet Russia – ludicrously stating that both are manifestations of a world-wide Jewish conspiracy to gain complete political power and eradicate the ‘gentile’ races, etc.  This is the far-right use of a legitimate (predominately ‘leftwing’) cause to attack the memory of the USSR, and turn the anti-fascist war it fought against Hitler’s Nazi Germany, into an ‘attack’ on peace-loving Europeans!  In pursuing this policy, the far-right are attempting to re-write history in their own distorted image.  The USSR fought and opposed fascism as a matter of ideological necessity, and as such, opposition to capitalism in decay, is the duty of every (non-Trotskyite) Socialist and Communist, and being so, is not a matter of choice.  The far-right plays down its own atrocities (as a form of historical denial), and instead projects its own short-comings and inadequacies onto the memory of the anti-fascist USSR.  This form of neo-Nazi revisionism plays into the hands of the Western-backed neo-Nazi regimes in Eastern Europe that pursue a racist anti-Russian policy.  Of course, as matters stand, none of this matters to Israel, because Israel is currently a racist colonial State occupying someone else’s land.

Israelis Murder Palestinian Teenager Seconds after Photograph Taken


Original Chinese Language Article By:

(Translated by Adrian Chan-Wyles PhD)

On the 21st, September, 2015, at the Jordanian West Bank city of Hebron, an 18 year old Palestinian female university student approached a check-point (wearing Islamic dress) – and according to (unverified) Israeli reports – attempted (but failed) to assassinate the Israeli soldiers.  This led to the young woman standing quietly whilst the Israeli soldiers trained their weapons upon her.  Seconds after the first two photograph were taken, two Israeli soldiers opened fire – cutting the young woman to the ground.  Her body was taken to a nearby hospital where it was confirmed that she had been killed by Israeli gun-fire – no weapons were found either on or near her body – and there was no evidence of any Israeli soldiers being injured.


This brave, young woman was killed by the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) as part of the continuous Israeli occupation of the city of Hebron.  The situation is tense due to the mix of Jews and Palestinians being made to live in close but unequal proximity.  Hebron (the largest city in the West Bank) is in fact an apartheid area with one section controlled by the Palestinian Authority, and the other directly administered by Israel.  The body of this young was carried through the streets of Hebron by her family and friends, whilst other people showed their sorrow for her death, and respect for her sacrifice.

©opyright: Adrian Chan-Wyles (ShiDaDao) 2016.

 Original Chinese Language Source Text:









When Zionism was Officially Racist (1975-1991)


Theodor Herzl (1860-1904) – Founder of Zionism

‘…increasingly in the years after the Russian May Laws and the pogroms of 1881, Jews, too, embraced race as a basis for unity.  This was particularly true among some Zionists and freethinkers for whom religion had ceased meaningfully to explain their ties to the “folk.”  The “Jewish Question” as it was posed during the period of pogroms in the East and the Dreyfus Affair in the West generated new secular and political notions of Jewish peoplehood in response.  It was in this period, for instance, that Joseph Jacobs began his forays into Jewish race science in Europe.  And, as John Elton has amply documented, the racial individuality of the Jews as a people was of particular interest within the budding Zionist movement.  Aron Sandler’s Anthropologie und Zionismus (1904), for instance, mobilised the scientific language of a distinct racial genius in order to press the necessity of a Jewish territory where that genius could properly take root and develop.  Indeed, a much longer tradition entwined Jewish nationalism with Jewish racialism.  The proto-Zionist Moses Hess, in Rome and Jerusalem (1862), had flatly announced that “Jewish noses cannot be reformed, nor black, curly, Jewish hair be turned through baptism or combing into smooth hair.  The Jewish race is a primal one, which had reproduced itself in its integrity despite climatic influences…  The Jewish type is indestructible.”[1]

Zionism is a secular ideology premised upon science, political thought, sociology, nationalism and various notions of ‘belonging’ and ‘group identity’.  Zionism is not Judaic theology and should not be mistaken with it.  During its inception, Zionism was not always racial in emphasis, but was in many ways a legitimate response to the presence (and intensification) of anti-Semitic racism across Europe and elsewhere.  However, despite these facts, there were certain contributors to the development of Zionist thinking that definitely embraced ‘racism’, and replaced a theological definition of ‘Jewishness’ with that of a ‘racialised’ identity.  Since the UN ruling that granted Southern Palestine to Zionist Jews in 1947, it has become ever clearer to the International Community that the Zionism as practised by the modern State of Israel is ‘racially’ biased and ‘racist’ in nature. The victims of this racist Zionism are undoubtedly the Palestinian Arabs.  This fact, was for a time, recognised by the United Nation (UN).  Today, with the unquestioned support of the USA, Zionist ideologues across the world counter any accusations of ‘racism’ with the counter-allegation of ‘racism’ (in the form of anti-Semitism).  However, despite this incessant Zionist propaganda offensive, many followers of Orthodox Judaism deny the legitimacy of Zionism and work to educate both Jews and non-Jews against its racist ideology.  The True Torah Jews website states:

‘1. Zionism, by advocating a political and military end to the Jewish exile, denies the very essence of our Diaspora existence. We are in exile by Divine Decree and may emerge from exile solely via Divine Redemption. All human efforts to alter a metaphysical reality are doomed to end in failure and bloodshed. History has clearly borne out this teaching.

2. Zionism has not only denied our fundamental belief in Heavenly Redemption it has also created a pseudo-Judaism which views the essence of our identity to be a secular nationalism. Accordingly, Zionism and the Israeli state have consistently endeavored, via persuasion and coercion, to replace a Divine and Torah-centered understanding of our peoplehood with an armed materialism.’[2]

Theodor Herzl is the acknowledged founder of the secular, political ideology of ‘Zionism’ which although is directly associated with the religion of Judaism, should in fact be interpreted as separate and distinct from the teachings of Judaic theology.  The term ‘Zion’ refers to a mythical castle or fortress positioned on a hill.  In the Bible (2 Samuel 5:7) it was originally a stronghold captured by King David (the 2nd king of the Israelites).  On that hill was eventually built a Jewish temple – whilst later the same term was extended to refer to the hill, and later a synonym for the entire city of Jerusalem.  The ancient Israelites destroyed their enemies and colonised the area.  This is the self-asserting, military basis of Zionism, which has served as the basis of Israeli policy in Palestine (since 1947) against the Palestinians (who are a priori interpreted as the ‘enemy’ of Israel and treated accordingly).  This aggressive and destructive policy has no justifying basis within Judaic theology, despite the fact that ‘Zionist’ supporters continuously pursue a propaganda policy of associating ‘Zionism’ with ‘Judaic theology’, and habitually conflates the criticism of ‘Zionism’ with the criticism of ‘Judaic theology’ (falsely assuming that the former reflects the latter) – with the motivation deriving from ‘anti-Semitism’.  Of course, anti-Semitism can be motivated by irrational anti-Jewish criticism, but this is a clear manifestation of ‘racism’ against all Jews, Judaic theology, and Jewish culture, and is not necessarily the motivation behind a logical and rational criticism of ‘Zionism’.  Theodor Herzl (and many other Jewish intellectuals who contributed toward the development of secular Zionism) in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, were of the opinion that Judaic theology was no longer suitable to hold Jewish people together, or defend the Jewish communities scattered around the world.  For Zionists, the emphasis transitioned from a Biblical definition of what it was to be a ‘Jew’, into that of a non-Biblical ‘political’ definition of what it might be to be a Jew premised upon a very strong sense of ‘race’ and ‘nationality’.  In a sense, Judaic theology was by-passed by the generally ‘atheistic’ Zionists, who replaced theology with what they believed to be ‘science’.

Although not all atheistic Zionists adhered to racial models of Jewish identity, it is true to observe that the notion of a ‘racial’ identity for Jews became an ever stronger influence in the Zionist Movement.  This led to Jewish terrorist organisations being formed in Arab Palestine decades before 1947, which attacked and murdered British people, Arab people who wanted independence, Arab people who disagreed with Zionism, and Arab people who favoured the British over the Zionists.  After 1947, the modern Israeli State – heavily armed by the USA and British, immediately began an aggressive war against the Palestinian people who did not possess an Army, an Airforce or a Navy.  The Zionist Israeli military continuously attacked, killed, murdered and maimed either unarmed or lightly armed Palestinian men, women and children, whilst destroying their homes and taking their land (beyond the 1947 agreement).  All this military action is justified by the Zionists as being ‘acts of self-defence’ regardless of the obvious contradictory circumstances surrounding these operations.  In fact so appalling has been Israel’s behaviour toward the Palestinians that in 1975 there was a world-wide movement to officially do something to control the destruction.  This was achieved through the United Nations (UN).  The United Nations General Assembly passed Resolution 3379, which was adopted on November 10, 1975 by a vote of 72 to 35 (with 32 abstentions), that “determine[d] that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination”.  The USSR withdrew diplomatic relations with Israel in 1952 (following an Israeli plot to kill Joseph Stalin) because the behaviour of the Israeli diplomatic staff were deliberately encouraging secular, Communist Jews in the USSR to regress to a state of religiosity and defy Soviet Law.  However, following the death of Stalin in 1953, diplomatic relations between Israel and the USSR were re-established.  However, following the murderous Israeli assault on Palestinians in 1967 (the so-called Six Day War), again falsely presented to the world as an act of ‘self-defence’, the USSR broke-off all diplomatic relations with Israel (a state of affairs that persisted until the dissolution of the USSR in 1991).  In 1991, as the USSR was falling apart, and its leftwing, Socialistic influence in the world was diminishing, Israel linked its participation in the Madrid Peace Conference with the revocation of the 1975 UN ruling.   This was achieved through the pro-Zionist lobby in the USA (at a time when the USA was leading the world in a war against Iraq) pressuring US President George W Bush to persuade the UN to annul its previous 1975 ruling.  This was done with the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 46/86, adopted on 16 December 1991, which revoked the determination in Resolution 3379, which had called Zionism a form of racism.  Many who voted in 1975 that ‘Zionism’ was a racist ideology changed their opinion in 1991 with no new evidence to the contrary being supplied (or considered) voted to repeal the 1975 resolution.  However, this 1991 ‘repealing’ was not a reversal of the original ruling (as it could not be proven that Zionist ideology was in fact not ‘racist’) but simply the artificial ‘removal’ of the official recognition that Zionism was racist.  Resolution 46/86 simply stated that ‘The General Assembly decides to revoke the determination contained in its resolution 3379 of 10 November 1975.”

The True Torah Jews website advises all supporters of Judaism in the following manner:

We seek to disassociate Jews and traditional Judaism from the Zionist ideology by:

‘1. Providing historical and supporting documentation that Zionism is totally contrary to the teachings of traditional Judaism through the words of our Rabbis, Sages, and Holy Scriptures which oppose the creation of a state called Israel.

 2. Providing historical documentation on the ideology and creation of Zionism, the supporters of Zionism and the negative impact of their actions on the Jewish people in the past hundred years, including their involvement in the Holocaust and their activities up to the present day.

3. Publicizing the efforts of traditional Jews to demonstrate their opposition to Zionism, efforts which are often ignored by the mainstream media.

4. Convincing the news media, politicians and the public to cease referring to the State of Israel as the “Jewish State” but to call it what it is: the “Zionist State”.

We also aim to reach out to our Jewish brethren who have never studied the subject of Zionism from a Torah perspective, and have only been taught the Zionist side of the story. It is our hope that all of our fellow Jews will soon open their eyes, return to Torah and reject this ideology that replaces the Jew’s age-old hope for G-d’s redemption with a false redemption and a human-initiated state.’[3]

[1] Back, Les & Solomos, John – Editors – Theories of Race and Racism – A Reader, Routledge, (2000), Page 246.

[2] True Torah Jews – Our Mission – Accessed 29.4.2016.

[3] True Torah Jews – Our Mission – Accessed 29.4.2016.


Terrorist Crimes of the Modern State of Israel

images (11)

The title ‘Terrorist Crimes of Israel’ pertains to three distinct categories of observation 1) the principle that the modern State of Israel is premised upon the Eurocentric and racist ideology of Zionism, 2) the application of this racially based terrorism toward the Palestinian people, and those sympathetic to their cause, and 3) the policy of the modern State of Israel to reduce all criticism of its extensive and ongoing war crimes (and crimes against humanity), to simply being that of isolated manifestations of ‘anti-Semitism’.  The modern State of Israel pursues this policy of eternal victimhood to mask the ‘racist’ policies it routinely pursues.  Any attempt to ‘see through’ this charade, or to call attention to the rapes, murders, abuses and tortures, are met with cries of anti-Semitism, despite the fact that Israel has carried-out deliberate terrorist attacks in the past aimed at US citizens and US interests abroad.  The Soviet Union permanently broke-off official diplomatic relations with the modern State of Israel in 1967, following the Six Day War that saw Israel use is US-supplied weapons technology to further attack the impoverished Arab populations of Palestine.  The USSR took this action due to the duplicitous behaviour of the Israeli government, which used the ‘myth’ that it was ‘defending’ itself against Arab aggression to extend its territory.  This is a lie that still has currency in mainstream history books throughout the Zionist supporting world, but not of course, in any history emanating from the victims of this Israeli aggression.  This is not surprising as the very notion of a ‘modern State’ of Israel is premised upon European racism and imperialism.  The creation of ‘Israel’ was an act of blatant Eurocentric racism that sought to take large parts of geographical Palestine and give it to predominantly ‘white’ European Jewish people, who were pursuing a racist, nationalist agenda through the use of terrorism.  This Eurocentric legitimation of ‘terrorists’ and ‘terrorism’ has led to widespread violence and racism throughout Palestine, and the death of thousands of innocent Palestinians.  Israel presents its naked aggression and atrocities as ‘legitimate’ military action, and demonises the impoverished, Palestinian population as ‘terrorists’ whenever Arab individuals are driven to disparate acts of resistance.  An interesting comparison can be made between the Palestinian resistance to Israeli aggression and fascism in Palestine, and the French Resistance to the Nazi German occupation of their country during WWII.  Essentially every Israeli military action since its inception in 1947, has been an exercise in land-grabbing, intimidation of the Arab population, and ethnic cleansing, but the actions of the Israeli intelligence and military personnel outside of Israel, has also involved the use of terrorism and murder to create conflicts between other nations.

In Soviet Russia during the late 1940’s and early 1950’s, it was thought that a Communist Revolution would occur that would create a Middle Eastern Socialist Block.  In the meantime, despite reservations, the USSR had diplomatically recognised the modern State of Israel following the Nazi German atrocities perpetuated against European Jewry.  Despite this assistance in legitimation, from the beginning of Israeli-USSR diplomatic relations, the Israeli policy was one of bourgeois nationalism and the undermining of Communist internationalism.  Despite the USSR recognising the modern State of Israel, its official policy was one of supporting Arab regimes fighting for independence from European colonialism.  As many Jewish people had openly supported the USSR and its fight against Nazi German fascism during WWII, (and had also professed a belief in the Communist cause), the USSR initially supported Israel in the hope that it would serve as a major support in the process of Communist revolution throughout the Middle East.  It was thought that through the instigation of ‘Socialism’ and ‘internationalism’ in the area, the ethnic, cultural and religious tensions would be defused, and replaced by a new ‘non-racialised’ solidarity that would unite around the common cause of anti-imperialism.  It soon became obvious that the rightwing Zionism pursued by the modern State of Israel had no ideological association with the tenants of Marxist-Leninism (which was readily embraced by the Arab populations).  Whereas ‘politicised’ religion was viewed as an impediment to modern and scientific civilisation, the Israelis viewed it as the basis of their state.  Whereas racism was viewed as being the false product of capitalist exploiters, designed to falsely separate the workers into easily controllable and mythical ‘national’ groups, Israel perceived the notion of a pure ‘Jewish’ race as being the basis for Israeli identity.  Whereas the USSR viewed terrorism as essentially incorrect and counter-productive to the cause (and well-being) of the worker, the modern State of Israel interpreted covert and overt military action as legitimate aspects of its foreign policy.  Golda Meir – the Israeli ambassador to the USSR from 1948-1949 – worked tirelessly to undermine Soviet authority in the USSR by continuously carrying-out Zionist propaganda campaigns within Soviet communities of Jewish descent.  This was a deliberate Zionist policy of working to re-instate the backward and primitive mind-set of ‘religiosity’ into the minds of those who had evolved to a higher state of progressive conscious development.  Part of the idea, no doubt, was to encourage Soviet Jews to immigrate to Israel and take with them their Communist education, whilst returning them to a state of dependence upon mythical beliefs.  As the Soviet System was opposed to this rightwing attempt to bring-down its Communist ideology, it took action to limit Israeli attempts at turning back the revolution.  This led to a Jewish inspired plot in the USSR (the so-called ‘Doctors’ Plot’) designed to poison Joseph Stalin.  In February, 1953, a bomb was exploded outside the Soviet Embassy in Tel Aviv, injuring three people.  Following this Israeli terrorist incident, the USSR announced that it was cutting its diplomatic ties with the Zionist State.

On June 30th, 1954, Israeli agents in Egypt launched Operation Susannah.  The Israeli spymaster in Egypt named Abraham Dar worked under the code name ‘John Darling’ – pretending to be a British business.  The Israeli government tasked Dar with attacking British and American targets in Cairo and Alexandria.  This operation was carried-out by the Israeli Special Forces Unit 131.  The brief of Unit 131 was to create ‘diversionary’ activity to influence political and military relations in the Middle East.  It was tasked with attacking US and British interests in Egypt as a means to create tension (and war) between Egypt, Britain and the US as a means to further Israeli nationalist ambitions.  The obvious ‘racist’ aspect of this ‘operation’ is evident from the fact that the European, Jewish agents of Israeli Unit 131, attempted to pass themselves off as ‘Arab’ terrorists and create the false impression that ‘Egyptian’ terrorists had deliberately targeted British and American citizens abroad.  Operation Susannah was also formulated to placate the pro-Israel Jewish lobby in the US that was opposed to any closer and peaceful ties between Egypt and America.  Unit 131’s anti-Western terrorist campaign began with the bombing of a number of American information centres in Cairo.  Then in December 1954, two Israeli agents were caught red-handed by Egyptian security forces, trying to smuggle a bomb into a packed cinema in Cairo.  These two Unit 131 operatives not only admitted to the plot (exposing the entire network of Israeli spies in Egypt), but when tried it was confirmed that the Israeli government was behind this blatant act of international terrorism.  Two agents were given the death sentence, one committed suicide whilst in prison, and the rest exchanged for Egyptian POW’s after the Six Day War in 1967.

During the Six Day War Israel launched a combined air and sea military attack on USS Liberty – an American ‘intelligence’ gathering ship stationed at the time in international waters, near the north coast of Sinai, Egypt.  The US, despite supporting Israel financially, militarily and politically, maintained an official position of ‘neutrality’ throughout the conflict.  This sustained Israeli military attack (against a lightly-armed US Naval ship) killed 34 US military personnel, and wounded 171 crew members.  The Israeli attacked commenced during the afternoon of June 8th, 1967.  Although Israel has never been held officially held responsible for this act of blatant aggression against its own ally – it has admitted initiating the attack and has paid-out tens of millions of dollars to the US families of those killed and wounded.  As usual, the Zionist State has used lying as a means to hide the true nature of its hate-filled ideology.  Although officially stating that the Israeli military thought the ship to be ‘unidentified’ when the attack took place (presumably believing it to be ‘Arab’), the recordings of radio communication between Israeli command, Israeli pilots and Israeli torpedo boat crews, clearly demonstrates that all the Israelis involved in the attack knew that that they were attacking a US naval ship, and that they had been ordered to do so.  The Israeli radio chatter is triumphalist and highly antagonistic.  US survivors of the attack reported that the Israeli Airforce deliberately machine-gunned survivors in the water – and after the attacked had finished – refused to offer any medical or humanitarian assistance to the beleaguered US crew.  Even to this day, many of the US survivors are embittered by the approach of their own American government, which chose to pursue a line that nothing of significance had happened.  This is remarkable considering how the US went to war in Vietnam after fabricating the ‘Gulf of Tonkin Incident’ which (falsely) stated that North Vietnamese torpedo boats had attacked the US Navy, etc.



%d bloggers like this: