Tag: Formosa

Photo taken on Oct. 13, 2025 shows visitors at an exhibition commemorating the recovery of Taiwan and the Nanhai Zhudao (South China Sea islands), from Japanese occupation at Nanjing University in eastern China, in Jiangsu Province. (Photo: China News Service/Yang Bo)

China: Nanjing Exhibition – Resumption of Mainland Sovereignty Over Taiwan! (15.10.2025)

Beyond conventional displays, the exhibition features specialized sections on maritime culture, historical maps, and Geng Lu Bu (ancient sea route manuals). It also incorporates Augmented Reality (AR) technology to offer immersive experiences of the South China Sea’s historical and cultural heritage.

The core value of the exhibition lies not only in demonstrating China’s historical proposition and legal basis on the South China Sea issue and Taiwan question but also in helping teachers and students understand history and draw spiritual strength, said Zhu Feng, executive director of Nanjing University’s Collaborative Innovation Center of South China Sea Studies.

“Only by clearly understanding the humiliations and struggles of the past can we more profoundly grasp the importance of safeguarding national sovereignty, which serves as the foundation for facing the future and building lasting peace,” he added.

Continue reading

There is Only One-China!

GENEVA: WHO-WHA Rejects Taiwan-Related Proposal! (20.5.2025)

He noted that 183 countries have established official diplomatic relations with China on the basis of the one-China principle. Ahead of this year’s WHA session, many countries sent letters to the WHO reaffirming their support for this principle. This fully demonstrates that the one-China principle embodies the broad consensus of the international community.

China’s central government has always attached great importance to the well-being of Taiwan compatriots. Provided that the one-China principle is upheld, technical experts from Taiwan Province face no obstacles to participating in WHO activities, he added.

The so-called claim of a “gap” in the international pandemic prevention system is inconsistent with the facts and is purely a political manipulation, he said.

Continue reading