Tag: fetish

Sutton: Revolutionay Seasons Greetings – Happy Yuletide!

“The essence of Trotskyism consists, lastly, in the denial of the necessity of iron discipline in the Party, in the recognition of the freedom of factional groupings in the Party, in the recognition of the necessity of constituting a Trotskyist party. For Trotskyism, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union must be not a united and single militant Party, but a collection of groups and factions, each with its own central organization, press and so forth. And what does this mean? It means that following the freedom of political groupings in the Party must come the freedom of political parties in the country, i.e., bourgeois democracy. Consequently, we have here the recognition of the freedom of factional groupings in the Party, leading directly to the toleration of political parties in the country of the dictatorship of the proletariat, and all covered up with phrases about ‘internal Party democracy’ and ‘improving the regime’ within the Party.” (Joseph Stalin, Leninism, Vol. II, English Edition, pp. 391-393.)

Continue reading

US: Police Officer Yvonne Wu – What the Western Media Fails to Explain! 

In the West this story is reported as a ‘fetish’ because all the women involved are a) ethnically ‘Chinese’ and b) ‘lesbian’ in sexual preference. These three women are not accorded the usual level of respect – or even derision – with which the LGBTQN+ community is usually treated, as they occupy a ‘peculiar’ category all of their own. Finally, what the Western media fails to convey is the fact that Yvonne Wu previously served in the US Army before joining the NYPD – and that she was known by her superiors to be suffering from ‘Depression’ and ‘PTSD’ – whilst still being entrusted with a loaded firearm on a daily basis!

Continue reading

The US Bucket List! (10.4.2023)

The routine ownership of fire-arms is ‘banned’ in most Western Europe countries! What is interesting is that the rebelling American government in the 1770s attempted to ‘militarise’ it’s British population against its rightful (elected) London government by overturning King Henry VIII’s (16th century) general ban on private weapon ownership. The King had dissolved the ownership of private armies as part of the dismantling of the feudal system and as a security against his fellow nobles launching an armed coup against his leadership! From that time onwards, the only military force allowed in the UK has been the British Army controlled by the Crown – and then after Cromwell (in the 17th century) Parliament. However, during the 18th century the British government was afraid of invasion by the French and for a time a law was in effect which allowed Local Militias to be formed – manned by the good and the well-off who could afford to pay for their own uniforms, pistols, muskets and training, etc. Interestingly, this law was active during the American War of Independence and it could be that the American rebels got the idea of arming their population from the British policy of preparing it’s homeland population to meet the threat of Napoleon.

Continue reading

1 2