When you consider the sheer state of Leicester (I visited recently) – why did the Leicester Mercury Newspaper decide to “censor” photographs of the alleged incident – so that the masses cannot “see” or “access” the true details of the situation. Who are the journalists and editor seeking to defend? Whose sensitives are being protected by attempting to alter reality? Which part of the population would be offended by this graffiti? I had to look on the internet to find the uncensored pictures. Considering King Richard III has been vilified in Shakespeare (and throughout history – possibly unjustly) – and that millions tuned-in on TV to watch the “live” digging-up of his bare-bones from under a car-park – what other injustice could the King possibly be defended from? History is history – reality is reality. Those who commit these pointless acts should be appropriately punished – but the media should not conspire to “hide” facts from the public. At least King Richard III possessed the courage to die fighting on the battlefield.
SANGHA KOMMUNE (SSR) 