China Supports Palestine Against Zionist Aggressionn and Occupation!

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Communist China – unlike the US colony of Taiwan – has always supported the country of Palestine and the Palestinian people. China has made it politically clear that it agrees with the 1975 UN Resolution (opposed by the US and Israel), that states Zionism is a form of White Supremacy racist ideology, originally adopted and adapted by a small clique of secular – but highly influential middle class Jews – in 19th century Western Europe. The point of ‘Zionism’ is to align secular ‘White’ European Jews with ‘White’ European non-Jews, so that a united front of Eurocentric racism can be achieved and maintained – one which does not ‘exclude’ Jews, or view Jews as either racially or ethnically ‘inferior’. Zionism has nothing to do with Jewish theology or traditional Jewish religious values, and everything to do with ‘White’ racist attitudes that denigrate ALL non-White people in the world. This fact explains why many traditional Jewish groups around the world ‘reject’ Zionism (as do a number of Jews living in Israel), and recognise its racist structure as being fundamentally incompatible with the wisdom contained within Jewish scripture. Modern Israel as a nation, is considered a theological ‘blasphemy’, because it contradicts god’s will – a divine will which cast the ancient Jews out of their home land. By secular Jews with racist attitudes assuming to create a fabricated State of Israel by invading Palestine and ruthlessly subjugating its Arab population, the will of the Jewish god is being contradicted. Of course, Jewish people have historically existed in China with no problem whatsoever, and Communist China fully condemns any and all anti-Semitism, or racial violence aimed at peaceful Jewish groups living around the world. On the other hand, the criticism of Zionism must never be associated with ‘anti-Semitism’, but rather viewed as the legitimate continuation of the common fight of the non-White people of the world (and other oppressed minorities) against White racism and the forces of fascism. China fully supports the Palestinian people in their fight against Zionist racism, and would like to emphasis that for over a thousands years Arabs have travelled to China and even settled to become distinct ethnic groups within the diverse populations of the motherland. Zionism is racism and must be exposed for the fascism that it is. Long Live Palestine!

Chinese Language Reference:

http://www.cpaffc.org.cn/content/details21-74181.html

Elvis Presley: Racist and Anti-Communist (1970)

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

The Nixon-Presley Meeting 21.12.1970

Much is made about an alleged racist comment Elvis Presley is supposed to have made in 1958 – but in reality his 1970 letter to President Richard Nixon reveals his true support for the White establishment and how he was prepared to use his celebrity to deceptively infiltrate minority ethnic and leftwing political groups (that liked his music) on behalf of the rightwing US government of the corrupt President Nixon. In 1958, Elvis Presley is said to have commented that Black people were only fit to shine his shoes and buy his records – but the White establishment (with help from sections of the middle class African-American community in the US) have continuously worked to ‘negate’ this statement and even disassociate Elvis Presley from it. Whatever the case, privileged White people such as Elvis Presley, writing about a ‘ghetto’ he has never experienced and which has been historically generated by White racism in the service of capitalism, is the quintessential example of a Eurocentric racism that cannot see itself. The point is that the White establishment (which Elvis Presley served as a ‘federal agent’), and the music industry that made him rich, has created a myth about Elvis Presley that does not reflect or represent Elvis Presley the real person. Therefore, stating the obvious about Elvis Presley will cause the bourgeois mind-set to ‘react’ with anger and aggression – but never logic or reason. So be it – this is the price of dialectical progression, and Elvis Presley, regardless of his talent and wealth, and whatever kindnesses he showed people in his life, did not understand the racism perpetuated by his own ethnicity, and remained ignorant of the working class Black experience that various Socialist Movements sought to remedy.

For the White (bourgeois) establishment in the USA, it is important that if African-American people feel the need to oppose (and fight) racism, they must do so whilst simultaneously supporting the capitalist system, and never associating the racism they suffer with the exploitative socio-economic system within which they exist. concomitant with this non-resistance to capitalism is the requirement for African-Americans to remain mired in Judeo-Christian thinking and never question established (bourgeois) religious narratives. The ironies inherent in this position are many. Capitalism was the driving force behind the European practice of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade – which for hundreds of years kidnapped and transported millions of African men, women and children to the Americas – where White slave-owners ‘beat’ African culture out of their prisoners, and instilled instead a subservient mentality mediated by the theology associated with the Judeo-Christian religion. The economic drive to expand markets for making profit is the basis of European racism, whereby the European Church aided and abetted this process through the use of justifying biblical scripture. Opposing racism, whilst not recognising the facts that racism has its roots in European capitalism and religion, is a grave dialectical error of interpretation. If capitalism and religion are not acknowledged as the progenitor and preserver of racism – the underlying foundation of European racism continues from one generation to the next unopposed, with only cosmetic changes to how racism manifests in outer society. Protesting about racism whilst ignoring the part capitalism and Christianity play in its existence only leads to superficial change, and only then in a way that only benefits wealthy African-Americans – as racism continues to oppress the working class in the same manner as it did hundreds of years ago.

The Black Panther Movement – as an African-American initiative – did indeed recognise the capitalist basis of European racism, taking its opposing ideological direction from the Scientific Socialism of Karl Marx. This was one of a number of African-American developments that demonstrated a progressive and advanced working class consciousness, and which directly took on the White establishment by confronting its racism and continuous outrages. This is the Black working class actively protecting itself against the abusive power of the White (bourgeois) establishment. This is Socialism (and Communism) in action. However, the brain-washing of the broader African-American community by the White establishment has led to many Black people ‘internalizing’ White racist attitudes, and assuming that kowtowing to White dominance, capitalism and Christianity is in their own best interests. This is a reactionary position whereby a certain economic category of African-American subconsciously think that White middle class culture is superior and worthy of emulation – not realising that in so doing they are legitimizing the historical racism of the White community which has been inflicted upon the Black community in America. This paradoxical (and inverted) situation will continue as long as White racism is allowed to exist unopposed. At the moment, the post-modern White community is busying itself by co-opting as many ‘non-White’ minorities into supporting its historical racist narrative as possible – with each minority remaining ‘inferior’ to their White over-lords (as complicity with racism does not guarantee ‘equality’ with the oppressor).

Elvis Presley was a racist because he opposed the Black Panther Movement and possessed no understanding of White racism and what it is like to live under such a historical tyranny. He associated the fighting of racism with Communist ‘brain-washing’, and suggested that Black people in the US were only acting in this manner because of outside influences (presumably from the Soviet Union). In other words, what Presley referred to as ‘America’ was nothing other than the White, racist establishment, which in his view should be supported and never opposed. Of course, Presley was a successful entertainer and fully fledged capitalist, but it is curious how a White man who made millions out of mimicking Black music, could possess such little understanding of the historical or existential plight of the African-American people whose music he stole. This is the letter Elvis Presley wrote to President Nixon asking to be empowered as a Federal Agent so that he could fight the hippies and Black Panthers (amongst other group he considered ‘undesirable’):

Dear Mr. President.

First, I would like to introduce myself. I am Elvis Presley and admire you and have great respect for your office. I talked to Vice President Agnew in Palm Springs three weeks ago and expressed my concern for our country. The drug culture, the hippie elements, the SDS, Black Panthers, etc. do not consider me as their enemy or as they call it the establishment. I call it America and I love it. Sir, I can and will be of any service that I can to help the country out. I have no concern or motives other than helping the country out.

So I wish not to be given a title or an appointed position. I can and will do more good if I were made a Federal Agent at Large and I will help out by doing it my way through my communications with people of all ages. First and foremost, I am an entertainer, but all I need is the Federal credentials. I am on this plane with Senator George Murphy and we have been discussing the problems that our country is faced with. Sir, I am staying at the Washington Hotel, Room 505-506-507. I have two men who work with me by the name of Jerry Schilling and Sonny West. I am registered under the name of Jon Burrows. I will be here for as long as long as it takes to get the credentials of a Federal Agent. I have done an in-depth study of drug abuse and Communist brainwashing techniques and I am right in the middle of the whole thing where I can and will do the most good. I am Glad to help just so long as it is kept very private. You can have your staff or whomever call me anytime today, tonight, or tomorrow. I was nominated this coming year one of America’s Ten Most Outstanding Young Men. That will be in January 18 in my home town of Memphis, Tennessee. I am sending you the short autobiography about myself so you can better understand this approach. I would love to meet you just to say hello if you’re not too busy.

Respectfully,

Elvis Presley

P. S. I believe that you, Sir, were one of the Top Ten Outstanding Men of America also.

I have a personal gift for you which I would like to present to you and you can accept it or I will keep it for you until you can take it.

Mr. President

These are all my PVT numbers

Beverly Hills 278-3496
278-9535
Palm Spring’s
Pvt #
325-3241
Memphis
Pvt. #
397-4427
398-4882
398-9722
Col P.S. # 325-4781
Col B.H. # 274-8498
Col. Off M.E.M. 870-0370

WASHINGTON HOTEL PHONE ME  85900
                                                Room 505-506
                                                Under the name of Jon Burrows

PRIVATE 
AND CONFIDENTIAL
            Attn. President Nixon
            via Sen. George Murphy                    

from

Elvis Presley

George Carlin – Bourgeois Reactionary

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

I was recently asked what I thought of US comic George Carlin (1937-2008), and whether he was leftwing, a Marxist, Socialist or Communist, etc. In many ways, due to the refined climate of US anti-intellectualism, the many hours of recorded George Carlin material, certainly provides some sound-bites that on the surface would make him appear leftwing, but these utterances when taken in isolation, lack an over-all narrative context. In many ways, George Carlin reminds me of that other US intellectual (and academic) Howard Zinn (1922-2010), who was a confirmed ‘Trotskyite’. Trotskyism, of course, is a type of rightwing reactionary, pseudo-Socialism that fully co-operates with capitalism and all aspects of the Bourgeois State. Trotskyism has historically defined itself around a (false) agenda of sullying the reputation of Marxist-Leninism, and the history of the Soviet Union. Quite often Trotskyites make use of a limited (and misconstrued) Marxist critique of society, whilst not taking any real ‘Revolutionary’ action to empower the working class. George Carlin’s approach to social and cultural commentary in his act certainly has the feel of a Trotskyite paradigm in operation. His take on ‘class’ within a capitalist society is ‘flawed’ and ‘non-Marxist’. Carlin states that the ‘upper’ class earns the most money but pays the least tax (?), whilst the ‘middle’ class does all the work and pays most of the taxes (?). Finally, Carlin says the ‘poor’ (constituting the ‘lower’ class) keep the entire system ticking-over. This is nonsense. The ‘upper’ class is the ‘aristocracy’, which today is kept in a life of luxury through government hand-outs. The ‘middle’ class is the ‘bourgeoise’ that possesses all the political power, does very little work, pays the minimum of tax, but appropriates most of the money (which it steals from the working class). The lowest class is the working class, the members of which make-up the majority within any capitalist society, and who do all the work, pay the most taxes, and receive the lowest wages and the least share of political power. As the middle class owns the means of production, and has accumulated all the political, legal, social and cultural power within society, it ruthlessly exploits the workers – stealing their income, their health and their leisure time. George Carlin has nothing to say about this Marxist analysis of capitalist society and appears completely unaware of its existence. More to the point, in the video shared below, George Carlin is featured being openly ‘racist’ and expressing a typical rightwing narrative that Europe has been over-run with Muslims, and that as a consequence the ‘White race’ is finished because it cannot reproduce at the rate of the ‘uncaring’ Muslims, etc. All this diatribe is rightwing mythology that falsely presents the White race as being a victim of its own historical racism and criminality. I suspect that George Carlin felt very relaxed in this interview and forgot to ‘check’ his more rightwing viewpoints. In effect he deviated from his own script, which generally applies a broad leftist critique to US politics and culture. Like a Trotskyite – Carlin uses the idea that White America is ‘racist’, but when viewed in the light of his support for ‘Governor Bush’ after the 911 terrorist attacks in New York, and his inability to ‘see through’ the collective cultural hysteria of the moment, it is obvious that what George Carlin produced was merely an ‘act’. He was not a Marxist, he was not a Marxist-Leninist, he was not a Socialist, and he certainly was not a Communist. He may have been a Trotskyite utilising the usual ‘opportunism’ (or ‘entryism’) familiar with that mode of expression, but I suspect that he was a rightwing anarchist, acting in complete agreement with the historical bourgeois project of spreading a virulent ‘individualism’ around the world. The hidden motive behind his ‘humour’ and distinct brand of ‘intellectualism’ seems to be the continuous criticism of any form of ‘collectivity’, be it bourgeois or leftist. George Carlin was not a working class intellectual, but rather an intellectual in the service of the Bourgeois State.

Affirming Ancient and Modern Black Egyptians

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

I visited Egypt around 1995, and saw with my own eyes a two-tier system of racism and discrimination in effect. The people who rule Egypt today, are of Middle Eastern descent, and the product of Islamic expansionism. These people are light-brown skinned, and look very different from what I was told are the ‘indigenous’ Egyptians – i.e. the descendants of ‘ancient’ Egyptians (i.e. those culturally magnificent people who built the pyramids), who have black skin and typical African (i.e. ‘negroid’) features. The problem was that these ‘black’ Egyptians now live as second class citizens in the country of their ancestors, and are trained from birth to think of themselves as ‘subordinate’ to their Middle Eastern (i.e. ‘Asian’) over-lords. These indigenous Egyptians are not stupid – despite the oppression they are forced to live under. Although forced to be manual labourers, and never to aspire to anything beyond this banal existence, many still retain the collective memories of their culturally great ancestry, which is reinforced continuously by the presence of their tombs, temples, statues and pyramids (which are thousands of years old). I visited Egypt with my Chinese family, and cruised the Nile. I became so ‘tanned’ in colour due to the heat, that Asian Egyptians mistook me for an (Asian) Egyptian tourist guide, showing around a group of Japanese tourists! The sense of ‘race’ is so pronounced in Egypt, that I assume it to be a vestige of British imperialist rule. The British controlled their colonies by strictly demarking each ethnic group by skin-colour, and ascribing a sub-ordinate position on a scale of assumed ‘racial fitness’. Of course, the ‘White’ British were always at the top of this scale, with others descending in worth – with lighter skin being perceived legally as being more ‘valuable’ than darker skin, etc. As a Socialist (i.e. Marxist-Leninist’) and Internationalist, I acknowledge the crimes of my European ancestors – and reject such ‘racialist’ thinking entirely. However, just after our flight touched-down in Cairo, both myself and my partner (who is ethnic Chinese), were taken aside by (Asian) Egyptian immigration officials, and asked why it was that we had a ‘mixed’ marriage! I explained that in the UK such marriages were allowed, and besides, I am of Anglo-Chinese descent. The Egyptian officials looked dumb-founded and said that in Egypt ‘race mixing’ between two ‘different’ ethnic groups is not allowed. They then checked with the British embassy about the validity of what I had said, and after a brief delay, we were escorted (by armed guards), to a waiting bus (which took us to our hotel – and not a prison!).  Later, whilst on board the cruise ship, I would wake-up early and head atop deck to practice qigong and gongfu. As it was around 5am – no other passengers were up. One-day, whilst practising my martial arts, I noticed two or three ‘black’ Egyptians carefully peering at me from below deck (the engine room, to be precise). I waved and went over to them. They were very friendly and told me that they were the ‘true’ Egyptians and that the Asian Egyptians were invaders and usurpers. They lived lives of oppression and repression, and had been warned not to talk to any foreigners. I found it ironic that Asian Egyptians made ample tourist money out of extraordinary ancient monuments that were built by ‘black’ Egyptians, and not by their own ‘Middle Eastern’ ancestry. It seems that after the British left Egypt, they handed over the political and economic power to the lighter-skinned Asian Egyptians, these ‘Egyptians’ now ensure that the indigenous ‘black’ Egyptians are kept in a subjugated position within contemporary Egyptian society. This plays into the hands of ‘White’ racism, and leads to all kinds of pseudo-science which (falsely) claims that the ancient Egyptians were not black! It seems a product of insanity to me, to suggest that ancient Egyptians were not black!

Revolutionary Tattoos of ‘Iron’ Mike Tyson

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Chairman Mao (毛主席)

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Che Guevara

Mike Tyson – an African-American and a ‘Black’ man – carries amongst many others, two tattoes of prominent ‘Communist’ (i.e. ‘Marxist-Leninist’) Freedom Fighters. On his right upper shoulder is a portrait of Mao Zedong – the former Leader of the Communist Party of China (CPC) – and on his lower left abdomen is the Argentine (and Cuban) Che Guevara.

Socialist Action (社會主義行動 ): Beware of Trotskyite Racism & Corruption in Hong Kong (PRC)!

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

During the run-up to the UK handing-back the colony of Hong Kong to the People’s Republic of China in 1997, the British imperialists demanded that China agree to not making any sweeping and/or systemic political reforms for 50 years. This agreement has not prevented a natural shift in education, business, culture and political allegiance toward the Mainland Chinese government, but it has meant that the disruptive and exploitative forces of liberalism and capitalism have been able to retain an imperialist foot-hold on the island. The point of this, or so the British thought, was that colonial influence could be continued to be exercised in this part of China, with the intention of eventually bringing down the Communist Party of China (CPC) and ending its Revolutionary governance of Mainland China – replacing Socialist Revolution with a capitalist counter-revolution. This would be disastrous for the Chinese people, as it would turn Mainland China into one gigantic Western colony, and the Chinese people into the slaves of US-style free market economics and liberal democracy.  Obviously, this backward step is not likely to happen, as the ordinary Chinese people are now self-determining and building an advanced and modern society premised upon the thinking of Marxist-Leninism and Scientific Socialism.

It is also true, however, that the US, UK and EU use Taiwan and Hong Kong as a potential spring-board to politically ‘destabilise’ Communist China. The idea is simple in design, create a ‘fifth column’ of pro-capitalist insurgents in these areas and package their preference for ‘greed’ as a heart-felt call for ‘liberal democracy’. This strategy is aided and abetted in the West by the propagation of an insidious anti-China racism, and such Western generated pseudo-cultural entities as the Falun Gong Cult and the Pro-Tibetan Movement. Racism is the foundation of these movements, with White Europeans pulling the strings somewhere in the murky background. These movements are merely parodies of Chinese culture, and are designed to keep the poorly educated and exploited masses in the West from understanding modern ‘Communist’ China, and striving to make Revolutionary links and connections, In other words, the Western capitalist powers do not want a Communist Revolution spreading from China to the West and freeing all the workers! To prevent this, the average European worker must be kept ignorant and brain-washed against Communist China. China’s good reputation must be continuously sullied and presented as corrupt. Communist China has to be presented as just another ‘Nazi German’ regime that invades other countries, violates Human Rights, progresses economically through the use of sweat shops, oppresses women, brutalises children, and retains its political power through military force. It is interesting to consider that these ‘capitalist’ misrepresentations of Communist China ARE EXACTLY the same criticisms levelled at China by the bourgeois Trotskyite Movement! This demonstrates that the  bourgeois Trotskyite Movement is nothing more than a capitalist stooge masquerading as a ‘Socialist’ movement.

Whilst searching the Chinese-language internet (on Google), I came across ‘Socialist Action’ (社會主義行動 – She Hui Zhu Hui Xing Dong), primarily through a ‘fake’ Chinese-language wikipedia page that has not been generated from within the Mainland of China, and does not exist on ‘Baidu’ – the mainland China, Chinese-language internet search-engine. The US is behind the creation of a number of ‘mirroring’ Chinese-language wikipedia pages that are designed to convey anti-China racism, and anti-Communist propaganda. The Trotskyite ‘Socialist Action’ entry is just one of many such pages, but its central message is pro-capitalist and anti-Communist. The only element of falsehood and prejudice that it adds to the pro-capitalist critique of modern China is the false allegation that Stalinism was a diversion away from the true spirit of Marxist-Leninism, and that therefore, Mao Zedong (the Communist founder of modern China), as an admirer of Joseph Stalin, perpetuated a ‘corrupt’ dictatorship upon the people of China. This is exactly the same racially motivated and philosophically flawed message that ALL Trotskyite so-called ‘Socialist’ groups in the West perpetuate and propagate against China. This is inaccordance with Leon Trotsky’s bourgeois background, and his preference for co-operation with the forces of capitalism. This false wiki-page states that ‘Socialist Action’ started within Mainland China in 2009 – before its magazine was ‘banned’ and the movement forced to relocate to Hong Kong. This is untrue – there are no ‘Trotskyite’ movements in Mainland China because every Chinese person understands that Trotsky was a racist who held profoundly anti-Chinese attitudes (as expressed throughout his works). The Chinese people would never look to a White racist for political liberation and support, particularly as the Chinese people are already free from the oppression of White capitalism and White imperialism.

False Chinese Language Wikipedia Page:

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/社会主义行动

Paul Robeson: Communists Should Not Apologise!

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Lush – Racist Golly Wogs in Paignton – Devon (12.8.2017)

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

‘Lush’ – 38-49 Torbay Road – Paignton

Lush – Torbay Road – Paignton (Devon( UK

Disclaimer: Following further investigation, it has been found that the owners of the (above) shop in question (which will be permanently shutting in around 5 weeks time) routinely share far-rightwing posts on their personal Facebook pages. This includes racist and Islamophobic content drawn from UKIP, EDL and Britain First websites, (as well as similar prejudicial material gathered from other poorly educated and narrow-minded individuals), which is inserted between photographs of children, family events and holidays, etc. For reasons of common decency – I have not included these links on this post. Individuals are free to pursue lawful political paths – and I consider ‘golly wogs’ to be racist and illegal – although I am told this is a grey area. Whatever the case, I am opposed to fascism in any guise and will confront it wherever it arises. ACW (13.8.2017)

A ‘golly wog’ is a racist caricature of an African person – usually a male. It is a ‘White’ prejudicial view of how an enslaved African should be – he should be happy in his servitude and have no intellectual ability. He must have an infantile mind and exist only to serve and to ‘entertain’ his ‘White’ masters (particularly their children). He is servile and yet oddly ‘threatening’ to the White imagination, who give their children ‘dolls’ of this racist nightmare to play with. Black people are presented as a racially inferior being and being ‘golly’ (i.e. ‘joyful’ and ‘accepting’ of their demeaning status). The term ‘wog’ refers to any foreigner of colour who is believed to lack the intelligence of the White race – but the fact that White people still make (and sell) these offensive ‘toys’ just goes to show how ‘un-intelligent’ many White actually people are. I have come across ‘golly wogs’ in a number of shops in Torquay and Paignton (including the famous and otherwise ‘genteel’ Cockington Village) – places where the far-right (and its racism) is very strong. Not so long ago, the Livermead Cliff Hotel was proud to host a conference for the racist UKIP – a hotel that hypocritically plays host to thousands of foreigners each year – and the local ‘Stagecoach’ bus company placed racist UKIP adverts on its buses, whilst Torbay Council allowed UKIP placards to be placed around the town and along the side of the local motorway. Local churches – both protestant and catholic – have advertised both UKIP and BNP on their church billboards as far away as Totnes! As can be gleamed, the Torbay and surrounding area has a major issue with racist attitudes and viewpoints which is not helped by an apathetic local police force – which has in the past took the side of the racist over that of the obvious victim. There is a complete lack of Socialist consciousness in this area and a routine functioning of a ‘false’ consciousness which I will expose through this blog. African people are human-beings and are not racially, morally, intellectually or culturally inferior. Black people ARE NOT ‘golly wogs’!

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Black African History Restored

Portrait of Gertrude Caton Thompson

Gertrude Caton Thompson

This documentary describes the power of racism – a very dangerous but addictive myth – that together with ‘literalist’ religion, has conspired to usurp, hide, obscure and even destroy the facts of material history. When modern (White) Europeans arrived in Africa prior to, during and after the Industrial Revolution, they ascribed their technological advantage to a god-concept ‘blessing’ the White race (rather than acknowledging human intellect and human labour, the real driving forces of the Industrial Revolution). Africa was (falsely) depicted as being ’empty’ of history, and a continent peopled by backward primitives. Any archaeology that contradicted this racist view (and there are many), were either suppressed, or interpreted as the product of ancient White settlers who had travelled to Africa hundreds or thousands of years ago. This quite frankly ‘weird’ take on African culture was further compounded by the stupidity of assuming that ancient Africa was somehow physically linked to Old Testament stories – again more imagination.  Apparently, Europe had traded with Africa prior to the Industrial Revolution (often with Arab merchants as middlemen), and much of the gold and ivory that fuelled the European Renaissance is now thought to have originated in and around Zimbabwe. Europeans have been lied to by their ancestors, and modern Europeans must throw-off these out-dated and out-moded (racist) interpretations of history, and psychologically and physically start studies anew. Early White colonialists even created the lie that Blacks and Whites had arrived in Southern Africa ‘together’, and that prior to this, there was no Black-African presence. The residing Black-Africans must have thought the violent and ignorant White settlers to be truly insane. On the other hand, the British Feminist – Gertrude Caton Thompson (1888-1985) – one of the first female archaeologists in the UK, led an all-woman team on behalf of the British Academy in 1928, on a quest to objectively study the ‘true’ or ‘real’ origins of Zimbabwe. Thompson rejected the racist ‘White’ interpretation, and the Old Testament gloss, and proceeded from the study of objective facts. Thompson uncovered vast (and ‘new’) archaeological finds in and around ancient Zimbabwe, proving that there were many and numerous different types of ancient African cultures – all apparently feudal in nature – but able to build large rock buildings and structures of religious and political significance. This was augmented by stratified social strictures, military formations, voluntary labour (people work 7 days a month free of charge to honour the king), and there was much sophisticated metal work, jewellery making, and stone-caving. Of course, African people already knew this, and did not require a European woman to tell then their own history, but for ‘White’ Europeans, the work of Thompson has been essential as a ‘corrective’ to otherwise highly ridiculous and racist interpretations. All African gold was owned by the African kings, and only used (together with ivory) strictly in trading with civilisations outside of Africa (which included Europe, the Middle East and China). The internal currency appears to have been the exchange of cattle – with those owning the most cattle being considered the most influential and successful. At one-time (during the 15th century CE), the Africans (Swahili) also sent a giraffe to China – causing great surprise and admiration at the imperial court. As Africa boomed, impressive town and cities developed all-over the continent – including East Africa (prior to Arab domination of the area).  Following African people converting to Islam, it was assumed that ‘Arabs’ had built the beautiful and ornate mosques (and other structures), but recent archaeological discoveries (made by the British academic Mark Horton) suggests this is wrong and just as ‘racist’ in nature as the ‘White’ imaginings. According to Mark Horton, it was Swahili Africans that conceived, built, maintained and prayed in the great mosques of East Africa – that only much later were taken over by Arabs. Eventually, of course, despite the greatness of African culture, a time came when this culture started to decline. This decline was almost complete by the 15th century CE – just prior to the arrival of the first Europeans.

How White Racism Sustains the Falun Gong

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Western Falun Gong Practitioner Collapses from Ill-Health! – New York (2016)

The Falun Gong is basically a theological fabrication created in the West, and deployed within Mainland China. The Falun Gong is as alien to the average Chinese person as is Christianity, and comes across as a bizarre ‘racialised’ mimicry of Chinese culture. In this regard, the Falun Gong is a continuation of the racialised, Western misrepresentation of Chinese culture, prevalent throughout Western entertainment and media. The greatest victory for this US (CIA) fabrication is the recruiting of ethnic Chinese frontmen as a means to deliver this perverse collection of Eurocentric imaginings to the Chinese populations around the globe. As a dangerous cult, the Falun Gong operates like any other cult operating in the West. Falun Gong teachings are designed to ‘strip’ an adherent of his or her individuality, and replace it with a ‘blind obedience’ to the whims of the psychopath Li Hongzhi – the ethnic Chinese frontman the CIA chose to represent this delinquent fabrication (in this regard, Li Hongzhi more or less equals the 14th Dalai Lama’s position of serving US foreign policy). With the stripping of individuality, the Falun Gong psychologically and physically ‘enslave’ the adherent and steal their income, savings and any property they might own. These cult victims are coerced into ‘giving-up’ all their previous material property, and to abandon their families and friends (because these people often possess the required influence to extract an individual from the cult). Once reduced to the state of automaton, the Falun Gong adherent (whose critical faculties have been ‘suspended’ through brain-washing) is now ready to do the illegal and immoral bidding of Li Hongzhi and his henchmen.

The ideology of the Falun Gong mimics the theology of Judaism and Christianity with regard to its own self-imposed (and wholly ‘imagined’) status of being ‘special’, and the subject of ‘persecution’ because of that assumed specialness. As Li Hongzhi commits the illegal act of psychologically and physically abusing his ‘disciples’, he is guilty in virtually all legal codes worth their salt, of deliberately ‘grooming’ men, women and children to pursue his perverse political, financial and cultural agendas. This is the first and foremost ‘criminal’ act of the Falun Gong. It is closely followed by these brain-washed foot soldiers being deployed throughout society to recruit new members (to replace those who are arrested and imprisoned, and those who escape or who are rescued) and to commit the further criminal activity of attacking the sovereign State of Mainland China and all its resources. Turning public opinion against Mainland China is one of the foundational aims of Li Hongzhi, who does this by falsely portraying China as ‘evil’ and himself as ‘good’ (again, symbolic of the Judeo-Christian origins of the Falun Gong). This policy is pursued as a means to destroy the ‘Communist’ system in China, and replace it with a US-dominated, free economic capitalist system. Just as Christ’s body was ‘destroyed’ by the Roman authorities, so do the Falun Gong create a similar mythos of persecution. Just as Li Hongzhi propagates the lie of ‘eternal life’, he also manufactures the further non-truth that states that the Falun Gong practitioners are ‘persecuted’ in China, and their organs ‘harvested’ after execution. This lie rings well with Western ears, conditioned as they are by Judeo-Christian theology, but sounds bizarre to Chinese ears. The truth of the matter is that the Falun Gong was never popular in China, and is not popular today. Since its banning in 1999, ordinary Chinese people are vigilant against its destructive presence. Whenever the Falun Gong Infiltrate Mainland China and commit illegal acts, they are tried and imprisoned and never executed (in fact, there is not a single record of any executions involving Falun Gong felons). From a Chinese cultural perspective, organs would never be ‘harvested’ from an ‘executed’ criminal due to the ‘bad’ qi energy associated with the executed individual (which is interpreted as corrupt, dysfunctional and unhealthy). Such an activity is probably more abhorrent in China than in the West – where its notion was first invented and applied to modern China.

Gullible Westerners (and sympathetic diasporic Chinese people), often seek a ‘good cause’ to support, because this is the self-righteous basis of the Judeo-Christian mind-set. The more ‘emotive’ the subject matter of the cause, the better, because such hyperbolic issues attract followers and money, and are more or less self-sustaining. Westerners particularly ‘latch’ onto the mythology of the Falun Gong, because it has its basis within the Western tradition of anti-Chinese racism. Whilst unthinkingly condemning China, these mistaken Westerners are simply perpetuating the racist policies of their fore-fathers – and generally speaking, do not care. Westerners who are racist toward China will support the self-hating Falun Gong to a very high degree (even though such support is obviously illogical), because it is seen as a ‘legitimate’ means to practice anti-Chinese racism in a thoroughly self-righteous and self-justifying manner. This racialisation of China is the Falun Gong’s greatest strength in the West – as without the support of Western racists, the Falun Gong would simply be exposed for the cult that it is, and quietly disappear into the dustbin of history – where it belongs.

%d bloggers like this: