Court – Page 2 – SANGHA KOMMUNE (SSR)

BUENOS AIRES: Argentine Judge Dismissed for Causing Mis-Trial in Maradona Death Trial! (19.11.2025)

19/11/2025 Adrian (釋大道)

The ruling also permanently bars the 48-year-old judge from holding any future judicial office. The misconduct stemmed from Makintach allowing the unauthorized filming of the documentary Justicia Divina inside the courtroom during the trial, in which she featured prominently.

Prosecutor Ana Duarte accused Makintach of having “lied, pressured, manipulated,” shown bias, and abused her power. Makintach argued she had only agreed to an interview with a friend and had not authorized the production of a documentary.

A new trial for Maradona’s death is scheduled to begin on March 17, 2026. Eight healthcare professionals are charged with homicide in connection with the former footballer’s death, and face potential prison sentences of eight to 25 years.

Woman at Centre of Plastic Surgery Scandel!

China: “Ugly Wife Court Case” – is the “Husband Feng Jian [冯健]” Story “True” or “False”? (13.11.2025)

13/11/2025 Adrian (釋大道)

Having examined the Chinese language online sources – it does seem that this story is true. It seems that it dates back to late 2012 – but every so often (even in China) – it is re-printed with elaborations and revelations which were not in the original story. I did read in the comments beneath one version that the family involved are in fact “Korean-Chinese” – and this is why the woman involved paid for her plastic surgery to be carried-out in South Korea. My instincts were that this is “fake” as it opposes the Socialist laws on equality and those supporting the rights of women and girls. Of course, it could be fake, but I have included a number of Chinese language versions as well as a YouKu news article. Usually, the Chinese State “removes” all fake news and as it has not moved to do this – this suggests this story is true. It is disgusting that a woman and/or a child would be considered “ugly” – as this is a body-fascist attitude contrary to all Socialist ideology.

US: Washington DC Sues Trump Over National Guard Deployment! (5.9.2025)

05/09/2025 Adrian (釋大道)

Aside from the original 800 National Guard troops, six Republican-led states have supported the president’s effort by sending additional personnel, bringing the total deployment in D.C. to over 2,000.

The D.C. lawsuit follows a court victory by the Democratic-run U.S. state of California earlier this week.

On Tuesday, District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco ruled that the Trump administration violated a 19th-century law barring the use of soldiers for civilian law enforcement when it deployed National Guard troops to Los Angeles in June.

Schwalb, a Democrat, noted that the National Guard deployment not only undermines public safety, but also hurts the district’s economy by depressing key sectors such as restaurants, hotels and tourism.

President Lyndon B. Johnson moves to shake hands with Martin Luther King Jr. while others look on after Johnson signed the federal Voting Rights Act into law at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Aug. 6, 1965. Yoichi Okamoto/Lyndon B. Johnson Library

US: 60 Years Later, Voting Rights Act Protections for Minority Voters Face New Threats! (7.8.2025)

07/08/2025 Adrian (釋大道)

Contrary to decades of precedent, Republican state officials in at least 15 states contend that private individuals and groups do not have the right to sue to enforce Section 2 because they are not explicitly named in the landmark law’s text. Only the head of the Justice Department, they argue, can bring this kind of lawsuit.

The issue is at the heart of a North Dakota legislative redistricting case that was brought by two tribal nations. A federal appeals court ruled against the Native American voters, and the case may be up for a full review soon at the Supreme Court. The justices may also be preparing to take up a broader question about the constitutionality of Section 2 protections, based on an order last week for legal briefs in a Louisiana congressional redistricting case originally filed by Black voters.

Court highlights a raft of errors in High Court judgment after wife hid more than 70% of her wealth in pre-nuptial agreement.

UK: Court of Appeal Overturns Ruling Upholding Pre-Nuptial Agreement – Due to Wife’s ‘Fraudulent Non-Disclosure’! (3.8.2025)

03/08/2025 Adrian (釋大道)

The ruling marks a rare appellate intervention in the context of pre-nuptial agreements. Lady Justice King stressed that the court’s conclusion should not be seen as undermining Radmacher, nor as any shift in the law: “So long as there is no statutory scheme, Radmacher will continue to bind this court. […] Pre-nuptial agreements are about the autonomy of the parties to determine for themselves what should be the fair outcome in the event that their marriage fails.” However, the judge continued, where the parties themselves set out a disclosure regime in the agreement, any deliberate misrepresentation of that disclosure – particularly when induced by one party – is liable to vitiate the agreement. “[W]ilful or fraudulent breach of that agreement […] is entirely different from the position in Radmacher,” she concluded.

Scales of Justice - Kate Fanning Defeated!

UK: British Neo-Nazi “Kate Fanning” Defeated in Court Action Over Assumed “White Victimhood” Claim! (30.5.2025)

30/05/2025 Adrian (釋大道)

Exercising the usual far-right deficiency in thinking, Kate Fanning falsely assumed that the 2020 Open University policy of aligning itself with the BLM movement at the height of the George Floyd-inspired riots – was somehow a “personal” attack directed at herself. The UK Court begs to differ and the Judge clearly explained in his statement why Fanning’s interpretation is legally and lawfully “wrong” and “incorrect”. As Fanning is unable to self-censor or self-correct – she is cultivating a cult-like belief in her corrupt attitude amongst those who feel she is worth following. It is ironic as Fanning is studying for a degree in the very bourgeois legal system she is attempting to take-on, defeat, and transcend – all of which she has failed to achieve. Fanning fails to understand that White countries developed modern “racism” around 400-years ago (during colonial and imperialist expansion) – and that non-White people have been forced to react to this hideous ideology ever-since. White people can be victims of inverse racism (which lacks any genuine economic power to make it anything other than nasty words) – but White people are never “disempowered” and are always in control of the societies and economic system they invented (predatory capitalist) and control. Fanning tried to make her inverted misconception of reality a concrete fact by manipulating the Courts to agree with her inherent stupidity.

« 1 2 3 4 … 10 »