Tag: Split

Paul Miller - Paedophile & Homosexual!

US: Paul Miller is on Steroids! (17.3.2026)

This is important as he now makes money online “larping” as a White Neo-Nazi. This despite rumours that he has been involved in exploiting underage girls in the US – grooming them online for his own sexual purpose. Miller did train in his youth in a Muay Thai gym in the US – under the guidance of an ethnic Thai teacher. I contacted this teacher – who was kind and polite to me. He stated that Miler used to be a kind and tolerant person but was supposedly beaten-up by a BLM crowd who mistook him for being White. A BLM crowd then boycotted the Thai gym and threatened to storm it and destroy its interior if Miller was not expelled. Miller was soon expelled and this pushed him even further to the far-right. Don’t get me wrong – I believe he is a fraud who has realised an hour or two a weak online being racist earns more money for him than the average 9-5 weekly job. Miller today is an obnoxious individual who just fought an unliicensed boxing match with a Black rapper named “Supah Hot Fire”. This fight was three three-minute rounds wearing 16oz gloves (basically pillows) and allowed to go ahead under the Trump II regime on purely racial grounds. The size difference looks a dwarf (SHF) fighting a giant (PM). Despite the size and weight difference – Miller’s punches did not hurt the smaller man at all – and yet SHF landed punch after punch on Miller’s face. 

Continue reading

Court highlights a raft of errors in High Court judgment after wife hid more than 70% of her wealth in pre-nuptial agreement.

UK: Court of Appeal Overturns Ruling Upholding Pre-Nuptial Agreement – Due to Wife’s ‘Fraudulent Non-Disclosure’! (3.8.2025)

The ruling marks a rare appellate intervention in the context of pre-nuptial agreements. Lady Justice King stressed that the court’s conclusion should not be seen as undermining Radmacher, nor as any shift in the law: “So long as there is no statutory scheme, Radmacher will continue to bind this court. […] Pre-nuptial agreements are about the autonomy of the parties to determine for themselves what should be the fair outcome in the event that their marriage fails.” However, the judge continued, where the parties themselves set out a disclosure regime in the agreement, any deliberate misrepresentation of that disclosure – particularly when induced by one party – is liable to vitiate the agreement. “[W]ilful or fraudulent breach of that agreement […] is entirely different from the position in Radmacher,” she concluded.

Continue reading