Joseph McCabe: The Anatomy of an Anti-Soviet ‘Lie’! (18.3.2023) 

The point being here, that for all his evilness – Adolf Hitler (who really did ‘kill’ verified millions) – is far more acceptable to the Bourgeoisie once his ‘National Socialist’ regime has been militarily defeated (ironically by the ‘Socialists’), and its threat to the dominance of the world ‘capitalism’ firmly removed! In Russia and China no one believes that their greatest leaders killed millions of people – as there are no bodies, no graves and no grieving masses. The Bourgeoisie, realising the practical weakness in their argument, decided that in Cambodia (Kampuchea) a new approach was needed – and the remains of the tens of thousands of innocent Cambodians killed in the illegal blanket-bombing (and military invasions) of that that country carried-out by the US during the Vietnam War – were simply ‘piled-up’ for tourists to gawk at – and see just how ‘evil’ Socialism can be!  

Wagner PMC Anti-NATO (English) Recruitment Video! (30.1.2023)

Richard Wagner was a primary inspiration for Adolf Hitler – and yet the Russian ‘Volunteers’ who fight in Donbass today not only name their Regiment after this bigoted fool – but also make use of the skull emblem used extensively by the Hitlerite SS Divisions! Fighting US-backed Neo-Nazism throughout Eastern Europe (and the Ukraine) is one thing – but supporting Russian Pan-Slavism without question is quite another! The average Russian person in the USSR always looked for support to the toiling masses who lived beyond the boundaries of the USSR – we were working-class ‘Comrades’ waiting for the World Revolution together – but today, on the many discussion forums available the average Russian perpetuates race-hatred toward all people living in countries whose Bourgeois governments disagree with Russian policy in the Ukraine. This is now the typical ‘Nationalism’ which Russia pursues. Even the so-called Russian, Donetsk and Lugansk ‘Communist Parties’ fall into lign with this Bourgeois thinking and acting!  

The Bourgeois Russian government is thoroughly ‘capitalist’ and encourages its society to be riddled with backward religiosity! The religiosity of the Russian Orthodox Church is just as bad as the contrived Ukrainian Orthodox Church – with its inverted view of reality, racism, misogyny and homophobia! Many of its monks and priests I have met exude what I term ‘pure evil’! There is nothing holy about any of these self-seeking deluders of humanity! The Russian government, whilst generating tens of thousands of casualties in Russia (on both sides) do not want any social instability that could lead to a ‘Socialist’ uprising! I reject ALL this Bourgeois reaction perpetuated by modern Russia and lament the destruction of the 1917 Great October Revolution! And yet we are still left with the problem of continuously expanding US hegemony which we have been accommodating throughout Western Europe since 1945! It is true that Russia is confronting it – but it does not offer ‘Socialism’ in its place – merely a form of ‘capitalism’ controlled by Russia! Whatever the case, Ukrainian Neo-Nazism must be defeated – and so should the fascism Russian Pan-Slavism!

Invalidation of the Worker Part II - 2017

Invalidation of the Worker – Part II (4.12.2017)

My original article entitled The Invalidation of the Worker – A Study of Disability in Capitalist Society was published in October, 2013. It is logical to assume that as ‘Austerity’ has continued unabated, thousands of disabled who were alive to read it then, are nolonger with us now. The proliferation of articles that over-simplify and misrepresent ‘disability’ are common place within bourgeois society. Most miss the vital point of economic exclusion, and focus instead upon misguided notions of bourgeois individuality – making such puerile statements as ‘if only disabled people were viewed as individuals and not their disabilities’, or ‘disabled people should not be viewed as dysfunctional able-bodied’, and so on and so forth. It is not that there is no truth to statements such as these, but that this kind of narrative is entirely bourgeois in nature, and as such, does not address the central reality of economic exclusion. Why should a person with a disability be categorised as ‘disabled’, when ‘able-bodied’ people are only referred to in that manner, within a temporary discourse which distinguishes the non-disabled from the disabled (privileging the former and disempowering the latter). In reality this situation is a matter of Marxist-Leninist critique, and involves the exclusion of the disabled community not only from bourgeois society, but also from proletariat society.