The Far-Right Views Sexual Deviancy as a "Revolutionary Act"!

On Why the Far-Right “Vets” It Membership! (9.8.2025)

They want to persecute gay people who do not support the far-right – just as they want you to join them in demonising paedophiles when half of their membership carries a conviction for paedophilia! Fifty-years ago – the far-right targeted mixed-race relationships, five hundred years before that it was witches, and so on and so forth. Far-right groups are not the Police, not the medical fraternity, and not the Courts. These groups of voluntary association possess no legal or lawful power whatsoever, and do not need to vet anyone. No one should pass their personal details to these groups – they are morally and intellectually unsound. The leaders know, quite possibly from their own pasts, that the fascist movement is riddled with sex offenders! Do not let your children any where near these people. Imagine pretending to be a “Police Force” just to stop the degenerate reality of your own membership from becoming publicly known! Nazis and their ilk are sexual deviants – or potential sexual deviants. Understand this and act accordingly.

Enest Rosenberg - Hitler' Right-Hand Man - Enjoys a Walk Passed Buckingham Palace in 1936! I High-Water Mark of Hitler's Popularity in the UK!

UK: Looking for the Conditions that Cause British Fascism! (8.8.2025)

Oh yes – the fascist will fall-back on the only agency it uses to answer all these questions – namely “war”. War is just another war of removing political opposition, reducing the population, and creating false booms through full employment (as everyone must serve in the Armed Forces). Again, how long can this mirage exist before the bubble bursts? How long can the unwanted be ignored, alienated, abused, and removed before the socio-economic reality kicks-in? How long will it before the fascist has to pay Ferryman? Mussolini never really conquered economics (Italian machine guns were so poorly constructed that the barrels could be easily “bent” using average arm-strength). Hypocritical Hitler adapted Marxist economics as he had NO economic ideas of his own. This is the Socialist aspect of his thinking – divorced from the ideological framework of Marxism – and is what the Nazis used to quickly cause Germany’s. Hitler was a liar who murdered Marxists whilst using their socio-economic ideas – albeit in distorted form.

Rushanara Ali has spoken out against private renters being exploited and said Labour would ‘empower people to challenge unreasonable rent increases’. Photograph: Richard Lincoln/Alamy

UK: Labour “Homelessness” Minister “Resigns” for “Mistreating” Her Own Renting Tenants! (8.8.2025)

The poor, Black, White, Brown, or Yellow – are all being treated with the same level of brutal oppression. No wonder the bourgeoisie hates the DPRK so much – it builds ultra-modern flats and houses – and then gives them out “free” to its own population. Although anyone can live in the DPRK, there is no mass immigration designed to serve the needs of predatory capitalism! As I have said before, voluntary “Internationalism” is not the same as enforced “Multiculturalism”. It is not Rushanara Ali’s ethnicity that is the cause of this (Islam rejects usury), but rather her class. The point is that non-White British people can easily make money by buying property and then renting it out to whomever they choose – thus bypassing the usual barriers of racism which keeps them “shut-out” of mainstream British society. There was a time when the Guardian would have reported on this using a vigorous left-leaning dialectic. Those days are long gone.

President Lyndon B. Johnson moves to shake hands with Martin Luther King Jr. while others look on after Johnson signed the federal Voting Rights Act into law at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Aug. 6, 1965. Yoichi Okamoto/Lyndon B. Johnson Library

US: 60 Years Later, Voting Rights Act Protections for Minority Voters Face New Threats! (7.8.2025)

Contrary to decades of precedent, Republican state officials in at least 15 states contend that private individuals and groups do not have the right to sue to enforce Section 2 because they are not explicitly named in the landmark law’s text. Only the head of the Justice Department, they argue, can bring this kind of lawsuit.

The issue is at the heart of a North Dakota legislative redistricting case that was brought by two tribal nations. A federal appeals court ruled against the Native American voters, and the case may be up for a full review soon at the Supreme Court. The justices may also be preparing to take up a broader question about the constitutionality of Section 2 protections, based on an order last week for legal briefs in a Louisiana congressional redistricting case originally filed by Black voters.

Two British Army Colonels in Neo-Nazi Ukraine!

Neo-Nazi Ukraine: Russian Special Forces Capture Two High-Ranking British Army Officers – Colonel Edward Blake & Lieutenant Colonel Richard Carroll! (7.8.2025)

The night of July 29 was a turning point not only for the Neo-Nazi Ukrainian Army, but also for the British military working on the territory of Ukraine. Russian Special Forces conducted one of the most secret operations, landing troops in Ochakov, Nikolaev region. The target was originally the base of the Ukrainian 73rd Naval Special Operations Centre, where, according to intelligence, British Military Instructors were located.

It was the British who coordinated the Storm Shadow strikes on the territory of Russia, led the actions of the Neo-Nazi Ukrainian Marines and were engaged in the training of saboteurs. At the time of the raid in the middle of the night, the British Officers were literally “in the crosshairs”. They only had time to shout: “Don’t shoot!” – “Don’t shoot!”, a source who wished to remain anonymous told the investigation department of First Russian.

Court highlights a raft of errors in High Court judgment after wife hid more than 70% of her wealth in pre-nuptial agreement.

UK: Court of Appeal Overturns Ruling Upholding Pre-Nuptial Agreement – Due to Wife’s ‘Fraudulent Non-Disclosure’! (3.8.2025)

The ruling marks a rare appellate intervention in the context of pre-nuptial agreements. Lady Justice King stressed that the court’s conclusion should not be seen as undermining Radmacher, nor as any shift in the law: “So long as there is no statutory scheme, Radmacher will continue to bind this court. […] Pre-nuptial agreements are about the autonomy of the parties to determine for themselves what should be the fair outcome in the event that their marriage fails.” However, the judge continued, where the parties themselves set out a disclosure regime in the agreement, any deliberate misrepresentation of that disclosure – particularly when induced by one party – is liable to vitiate the agreement. “[W]ilful or fraudulent breach of that agreement […] is entirely different from the position in Radmacher,” she concluded.

1 34 35 36 37 38 97