corruption – SANGHA KOMMUNE (SSR)

Shi Xingzheng (Front-Centre) & Shi Yongxin (Back-Left)

China: Former Shaolin Head Monk – Shi Yongxin – Recent Developments! (28.7.2026)

28/07/2026 Adrian (釋大道)

The Shaolin Temple was founded by visiting Indian monks to China long before Bodhidharma arrived (in 528 CE), Sitting and clearing the mind has always been the primary skill. However, many other temples and spiritual centres also combine seated meditation with “moving” meditation in the form of martial endeavour (it is even hinted at in the Book of Change). Although the Shaolin Temple is famous – it is in no way the only place martial arts are practiced for health and self-defence. Master Xu Yun changed the law in China by integrating the Vinaya Discipline with Chinese Secular Law. Failing to uphold the Vinaya Discipline is tantamount to breaking the law. What is happening to the former Head Monk of Shaolin – Shi Yongxin – is entirely due to the legal reforms that Xu Yun initiated in the early 1950s as a means to protect China from going down the Japanese path of abandoning the upholding of the Vinaya Discipline. The above translation (click picture link) gives all the recent developments in this fascinating case.

1. Neha, AISA President 2. Danish, JNUSU Jt. Secretary 3. Manish, AISA UP President 4. Deepak, AISA DU Vice President 5. Hrishikesh, President, Barak Hostel JNU 6. Aameen, Former CC Member, AUD Students Council

India: Students Set on Anti-BJP Corruption Hunger-Strike! (3.7.2026)

03/07/2026 Adrian (釋大道)

1. Neha, AISA President

2. Danish, JNUSU Jt. Secretary

3. Manish, AISA UP President

4. Deepak, AISA DU Vice President

5. Hrishikesh, President, Barak Hostel JNU

6. Aameen, Former CC Member, AUD Students Council

Students have called for the strike in complete solidarity with the call by Sonam Wanghuck and will fight shoulder to shoulder in the struggle for Dharmendra Pradhan’s resignation, repeal of NEP 2020 and scrapping of the National Testing Agency!

Dharmendra Pradhan must resign!

Scrap NTA!

Repeal NEP 2020!

Meizhou Hakka Football Club - Dark Days Ahead!

China: Meizhou Hakka Football Club Hammered by CFA Ruling! (25.5.2026)

22/05/2026 Adrian (釋大道)

On the afternoon of May 21, the Chinese Football Association announced its disciplinary decision. Based on the latest criminal judicial judgment materials, it was found that Meizhou Hakka Football Club had committed other serious violations and disciplinary infractions. Referring to previous industry disciplinary principles for clubs involved, it was decided to deduct 6 additional points from the 2026 Professional League and impose a fine of 800,000 RMB on Meizhou Hakka Football Club.

China Football Association: 3rd Batch of Match-Fixing Penalties Issued – Gambling & Black Market Corruption – 17 [Including Hakka] Banned! (22.5.2026)

22/05/2026 Adrian (釋大道)

The first Article is the official “English” announcement permitted by the Chinese Court and/or government. Good to see the Meizhou Hakka people at the fore-front of sporting corruption. The Hakka are always industry-leaders – and I expect nothing less of their innovative activity (I jest – of course). Even in the UK – Hakka take-away owners cannot resist wasting thousands of their hard-earned money on gambling! It is an issue amongst the Chinese community – or at least a certain strata of it. From gambling speculation there creeps-in all other types of corruption. Let this be a lesson. Although the US government (and the far-right) does allow and encourage “gambling” (as a form of capitalistic social control) – the far-left (and certainly not the CPC) will allow this cancer to fester within Chinese society. Enjoy sport but participate fairly and without exploitation! Hakka people need to police their communities more effectively and demand the law is followed. Remember, the Hakka were avid supporters of the Socialist Revolution – do not spoil this achievement!

An American flag flies outside of the US Capitol dome in Washington, US, Jan 15, 2020. [Photo/Agencies]

SIGAR: American Report Reveals “US Blunders” in [Failed] Two-Decade-Long Afghanistan Invasion! (2.2.2026)

02/02/2026 Adrian (釋大道)

It may be that the US invasion of Afghanistan will be historically viewed (when analysed objectively) as a far more comprehensive “defeat” for American neo-imperialistic intentions than either the US invasion of Korea (partly in 1945 in the South at the end of WWII – and then in the North between 1950-1953) and Vietnam (either covertly or overtly) between 1955-1975. The US mentality involves throwing bullets and money at problems – but considering the fact the US possessed weaponry of a far more advanced and destructive capability than the malnourished enemy (which carried rusty AK-47s – and were motivated by Islamic and Islamo-fascist ideology) – it is astonishing that after “20-years” – no military victory was won and no political socio-economic vision was accomplished. The US reduces countries to rubble (just look at Libya and Syria) – and refers to this wanton destruction as “freedom” (since 1945 to present – the US has killed around 30-million people around the world in the name of this “freedom”). When the Russians betrayed their Revolution in 1991 – the US was permitted to steal billions from the Soviet economy the workers had spent decades earning and establishing. Between 1991-2001 – around 10 million Russians died of starvation, homelessness, and medical neglect as a caring and uplifting Socialism was replaced by an uncaring (predatory) capitalism. This disaster was ignored in the West and viewed as “normal”. Only the rise of Putin saved the Russian people and put a post-Soviet Russia on an even keel.

Bourgeois "Dishonesty" is "Weighed" - and Found Wanting!

UK: An Interesting Example of the “Internal Machinations” of the Bourgeois Legal System! (14.1.2026)

14/01/2026 Adrian (釋大道)

The first was a probate sale which wrongly completed before the grant of probate had been received. Around three weeks later, the buyer’s solicitor emailed the pair, threatening to report Mackrell to the SRA if the signed transfer form was not received soon after.

Just under an hour later, Ms Lakhani responded to say that the signed contract and transfer had been mistakenly sent to another firm and lost in the post, and there had been IT issues within the firm. This was not true.

The deed was eventually sent a few weeks later, after the grant of probate was made.

In her defence, the paralegal accused Ms Tappin of drafting the email – but Ms Tappin’s evidence was that, after being shown the email, she had told Ms Lakhani not to send it and wait for instructions from the head of department.

The SDT said it found Ms Tappin to be a “broadly credible witness”. It explained: “She accepted a significant failing in relation to supervision and document checking and her concessions were made without any apparent evasion.”

1 2 3 … 12 »