Research: Leon Degrelle Did NOT Meet Winston Churchill in 1936! (18.8.2023)

The general reader should be assured that I in no way support Holocaust Denial or any form of far-right historical revisionism. However, as these entities are responsible for this misunderstanding, what each institute has to say must be heard. The clear and present danger for this (and future) generations is that this type of inverted and deluded thinking is deliberately targeting the youth of the world and is attempting to revitalise and reinvigorate the Hitlerite mania that caused so much death and destruction between 1933-1945! Logic and reason must cut a straight course through all the far-right lies. Winston Churchill was certainly no angel – but when push came to shove – he led the UK in the fight against Hitler and everything he stood for. The idea that he met Degrelle is one deviation that Churchill cannot be accused of carrying out!

A Tribute to David Irving’s Ability to Misrepresent and Lie! (15.8.2023)

For Irving, Hitler is an innocent victim of manmade history – and never its perpetrator (an ‘inversion’ of genuine history). Hitler is a sweet holy being who omits light and wonderment from an elevated and superior position of vision (as if stood on Glastonbury Tor). The Nazi German System, according to Irving, simply positioned itself around Hitler’s purity and played out a corrupt narrative within which an innocent ‘Fuhrer’ was trapped and captured! The reality is, of course, that Nazism was the total and unquestioned manifestation of Hitler’s destructive Will – plain and simple (those who disagreed or did not fit in were ‘removed’). Like a seasoned paedophile who knows how to impeccably ‘groom’ a child – David Irving seeks to deify Hitler whilst obscuring his murderous mission by using endless reams of supportive, historical fact. By being interested in this ‘fact’ – we are misled into the abyss of Hitler worship. David Irving is a very dangerous individual not because he is not a good historian – but because he is a good historian. Despite this, a fascist is a fascist – and Hitler was a murdering bastard!

Alexander Werth: German Crimes in the Soviet Union! (30.7.2023)

In fact, having looked through all the Alexander Werth books I possess in my library – NONE use the term ‘Holocaust’ – despite the fact Werth wrote extensively about the atrocities committed by the Nazi Germans. He was the first BBC Correspondent to make a report (in 1944) when he encountered the ‘Majdanek’ Death Camp in Poland. As a Journalist ‘Specialising’ in the USSR – Werth made a point of carefully examining the Hitlerite murder and maiming of the 41 million Soviet men, women and children which suffered during WWII. Nowhere does Werth use the term ‘Holocaust’. Finally, David Irving’s book regarding the biography of Josef Goebbels states that 26 high-ranking Nazi German Military Officers were captured by the Soviet NKVD – and whilst under intense interrogation – all admitted participating in the ‘1941’ mass execution of Polish officers at Katyn! Goebbels was concerned that his carefully crafted ‘lie’ about the Soviets committing this crime would now be undermined!

Miscellany: Fifty-Six Years of Toil! (30.5.2023)

Whereas Jonathan Dimbleby makes non-existent comparisons to prove his bias – Irving quotes obvious Nazi German anti-Soviet propaganda as if it were true – and states cold and objective facts (which confirms the impeccable behaviour of the Soviets) as if they were false! Afterall, both of these Bourgeois Establishment manifestations are supportive of the predator capitalist system and are opposed to working-class hegemony and ‘Socialism’! As I have stated elsewhere – a Bourgeois historian always presents one concrete fact bolstered by two supportive falsehoods! The Americans have mastered this process through US anti-intellectualism (shot-through as it is with extreme religious ignorance)!

Historical ‘Weight’ of Evidence Suggests ‘David Irving’ Did Take Place! (25.5.2023)

By the end, Irving tells us that Hitler was not in good physical shape but yet kept a tenuous psychological grip on a type of reality. David Irving pieces together the Hitler paradigm with a remarkable clarity and it is a shame that he let his far-right political views edge out his outstanding literary and research skills. As a result, the man formerly known as ‘David Irving’ still peddles his wares through self-publishing, a hard to find website (linked above) and the ‘direct selling’ capacity the internet age offers! David Irving is not only being persecuted for his far-right views (as despicable as they might be) – but is also being punished for pointing-out certain ‘unsavoury’ facts about WWII that emerge from the objective consideration of Allied behaviour! I remember reading in a book about the Nuremburg Trials (NOT penned by David Irving) that an Allied legal expert thought that the remit of the ‘Trials’ should to expanded to consider alleged ‘Allied’ War Crimes – but this idea was considered too controversial and was ultimately ‘rejected’! I suspect David Irving got the Memo (he is too good of a researcher not to have done) but I doubt he had time to read it – hence the misunderstanding!

1 2