Expunging Trotsky from ‘Socialist’ History – a Dialectical Necessity

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

‘The whole foundations of Leninism at the present time is built on lying and falsification and carries within itself the poisoned element of its own disintegration.’ (1)

Even before he was expelled for treasonous activities from the Soviet Union in 1929, Trotsky’s distorted version of ‘Socialism’ had attracted the attention of the anti-Soviet ideologues in the USA. Indeed, there is much evidence to suggest that after WWII, what had by then become referred to as ‘Trotskyism’ was used as the basis for the US anti-Soviet (and anti-Communist) Cold War rhetoric. This is why most people are confused by ‘Trotskyism’ and the many organisations that follow his anti-Soviet ideology – whilst still insisting on calling themselves ‘Socialist’. Trotsky, for many, is known the wrong way around back to front, and in many ways ‘ahistorically’. What must be understood is that Trotsky was not a true Revolutionary, but rather a political ‘opportunist’ of the worst kind. He temporarily aligned himself with Revolutionary Movements to further his own political career, and as a means for him to attain influence and personal power at any cost. In this regard, he certainly was not a Marxist or Marxist-Leninist, and had no theoretical interest in those ideologies.

Trotsky was criticised by Lenin – and later by Stalin – for continuously failing to understand and interpret history from a Marxist perspective. This led to Trotsky attempting to undermine the hard-earned Soviet System from within, by advocating a thoroughly ‘bourgeois’ counter-revolution, with himself at the helm. For this treachery, he (and many of his followers) were expelled from the Soviet Union in 1929 – but a number of his followers remained behind ‘undetected’ within the Soviet System to spread their particular brand of ‘unrest’ and ‘discontent’. Many, as the years went by, attempted acts of sabotage against the Soviet State, destroying technology and machinery, and interfering with scientific research. Some even attempted to undermine the morale of the Red Army, and turn its officers against the Soviet State it had helped to build.

As Trotsky became the darling of the West, he attracted a great attention from the supporters of capitalism – which included many members of the rightwing and far-right political establishment in America, Europe and Asia.  This inspired Trotsky to actively call for all of his supposedly ‘Socialist’ supporters to enter into an alliance with Nazi Germany and fascist Imperialist Japan in 1938, and work to over-throw the Soviet Union AND the liberal democracies of the West! A year before (in 1937), many of Trotsky’s ‘sleeper cells’ in the USSR had become active, and were immediately identified by the NKVD and ‘neutralised’. This policing action was necessary to prevent what would today be interpreted as a comprehensive ‘terrorist’ attack on a sovereign government and the country it administers. If Trotsky had been successful, the Soviet Union would have collapsed prior to WWII, and the Red Army would not have existed to confront and eventually destroy the military forces of Nazi Germany.

As it is now the 100th anniversary of the Russian Revolution (2017), it is important that Trotsky is nolonger viewed as a legitimate ‘Revolutionary’, and that his path of ideology (which he and his followers deceptively term ‘Socialism’), not be associated with either Marxism-Engelsism, or Marxism-Leninism. Trotsky’s work must be historically ‘re-oriented’ and removed from the glittering history of Revolutionary Struggle, and placed firmly within the realms of capitalist-supporting, bourgeois counter-revolutionary thought. Trotsky’s duplicity cost the lives of immeasurable numbers of people due to the Nazi German invasion of the Soviet Union – despite this beginning a year after Trotsky’s death. Presumably Hitler was of the opinion that Trotsky’s followers had carried-out enough damage to the infrastructure of the USSR, and that the time was now ripe to invade. Of course, the distorted history of the capitalist West blames all this on Stalin – as Trotsky demanded. Indeed, in 1925, just one year after the death of Lenin, the US Time magazine already began to exhibit the interfering-style of developed US Cold War rhetoric – by implying that Trotsky (and his ‘distorted’ Socialism) should now run the USSR – over Joseph Stalin. The myth here, is that Soviet citizens did not vote. In fact, ‘voting’ in a proletariat society is a central activity to every citizen’s life, but of course, proletariat democracy is not liberal democracy, and does not favour or privilege the bourgeoisie. The point continuously omitted in Trotskyite accounts of the USSR, is that from 1924 until his death in 1953, Comrade Stalin was continuously re-elected into office – despite trying to resign ‘twice’ after 1945. The citizenry of the USSR was organised around the trade union model, where from lowest to the highest in society – everyone voted for representatives on numerous committees. This organisational model did allow the bourgeoisie to manifest and/or exercise power within a Socialist society. Trotsky wanted to reverse this Revolutionary change, and allow the resurgence of capitalism in the USSR, and along with it the predatory capitalist system.

The very idea that Stalin had millions, or hundreds of thousands sent to the gulags – and/or executed – is an ‘ahistorical’ lie perpetuated by Leon Trotsky and his followers. Alexander Werth was a British BBC correspondent who was of Russian parentage. He was with the Red Army virtually throughout the entirety of the ‘Great Patriotic War’ (1941-1945), and was allowed at the frontline. During August, 1944, Alexander Werth was with the Red Army when it liberated the Majdanek Concentration Camp in Poland – built by the Nazi Germans. His initial reports to the BBC in London were the first to reach the allies regarding the Nazi German holocaust of the Jews and other minorities. Winston Churchill, still looking for ways of absolving the Hitlerite regime, had Werth’s reports quashed – stating that they were Soviet lies about Nazi Germany. As a result, Werth spent much of his later life repudiating US and UK anti-Soviet propaganda, proving it to be ‘untrue’. In 1959, Werth visited the Soviet Union once again, and met-up with a number of American friends who lived and worked in the USSR. As incredible as it seems, and despite the rabid anti-Soviet propaganda in the US, American people still travelled to the USSR, with some making their homes there. When Werth asked one or two prominent Americans about the supposed ‘purges’ of the late 1930’s, he was usually met with laughter! The general consensus was that a Trotskyite plot was uncovered that involved around 10,000 traitors. Many were sent to prison, whilst a minority were executed for treason. There were not hundred of thousands, or millions of people involved – Trotsky was just not that popular in the USSR – where life was very good for most people!

The Nazi German holocaust cost the lives of around 11 million people (6 million Jews, and 5 millions of other ethnicities, political and sexual orientations, the disabled, and anyone who disagreed with fascism). Meanwhile, Imperial Japan is estimated to have caused around 60 million deaths in China, a figure that does not include those killed throughout other parts of Asia by Japanese troops. When the Nazi German forces invaded the Soviet Union, between 27-40 million casualties were suffered (both military and civilian). The conquered Ukraine area of the USSR saw some of the worst Nazi German excesses of the holocaust – aided and abetted by a minority of rightist Ukrainians – the political (and in some cases ‘biological’) descendents of whom comprise the contemporary ‘Madan’ neo-Nazi government of Western Ukraine. All this anti-Socialist death and destruction is exactly the political policies that Trotsky advised his followers to embrace in 1938. A question worth asking is why the Trotskyite Movement today, remains entirely ‘free’ of any criticism from the bourgeois press. The answer, of course, is that the Trotskyites support capitalism, and are not averse to fascism, or fascist atrocity.

(1) Trotksy’s (1913) letter to the Georgian Menshevik Chkheidze – quote reproduced in EH Carr’s ‘The Bolshevik Revolution 1917-1923’, MacMillan, (1950), Page 63. Carr explains that this letter was intercepted by the Czarist Authorities and only discovered in the Archives after the 1917 Revolution. This letter was used against Trotsky after Lenin’s death (in 1924), when Trotsky was presenting himself as the ‘natural’ air to Lenin’s ideological leadership.

100 Hundred Years On – How the Capitalist West Denigrated the Soviet Union

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

The misrepresentation of the history and intent of the Soviet Union (and the Scientific Socialist Movement in general), is one of the greatest academic atrocities and tragedies committed by the British (and European) academic communities, probably since the art of writing and critical thinking began. Particularly disturbing – as I look through various British university books from the 1970’s and 1980’s – is the air of ‘authority’ with which the known lies were presented to the general public, through each new generation of students. From at least 1945, the British academic community – with regard to the ‘objective’ analysis of the history and intent of the Soviet Union – has definitely compromised its integrity, and sold its dignity ‘cheap’ to the American anti-Soviet ideologues! Since probably around 1950, the Soviet history was re-written so as to represent the Truman and the Marshall Plans – both foreign policy ogres of the United States, that facilitated a religious-like fanaticism against the Socialist cause, that equated being a ‘Communist’, to being the devil incarnate! Anyone who visited the Soviet Union in the 1920’s or 1930’s, and who had only praise for what they saw, were undermined by the an establishment that now said that they must have been mistaken in what they saw, and that if they wanted to keep their job and their family, they should ‘officially’ retract these positive statements. Of course, with this kind of fascist incentive, many had no choice but to ‘recant’. This is how the US government and the European academic community concocted an entirely ‘new’ and completely ‘negative’ history of the USSR, that tells more about the dark-side of the psyche of a Christian (capitalist) West, than it tells us about the Soviet Union!

How does this misrepresentation work? First and fore-most, rather like a theological theory, a lack of material evidence is interpreted as ‘proof’ that something a) currently ‘exists’, or b) has ‘existed’ in the past. This is a typical bourgeois ‘faith-based’ approach to ‘inventing’ a purely mythical (and denigrating) history. Of course, this is nothing but the ‘inverted’ mind-set of the bourgeoisie and nothing to do with the secular academics of the modern world. Why then, did the mainstream academic community in the West adopt this essentially illogical, dishonest and incorrect approach demanded by the USA? The answer is simple; despite the surface differences in culture and language throughout the West, the fact remains that all these countries are dominated by the bourgeoisie and the ruthless and exploitative capitalist system it generates and adheres to. If the Western working class were ever inspired by the Soviet experience and success, it would probably rise-up and over-throw the oppressive bourgeoisie and create a ‘new’ Soviet Union in the West. This Workers’ State would eradicate capitalism and develop a fairer Socialist society. At all costs the Western bourgeoisie had to prevent this from happening, and it called upon the irrationality of theistic religious thinking to do the job. In so doing, the concept of ‘good’ had to be transformed into the concept of ‘evil’. The concept of ‘truth’ into the concept of ‘lies’, and the reality of ‘freedom from oppression’, into the myth of the ‘enslavement of humanity’. In fact, the denigration of the Soviet Union, being as false as it obviously is, nevertheless reads like an Old Testament Prophet ranting and raving about the ‘evil’ that defies god – and how the faithful should attack and destroy that evil if they want to continue ‘live’. Something, of course, the Rosenberg’s were not allowed to do, as they lost their lives to the electric chair for daring to oppose capitalism and embrace Socialism!

Arguably one of the greatest achievement of the Soviet Regime (other than the Russian Revolution), was its victory over Nazi German fascism during the Great Patriotic War (1941-1945). This included all the Northern and Eastern European counties that either openly or indirectly assisted the Nazi German invasion of the USSR, fascist Italy and Imperial Japan. Of course, the fledgling Red Army had already took on and eventually beaten a combined international force of 14 countries (led by Britain, the US and Germany) during the ‘Russian Civil War’ (1918-1921) – an unjust war that saw the British Army commit a well-known atrocity at Baku in 1918. Although Adolf Hitler, Roosevelt and Churchill were on different sides during WWII, they were united in their support for capitalism, and in their hatred for Soviet Socialism. In one way or another, all conspired to destroy the Soviet Regime – but nothing worked. After 1945 a new way was tried. If the USSR could not be materially destroyed, it could be destroyed in reputation (at least outside of the Communist Bloc). This was, in reality an ‘imagined’ defeat of a USSR that never existed. As a consequence, Joseph Stalin was really Adolf Hitler – with Adolf Hitler becoming a misunderstood democrat and voice for freedom and tolerance! Every victory of the Red Army was simply a massacre in disguise, and every real atrocity committed by Nazi German troops in the USSR – was merely acts of self-defence blown out of all proportions by Communist propaganda! Every time Red Army soldiers liberated, fed, protected and befriended the different peoples they encountered (motivated by a Soviet Socialist education), these actions were re-interpreted as the manifest behaviour of the deranged and the insane! When liberated people expressed their gratitude and made positive statements about the USSR, they were attacked and denounced with a fanatical religious zeal!

 

Sergei Aleshkov (Aleshkin) Сережа Алешков (Алешкин) – Six Year Old Soviet Soldier at Stalingrad

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Many millions of children suffered during the Great Patriotic War (1941-1945), with many millions more being orphaned due to the military actions and atrocities carried-out by the brutal invading troops of Nazi Germany. Many of these children died alone in terrible conditions, whilst others were tortured and maimed by the Hitlerites who were trying to eradicate the Slavic peoples. On the other hand, the tales of bravery and resistance to the Nazi German atrocities is not very well-known in modern Russia today, where the shallow ‘cult of celebrity’ has replaced the veneration of true bravery. This is the story of the youngest Soviet Red Army soldier of the Great Patriotic War (1941-1945). Prior to the Nazi German invasion of the Soviet Union, Sergei Aleshkov lived peacefully with his family in the village of Gryn. Sergei Aleshkov was only 6 years old in 1942, when the invading Nazi Germans executed his mother and elder brother for supporting the Partisans. This is how Sergei Aleshkov became orphaned. They lived in the Kaluga region of western Russia. The boy was saved by the quick-thinking of a neighbour – this selfless woman threw the him out of a hut window – and shouted for him to run … Sergei managed to hide in the woods. Today, it is difficult to say for how much time the wounded and hungry child wandered through the autumn forest, but he eventually met-up with the Partisans. The next summer, as the Partisans manoeuvred around (and through) the Nazi German lines, Sergei Aleshkov fell and injured his leg. but he was lucky – as he was accidentally found by Scouts of the Red Army 142th Infantry Regiment, (commanded by Major Vorobyov). He was starving, covered in mud, and dressed in tattered clothing. The Red Army soldiers took care of his wounds, washed and fed him, and made a specially small Red Army uniform for him.

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

from that point on, he was protected from direct contact with the brutal and ruthless  Nazi German soldiers, but he worked tirelessly in support of the Red Army troops as they fought ongoing battles. Between battles, Sergei Aleshkov raised morale by singing poems and songs, and during battles he carried ammunition to the front-line troops (keeping them supplied), as well as passed-on messages and delivered mail. The soldiers of the Red Army treated Sergei Aleshkov as if he were their own son. However, the commanding officer of the Regiment – Major Vorobyov – eventually adopted Sergei Aleshkov, and even accredited Sergei with helping him meet his beloved wife – Nina – a nurse. This was after a bomb had hit the dug-out Major Vorobyov was operating from during the Battle for Stalingrad, blocking the entrance and sealing him in. As there was little air, Sergei Aleshkov tried to pull the debris away from the entrance himself, but was not strong enough. Instead, despite the Nazi Germans heavily bombing the area, Sergei Aleshkov ran through the falling bombs and into the surrounding trenches (that were receiving enemy fire), where he told other Red Army soldiers what had happened to Major Vorobyov. In the process, Sergei Aleshkov was shot down (along with many other Red Army soldiers), and was wounded in the legs yet again. After this, a rescue party was immediately sent to rescue Major Vorobyov. After the battle, he was well looked after and cared for by all concerned – as news of his bravery spread throughout the Red Army. For his bravery, Serezha Aleshkov was awarded the Medal for Military Bravery.

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

On another occasion (whilst stationed on the Dnieper), Sergei Aleshkov spotted two men hiding in straw near-by. After reporting this sighting, it was revealed that these were Nazi German Scouts who were spotting for the fascist artillery and bringing fire down upon the civilian areas. After his military service, and on the orders of the High Command, he was enlisted in the Suvorov School situated in the city of Tula. Although as a youth and young man, he suffered disabilities from his leg injuries, Sergei Aleshkov trained in law, and became a very effective lawyer – always representing the rights and interests of the ordinary people. He eventually worked as a prosecutor and remained a man of honour, constantly fighting for justice. The science of war forever teaches us to value honour, conscience and brotherhood

Russian Language Sources:

http://nhero.ru/serezha-aleshkov-aleshkin/

http://es-kiz.ru/gvardiї-ryadovij-sergijku-samij-yunij-soldat-velikoї-vitchiznyanoї-yakij-vryatuvav-svogo-komandira/

The Rightwing Polish

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

The Nazi Germans used ‘Sonder Kommando’ Units in their death camps. Usually, these ‘Units’ were comprised of collaborating Polish Jews and they assisted in every part of the extermination process – from arrival to the dead bodies being burnt. Churchill had encouraged a rightwing Polish government in exile in London – which was not concerned about the deportation from Poland of Jews, gays or the disabled – but took exception to Germans running their country! The real Polish government, however, was Socialist and living in exile in the USSR – assisting in the raising and training of Polish volunteer military units to assist the Red Army’s fight against Nazi Germany. However, when the Polish Jews rose-up in the Warsaw Ghetto in 1943 – Churchill (and the rightwing Polish government in London) refused to support them, because it was felt that Jews were not Polish, and prone to holding leftwing viewpoints. Churchill let the Jewish uprising be destroyed by the Nazi Germans – but he did work on a new plan that involved the ethnic Poles rising-up in Warsaw (a year later), in an attempt to quickly get the rightwing Polish government in London back into power in Poland BEFORE the Soviet Red Army arrived on the scene! Churchill viewed this gambit as a means to prevent a Socialist government in Poland. This plan failed when the Nazi Germans quickly put-down this new threat before the Soviets could fight their way into the city. As matters transpired, it was the Soviet Red Army that eventually fought its way into Warsaw – freed the Jews, freed the Polish people in general, and installed a Socialist Polish government. However, racism has always been a problem in Poland – particularly anti-Semitism, but also anti-Slavic (i.e. ‘anti-Russian’) prejudice. This situation led to a permanent rightwing resistance to ‘Socialism’ that exists in Poland to this day (alongside the usual racist attitudes). Today, the modern Polish State plays-down the Jewish Warsaw Ghetto Uprising of 1943, but eulogises the Warsaw Uprising of 1944 – whilst simultaneously demonising their eventual liberators – the Soviet Red Army!

The Myth of Adolf Hitler’s Vegetarianism

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

In Adolf Hitler’s defining (and only) book entitled ‘Mein Kampf’ (‘My Struggle’), he records how the use of ‘lying’ and ‘deception’ should be an integral part of any rightwing campaign to acquire and maintain political power. His attitude is one of ‘existentialism’ and ‘presentism’, where the past and future are defined by the present, and can be defined as anything one happens to think at the time. This attitude eradicates the necessity for a ‘correct’ history, and replaces this concept with a fluid and highly malleable version of what might have happened in the past, and how this should be interpreted in the present, so as to bring the desired future ever present. Of course, Hitler lived within the false mythology of a racially ‘pure’ (but distant) past, which must be regained and restored in the immediate and present time. Hitler assumed that between this ‘perfect’ time of racial purity in the past, and the present times of racial ‘decadence’, the ‘Aryan’ (i.e. ‘White’) European race had lost its purity and supremacy in the world through ‘race-mixing’. One manner for solving this problem as conceived by Hitler, was the permanent separation of the races – so that the White race could maintain its inherent purity unsullied – with the most decadent and degraded races in the world being designated ‘life unworthy of life’, and ear-marked for ‘extermination’. This process was not limited to the Jews, Romany or Slavs, but included the disabled from all races (including the ‘Aryan’), homosexuals, White Germans who disagreed with Hitler, and anyone who supported Communism.

Another aspect of this racial purification process that has not received the attention it should, was Hitler’s apparent conversion to a vegetarian diet. According to some biographers of Hitler, the influence on his diet was provided by the works of the composer Richard Wagner, who promoted the spread of vegetarianism. In 1881, Wagner argued that the natural diet of humanity should be plant-based, and that eating meat was tantamount to polluting the blood (in very much the sameway as ‘race-mixing’). When Hitler was young, he admired Wagner and said: ‘I do not touch meat because of Wagner’s opinion on meat-eating’. As Hitler employed ‘lying’ as a means to create false-fronts and appealing propaganda, the question must be asked whether he actually followed a vegetarian diet, or simply said he did as a matter of show business designed to make him more appealing to the masses. One disturbing aspect of this issue is the extent to which a number of modern vegan and vegetarian movements in the West are willing to accept Hitler as a role model and a representative of their cause, simply because he apparently adhered to a vegetarian diet (as if the historical inconveniences of the holocaust and the deaths of 40 million Soviets never happened or simply do not matter). To my mind, these groups are criminal and should be investigated in exactly the same manner as holocaust deniers.

Was Adolf Hitler a vegetarian? Despite the rhetoric that he was, ample biographical evidence suggests that he regularly ate meat, and although apparently opposed to animal cruelty in principle, it is known that he killed his own German Shepherd dog whilst hiding in his bunker under Berlin, toward the end of WWII. However, it cannot be denied that within the Nazi Party, there was a drive toward curbing animal cruelty.  At the end of the 19th century in Germany, the main problem concerning animal rights campaigners was the practice of vivisection. In 1927, a representative of the Nazi Party (but not Adolf Hitler) was the first to raise this problem in Germany’s Parliament. After the National Socialists Party came to power in 1933, the Reichstag voted to ban vivisection (making Germany the first country in the world to prohibit such a procedure). In early 1934, Hitler ordered that hunting be limited – with the Ministry of Trade and Employment issuing a decree on July 3rd of the same year. On July 1st, 1935, the ‘Reich Law on Nature Conservation’ was adopted. In 1933, the ‘Imperial Union of German Animal Societies’ issued a medal with a portrait of the Hitler on one-side and an inscription on the other which read: ‘I am a determined opponent of the slaughter of animals. Adolf Hitler’. However, following Hitler’s murderous invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941 (designed to eradicate the ‘inferior’ Slavic race), the Soviet poet Samuel Yakovlevich Marshak wrote the satirical poem entitled ‘The Cannibal and Vegetarian are Two Sides of the Same Coin’, as a means to point-out the contradiction and hypocrisy of Hitler’s rhetorical position. Here was a man who had forged a racist regime to commit mass murder, whilst he advocated animal rights! The poem read:

This kind man ordered a medal which said: ‘To the lambs I have slaughtered – I am very sorry!’ As you know, every coin has two-sides and on the other it fatally reads – ‘Although I will not spill the blood of lambs, I have no qualms against the spilling of human blood!’

(Этот добрый человечек заказал себе медаль:«Мне зарезанных овечек и барашков, очень жаль».Как известно, у медали есть другая сторона,И на ней мы прочитали роковые письмена:«Не нужна мне кровь овечья, а нужна мне человечья!»)

Many biographers of Adolf Hitler claim that he was a vegetarian since the time of the suicide of Geli Raubal in 1931, up until his death in 1945. However, there are also arguments against this assertion. Hitler’s biographer Robert Paine wrote that Hitler ‘had a special love for Bavarian sausages’, whilst Salvatore Paolini, a former Hitler waiter claimed that the Fuhrer ‘loved sausages and ham, but generally never ate meat, preferring potatoes and fresh Vegetables’, and Dion Lucas, a chef of Hitler, wrote in the late 1930’s that Hitler’s favourite dish was stuffed pigeons. The confusion seems to stem from the fact that Hitler retained a number of cooks – one of which was a specialist in vegetarian cooking – whilst the others cooked meat. It seems that Hitler ate both meat and vegetarian dishes – a fact which means that he was not a vegetarian in the strict sense of the term. This behaviour could have been motivated to gain favour with the animal rights trend that existed within the otherwise murderous Nazi Party, a policy that could be seen as ‘typical’ of Hitler’s deliberate appeal to whatever fad was apparent, as a means to retain power and dominance over the Party apparatus, and of course the German people.

Russian Language Reference:

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Вегетарианство_Гитлера

 

Modern Fascism: Beware the National Bolshevist Party (of Russia)

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

National Bolshevist Flag (Mimicking the German Swastika)

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Swastika: National Socialism

In his ramblings recorded in ‘Mien Kampf’, Adolf Hitler made it clear that the number one enemy of the Third Reich was the Scientific Socialism developed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, more commonly referred to as ‘Communism’. As the father of Karl Marx had been a Jew before converting to Christianity (and marrying a non-Jew), Hitler was of the opinion that ‘Marxism’ was a Jewish plot to secure world domination. Hitler thought that the Jewish race might gain popularity around the world by ‘sharing’ their wealth with everyone and thereby creating a Socialist World State (despite the fact that Karl Marx never considered himself a Jew, and Friedrich Engels was a non-Jewish Prussian aristocrat). Paradoxically, Hitler also subscribed to the contradictory idea that all Jews were money-grabbing parasites that sought to control society through predatory capitalism. Hitler could entertain this two diametrically opposed ideologies because he was quite insane. Within the work of Marx, fascism is a ruthless ideology that is created by capitalism whilst in a state of decay. Fascism is the opposite to Communism, and is viewed as all the vicious elements of capitalist greed condensed into a single and deadly political system. When Hitler invaded the USSR in 1941, a fight to the finish was initiated between these two ideologies that led to around 40 million Soviets losing their lives before Nazism was finally crushed in early 1945 (in Berlin). Although the USSR was an ally of the West during WWII, following 1945, the USA developed a false Cold War strategy that misrepresented the USSR (and its Communist ideology) as nothing more than just another a form of German Nazism. From that time onwards, many commentators in the West bizarrely (and illogically) compared Stalin with Hitler, and routinely demeaned the Soviet contribution and sacrifice in the defeat of International Fascism. The political rightwing likes to endorse this thinking, and takes it one step further by stating that the USSR was far worse than Nazi Germany, and that it was the USSR that perpetuated the holocaust, etc. Following the collapse of the USSR in 1991, and the violent suppression of its supporters in 1993, the capitalist West demanded that all manner of political rightwing ideologies be imported into the Russian hinterland. This included the Cold War ‘false flag’ idea that Soviet Communism (i.e. ‘Bolshevism’) was identical with German Nazism. As a counter to Communist ideology, Russian racist nationalism was encouraged amongst the younger generation, and many White supremacist movements developed (particularly centred around martial arts clubs and anti-migrant violence). Out of this mess developed the ‘National Bolshevik Party’ (NBP), a movement that accepted the lie that Soviet Communism was identical with German Nazism, and which adopted a modified Hitlerite swastika as its flag. The NBP has a flag has a central white circle superimposed on a red rectangular background, and within the white circle there is a black hammer and sickle emblem (which replaces the black swastika proper). The NBP is NOT Communist or Socialist in a Marxist-Leninist sense, and should not be mistaken as such. The NBP is a racist organisation that encourages White Russian nationalism, and advocates total war to achieve its political ends of racial purity and world domination.

Raoul Wallenberg – CIA Operative

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Raoul Wallenberg (1912-1947)

During WWII, a number of Eastern European countries such as Hungary, actively supported Adolf Hitler’s Nazi German regime, and enthusiastically endorsed and applied its racial and sexual hygiene laws (which served as the ideological underpinnings of the holocaust that murdered 11 million people – including 6 millions Jews – as well as Romany people, the Disabled, the Homosexuals and all kinds of dissidents, including Socialists and Communists). Hungary possessed a very strong anti-Semitic rightwing that thought nothing of applying the destructive Nazi ideology against its own people. Raoul Wallenberg was not Hungarian, however, but rather a very successful Swedish businessman and diplomat stationed in that country during WWII. Not only this, but as Sweden was also a supporter of Nazi Germany during WWII (providing natural resources for the Nazi war machine), Raoul Wallenberg – as a ‘racially pure’ Swedish citizen – was permitted to travel around Nazi Germany and its conquered European territories unhindered. During these travels, he was able to observe first-hand how Nazi anti-Semitic policies were applied and developed a deep disgust for Hitler’s murderous regime. As he possessed extensive business interests in Hungary, he applied his considerable abilities to rescuing around 100,000 Jewish people, and preventing them from being transported to the gas chambers. For this remarkable anti-fascist activity (that placed his life in continuous danger), the modern State of Israel conferred upon Raoul Wallenberg the designation of ‘Righteous Gentile’ – a title very seldom used to describe non-Jews.

When the Soviet Red Army ‘liberated’ Hungary from its fascist over-lords in 1944, a worker’s government was implemented that set about purging the country of its fascist past. For reasons that are not yet clear, Raoul Wallenberg was detained by the Soviet Authorities in January 1945, and transported to Russia (probably Moscow). At the time, he was escorted by two Soviet Red Army motorcyclists, and Raoul Wallenberg was reported as saying that he wasn’t sure whether he was being protected or arrested. When relatives and friends made concerned enquiries between 1945 and 1947, the Soviet Authorities stated that as a diplomat, Raoul Wallenberg was under USSR protection, and that there was nothing to worry about (a contrary story appears in Western accounts, which state that the Soviet Authorities also claimed in March, 1945, that Raoul Wallenberg and his driver were killed en route to the Soviet Headquarters in Debrecen – by Nazi troops). Two years later (in 1947), the Soviet Authorities denied any knowledge of Raoul Wallenberg (and his driver detained with him). Although modern (capitalist) Russia has made public virtually all the previously ‘secret’ Soviet Archives – the file regarding Raoul Wallenberg remains firmly ‘closed’. This seems odd on the face of it, as Raoul Wallenberg was an avid anti-fascist, but of course, being an anti-fascist does not necessarily equate with being ‘pro-Soviet’. However, with the information that is available within Russian language sources, Raoul Wallenberg does not appear to have made any overt anti-Soviet statements. What is clear, is that the ‘secret’ information regarding Raoul Wallenberg must be so sensitive that every Russian leader from Stalin to Putin has refused to reveal it. However, new information appeared in 1957. A file pertaining to Raoul Wallenberg contained a single document. This report was from a prison doctor stationed at Lubyanka Prison, and stated that the prisoner – Raoul Wallenberg – died of a heart attack in his cell on July 17, 1947,with his body being cremated (without autopsy) in the grounds of the Donskoy Monastery in Moscow.

In the US 1996, it was revealed by Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that Raoul Wallenberg was a CIA operative working in Hungary during WWII – tasked with ‘spying’ on the Nazi Germans, the collaborating Hungarian Authorities, and the Soviet Authorities. His cover-story was exposed in part as being that of an ‘anti-fascist’, and his activities in rescuing Jewish people was part of his espionage work. As modem Russia is now a (capitalist) bourgeois State, Raoul Wallenberg was declared a ‘hero’ in 2000, and in 2001, a statue was raised in his honour in the grounds of the State Library of Foreign Literature in Moscow. In the meantime, whilst still not opening the Soviet era files on Raoul Wallenberg, Russia (and Sweden for that matter), continues to ‘ignore’ the fact that Raoul Wallenberg was a CIA operative, and that this information has now been made public in the USA.

Russian Language References:

http://inosmi.ru/history/20110806/172967492.html

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Валленберг,_Рауль

Nazism & Catholicism: Adolf Eichmann’s Red Cross Passport

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Although it is true fascist Italy ‘officially’ changed sides near the end of WWII, and stated its opposition to German Nazism, nevertheless, it is also true that the Roman Catholic Church (with its Vatican headquarters situated in the heart of Rome) continued in its decades-long support for the political far-right. This has led many to speculate that Italians sympathetic to German Nazism, (the Roman Catholic Church was complicit in the holocaust), worked to save prominent Nazi German officials from Allied justice following the defeat of Adolf Hitler in 1945, and there are good grounds for this assessment. Whilst the CIA was busy opposing Socialist and Communist Movements around the world (which included a failed attempt to destabilise China through its Tibetan region), historical records state that US Intelligence knew that Adolf Eichmann was alive and well and living in Argentina in the late 1950’s. Eichmann was eventually captured by Israeli operatives, tried for his crimes against humanity, and executed by hanging in 1962 (in Israel). What is interesting is that leading Nazi Adolf Eichmann was able to escape war-torn Europe at the end of WWII (evading Allied capture in the process), through the help and assistance of the Italian section of the Red Cross, and the Roman Catholic Church (in Italy and elsewhere). Eichmann could only have got a fake Red Cross Passport if a Roman Catholic priest signed his application form, confirming Eichmann under a false name. This service was preformed by the Franciscan priest named Father Eduardo Domoter. Red Cross Passport number 100940 was issued to Adolf Eichmann under the false name of ‘Ricardo Klement’ in Genoa, on the 1st of June, 1950. This suggests that Eichmann was extensively protected by the Roman Catholic Church (and others sympathetic to Nazism), for at least five years after the end of WWII, before eventually being assisted to flee Europe for Argentina. These facts have led to the wide-spread assumption that many more leading Nazis escaped justice at the end of WWII through the help of the world-wide Roman Catholic Church.

References:

http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/trials/eichmanntrialcapture.html

http://en.mercopress.com/2007/05/30/false-passport-of-nazi-eichmann-found-in-buenos-aires-court

Anti-Science Agenda of CCHR International

The Citizens Commission on Human Rights International was founded in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and US Psychiatrist Thomas Szasz.  The CCHR has no connection with the Human Rights Commission of the United Nations (UN), despite the rather deliberate use of a similar name to garner legitimacy in the minds of ordinary people.  The CCHR is not an official government body, and possesses no political power.  It is a pressure group that is opposed to the establishment of material science in the world, and seeks (through numerous well-made propaganda documentaries) to brain-wash ordinary people into believing that material science is a sinister plot against humanity, concocted by ‘evil’ people, as a means to deny the literal existence and relevancy of the Christian theological viewpoint.  The Church of Scientology, is of course a ‘cult’ that exists to limit the expression of the creativity of the human-mind to its own distorted understanding of Christian theology.  Do not be fooled by the sophisticated ‘anti-establishment’ rhetoric that emerges from this fringe group – as it is pursuing its own agenda of destroying humanistic science by deliberately misrepresenting secular human progression, through a false image of corruption and debauchery.  Of course, as the ideology of Scientific Socialism advocates the development of humanistic science as a means to progress society (as opposed to theology), the CCRH takes an automatic dislike to it, and seeks to misrepresent the history of the former Soviet Union wherever, and whenever it can (albeit in the most unconvincing of manners).

In the following documentary, the CCRH is attempting to achieve the following:

a) Establish a counter-narrative that misrepresents and undermines the developmental history of general (material) scientific understanding in the West. This is considered a prelude within the Church of Scientology to ‘converting’ the susceptible to that cult’s theology.

b) The ‘entry-point’ for this strategy of undermining the entire edifice of material science, is the academic subject of psychiatry.

c) As the CCHR is reliant upon the brain-washing technique of providing fast and continuous ‘facts’ as a means to prevent individual thought and self-determination in the viewer, as the term ‘Psychiatry’ is never properly defined. This is because the CCRH does not want to build understanding, but rather dismantle any such notions that support material science.

d) Psychiatry is generally defined as the ‘study and treatment of mental illness, emotional disturbance, and abnormal behaviour.’

e) The CCHR is pursuing the Christian agenda of the Church of Scientology, and as such is seeking to re-establish the notion of a Christian ‘soul’ (Greek: ‘psyche’) within mainstream Western discourse. To do this it must misrepresent psychiatry as ‘soulless’, or denying a ‘soul’. This is illogical in the sense that the term ‘psychiatry’ is a word of Greek origin meaning ‘psyche’ (soul) and ‘atresia’ meaning ‘healing’ or ‘healer’.  Of course, ‘psyche’ can mean ‘mind’, despite the fact that in the original Greek, it means ‘breath of life’.  The Christian term ‘soul’ is Germanic pagan in origin, and was co-opted by the early Christians as an alternative pronunciation of ‘psyche’ (distorted by Christian theology to refer to a spirit as opposed to matter).

f) The CCHR does not define its terms, and this is a deliberate tactic to sully the waters of understanding. Just as the history of the Christian Church is riddled with a history of deliberate death and destruction (primarily of those who did not believe in ‘Christianity’ – a death toll through Christian persecution numbering around 10 million deaths in the last thousand years), the history of the development of scientific understanding has not been smooth, consistent or even morally palatable. However, whereas the pogroms of Christianity deliberately sought to eradicate any physical rejection of Christianity, most scientists have been motivated by the ambition to progress humanity.

g) The Christian CCHR mentions the Nazi German holocaust quite rightly as a misuse of science, but fails to mention that both fascist Italy and Nazi Germany were supported by the Roman Catholic Church (that is supported by Christian theology).

h) The CCHR mentions racism within Western Science, but fails to mention that the Christian Church fully supported ‘racism’ (the reason Christ is depicted as ‘White’), and was at the fore-front of imperialist expansion, colonialism and slavery. The CCHR Is very careful to divorce the inconvenient history of the racist Christian Church from its anti-science narrative. The CCHR does this because it is attempting to establish a ‘privileged’ position for Christian theology, albeit one of its own concocting.

i) The CCHR ignores the fact that it is the capitalist system that lies at the heart of all racism. The CCHR does not highlight this fact because the CCHR is a capitalist entity seeking to ‘sell’ its produce and merchandise to the gullible.

j) The anti-Soviet section of this video is bizarre. As the CCHR is a capitalist entity, it obviously views Communism and the Soviet Union as a threat to its hegemony. It offers no documentary (Russian) sources for its groundless allegations, but pursues the usual Cold War anti-Sovietism that has no bearing in observable historical facts.  As this video contained Dutch subtitles, for some reason the subtitled dialogues with Russian ‘dissidents’ are ‘blacked-out’ so that an empty subtitle box appears in each scene.  This means the viewer has no way of understanding these ‘dissidents’ when they speak.

k) All the ‘experts’ called for this interview, are either unaware of the CCHR, or have had their interviews for other programmes co-opted without their knowledge. Whatever the case, the CCHR simply takes whatever liberal protest is popular, and runs with it to undermine the power of material science. These popular protests, in and of themselves, are not without merit, but the CCHR is misusing these aspects to pursue its own pro-Christian agenda.  It is important to learn about the limitations of human thought, and I would advise that the activities of the CCHR come under this category, and individuals should be aware of its cult-like agenda.  The problems of material science will be solved by the clear thinking of material science, and not by the pseudo-theology of the Church of Scientology or the nefarious activities of the CCHR:

In the 1970’s, the Church of Scientology launched a highly aggressive infiltration campaign that saw a series of infiltrations and thefts from 136 government agencies, foreign embassies and consulates, as well as private organizations critical of Scientology.  It seems to me that the CCHR is a front for the Scientologists to attack the very academic subject that possesses the power to reveal their cult-like agenda, and prevent innocent people from being recruited and exploited.

Scientology Infiltrated U.S. Government, Foreign Embassies and Private Organizations

The Far-Right Complexities of Zionism and Anti-Zionism

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Zion (Jewish Eurocentric racism), and anti-Zionism (opposition to this racism), are peculiar entities, as both possess the power to attract far-right political support.  In the case of Zionism, not much imagination is required as to work-out what the political far-right find attractive, as a predominately ‘White’ and highly militarised and aggressive Jewish State is given carte blanche by the United States (and its allies), to persecute, torture, rape and murder the non-White Palestinian (and primarily ‘Islamic’) indigenous population of that occupied land (i.e. historical Palestine).  It seems illogical for the forces of neo-Nazism to politically ‘align’ themselves with Israel – particularly as this political far-right grouping has historically viewed all Jewish people with a racial disdain, and perpetuated the Hitlerite holocaust of WWII specifically (although not exclusively) against them.  Just as ‘like’ attracts  ‘like’, it is the Eurocentric ‘White’ racism that is implicit in Zionism that the political far-right find attractive, and not the theology of Judaism.  The Western far-right will support Israel for as long as it pursues its racist anti-Palestinian cause, but will abandon this support if Israel ever changed its Zionist policies.  This is nothing more than a relationship of convenience, because although Israel is currently supported by the far-right political establishment, Jews living outside of Israel are still subject to attack and murder by Western neo-Nazi thugs. Israel, of course, from time to time, condemns far-right political activity, but refuses to include its own Zionism in that criticism.

As Adolf Hitler specified that ‘lying’ is an important tool for far-right political activists, the far-right ‘ideologues’ have continuously sought new ways to sully and blur the left – right political debate.  This policy has been inspired as a means to hide its own despicable actions throughout the world both before and after WWII, particularly with regard to the Holocaust that targeted primarily Jews, but also the disabled, homosexuals, political dissidents, anti-racists, Communists, Socialists and anyone who opposed any aspect of Hitlerite thinking.  Rightwing historians assist this process of denial by claiming that the holocaust never happened, and that such a claim is nothing but a conspiracy theory aimed at besmirching Hitler’s reputation as a ‘great’ leader.  Another tactic is to argue numbers – stating that for various (and spurious) reasons, at least six million Jews (and other people) could not have been killed in the Concentration Camps both before and during WWII.  Given al this seeming contradictory information, how does the far-right justify supporting the anti-Zionist cause?  It does so because it links Zionist Israel with Soviet Russia – ludicrously stating that both are manifestations of a world-wide Jewish conspiracy to gain complete political power and eradicate the ‘gentile’ races, etc.  This is the far-right use of a legitimate (predominately ‘leftwing’) cause to attack the memory of the USSR, and turn the anti-fascist war it fought against Hitler’s Nazi Germany, into an ‘attack’ on peace-loving Europeans!  In pursuing this policy, the far-right are attempting to re-write history in their own distorted image.  The USSR fought and opposed fascism as a matter of ideological necessity, and as such, opposition to capitalism in decay, is the duty of every (non-Trotskyite) Socialist and Communist, and being so, is not a matter of choice.  The far-right plays down its own atrocities (as a form of historical denial), and instead projects its own short-comings and inadequacies onto the memory of the anti-fascist USSR.  This form of neo-Nazi revisionism plays into the hands of the Western-backed neo-Nazi regimes in Eastern Europe that pursue a racist anti-Russian policy.  Of course, as matters stand, none of this matters to Israel, because Israel is currently a racist colonial State occupying someone else’s land.

%d bloggers like this: