Khrushchev – SANGHA KOMMUNE (SSR)

Shi Yongxin Accused of Making Giant Spliffs at Shaolin!

China: Shi Yongxin Rumours Light-Up Internet! (29.7.2025)

29/07/2025 Adrian (釋大道)

It was the Trotskyite Khrushchev who (copying the US) introduced the Death Penalty for Civil Crimes in 1959. The problem Khrushchev had was that no Soviet-educated Jury would inflict the Death Penalty – as they had been taught that the Czarist Authorities routinely used “Death” as a means of controlling and oppressing the workers. Karl Marx, of course was opposed to all forms of Death Penalty. He quite rightly said that the State does not possess the right to harm an individual’s body in anyway – and I agree (doubly as a Buddhist). Lenin was of the opinion that Marx only meant that the Death Penalty should not be applied to the workers – but can be applied to class enemies. Why Lenin thought this – I am not sure. Lenin was a trained lawyer after-all – so perhaps he is seeing something I cannot in the work of Marx. Of course, I do accept that in the time of brutal war – executions might be required – even if I personally disagree. Sometimes we have to separate our personal beliefs (disentangle them from exterior circumstance) if life is to flow-on unhindered. This is why we require a strong moral foundation to our characters and judgement. We must avoid self-indulgence and wayward harshness. If it is proven “true” that Shi Yongxin was defecting to the US and was preparing to condemn the Communist Party of China on the White House lawn whilst Vance and Trump chuckle away – then i could well see an execution taking place. Surely a demonstration of bad-karma if ever I’ve seen it!

Prof. Grover Furr Applies the Academic Method!

Grover Furr: “Trotsky Was a Fascist!” – Talk on Trotsky’s Comintern Conspiracy to the Oakland ICSS October 20, 2024! (5.1.2025)

05/01/2025 Adrian (釋大道)

When it comes to historical evidence there is no such thing as “credibility.” All evidence must be subjected to doubt and carefully studied.

The Need For, and Lack of, Objectivity

Everybody has biases. But everybody can learn to be objective in studying any subject, whether it be physics or history. The techniques are basically similar.

Objectivity as a scientific method is a practice of “distrust of the self.” You can learn to be objective by training yourself to become aware of, to articulate, and then to question your own preconceived ideas. You must be reflexively suspicious of evidence that tends to confirm your own preconceived ideas, prejudices, and preferences. You must learn to give an especially generous reading to any evidence and arguments that contradict your own preconceived ideas.

UN: Soviet Influence in its Founding – Russian Embassy in Cuba! (15.12.2024)

15/12/2024 Adrian (釋大道)

In 1945, the USSR delegation insisted that the principles of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion, be included in the UN Charter.

USSR: Deconstructing the [1953] Doctors’ Plot – Exonerating Stalin! (11.1.2024)

11/01/2024 Adrian (釋大道)

Comrade Joseph Stalin – In answer to your inquiry:

National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of cannibalism.

Anti-semitism is of advantage to the exploiters as a lightning conductor that deflects the blows aimed by the working people at capitalism. Anti-semitism is dangerous for the working people as being a false path that leads them off the right road and lands them in the jungle. Hence Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable, sworn enemies of anti-semitism.

In the U.S.S.R. anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost severity of the law as a phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under U.S.S.R. law active anti-semites are liable to the death penalty.

J. Stalin
January 12, 1931

Scientific Socialism Should NOT Be Eurocentric! (19.12.2023)

21/12/2023 Adrian (釋大道)

Opposing this ignorance (as a genuine ‘Marxist-Leninist’) is tantamount to confronting the entire ‘White’ edifice of reaction that defines the Eurocentric Bourgeoisie. The post-1991 ‘Communist’ Parties are counter-Revolutionary whilst pretending to be ‘Revolutionary’. Collaborate with capitalism and fascism – whilst pretending to be anti-capitalist and anti-fascist. Remove the working-class from power – whilst claiming to be empowering this very Proletariat! All is ‘White’ and all is ‘Bourgeois’ and this is why the working-class of the West is leaderless and rudderless – opening the field for the fascist groupings to take full advantage. The thinking of the (reactionary) Bourgeoisie has the foundation for many post-1991 ‘Communist’ Parties which are merely (empty) Trotskyite husks tasked with disempowering the Western working-class whilst enforcing racial stereotypes and encouraging racist ideology.

ALEXANDER WERTH: The Defensive BATTLE OF STALINGRAD [PART II]! (4.10.2023)

04/10/2023 Adrian (釋大道)

The content is a criticism of the perceived overlooked brutality of Nazi Germany in the USSR during World War II, particularly during the Battle of Stalingrad. It references Alexander Werth’s 1947 book ‘The Year of Stalingrad’ and accuses post-1945 US of ignoring the racially motivated brutality. The piece also suggests the capitalist West is supporting Neo-Nazi regimes to confront capitalist Russia and questions if history is repeating itself referencing the Ukrainian US-proxy war against Russia.

1 2 3 4 »