Murderer - Đoàn Văn Sáng, a 57-year-old deputy head of the 4th Market Management Team in Lạng Sơn Province, Vietnam, and a serving civil servant.

Vietnam: Đoạn Văn Sáng’s Bloody “Butcher” Video Goes Viral on “Dark” and “Light” Internet! (13.12.2025)

It should be noted that this incident occurred in Vietnam, with the victim died in February, but the video was not publicly released until July. The earliest trace of the video appeared on July 2nd (2025) in a small Vietnamese Telegram group called “Preview”, which contained 11 users, while screenshots of other chats appeared earliest on June 24th to June 24th (2025). The 41-member group was created by a Vietnamese who could also speak Chinese to promote the sale of videos and photographs of killings. He charged about $100 (US) to join the group that contained videos. It is not clear whether the group of 11 members is a legitimate one. The “Preview” group of 11 members has been confirmed to contain at least one of the videos. It is reported that the cost of the “package” mentioned in the group is $600 (US).

Was Charlie Struck to the Front or Back of the Neck?

UK: Was Charlie Hit in the Front or Back of the Neck? (23.9.2025)

Indeed, Parliament ordered the block be made “lower” than is usual – so that the King had to kneel closer to the ground in submittance to the people. With his chin placed in the notch – his face was positioned “toward the floor”. Therefore, the blow that finished him-off came from behind (entry wound) and “exited” through the front of the neck. If film existed – this is exactly what the footage would show. A sudden screech from crowd was let-out as the axe fell and Charlie’s head dropped with one, clean blow. The people of England had fought a series of wars regarding freedom of speech – and had collectively executed their King because they disagreed with what he thought and said. Those who believe Charlie was struck from front must surely be mistaken. The evidence supports the position that Charlie’s death was caused by a substantial blow to the back of the neck. The eruption of blood to his front would support this analysis. By killing Charlie – the English people ensured freedom of speech then – and for all time!

PFLP 2024 Jan

Lebanon [PFLP]: US Suppresses Freedom of Speech in Assistance of Israeli Genocide! (8.1.2024)

Even when using a VPN – the website of the PFLP is being ‘blocked’ in the West. I am used to this with regards to the news sites emerging from China and North Korea – but the usual reactions that gets around these US suppressions of freedom of speech are not working. Of course, just as the Hamas (and other) Freedom Fighters are finding numerous clever ways of destroying Israeli fascism – we must find clever solutions to US and Zionist attacks upon freedom of speech!

US: Judge Blocks Arkansas State Law Allowing Library Censorship! (30.7.2023)

This article accuses the US System of being ‘draconian’ – whilst NOT exactly ‘explaining’ as to ‘why’ this might be happening. This is because the Chinese government (and judiciary) also ‘blocks’ any material considered ‘reactionary’ or of an unacceptable ‘Bourgeois’ nature. Of course, the West carries-out a similar process through ‘supressing’ various political data (rather than ‘banning’). As everybody does this – the clever bit is working-out how to use this knowledge to make the enemy look worse than you – and cause the maximum rhetorical damage!

Fetch the Fire Brigade: Chinese People Being ‘Human’ Again! (22.7.2023)

A problem has sometimes been caused by these barricades when people have been trapped in their flats by out of control fires and have been unable to get to the front door! This delay between a fire being reported, the Fire Brigade arriving and the victim(s) getting out can be lethal! As can be seen here, the local people took matters into their own hands and decided to act! This action prevented this young child from be trapped between the barricades and the fire and being burned to death!

China: US-Europe Co-Operation Should Not Target 3rd Parties: FM Spokesperson! (6.12.2022)

The U.S. has introduced the CHIPS and Science Act, engaged its allies in economic bullying against China and sought to decouple from China and cut China off supply chains. The U.S.’s Inflation Reduction Act forces European companies to relocate their production lines to America. All of those are defining examples of economic coercion, she said.

“U.S.-EU cooperation should not target any third party, still less seek to make an issue of China or stoke confrontation,” said Mao.

As major forces in the world, the U.S. and the EU need to demonstrate responsibility and do more things that are conducive to world stability and prosperity, she added.

1 2