India and Hitler - a Double-Bind!

India: Deconstructing the Dialectical Idiocy of Vaibhav Purandare – He Hates Hitler and Stalin Equally! (7.4.2025)

Pretending there are non-existent grades of sophisticated justification is typical of the inverted mind of the bourgeois historian. The above author is a product of BJP nurturing would have you believe that all the oppression that Indians suffered in Germany was merely a product of a misunderstanding between themselves and Hitler’s regime. Of course, at no point does the author address the subject of why it was that so many middle-class (often English-educated) Indian men were living in Germany in the early 1930 – or why it was many of them preferred “White” sexual partners, when they already possessed a suitable caste-wife in India, or were betrothed to a suitable caste woman in India – the marriage to happen upon their return to their motherland. Usually, the racist attitudes inherent within Indian Brahmanical views prevent what they see as “race-mixing”. Whilst attempting to be Western and negate the Communist contribution to world history – this book generates far more questions than it answer. It is a tome typical of the bourgeois habit of presenting one-fact supported by two-lies. So be it.

Rosa Luxemberg’s Bourgeois Dialectical Errors

In this regard, Rosa Luxemberg’s ideas were more ‘bourgeois’ friendly, than Socialist Revolutionary, as she spoke with the attitude of a fully empowered bourgeois individual. Rosa Luxemberg mistakenly assumed that the oppressed Working Class possessed the same bourgeois education and access to social and political institutions that she did, and that all the Working Class had to do was to ‘realise’ this apparently ‘hidden’ or ‘latent’ power.