Zack Polanski Supports Neo-Nazi Ukraine

UK: Are We All “Victims” of Zack Polanski’s Pocket Watch? (17.9.2026)

I quietly gathered-up all the evidence before openly broadcasting this treatment and the Green damage limitation began. The Greens are a fake leftist movement whose actual political bias is to the centre-right. Now, Mr Zack Polanski (born “Paul Paulden”) was a Harley Street “Hypnotist” – the epicentre of very expensive private medicine in the UK. The poor are a) excluded, and b) left to suffer – all in the name of “profit” and the “free-market”. In 2013 he was involved in what the Press now term “Boob-Gate” – involving his claim that women could “will” or “wish” their bust-size to a larger size. As if that (deluded) bourgeois nonsense was not enough – Mr Polanski admires his fellow Jew – Vladimir Zelenski – the Zionist Jew who is the current Dictator running Neo-Nazi Ukraine. Okay, on the plus size he is permitted on mainstream media to criticise Zionist Israel and hold it to account for what the UN has termed its “Genocidal” actions. Devil in the room – so what? There are plenty of individuals on the left and right (although for different reasons) who criticise Israel – but who risk imprisonment in their own countries due to the influence the Zionists operate throughout the world.

Workers of the World Unite!

UK: A 3-Pronged [Left-Wing] Answer to the Migrant Issue! (17.9.2026)

The problem with this definition is that the concept of a modern “migrant” is not politically “neutral”. A migrant is displaced by war, famine, illness, and economic hardship – much of which stems from the disruptive foreign policies perpetuated by the political establishment. Migration is quite often heavily politicised – as the acceptance of the individual migrant is used by the government and the media – to equate to the acceptance (a priori) of the political cause associated with the migrant. Migrants from regimes the UK government prefers are welcomed with open-armed – whilst migrants from opposing regimes (or political) views are excluded. The UK has a long history of importing migrants from regimes that oppose Socialism. The government (and establishment) do not want the taxpayer to understand or grasp the real situation and reduces it instead to a simplistic “either-or” argument. The issue is twofold – rejecting the coercive political situation becomes conflated to rejecting the migrant. Rejecting the migrant is equated with an “immoral” decision.

The US Embassy in London in a picture taken in April last year!

UK: US Embassy “Paedophile” Flown to Safety! (15.9.2026)

US Embassy staff have a long history of breaking UK law – and then using their diplomatic immunity to flee the country. Once back in the US – due to American notions of racial exceptionalism – the US government refuses to extradite. US crimes in the UK include murder, assault, rape, and possession of child sexual images (below), as well as breaking UK parking and driving laws, and refusing to pay parking and driving fines (the US owes £15.9m fines going to press). Bear in mind, both US diplomats and private US citizens are always committing crime in the UK – but due to US hegemony – these crimes are ignored or played-down by the UK media. I believe this criminal tendency stems from their terroristic days of the 1770s.

Shackles Made in Sheffield!

UK: British Crown Symbol was Branded on Enslaved Africans! (15.9.2026)

The Captains were paid for the slaves, purchased sugar with some of this money, and then set-sail for England. The slaves, of course, particularly in the West Indies, were forced to work on the sugar plantations, but were further exported into the American hinterland – where they would farm cotton. The Americas consisted of vast open spaces but there were not enough White workers to exploit this space. Slavery was the answer – with thousands of slaves controlled by a handful of Whites. Until 1648 – the slaves branded with a “Crown” meant that they were the personal property of the (absolute) British Monarchy. After the 1648-49 Execution of Charles I (and the overthrow of the aristocracy by the bourgeoisie) – the absolute monarchy was abolished and the “Crown” symbol was re-directed to refer to the bourgeoisie (which now controlled the means of production) and the elected government that was voted-in by the masses to represent its interests. Of course, the “Crown” simply designated those slaves acquired and sold by the British – as opposed to those slaves acquired by other European nations. It was a marker of dominance – rather than direct ownership – as each slave was owned by whoever had provided money to purchase the rights of ownership (like a car or a house).

Nation to Advance Fertility-Friendly Push!

China: Nation to Advance Fertility-Friendly Push! (15.9.2026)

With more than 10 million students enrolling in colleges and universities each year amid a boom in the higher education sector, China is building an expanding and highly skilled workforce, Lei said.

Official data shows that, by the end of 2025, China had about 851.36 million people ages 16 to 59, and that group had an average of 11.3 years of schooling, up 0.1 year from a year earlier.

Lei added that the annual number of newborns has remained at about 8 million despite an overall downward trend.

“Compared with other developed and developing countries, very few have births at this level, so China will still have a relatively ample labour force in the future,” he said.

Lei noted that China will continue to roll out fertility-friendly measures to ease the burden of childbirth, child-rearing and education.

Among the latest fertility support policies are the rollout of a fertility subsidy, which has so far benefited more than 30 million families, and the establishment of nearly 12,600 early pregnancy care clinics nationwide, providing counselling and assessments.

Soviet Pilots with Their UK-Provided Spitfires!

UK: Debunking an Anti-Soviet Episode of the 1970s BBC Drama “Secret Army”! (13.9.2026)

The “Line” is comprised of petty bourgeois hotel, restaurant, and cafe owners, etc, and these people refuse to relate to unionised workers. The series conforms to Cold War sentiment as the Belgians are depicted as confronting the Nazi Germans and subtly resisting their allies – the Communists. And yet in reality, it was the Communists who carried-out most of the fighting, took most of the risks, and suffered the highest casualty rates. The Communist Party of France was funded and directed, in-part, from the USSR and the UK. I would say the series treads an ideological tightrope very successfully. The height of the rather silly anti-Soviet script writing appears in Series 2, Episode 2, entitled “Russian Roulette”. This story supposedly depicts two airmen (from the Soviet Red Airforce) shot-down over Eastern Germany during 1943.

1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 118