First Offense - Bai Tian Hui Thanks the Court for its Leniency!

China: Bai Tian Hui (白天辉) Executed for “Economic Crimes”! (9.12.2025)

He was Sentenced to Death for accepting a bribe of 1.1 billion Yuan, but the whereabouts of most of this money is still unclear. He returned some of the stolen money, but hundreds of millions of dollars have not been recovered. People familiar with the matter said that he secretly transferred money out of China and into capitalist countries – through means such as holding on behalf of relatives, purchasing assets overseas, and laundering virtual currency. He also squandered some of it in overseas casinos. Although the task force seized his mansion, luxury car and equity, more than 300 million yuan has not yet been recovered. It is unclear how much of the 1.1 billion in bribes has been recovered and how much has disappeared overseas. He deliberately exploited loopholes in the system and was assisted by outside influences. Before his execution during the early morning of Tuesday December 9th (reported online around 03:37 hrs in China), Bai Tian Hui met with his close relatives. His former “boss” – Lai Xiaomin – was executed in January 2021 for similar capitalistic crimes.

Oakham Castle - Rutland!

Rutland: Visiting Oakham Castle – the Land of Large Horse Shoes! (29.10.2025)

As we are staying in the Rutland area – we decided to visit the Castle after I saw a so-called “Auditor” who compromised the “good will” of the institute by deliberately igniting a pointless conflict about flying a drone over the property. We felt that we should visit the site, behave properly and with civility, and defend the good culture of England. These Auditing thugs are making money out of YouTube (most are unemployed and are working on the dole) by following a movement which emerged out of the political far-right in the US. Indeed, Rutland is the only place we have visited that is so democratic that we were allowed to “sit” in the Judges Seat whilst the Magistrate’s Court was not in session. We were told this was allowed as the Court “belongs to the people” who pay for it through taxation.

1 2