Proletariat Blogging in the Heart of (UK) Predatory Capitalism! Exploring the Interface between Matter and Perception, Chinese Buddhism, Daoism, Hakka Ethnography, and All Aspects of Radical Politics, History, Psychology and Philosophy – 全世界无产者联合起来!
Well, it’s that time of year again in the UK. All the school children are invited to wear a festive jumper – which is a little ironic for the Sikhs, Muslims, and Hindus that live amongst us. There might also be one or two reluctant Jews thrown into the mix. After all, most of these groups have already celebrate their equivalents of Xmas.
If this was the case, why did the Buddha reject Brahmanism? Why did the Buddha bite the hand that fed him? Well, he practiced all the available meditative paths, mastered them all, and realised none of them expressed the ultimate truth. He carried-on training in meditation as the Upanishads advised – and saw through all the conditioning of his mind, body, and environment. He gave up caste privilege and all work for money. He knew that this would lead to starvation, homelessness, and nakedness. He resolved these issues by dressing himself in rags found in the charnel grounds (the clothing of dead who were to poor to be cremated), he acquired the skull-cap of a dead person and used it as a begging bowl as he walked from village to village quietly requesting waste-food on a daily basis, and he sat under the foot of a tree when he meditated. The Buddha left society and lived on the forested outskirts of Hindu society. Of course, the Buddha still physically lived in India, and interfaced with Hindu society, but he did this under a completely new contract of understanding.
Furthermore, as the founders of Zionism rejected “Socialism” – they aligned their movement with the political far-right and incredibly attempted to integrate their community with anti-Semitic ideology (as if they were hiding their “Jewishness” behind their European identity). This denial of identity even led to very good relations with Adolf Hitler’s early regime (1933) – particularly as far-right Zionist groups had been murdering Arabs and British citizens in Palestine since 1917. Indeed, the British Army went on the offensive against the Zionist Jews in Palestine (that had not been directly effected by the Holocaust in Eastern Europe) between 1945-1947 – in an attempt to stem the tide of their terrorist outrages. Zionists today, want to align themselves with the conventional (usually anti-Jewish) far-right – and it intends to do this by appealing to the Islamophobia which is currently extant in the West (as if no one will notice they are Jews). Tommy Robinson is the paid traitor in the UK who is attempting to race-hate Muslims on behalf of his pay-masters in Tel Aviv. It is an up-hill struggle as Hitler defined the greatest enemy of humanity “to be the Jews”. The conventional far-right, as it perceives its ideological foundation to lie within the pages of Mein Kampf” – this will be a difficult association for the Zionists to break. Impossible, in fact, and the main reason (contradiction) that dooms the Zionist psychological operation to doom.
This militancy is directly equal to the suppressive-force that has produced it – but is it relevant, required, or legitimate for a mass working class movement to be effective? Remember, Karl Marx firmly rejected pointless acts of terrorism – which he defined as being separate and distinct from the acts of genuine working class self-defence. The point is that the working class must possess iron-like discipline if it is to achieve its objectives within a bourgeois society. Pointless acts of individualistic “terrorism” ultimately achieve nothing positive, and always lead to the working class being collectively punished for the actions of a few. Now, on the Bronx Anti-War site, and many others like it, there is a general eulogising of the actions of one “Elias Rodriguez” – a Hispanic-American man. Indeed, there is a very well-developed “Free Elias Rodriguez” Campaign much to my astonishment.
I have a number of hobbies – Chinese roundel technology, classical Greek Philosophy, and giving George Orwell a good kicking any time I am given the opportunity. Of course, there are other pastimes – but Orwell is a blight on all our children – as his poorly written books are taught to every generation of British school child as a means of inoculating them against the positive study of Scientific Socialism. Orwell is a bourgeois degenerate in every conceivable way. Indeed, the common mess seen in Burma at the moment is in-part due to people like Orwell – who served as a British Police Officer in that colony! I am critiquing the work of an English Churchman – Bishop Alan Smith of St Albans – who is in many ways sympathetic to the plight of worker – but always in a qualified manner. Typical of CofE duplicity – there is always a reluctance to completely commit.
Of course, sexual deviancy is a distinguishing factor seen in the far-right – developed upon the Hitlerite grounds that those who constitute their victims are considered “sub-human” – and are therefore not protected by anti-abuse laws! Many Jewish offenders, for instance, claim the Bible justifies their sexual abuse of non-Jews (goyim) – and that as a “divine race” they should not be subject to the rigours of secular law. Ivor Caplin, who has made a career using secular law to oppress others and further his career, accts in these videos as if he should not be subject to secular law! As I suspect these videos will “go missing” – I have made my ad hoc copies!
SANGHA KOMMUNE (SSR) 