Joseph Stalin - Great Working Class Hero!

UK: In Praise of Stalin – Who Always Kept His Guard Up Against Trotskyism! (18.2.2026)

In my veins I feel the truth of what Joseph Stalin has to say – because what he has to say is absolutely correct. In this regard, Nicolae Ceausescu (and his partner) are working-class heroes murdered by the bourgeoisie (as is Saddam Hussein). It is ironic that whilst the bourgeoise is always trying to delude the masses through the perpetuation of the fog of theist religion – it is always using Christmas-time to carry-out its most brutal executions – even televising such hideous spectacles as a form of “warning” entertainment. Suddenly, the Dalai Lama’s 169 mentions in the Epstein Files fall into place. At one time, the West attempted to infiltrate Moscow high society with secret agents willing to practice homosexuality in the USSR. The NKVD traced this from Washington to Tel Aviv – and reported it to Stalin – who ordered the agents destroyed – and quite right in my opinion. From what I gather, these “male” agents were heterosexuals carrying-out a “trained role” for their country. The idea was to plant the foundation of bourgeois individualism in the USSR using sexual decadence as a vehicle. Indeed, post-1991 saw all kinds of sexual deviance imported into the post-Soviet space, including religion and far-right ideology. All this is “Trotskyite”. Revealing its treachery is not homophobia – but pro-worker (many of the early Bolsheviks were known to be “gay” – but not decadent – and there is the difference). The point is that deficient ideology is not correct ideology – and this applies to false derivatives claiming to be “Marxist”. 

The Book I Am current Reading!

Stalin – A Biography (Re-Examining Stalin – Learning from Past – Taking the Right Path) By Dai Longbin (戴隆斌)! [20.8.2025]

Deprived of his father’s love at a young age, Stalin developed a distinctly rebellious character, a daring spirit of adventure, and a willingness to fight—key factors in his subsequent development as a staunch Marxist and Lenin’s successor. His personality enabled him to make tremendous historical contributions to Soviet governance, the Communist Party, and the military, leaving behind both glory and retribution. He was a historical giant, both charismatic and discerning.

Apply the Marxist Dialectic Correctly!

Stalin was a Great Working-Class Leader of Organic Communism! (20.8.2025)

Another tiger-trap is the “National Bolshevik” movement. To be clear, I am a Bolshevik (from the Chinese perspective) – but I am not a nationalist (Indeed, I am an “Internationalist” – a Maoist no less). The “Naz-Bol” movement evolved out of a fascist-infected (post-1991) Russia. This movement integrates Hitler’s ideology with a post-1945 US (Cold War) misidentification of Joseph Stalin. This flawed ideology misinforms that there is “no difference” between historical Hitler and a fictional Stalin. Well, 41 million dead and wounded Soviet citizens would beg to differ. Naz-Bols combine Marxist-Leninist economics with Hitler’s warped theories on race. This rejects the Marxist idea of “Internationalism”. On the face of it, these deluded individuals will talk highly of Stalin (as I do) – and then state he is no different to Hitler (which I definitely do not) – claiming both were ruthlessly racist (a complete lie – Stalin wasn’t even Russian).

Many Good Points - A Number of Bad!

Emails: Exposing the Catholic [Anti-Soviet] Ignorance of Abbot Andre Louf [1929-2010]! (19.5.2024)

This is despite the anti-Soviet nonsense he spouts on page 114 – a line of Vatican propaganda that sullies a man who tolerates a qualified “atheism” in his monastery! Of course, this type of anti-Stalin invention can be dismissed by studying the Collective Works of Stalin (Stalin trained in the Seminary before becoming a Revolutionary) and the historical (academic) work of EH Carr, Alexander Werth and Grover Furr, etc. EH Carr does mention that following the Bolshevik Revolution, monks and priest were not allowed to vote in elections until after 1922 (the founding of the USSR) – but prior to 1917 – no one (ecclesiastical or lay) was allowed to vote for any reason outside the closed circle surrounding the Czar – and the oppressive feudal system he administered. Just as Catholic monks live under the “Dictatorship” of God, the Pope and their Abbot – monks and priests in the USSR possessed absolutely no rights prior to 1917! Andre Louf, as a professed Catholic monk, was NOT permitted by the Catholic Church to vote in any election. When the reality of his position is fully understood – then the magnitude of his ignorance becomes fully revealed. Even monastic masters are inclined to “lie” – perhaps that is what their God requires.

MI Kalinin - President USSR

USSR: MI Kalinin Explains the Efficacy of “Centralised Democracy”! (26.1.2024)

In other words, with the odd exception, virtually all Western academia relating to the history of the USSR is ‘false’. This is why the work of MI Kalinin, although all translated into English, is nevertheless very difficult to acquire as it runs through all the different epochs up until 1946 – contradicting the often ‘racist’ nonsense that still spills from the corrupt (Bourgeois) mind. I was particularly influenced by his ‘On Communist Education’ – but what is quoted below is the reality of how the Socialist System of ‘Centralised Democracy’ is far more ‘representative’ and ’empowering’ than ‘Liberal Democracy’!

Sutton: Revolutionay Seasons Greetings – Happy Yuletide!

“The essence of Trotskyism consists, lastly, in the denial of the necessity of iron discipline in the Party, in the recognition of the freedom of factional groupings in the Party, in the recognition of the necessity of constituting a Trotskyist party. For Trotskyism, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union must be not a united and single militant Party, but a collection of groups and factions, each with its own central organization, press and so forth. And what does this mean? It means that following the freedom of political groupings in the Party must come the freedom of political parties in the country, i.e., bourgeois democracy. Consequently, we have here the recognition of the freedom of factional groupings in the Party, leading directly to the toleration of political parties in the country of the dictatorship of the proletariat, and all covered up with phrases about ‘internal Party democracy’ and ‘improving the regime’ within the Party.” (Joseph Stalin, Leninism, Vol. II, English Edition, pp. 391-393.)

1 2 3 5