Many Good Points - A Number of Bad!

Emails: Exposing the Catholic [Anti-Soviet] Ignorance of Abbot Andre Louf [1929-2010]! (19.5.2024)

This is despite the anti-Soviet nonsense he spouts on page 114 – a line of Vatican propaganda that sullies a man who tolerates a qualified “atheism” in his monastery! Of course, this type of anti-Stalin invention can be dismissed by studying the Collective Works of Stalin (Stalin trained in the Seminary before becoming a Revolutionary) and the historical (academic) work of EH Carr, Alexander Werth and Grover Furr, etc. EH Carr does mention that following the Bolshevik Revolution, monks and priest were not allowed to vote in elections until after 1922 (the founding of the USSR) – but prior to 1917 – no one (ecclesiastical or lay) was allowed to vote for any reason outside the closed circle surrounding the Czar – and the oppressive feudal system he administered. Just as Catholic monks live under the “Dictatorship” of God, the Pope and their Abbot – monks and priests in the USSR possessed absolutely no rights prior to 1917! Andre Louf, as a professed Catholic monk, was NOT permitted by the Catholic Church to vote in any election. When the reality of his position is fully understood – then the magnitude of his ignorance becomes fully revealed. Even monastic masters are inclined to “lie” – perhaps that is what their God requires.

A Bear Will Kill You!

Philosophy: The Public Thought Experiment – “Man or Bear”? (15.5.2024)

A prime example of an academic who does operate freedom of thought is Grover Furr. Like myself, he has examined and seen through the lies and distortions which the West uses to interpret the history of the Soviet Union and the purpose of the ideology of Socialism. This corrective has important implications for Cuba, Vietnam, China, North Korea, and Laos, as well as all those left-leaning regimes throughout the world (many operating in Central and South America). Developing a three-dimensional state of mind only comes about by the purposeful adopting of “thought exercises” (a type of role-playing) which allows the thought processes to expand into directions they would not necessarily extend into. In a very real sense, this is arguing for argument’s sake. Examples of this might include arguing for the ideology of Adolf Hitler, or make a case for the Zionist invasion, occupation and settlement of the entirety of Palestine. What is argued for must be “shocking” to those who have no choice but to conform and constructively act.

USSR: Grover Furr Debunks the Lies of Robert Conquest and the Anti-Stalin Paradigm! (8.2.2024)

The available source texts from time portray and reveal this reality. There is no talk of pogroms, gulags, oppressions and purges – although it is true that the US took the side of Trotsky. How odd it is then, to bear witness to a deluge of post-1945 texts which serve to construct an alternative history that would have the unsuspecting reader to believe that whilst Roosevelt was chatting with Stalin and Harpo was making Soviet Generals ‘laugh’ – that most of the population of the USSR lived in Prison Camps and that Stalin was personally involved in a famine he had deliberately caused in (Catholic) West Ukraine! Interestingly, the US Philosopher – Will Durant – who could not read, write or speak Russian, visited the USSR in 1933 (the year of Roosevelt’s Diplomatic Mission) – and claimed a Russian peasant woman stated to him that life was terrible. When asked to produce this woman, he could not – and neither could he explain how he understood or communicated with this woman. Durant appears to be a foreshadowing of the disinformation that was to come out of the US – post-1945.

Putin Respects Stalin!

USSR: Grover Furr Explains the Link Between Putin, Stalin and Trotsky! (4.2.2024)

Of course, Franco was armed by Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy – whilst the USSR rallied the International Working Class (via the Communist Party). These brave men and women made their own way to Spain and fought and died in the ‘International Brigades’ – under the protection and care of the Soviet Union whilst their own countries considered them ‘criminals’. Even the Bourgeois tractor – George Orwell – joined an anti-Soviet ‘Anarchist’ Brigade! The point is that Grover Furr correctly states that the US, UK and France (even during 1940) would rather have fought with Nazi Germany against the USSR – than with the USSR against Nazi Germany! Joseph Stalin was the genuine hero of the International Working-Class – and Leon Trotsky the worst type of International Traitor!

Karl Radek - Nazi Collaborating Jew!

Gestapo: Two Examples of “Jewish” Trotskyites Who Collaborated with Nazi Germany! (30.1.2024)

Within Russian-language sources I have read Leon Trotsky’s name written as ‘Lev Trotskii’ – as he was of Jewish origin. Grover Furr, in his 2020 book entitled ‘New Evidence of Trotsky’s Conspiracy’, includes the names of two ‘Socialist’ men of Jewish origination, who actively conspired against the USSR in the name of Nazi Germany (although there were many more). The two examples included below are named ‘Khaskel Gesselevich Gurevich’ and ‘Karl Radek’. Remember, that when Trotsky attempted to found his ‘Fourth International’ during 1938 – he called upon his followers to join any international ‘fascist’ attack upon the USSR – and directed all his followers still in the USSR to carryout endless terrorist attacks! We now know that these ‘terrorist’ attacks included the agency of assassination with an emphasis of murdering Joseph Stalin (rather than attempting to ‘vote’ him out of Office):

Exposing Trotsky's Lies

On How Grover Furr Exposes Incorrect Soviet-Era Historical Analysis! (30.1.2024)

The archaeologist, as a trained academic, is applying a logical method of ‘removing’ eras of material obscuration, being careful to correctly observe the origin, construction, constitution, and positioning of said debris. Indeed, amassing this data is crucial for constructing a correct (contextual) historical narrative regarding the age, origin, purpose, and fate of the object being observed. If any of this analysis is false – then this falsehood permeates its way though the entire academic process – leading to incorrect assumptions and interpretations. Indeed, the history of archaeology is strewn with such numerous examples of misread data. The study of historical events is conveyed through many mediums, archaeology, art, culture, texts, film and audio recordings, etc. Some of this data is said to be eye-witness accounts – whilst others tend to be merely opinion at a distance.

1 2 3 4