Books Ven Pannaloka

UK: What Do You Think of the Work of Ven. Pannaloka and His Latest Book? (14.11.2026)

Having said this, I do know a number of Taiwanese people in Taiwan who do possess a good and positive attitude – and there are many who view the Mainland as their cultural ancestor (not the US). Of course, none of this has anything to do with the Ven. Pannaloka – but I mention it as it contextualises my thoughts and opinions. Back to business. Although Ven. Pannaloka’s latest “published” book is his 2026 time – it is NOT his latest “written” book. Far from it, the basis of this text is the Venerable Bhikkhu’s PhD Dissertation written whilst he was studying in Taiwan (I cannot see an exact date for this text – but as the Venerable Bhikkhu was born in 1974 – I assume he may have been studying during the 1990s or thereafter). Twenty-years after writing my dissertation (2006) – I can safely say that accept in very broad assumptions – I probably no longer agree with any of it (as my thought processes have developed and moved onwards in understanding). As to the content, although the Ven. Pannaloka atempts a parallel between Theravada Buddhist ethics and the philosphy of Aristotle, John Stuart Mill, and Kant, etc.

Youth Seminar Explores Buddhism’s Role in Addressing Modern Social Issues!

Laos Buddhist-Socialist Republic: Youth Seminar Explores Buddhism’s Role in Addressing Modern Social Issues! (13.11.2026)

The seminar was held as part of the 11th Nanhai Buddhism Shenzhen Forum in Vientiane. Participants included Most Venerable Yin Shun, President of the Shenzhen Buddhist Association and Abbot of Hongfa Temple in China; Most Venerable Damlong Phimmachack, Vice President of the Central Committee of the Lao Buddhist Fellowship Organization (LBFO) and Head of its International Monks Affairs Committee; Sonsamai Vorasane, Director General of the Department of Ethnic and Religious Affairs under the Prime Minister’s Office; Buddhist monks from 30 countries; and representatives of the Lao Front for National Development.

Where Does Material Reality Stop & Start!

UK: Communist Futurism – the “Future” in the “Present”! (28.10.2026)

This vague idea that the essence of the future reside in the present mind (and body) of humanity is used to exploit vulnerable and desperate individuals who seek answers in the present from a future technology that does not yet exist. This is why fake psychics (and the like) – who pretend (for the exchange of money) that they already possess these abilities – need to be exposed by the gate-keepers of hardline (material) science. Of course, things are no always what they may seen. Exposing a fake psychic should not be conflated with denying that the essence of the “future” resides in the “present”. All great innovations begin here and now with “vague” ideas of what might be. Material scientists carefully follow a very narrow and stringent process that measures time and space. This is an important power of the mind (and body). Exploiting one another for monetary profit is a major problem – with even the best material scientists often being paid to produce research that interprets reality in a certain manner.

Robo-Bhikkhu

BMA (UK) – Techno-Dhamma – Enlightenment Beyond the Body! (22.10.2026)

According to Buddhist theory, the content of the mind is imported a) from the material environment (via the six sense-organs interacting with six sense objects), and b) thought formations premised upon karmic traits laid-down (as “habit”) in previous existences. A previous existence does not have to have been “human” – but could involve any type of life-form – even on other planets situated in different universes and/or dimensions. As this type of existence is mysterious and not fully understood – existences may not unfold in a logical choreography. A past life might have happened in the future when compared to the present – or unfolded within a completely different time corridor not obviously related to the present (although there must be some kind of hidden karmic association). The mechanism of continuing thought-habit might be like one candle lighting another as the former burns-out and the latter blazes brightly. Of course, the Buddha asserts that rebirth (and karma) no longer exists in the enlightened state.

The Hermit is Self-Sufficient!

UK: Emergency Self-Ordination in the Chinese Vinaya Discipline! (14.10.2026)

Of course, the laity has a more superficial relationship with the Vinaya Discipline – and the Buddha taught soldiers, prostitutes, butchers, and even murderers, amongst many others. The Buddhist rules are NOT punishments inflicted by a disembodied sky-spirit (theistic god entity) – but exists to guide the psychological and physical energy that comprises an individual. The Buddha was scientific in that he emphasised cause and effect. We are responsible for the way we experience the inner (psychological) or outer (material) world. If you are happy suffering the consequences of the manner in which you live – and you never complain to anyone else about it – then why bother inflicting this form of Buddhist self-discipline upon yourself? There is no point. There are all kinds of reasons why people pursue the lives they do – and this is nothing to do with others – as we possess our own unique karma. Finally, status-hunting in the West – pretending to be a bhikkhu or being a genuine bhikkhu for the wrong reasons – is an offence and will bring its own hellish karma. The Vinaya Discipline is a very powerful and life-affirming vehicle that permits an individual to meet each manifestation of life with tranquillity and wisdom (in-depth).

Confucius lived from 551 BCE to 479 BCE

China: Life of Confucius [551-479 BCE] Commemorated! (29.9.2026)

This meant that the nobility could do whatever they wanted to the peasants in different circumstances, and that the there was no set law that applied identically to everyone in every situation. This was fine just as long as the nobility showed proper respect to their superiors and guidance to their inferiors within the aristocracy. As for peasants, Confucius believed they should be treated with the harshest of draconian laws to keep them in-line. Peasants had no rights other than offering the highest deference toward the aristocracy. The Emperor retained the right to execute anyone (of any rank) at anytime, for any reason. Social order was the purpose of politicised Confucianism. On the other hand, some are of the opinion that as a personal philosophy (rather than a forced political ideology), Confucianism advocates self-discipline and a dedication toward a continuous academic study and character-refinement (modern China takes this position). Indeed, Confucius the man pursued this latter model as he possessed no political power during his lifetime. Behind the scenes, scholars argued whether humanity was inherently “good” or “bad’ – and whether people outside your own family (nepotism) should be treated with the same respect and consideration as people within your family. The First Emperor detested hierarchical Confucianism, banned it, and introduced “Legalism” – a unique idea in China at the time – an ideology which advocated that the same law applied everywhere, to everyone – at all times – without exception or deference to social status. Today, The CPC advocates the rule of law and defines Confucianism as pursuing the ability to “educate” in relation to the learning of the Chinese language (reading, writing and speaking). This approach removes the unsavoury aspects of politicised Confucianism (without suppressing Confucianism per se) and lifts its thinking out of the quagmire of a narcissistic philosophy.

1 2 3 … 15