Proletariat Blogging in the Heart of (UK) Predatory Capitalism! Exploring the Interface between Matter and Perception, Chinese Buddhism, Daoism, Hakka Ethnography, and All Aspects of Radical Politics, History, Psychology and Philosophy – 全世界无产者联合起来!
Deprived of his father’s love at a young age, Stalin developed a distinctly rebellious character, a daring spirit of adventure, and a willingness to fight—key factors in his subsequent development as a staunch Marxist and Lenin’s successor. His personality enabled him to make tremendous historical contributions to Soviet governance, the Communist Party, and the military, leaving behind both glory and retribution. He was a historical giant, both charismatic and discerning.
Another tiger-trap is the “National Bolshevik” movement. To be clear, I am a Bolshevik (from the Chinese perspective) – but I am not a nationalist (Indeed, I am an “Internationalist” – a Maoist no less). The “Naz-Bol” movement evolved out of a fascist-infected (post-1991) Russia. This movement integrates Hitler’s ideology with a post-1945 US (Cold War) misidentification of Joseph Stalin. This flawed ideology misinforms that there is “no difference” between historical Hitler and a fictional Stalin. Well, 41 million dead and wounded Soviet citizens would beg to differ. Naz-Bols combine Marxist-Leninist economics with Hitler’s warped theories on race. This rejects the Marxist idea of “Internationalism”. On the face of it, these deluded individuals will talk highly of Stalin (as I do) – and then state he is no different to Hitler (which I definitely do not) – claiming both were ruthlessly racist (a complete lie – Stalin wasn’t even Russian).
This is despite the anti-Soviet nonsense he spouts on page 114 – a line of Vatican propaganda that sullies a man who tolerates a qualified “atheism” in his monastery! Of course, this type of anti-Stalin invention can be dismissed by studying the Collective Works of Stalin (Stalin trained in the Seminary before becoming a Revolutionary) and the historical (academic) work of EH Carr, Alexander Werth and Grover Furr, etc. EH Carr does mention that following the Bolshevik Revolution, monks and priest were not allowed to vote in elections until after 1922 (the founding of the USSR) – but prior to 1917 – no one (ecclesiastical or lay) was allowed to vote for any reason outside the closed circle surrounding the Czar – and the oppressive feudal system he administered. Just as Catholic monks live under the “Dictatorship” of God, the Pope and their Abbot – monks and priests in the USSR possessed absolutely no rights prior to 1917! Andre Louf, as a professed Catholic monk, was NOT permitted by the Catholic Church to vote in any election. When the reality of his position is fully understood – then the magnitude of his ignorance becomes fully revealed. Even monastic masters are inclined to “lie” – perhaps that is what their God requires.
In other words, with the odd exception, virtually all Western academia relating to the history of the USSR is ‘false’. This is why the work of MI Kalinin, although all translated into English, is nevertheless very difficult to acquire as it runs through all the different epochs up until 1946 – contradicting the often ‘racist’ nonsense that still spills from the corrupt (Bourgeois) mind. I was particularly influenced by his ‘On Communist Education’ – but what is quoted below is the reality of how the Socialist System of ‘Centralised Democracy’ is far more ‘representative’ and ’empowering’ than ‘Liberal Democracy’!
“The essence of Trotskyism consists, lastly, in the denial of the necessity of iron discipline in the Party, in the recognition of the freedom of factional groupings in the Party, in the recognition of the necessity of constituting a Trotskyist party. For Trotskyism, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union must be not a united and single militant Party, but a collection of groups and factions, each with its own central organization, press and so forth. And what does this mean? It means that following the freedom of political groupings in the Party must come the freedom of political parties in the country, i.e., bourgeois democracy. Consequently, we have here the recognition of the freedom of factional groupings in the Party, leading directly to the toleration of political parties in the country of the dictatorship of the proletariat, and all covered up with phrases about ‘internal Party democracy’ and ‘improving the regime’ within the Party.” (Joseph Stalin, Leninism, Vol. II, English Edition, pp. 391-393.)
Simple – if the physical bodies of the Russians can be ‘destroyed’ through warfare – this (Jewish-Marxist) ‘taint’ is removed and society ‘purified’ – so that a new tomorrow can be constructed! He would then move ethnic German people into this newly conquered land and enjoy all the new ‘living space’, houses, food supplies and property, etc, such a victory would secure! This led to the war fought between the USSR and Nazi Germany (1941-1945) through which the Hitlerites sought to ‘eradicate’ the entire Slavic race! This conflict took place on what the Nazi Germans termed the Eastern Front – whilst for the Soviets – all the fighting took place in the West (indeed, where it is still happening today)! Capturing Soviet Red Flags was something of a national sport for the Hitlerites! Examples include those Red Flags captured by the Fascist Forces of the Axis Powers invading the USSR – including the Nazi Germans, the Fascist Italians, the Fascist Finns and the Fascist Romanians! This article remembers these ‘Red Banners of Human Freedom’!
SANGHA KOMMUNE (SSR) 