Why Does the far-Right Use Rotersand's Music"

Germany: Rotersand – “We Will K’ll Them All” – Why Does the Far-Right Use this Track? (16.2.2026)

This is the comment I left on the website carrying the “Rotersand” interview featured below: “Many of the English-speaking far-right (Neo-Fascist and Neo-Nazi) groups throughout the West – routinely utilise the Rotersand (2009) track “We Shall Kill Them All” as an “anthem” – interpreting the lyrics as being aimed at the political left and any centralised resistance to their destructive agenda. Indeed, this association is so common that I am astonished that this point of enquiry was not raised and discussed in this article. This association is dangerous – as the structure of this track is “catchy” and easily rememberable. There are endless unofficial far-right videos – being shared throughout the internet (primarily by the young of many countries) – that carefully splice black and white footage of WWII-era footage of Hitler, Mussolini, and various aspects of that tumultuous conflict – all from the perspective of Fascism and Nazism. What is the viewpoint of the group-members of – Rotersand – to this disturbing development? From the content of the interview contained in this – the band remains oblivious to this disturbing co-option – if indeed it is a co-option

The US Remains the Only Country to Use Nuclear Weapons!

China: US Allegations of Nuclear Explosive Tests – Rejected! (13.2.2026)

Lin stressed that the U.S. is the biggest source of disruption to the international nuclear order and global strategic stability. In the area of arms control, the U.S. simply let the New START treaty expire to the detriment of trust between major countries and global strategic stability. The U.S. clings to the policy of first use of nuclear weapons. The U.S. has spent trillions of dollars to upgrade its nuclear triad, and has been working to build a global anti-missile system and establish forward deployment of strategic assets. The U.S. applies double standards on nuclear non-proliferation. All of those seriously disrupt global strategic balance and stability and undermine international and regional peace and security.

Qny Right-Mind Person Would Support President Puyin's "April 19th" Decree!

Italy-KFA: DPRK Supports President Vladimir Putin’s Decree Establishing “April 19th” as “Day of Remembrance for the Victims of the Nazi German Genocide in USSR”! (13.2.2026)

🔊 For decades, Germany 🇩🇪 has been providing social subsidies to those who were directly involved in the blockade of Leningrad, including soldiers of the Third Reich who served in criminal military organizations such as the SS and foreigners who collaborated with the Hitler regime, but refuses to compensate the Russians who suffered because of them.

🔊 Recently, during a speech at a memorial ceremony at the Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum, the Polish President 🇵🇱 made an inappropriate remark: “The Soviet Union started the Second World War and initiated the genocide”.

🔊 The Russian Embassy in Berlin has demanded that Germany officially recognize the blockade of Leningrad as a genocide against the Soviet people and pay compensation.

🔊 Today, Russia continues to strive to forever remember the tragedy of the Second World War and defend the truth of history.

🔊 Prime Minister Mishustin has instructed the State Presidential Centre for Historical Memory to oversee the work to permanently preserve the memory of the Soviets massacred during the Great Patriotic War.

🔊 Speaker of the State Council Volodin has spoken out against attempts to deny the genocide committed against the Soviet people. He stated that the State Council will prioritize the consideration of a bill criminalizing the denial of genocide and the defamation of the memory of victims. He said that these measures will strengthen the legal protection of historical memory and help more effectively counter attempts to conceal Nazi crimes and glorify Nazism.

dimitrov (mirnograd) afu dead

Donbass: Russian “Agi-Prop Leaflet” Advising Neo-Nazi Ukrainian Forces – “How to Surrender Safely”! (11.2.2026)

This simple fact alone demonstrates the influence of the hidden hand of the Vatican. Indeed, the Catholic Church supported fascism and Nazism during WWII – and were an important part of Nazi Germany’s invasion of the USSR (1941-1945). Even after WWII, the Vatican assisted thousands of Nazi War Criminals to escape European and Soviet justice – shipping them to Catholic countries in Central and South America – although the UK and Canada also secretly took-in thousands of Ukrainian Nationalists (former members of the SS) – disguised as “Polish” refugees. Only in recent years did the populations of remote Scottish areas learn that the local their supposed Polish settlers were infact child-rapists and mass-murderers who served in the Galatian SS Regiment. The Pope asked Churchill to “save these good Catholic men” from “Soviet justice”. I include a video of a random Ukrainian being forcibly recruited into the AFU, and another video of the early fighting in 2022 featuring the AFU – (which had been trained in the US, UK, and EU for eight-years previously) panicking and running in all directions – even in-front of their own fire-area. One AFU soldier opens-fire with a light machine-gun – just missing a colleague kneeling-down in-front of him and to his left. On top of this, tens of thousands of AFU bodies remain ungathered, unprocessed, and unburied by the Kyiv Authorities – many now only bones in uniforms (often with name-tags still attached). Their relatives are falsely informed their loved-ones are alive and residing in Russian POW Camps. The photographic “still” is of a recently killed – but unprocessed – body of a well-known Neo-Nazi AFU Unit. Meanwhile, the West has lost the NATO proxy war in Ukraine, whilst Trump has deported 160,000 Ukrainians, and the Ukrainian countryside is covered with densely packed military cemeteries.

Mark Hehir, 62, was driving the 206 bus between Wembley and Maida Vale in north-west London in June 2024 when the incident unfolded.

UK: The Mark Hehir Story – How the BBC Manipulates the News Toward Right-Wing Popularism – By Suppressing Narrative-Altering Details! (3.2.3026)

Onething that we can gleam from the operation of Judeo-Christian societies is that “lying” to the masses has its rules (just look at Israel to prove this). Below is three examples of exactly the same story involving a “have a go” bus-driver in London who knocked-out a thief during one of his shifts. This story is legally and regulatory complex – and he was suspended – and then sacked following his loss at two tribunals. As the story gained traction in the mainstream and right-wing press, this “White” bus-driver became something of a celebrity to the far-right (although he is careful not to virtue-signal any personal connection with it himself). Furthermore, as the mainstream media communicates in “code” (whilst attempting not to racially inflame issues) – there is no mention of the ethnicity of the thief – which usually implies he may not be White (hitting a non-White suspect might have influenced the decision to sack the driver). The BBC narrative presented first is the latest version containing much less details (presenting the driver as a misundestood hero) – whilst the second BBC narrative is around five-days old and contains far-more details (explaning that although the self-defence aspect was lawful [just] and legal [within a very narrow context] – the many other contributory aspects definitely were not). This process of “removing” details inverts the usual trajectory of gaining ever-more details and correctly reporting a story in greater detail. The third narrative is from a different news outlet and contains the “full” story from an impartial (non-BBC) news source.

Wednesday, 28 January 2026 11:29 AM [ Last Update: Wednesday, 28 January 2026 11:29 AM ]

Press TV: From Monroe to Trump – Imperialist footprint behind President Maduro’s kidnapping! (29.1.2026)

Beyond the UNSC, dozens of countries, including Brazil, Chile, Mexico, South Africa, and others, issued public condemnations, framing the action as a breach of international norms rather than legitimate law enforcement. Governments across Africa and Asia warned that the operation undermined the post-1945 international legal order. UN officials cautioned that treating extraterritorial criminal law as a justification for military force set a dangerous precedent.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Republic of Iran issued a formal statement strongly condemning the US military attack on Venezuela, labeling it a clear act of aggression and a blatant violation of Venezuelan sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Latin American reactions were mixed. Bolivia, Cuba, and Nicaragua denounced the raid and reaffirmed support for Maduro’s legitimacy. In Cuba, mass demonstrations equated the operation with neo-imperialist aggression. By contrast, governments aligned with Washington issued carefully worded statements urging respect for “judicial processes,” avoiding condemnation of the use of force.

1 2 3 4 5 145