UK: London’s Holborn Viaduct! (18.10.2026)

It seems that London had evolved into to two levels – creating steep inclines and bottle-necks. Movement was inefficient and caused traffic-jams and congestion. The government needed to reduce the ability of workers to come together in ad hoc and agitated groups. Therefore, engineers and architects were tasked with creating sturdy bridges that could handle weight and continuous usage – whilst functioning to link one level of existence to another. In a way, the design – at least the steps – remind me of multi-storey car-parks – although in a much more ornate state. Like the original Tube network – thousands of working-class men (many Irish) – dedicated their lives to building these structures. Of course, these ordinary men (who performed all the labour) are not remembered – but only the middle-class who control the means of production. It is through architecture that the current generation gains an understanding of what physically existed and came before them. Through physical structure – the thoughts that were in the mind of the creators can be seen in stone, wood, and cement. Furthermore, the statues tell something about the values and belief of the time.

Visiting Charles Darwin's House - Das Kapital

Down House: Meeting Yet Again with Darwin’s Copy of “Das Kapital” By Karl Marx! (8.3.2026)

Darwin (like Marx) believed that “consciousness” was a function of the physical brain in as much as the ability to “think” emerges from the brain – and is the consequence of the functionality of the physical brain. In other word, the ethereal “mind” is a function of the material brain and cannot derive from anywhere else. Wallace had a different opinion. Whilst supporting the idea that the physical body (and brain) had evolved over a long period of time, Wallace was of the opinion that as the physical structures of the brain developed (and become more sophisticated) these structures evolved the ability to “receive” and “sense” consciousness as if it were broadcast (like a radio signal) from an outside source (Wallace never defined this “source” – but many believed his was trying to re-introduce religious thinking into material science – possibly due to the rise of “Spiritualism”). Indeed, perhaps Wallace was influenced by the science of radio-waves when he formulated this idea. Darwin rejected it, (as did Marx) – as they thought it was an attempt to enforce religion via the backdoor. Consciousness, as a special arrangement of matter, developed as a response to environmental conditions and the requirement for the “species” (not individuals) to survive. This might explain why capitalism, and its insistence upon “individualism” – runs counter to human developmental existence and evolutionary science. I suspect that Darwin agreed with Marx on this matter – that this point explains why the correspondance between the two has not yet been fully released.