Stop Eco-Fascism!

Oxford: Labour “Rejects” Planned Solar Park as “Bad” for Environment! (11.11.2026)

It was also deemed that the solar farm posed genuine dangers to life because panels were planned directly inside emergency landing zones at London Oxford Airport and trainee pilots rely on these if their engine fails just after takeoff.

The government also found the bright solar glare could blind student pilots flying nearby circuits, rising heat waves from panels could destabilise aircraft, and the developer failed to sign a binding agreement to stop birds flocking to the site and causing bird strikes.

Concerns were also raised about covering up vital countryside with more than 300 hectares of the UK’s highest-grade agricultural land covered in panels and lost to crop farming for around 40 years.

EV Cars Too Heavy for Road!

UK: EV Design & Tyres Damage Environment – New Research Finds! (8.11.2026)

While EVs wear out their tyres more quickly, experts say increased degradation does not necessarily mean more pollution – but EV-specific rubber could bring its own set of concerns. Andersson said wear and airborne emissions aren’t equivalent: “A tyre with higher overall wear does not necessarily generate proportionally more airborne particle pollution.” Yet as impending Euro 7 abrasion standards compel manufacturers to create longer-lasting compounds, solving wear may simply shift the hazard. Molden said new compound formulations “will affect the toxicity of the particles”. That chemical profile remains a critical blindspot. University of Surrey professor Prashant Kumar, who studies the impact of air pollution on health, said tyre-wear particles can contain metals and chemicals whose long-term health impact “is not very well understood”. Larger rubber fragments stay on the ground and are washed away by rain but finer particles “could become airborne” and pose a risk. Asked to comment, the BTMA pushed back, saying any changes to materials or product design are subject to “extensive technical evaluation and scrutiny”.

Zugspitze Ski Lift Was Humanely Destroyed!

Germany: Churches Hold “Requiem” for Luxury Ski Resort – Whilst Remaining “Silent” About Israeli Genocide In Gaza!

Of course, this religious approach to science (origin from essence) assumes that the past does not really exist as developed science has proven theology not to be true. Religion responds by declaring science false and ignores its findings about how evolution has been driven by the agency of global warming-cooling and climate change. What humanity is today owes its existence to the most tumultuous episodes of climate change – which is healthy in a well-functioning biosphere. But hold on one moment, what am I missing? Yes – it is the “holier than thou” attitude that is emanating from these German articles – all neatly held together by the attractive wrapping-paper of hypocrisy. Whilst it is okay for pieces of projected, hot German metal to rip the bodies of Palestinians apart – it is not okay for the hot German sun to melt a mountainside full of snow – because such an event would inconvenience the holiday plans of the bourgeoisie. Why not let the Christians speak for themselves?

Trump Abolishes Pseudo-Eco-Fascism With Sweep of Pen!

US: Trump Abolishes “Fake” Obama-Era “Green Agenda”! (13.2.2026)

“There is no convincing evidence that human activity adds-to or subtracts-from the agency of “natural” Climate Change”. When all the evidence is corelated and processed, the percentage of “unnatural” Climate Change (occurring due to deliberate human activity) is 50-50. In other words, no better than “chance” – or from an academic perspective – “nothing is happening”. It is the considered view of the Russian Academy of Science that “unnatural” (human-induced) Climate Change is a bourgeois (racist) invention of the capitalist West, designed to prevent Second and Third World countries from undergoing the industrialisation process that has made First World countries the advanced entities they now are.”

Critique The Diplomat - 2025

Critical Assessment of “Tibet Is Paying the Cost for China’s Green Energy Transition”! (18.11.2025)

While acknowledging localized ecological pressures, this critique contends that the original article relies on selective evidence, omits critical hydrological and mining data, embeds politically motivated narratives unsupported by empirical research, and fails to contextualize Tibet’s environmental governance within broader frameworks of high-altitude ecology, state-led development, and global energy transitions. Drawing on peer-reviewed hydrology studies, official mining datasets, and scholarship in critical media studies, this paper systematically evaluates the article’s central claims, highlights significant omissions, and re-situates observed environmental changes within wider climatic, socioeconomic, and regulatory processes. Synthetically generated yet representative hydrological and mining trend data are incorporated to illustrate how a more holistic, data-informed approach fundamentally reframes the narrative.

1 2 3